« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Is Herman Cain Our Man?

Herman Cain is surging in Republican presidential primary polls supported by us Tea Partiers and conservatives.

Yet aren’t we supposed to be “racists” according to insults hurled at us for decades by Democrats?

Then when we find a conservative black candidate like Cain whom we can embrace, the racism just gushes from the Democrats. It is like the 100 years of Democrat hatred of blacks until they were able to co-opt the black vote. (Note: Most blacks were Republicans up until the 1960s, including Martin Luther King. Because the Republican party was founded in 1854 as the anti-slavery party.)

Look at the way modern-day Democrats have despised black Republicans like Supreme Court justice Clarence Thomas and former secretary of state Condoleezza Rice.

So what is going on here?

Answer: As with all of conservatism, our embrace of Herman Cain is not about the color of his skin. It is about the content of his character. And we conservatives like Cain’s character very much.

On the other hand, we conservatives find that most blacks in America today are liberals and, like white liberals, do not fit our definition of what kind of character a person needs to succeed and to be a good citizen. So we are called racists even though we in fact are talking about character, not race.

We conservatives indeed are demonstrating what Martin Luther King urged us to do in his ‘I Have a Dream’ speech of August 28, 1963 when he said, ”I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.”

So are we closer to King than liberals are?

Of course we are. We always have been. And King would be shocked at the state of much of black America today under Democrat liberalism with its widespread violence, illegitimacy, disrespect for moral and societal standards, educational failure, family breakdown and general dissolution.

Thus now we conservatives are saying that a black man like Herman Cain may indeed be just what we need to lead our nation out of the economic darkness as Cain continues to surge in Republican polls.

Is this just a temporary blip? Or is he really our guy?

Time will tell. But I have a feeling that this is more than a blip. Much more.

Our admiration for Cain represents a burning desire to have another decent, thoughtful, impassioned conservative in the White House. After all, the last one was Ronald Reagan. And we are hungry. It has been a long haul for us.

Cain is an unabashed conservative and that is what we love about him. He is brash. He is bold. He is unafraid. He knows what he knows, just as we all do. He is eminently likeable. What you see is what you get. And oh, yes, he is black.

And this is what the Democrats fear most – a conservative of any race or ethnicity with a clear message who is not cowed by liberals or their media friends. Who is not tongue-tied in a debate. Who has charisma. Who will appeal to Americans of all stripes who are deeply concerned about the drift of our great nation.

Because Democrats think that charisma is something you get at Harvard, not in the military and in the hard-knocks world of business where Cain built his character and his appeal. Because if you can come out of corporate America with a big smile on your face, you are something special. And Cain indeed is special.

And rest assured that if Cain is the nominee, he is going to need all the charisma he can muster because he will be subject to the worst Democrat racial attacks since the days of the Ku Klux Klan. And the real racists in America will finally be exposed.

Oh, the liberals are having a fit. They say we conservatives are embracing Cain just to prove something, that we are not the bigots that we certainly are inside, according to their dogma.

If only it were so, liberals… if only it were so. You may be in for the shock of your lives.

To tell the truth, I have been undecided about this race. I support Rick Perry but he has been disappointing in debates despite the fact that he is probably the best candidate. His record in Texas is one of success except for one bad spot – his stand on illegals. If he can get back on track in the debates, he can win. Unfortunately he is not a good debater and that has hurt him.

Romney has the advantage of name recognition and polished debating skills. And the aura of invincibility – that he is going to be the nominee. But he has several big minuses among us conservatives.

Newt Gingrich remains an intellectual powerhouse but remains perhaps exactly that – an ideas man, not a president. But, hey, you never know; he has surged recently. Rick Santorum could be as good a president as Reagan. So could Michele Bachmann; she is smart as heck. And Ron Paul is as good as they come on most conservative issues.

But Herman Cain is doing what the others are not – he is sizzling like a T-bone on a steakhouse grill. He has captured the public imagination. He is funny and alive. He is more exciting than any other candidate. Is he going to be the breakout figure for 2012?

He sure could be. Supported by all us “racists” in the conservative movement.

To be honest, I was skeptical about Cain. Although he has sterling credential with his military and business experience he also has stirred controversy with his 9-9-9 plan. He has slipped up with a comment about an electric fence on the Mexican border and has upset pro-lifers with a muddled statement about abortion.

But it is still early and these are minor mistakes. And hey, who the heck was Barack Obama when he first ran – an inexperienced one-term US senator and a former community organizer who was catapulted into office by a compliant media.

And Cain is despised by liberals because he has not come up through the black-power vetting process – as a politician, entertainer or activist with all the proper politically-correct left-wing lingo in his vocabulary.

No, Herman Cain is someone who has a sterling character that speaks to the American experience, not the black experience.

And that is precisely what we conservatives are looking for – character. Someone who understands what it means to be an American rather than part of some aggrieved group that wants spoils from the federal government.

Indeed Herman Cain is a hot ticket for those of use yearning for a leader with a vision for the future, for those of us who are just like Cain – people of character who are not members of some group… except one big group called Americans.

Please visit my blog at www.nikitas3.com for more conservative insights.

COMMENTS

  • circlegranch

    In support of Michelle Bachmann’s plea to “vet these candidates!” (except for her), you have to hand it to Rick Santorum for bringing to light some interesting political background on Mr. Cain that hasn’t gotten much press. (Politico carries the story this morning)

    Herman Cain usually says he decided to run because he fears for his grandchildren’s future. I’m with him on that; I have the same worry. He kinda makes it sound like he has observed the downward spiral of the country in the past few years and sees more on the horizon so he decided to do something about it.

    We know he ran for the Senate in ’04 and lost. In 1998 he served as president ofthe National Restaurant Assoc. which lobbied Congress to the tune of about $1 million. Back in 1996 he told the Omaha World-Herald that he might run for president some day. Going back to 1994, the registered Independent told Restaurant Business magazine that nobody should be shocked if he ran for an office.

    These are all weak arguments that Cain has had political ambitions and has political insider experience regarding the lobbist effort, but at the same time, some up front honest would be nice. There’s a whole bunch of tea party support for him right now based solely on the idea that he’s an entirely fresh face in politics and is very proud to boast about having no political connections of any kind.

  • tngal

    And now his fundraising is beginning to match the enthusiasm.
    It’ll be tough getting the deep pocket good-ole-boy money that romney and perry have had since being annointed, but C\cain is definately working on it.

    And as an aside, It was really fun yesterday to watch all the Perry supporters talk about how confusing Cain’s statements can be, but then trying to defend him when Perry comes out with his Obama birther/birth certificate comments. Glad to see the media throwing gotchas out to some of the other candidates. Perry’s answer was so,’politican’.

    And Romney got some fresh fire when news started focusing on the robama care he implemented. It allows for goverment subsized healthcare at no or low cost to uninsured llegal immigrants. This immigration thing is one he won’t be able to shake. That health care bill is the gift that just keeps on giving.

    Race has nothing to do with Cain’s meteoric rise. If they just read words and looked at his press releases of transcripts and saw where he stands on the tax code, self reliance, states right’s, etc they wouldn’t see ‘black candidate’. They would see their next door neighbor with similar values and character. The well known successful businessman in town, or a friend from church. We don’t need any more slick politicians. Had enough of that with Slick Willy.

    In fact, I think the only one who sees or treats him differently is Perry. Calling him “Brother” twice – now where did that come from? I’m not black but I cringed when I heard it. Cain must have exemplary control skills.

    • rightwingmom52

      What’s that all about? (asking sincerely and not trying to get you banned). Birther comments by and large are not tolerated here at redstate, i.e., if one is a birther and pushes that meme, which clearly you aren’t. And just so we don’t threadjack into Perry here, could you post more info on the Morning Briefing open thread?

      As for Cain, it’s been reported that he’s raised $1M a week in October. If that’s the case, that’s some pretty big numbers which includes the little bit I’ve been able to send. I’m glad to be part of it.

      On the “brother” comment, my husband asked me about it when it happened. I really didn’t think anything of it and think it’s probably more of a southern thing or even comes from being a regular church goer. I have folks at church who I call my black brothers and sisters in all love and unity.

      • onemovoter

        Read this interview, it’s really good:
        http://www.parade.com/news/2011/10/23-rick-perry-hates-to-lose.html

        Also here is the video of Perry at the Faith and Freedom forum:
        http://www.therightscoop.com/rick-perry-speech-and-qa-at-iowa-faith-and-freedom-coalition/

        And here is Steve Forbes endorsing Perry:
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Srw74pRclqU

        • rightwingmom52

          . . .

      • tngal

        As rwm52 pointed out you can get perry’s birth certificate info from an article in parade magazine. You can also pick up various takes at daily caller, wapo, the usual.

        Basically, he went to talk with donald trump and trump brought up O’s birth certificate (which trump loves to do ) Here’s the exchange.

        ____
        Governor, do you believe that President Barack Obama was born in the United States?
        I have no reason to think otherwise.

        That?s not a definitive, ?Yes, I believe he??
        Well, I don?t have a definitive answer, because he?s never seen my birth certificate.

        But you?ve seen his.
        I don?t know. Have I?

        You don?t believe what?s been released?
        I don?t know. I had dinner with Donald Trump the other night.

        And?
        That came up.

        And he said?
        He doesn?t think it?s real.

        And you said?
        I don?t have any idea. It doesn?t matter. He?s the President of the United States. He?s elected. It?s a distractive issue.

        ____

        got that transcript from politico. Anyway. As you can see, Romney attempts to dismiss the matter. “I don’t have an answer because he’s (Obama) never seen my birth certificate?” is really kind of odd. What does than mean? My favorite line is where he’s asked “you don’t believe what’s been released? And he’s “I don’t know. I had dinner ith donald trump the other night”. What does dinner have to do with the question.

        Now…because of his “I don’t knows”, there goes the rumor mill and he has to take the heat. Is he a birther? I personally doubt it. On the other hand, I think most agree Cain personally is prolife. But that doesn’t stop opposition from from going full bore “Hey, clear answer on this abortion thing. buddy. Which is it yes or no?

        Reminds me of Have-you-stopped-beating-your-wife or not scenario???!!

        Have you quit beating your wife.
        No, I…

        So you haven’t quit?
        I never beat her so how could I quit,

        Either you’ve quit beating her or not. its a simple question. There is no in between.
        —-
        Basically, now perry has said something that many find odd and want him to give a yes or no answer to. No in between. Until he comes out with no I’m not a birther, or yes that is his true birth certificate or something to that effect, it won’t go away.

        And Romney’s got the same problem with his illegal immigrant free health care in hospital issue. He’s gonna catch flak.

        http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1011/66648.html#ixzz1bjDIuvyG

        • rightwingmom52

          I don’t believe Perry is any more of a birther than I am (and I’m not), just like I believe Cain is 100% pro life.

          To me, a gaffe is a gaffe, however, the context in which words are spoken is important whether we’re talking about Cain or Perry.

          Was your politico link supposed to be to the Romney story? (It linked to the Perry story.) I hadn’t heard that one, either. Sorry for being lazy, but I just haven’t had time to read much today.

          • rightwingmom52

            Never mind on linking to the Romney story. I see Moe’s diary.

          • tngal

            The politico link was the Perry story (birth certificate), The Romney
            thing about free healthcare for illegal immigrants can also be found at all the suspects. it originally appeared in the LA Times, but to make it easy I’ll just direct you to Moe’s article on the front page here at redstate. When you’re at the front page look for a story called romney-romney care – free health care and illegal immigrants. Its not in the side diaries its a main story. You can get the basics of what the hoopla is.

            Essentially, one of the aspects of the healthcare law which Romney passed in his state allows for free heath care for undocumentedcertain poor illegal immigrants in hospitals and clinics. In other words, goverment funds subsize it. Jump into Moe’s article and then the comments and you should get several points of view.

            http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2011/10/24/romney-romneycare-free-health-care-and-illegal-immigrants/

    • vaaztx

      ?with Flipflop McRomneycare flip-flopping again over health care as I am with him flip flopping on Issue 2 in Ohio because yesterday he was against, like the liberal we know he is, and today he’s back to being for it.

  • gator_hoo

    Do you know how many times I have been called brother by people of all races? Maybe it is a southern thing, but that is as much of a nothingburger as there is. Maybe if he said “brotherman” I could see it, but this is getting a bit ridiculous.

  • Tbone

    rather obvious white guilt, just vote for Obama and leave governing to those who know how.

  • carolynr

    Look at the world around you. Mitt Romney and his positions are like standing in quicksand..or being in an earthquake…we don’t know where we stand (pardon the pun).

    Herman…you’re a good guy…but you don’t have to gravitas…you don’t have the record. We need jobs. OK…Perry has a record. You helped bring back business…that’s OK…but you didn’t do it with government say so…you did it through the capitalist market. You had to report to your board of directors and they wanted profit. If you were prez…you’d be dealing with 100 senators who are at odds with you on your objective…and 400+ representatives in the House…who are at odds with your objective. Government experience counts.

    What … you say…Romney has government experience…although he doesn’t crow about that one (no one should with his record)…however, what he did get passed was a STATE CONTROLLED HEALTHCARE PLAN and his senate/house was run by DEMOCRATS….So…How do you think Mitty will do with Conservatives? He won’t…He’ll do better with the Libs.

  • bennymoten

    “He is brash. He is bold. He is unafraid.” He is a buffoon.

    This is pathetic. The only thing that Cain has going for him is that he is not Romney. He clearly knows nothing about taxes, foreign policy, abortion-related issues—in fact on anything that he’s asked about, he shows his total ignorance.

    He’s not even running for President, people! He’s on a book tour! He’s practically never in Iowa or NH, because he’s too busy selling books.

    It’s very sad and all, but Romney is going to win the nomination.

  • explodinghead

    Okay, I’m a Perry supporter for now. I have looked at Cain before and actually posted that in one of my comments way back when. It seems to me that once Cain dismissed any chance of having Perry as his VP nominee.
    This is my big sticking point with Cain. Why would you support Romney over a clearly more Conservative candidate Perry? It’s fine to say “I disagree with Perry on this or that policy”, but to isolate Perry as the only candidate you wouldn’t choose as VP, strikes me as someone who wants to put his own interests above that of the Conservative movement.
    That was the moment I thought Cain might be a populist. Since then I have read about Cain running for senate, his “mis-speaking” and flip-flopping on 9-9-9 and his statements on abortion over the years, I began to believe that he is just another pandering politican.

    Sure he speaks well, is charismatic and articulate, but I just don’t trust him with his empowerment zones and 9-0-9, and flip-flops.He became a radio talk-show host when he could have gone a more serious route to the presidency, and he is on a book tour. I think he will be another typical pandering politician. Sorry, I like the guy, I’m just not sure there is anything under the veneer.

    • tyman

      NT

    • Scope

      Cain is certainly charismatic, but he is not articulate.

      Speaking about Cain’s ego, just a few minutes into the 6PM Fox hour, they played a clip with a staffer telling anyone who rides in the vehicle with Cain is not to speak to him, unless he speaks to them first. I understand that one of the people who quit his campaign was a driver, who left as a result of that memo. Talk about a swelled head. Yet Cain is the teflon candidate.

      • Finrod

        James Baker as Chief of Staff did his best to restrict access to Ronald Reagan, because Reagan would always engage anyone in conversation that spoke to him for as long as they wanted. So Baker, wanting to keep his boss focused, did his best to keep people away from him as much as possible.

        Without knowing more details, it’s impossible to tell whether this supposed memo is of this same nature or not. In any case, it’s awfully weak tea as far as criticism goes.