« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Warning signs for November 2010.

Ive had it folks. Ive had it up to here (hand gesture passed head).

We need to win this fall in the worst possible way. Not because of pure partisanship, but it is the only thing that will save this nation from falling into a dark state of socialism, if not out right communism.

On the surface it seems like things could be worse with a number of radical anti-freedom, anti-American bills queued up in Congress and the economy looking to be in recovery.

That belittles the significance of what is occurring in front of our eyes. The government is in full nationalization mode – taking over of several industries while quadrupling our debt striping the most basic of freedoms to determine our own fate via the passage of Obamacare.

With our nation shrouded in such darkness you would believe opposition would unite and people would focus on breaking the back of the policies creating the problem and destroying what made this nation great.

People get it, too. With every tweet I read and person on the street I discuss happenings in our nation with it is apparent people are mad as hell. We all know and agree that the government has gone too far. Way too far. The power needs to be returned to who it belongs to, us.

This is where our common ground ends, unfortunately.

In the search for political scalps or muscle flexing we seemingly end up in a tirade which produces scorched earth campaigns. This not only splits our efforts and undermines our goals, it serves the needs of those who seek to control us.

There is a reason why Reagan preached the 11th commandment.

Am I saying backing Rubio or Stutzman was wrong? No way. That is what primaries are for. He is the right man for the job. Crist’s changing of parties proves what Erick said before regarding the double standard conservatives are forced into during contentious elections. We must “playing nice.”

However, while we are striving to produce the best candidate who serves our nation, we should also not char participant’s policy positions beyond recognition. To do so is plain dumb and intellectually dishonest. Period.

It is for this reason I opposed “purity” tests and approach primary claims without policy backing with skepticism. We should have each others backs, without there being a knife involved in the process.

In my state, Sarah Steelman’s flirting with a U.S. Senate candidacy serves as a perfect example. Early on she attempted to smear Roy Blunt on earmarks (see my post on earmark demagoguery)  and smooze Erick Erickson while trying to figure whether she could win a GOP nomination for United States Senate. She never did follow through with her inquiry, but left plenty of ink for Democrats to use while the rest of Missouri was getting to know Roy. I should note Steelman joined the “Blunt Brigade” later.

We have one shot at returning the power base to the people and limiting our government.

We either lose the me first attitude and contempt for others within our movement or our nation loses what remaining freedoms we enjoy.

It is our choice.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • Scope

    The primaries are where the battles for the best candidate need to be fought. We’re tired of everyone now calling themselves conservatives, and at times are even worse than Progressive Republicans. When a candidate has a record, that gives a good indication of where they stand, and it isn’t remotely conservative, they deserve to be scorched, especially when they contribute to the diluting of the term conservative.

    When there are 5 or 7 candidates running for the same seat, what do you suggest those candidates campaign on, in the primaries? Yes, it is important to tell the voters what their ideas are to combat the Progressives, but, how do they distinguish themselves from the large field they are a part of? If you can’t “scorch” a rival with a bad voting record, or a misguided view of core Republican beliefs, then the several candidates may just as well draw the winner from a hat or flip a coin until the last man stands.

    The people that have gained enormous important support from our side, are those that have abandoned the notion of Political Correctness, or the Progressive meaning of “civility” pertaining only to Republicans. In other words there are other colors that are appropriate to wear to a funeral other than just black.

    The ones that are using dishonesty and outright lies in their ads are being shown the door, such as Charlie Crist, that is when he was still a RINO. When the myriad of information about Bennett’s breaks from conservative goals was released, here and just about everywhere else, that was a much needed, appreciated and loudly spoken outster. The people reject those types, they are not dumb. If you think that that is abandoning Reagans 11th commandment, or becoming circular firing squads, then we have moved in the right direction. After all, we are talking about the PRIMARIES, not the general where there will be unity at the end of the day. At least among those that know just how important this election will be for the Republicans. I don’t see the need for warning signs at this time.

  • Paul Seale

    But enough of the scorched earth policies which damage and or destroy the winning candidate.

    I see many sides of campaigns doing this and it must stop.

    Debate issue and policy, yes. Stick to that policy though and make sure it is accurate discussion – not just over hyped campaign fluff designed to destroy the other guy.

    Yes, good campaigns should be ready for that type of tactic – but no – that doesnt make it right.

    There is a darned good reason why the public has a bad perception of Republicans, still. Partly based upon what they are doing – but another large part is because of over hyped and untrue rhetoric.

    The public sees this and guess what, since it comes from the same side of the side, view it as true and confirms what ever message – which is then used against us in the general election.

    So again, the choice is ours.

    Keep castrating our selves with scorched earth primaries and damage the candidates in the process, or clean up the debate and do whats right for our nation.

    Why do you think there is so much third party talk? Would you want to vote for someone who you think may be slightly better than pond scum?

  • Scope

    coming from any of the campaigns. Something that you consider so obnoxious and ruinous and unnecessary.

  • Paul Seale

    Dont think you read my piece.

    thanks.