On Sarah Palin (Part Deux)


In the immediate aftermath of the Palin selection, I wrote that Governor Palin has been a reformer and a change agent in Alaska, has helped clean up politics substantially in the state and could–if mainstream theories concerning the electoral appeal of Vice Presidential candidates are to be believed–tip a close race in John McCain’s favor.

But the judgment of the efficacy of a Vice Presidential pick does not, of course, end with electoral considerations. More pertinently, it does not even begin there. Rather, the efficacy of a Vice Presidential pick needs to be judged ultimately by examining the policy stances of a Vice Presidential candidate and by determining whether a Vice Presidential candidate is prepared to be President of the United States on a moment’s notice.

I stand by all that I wrote concerning Sarah Palin’s record in Alaska and the potential that she might be an electoral force to be reckoned with. But careful readers of my previous post will note that I wrote nothing about Governor Palin’s policy stances or her preparedness for the Presidency. I break my silence on those topics with this post.


Three issues are of concern when it comes to free market/small-government types like me. The first is the issue of free trade, regarding which, I am a passionate supporter of trade liberalization. Governor Palin has no record on free trade. Now, of course, “no record” does not mean “a bad record,” but in a day and age in which it increasingly–and depressingly–appears that protectionism is on the march anew, it behooves a Vice Presidential candidate of the major American political party most associated with free markets and trade liberalization to ally herself closely and completely with the free trade movement. This is particularly the case given that John McCain is an instinctive free trader and that his record on trade issues is nothing short of outstanding.

Governor Palin, therefore, owes it to McCain supporters to state her unqualified support for enhancing free trade in general, preserving NAFTA, augmenting CAFTA by pursuing free trade agreements with countries like Chile, Panama, Peru, Bolivia (I know that Evo Morales will be an obstacle but a free trade agreement with Bolivia ought to be pursued nonetheless) and Ecuador. Governor Palin should also state her support for the U.S.-Colombia Free Trade Agreement, which Democrats are inexcusably holding up in Congress. She should speak to the need for the United States to do whatever it can to revive the dormant Doha Round negotiations and to thus strengthen the forces of trade liberalization worldwide.

On the issue of windfall profits taxes, Governor Palin does indeed have a record. And it is not a good one:

Republicans in Congress this June united to defeat a proposed windfall tax on oil companies, deriding it as a bad idea that would discourage investment in U.S. oil exploration.

Things worked out far differently in the GOP stronghold of Alaska, a state whose economic fate is closely tied to the oil industry.

Over the opposition of oil companies, Republican Gov. Sarah Palin and Alaska’s Legislature last year approved a major increase in taxes on the oil industry — a step that has generated stunning new wealth for the state as oil prices soared.

“Stunning new wealth” may be a lovely thing in the short term. In the long term, however, it will serve to discourage oil exploration in Alaska, as the article mentions, and will impose costs on oil exploration that will only be transferred down to the consumer by oil companies seeking to ensure (rationally and predictably, of course) that their profits remain as high as possible in what is a much more difficult business than many people think, and thus ensure shareholder value. In addition to the deleterious consequences that arise concerning future oil exploration, there is the fact that Governor Palin’s windfall profits tax was not offset by any major tax cuts.

The imposition of a windfall profits tax on oil companies was a bad idea when Jimmy Carter tried it. It is a bad idea when Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama proposes it, as both have. And it does not get any better as an idea when a Republican Governor of the state of Alaska–the Republican Party’s presumptive nominee for Vice President of the United States–adopts it as a part of her tax policy in Alaska.

Governor Palin should recognize publicly that the imposition of a windfall profits tax was ill-considered public policy that should not have been tried in Alaska and should not be tried on the national stage either. Absent such a declaration, small-government and free market advocates will have every reason to question her sincerity and her devotion to the policies of economic liberalization that the Republican Party has properly sought to implement for so many years and has made part and parcel of its brand.

Equally disturbing is Governor Palin’s position on the issue of school choice. Put bluntly, she is on the wrong side:

“The 3.2 million members of the National Education Association are pleasantly surprised by Senator John McCain’s selection of Alaska Governor Sarah Palin to join his ticket as the Republican nominee for vice president.

“While she is only in her second year as Alaska’s Governor, she has thus far shown herself to be a supporter of children and public education. She comes from a family of educators. Her father was a teacher, her brother is a teacher, and her mother was an education support professional.

“In her less than two years as the state’s chief executive officer, she was able to increase per-pupil education spending, and she is opposed to sending public money to support private schools through political schemes like vouchers.

(Emphasis mine.) When the NEA thinks that you have done a good job on the issue of education policy, chances are that you haven’t. By denying parents and children the many benefits of school choice, Governor Palin betrayed–yes, that is the proper word–the people of Alaska and their efforts to seek either for themselves or for their children the best education possible. The United States spends more per capita on education than any other country on Earth and has the least to show for it. Education can only get better if competition is introduced into the mix and if parents are able not only to select the best public school for their children but also, if necessary, to pull their children out of the public school system and enroll them in private or charter schools. Such competition is what the free market is built on and it shows itself to work time after time after time.

Governor Palin should pledge that as Vice President, she will work to persuade as many people as possible of the need to adopt and embrace free market competition in the education system. She should renounce and repudiate any and all policies she implemented as Governor of Alaska that sought to deny or bar such competition from entering into the educational equation and from bettering the educational establishment in Alaska. The effort to implement school choice–especially at the state and local level–should be a sine qua non of the educational platform of the Republican Party. If Governor Palin does not endorse and enlist in that effort, she should be considered an unworthy Vice Presidential nominee of the Republican Party.

Finally, there is the issue of experience. Governor Palin’s record has opened her to attack on this matter. As I mentioned in my previous writing, much of these attacks are hypocritical. When the equally experienced–or inexperienced, however you want to phrase it–Governor Tim Kaine of Virginia was being considered for the Vice Presidency, talk about his resume was kept at a minimum. Instead, we heard countless stories about how Governor Kaine went to Harvard Law School (just like Barack Obama), how he took time off to do missionary work and how he speaks Spanish and has integrated a discussion of his faith in his stump speeches. Additionally, arguments that the nomination of Governor Palin should render discussions concerning Senator Obama’s inexperience as moot are laughable. One can walk and chew gum at the same time; it is possible to discuss both the level of experience that Governor Palin would bring to the Vice Presidency and the level that Senator Obama would bring to the Presidency. And since Senator Obama–unlike Governor Palin–seeks the highest office in the land–questions concerning his experience (or lack thereof) are more pressing than questions concerning Governor Palin’s resume.

That does not mean, however, that Governor Palin is off the hook when it comes to this issue. Fair or not, there will be plenty of people who question her experience and who will charge that she is not prepared to be a heartbeat away from the Presidency.

As such, Governor Palin needs to ensure that she is entirely and completely prepared to discuss scenarios and hypotheticals–which will inevitably be thrown at her–in which a President McCain dies in office or is incapacitated and in which a Vice President Palin will have to assume the office of the Presidency. How will a President Palin ensure that order remains here at home in such a circumstance? What specific demands will she make of the Department of Homeland Security, the FBI and other governmental agencies to make certain that a sense of calm prevails in what may well be a chaotic political situation? How will she work with her Defense Secretary and the Joint Chiefs of Staff to ensure that America’s military posture will allow it to deter and repel threats that may materialize during such a scenario, threats that seek to take advantage of what enemies of the United States might perceive as a moment of confusion concerning American security policy and American politics in general? How would a President Palin work with her Secretary of State and the diplomatic corps to convince allies, enemies and neutrals that the goal of continuity of government will be met in such circumstances?

Closely associated with these matters, of course, is the need for Governor Palin to demonstrate a comprehensive mastery of defense and foreign policy issues–especially given the presence of Senator Joseph Biden, the Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, on the Democratic ticket. To be sure, Senator Biden’s reputation as a foreign policy savant is dramatically overblown, but again, this will not prevent the questions from being asked of Governor Palin. She will have to make sure that she is well versed on the foreign policy and national security policy issues of the day–especially when it comes time to debate Joe Biden during the course of the fall campaign. Slip ups will be judged harshly. That may be unfair but that is a fact of life; because Governor Palin is a blank slate when it comes to foreign and national security policy, she will repeatedly be tested on these matters. She will have to surprise and impress to pass the tests that are placed before her and she and the McCain campaign in general will have to understand and accept the inevitability of those tests coming down the pipeline.

I write all of this with the hope that Governor Palin will impress and capture the respect of the free market/small-government community and that her stance on foreign and national security policy will show her to be both highly informed and well-prepared to take on the duties of the Vice Presidency. In addition, I write all of this with the hope that Governor Palin will eliminate and remove all doubts concerning her ability to assume the office of the Presidency on a moment’s notice.

Governor Palin’s candidacy has the biggest upside to it of all of the other Vice Presidential candidates. But it also has the biggest downside as well. If she ensures that she is right on the issues and if she shows herself prepared for the responsibilities that will lay before her in the event that she and Senator McCain are elected, then she will have merited the trust that has been placed in her.

If not, then speaking for myself, this will be the first Presidential election in which I do not vote for the Republican Presidential candidate. Oh, I won’t vote for Barack Obama and/or Joe Biden and to be sure, any decision I might make not to vote for John McCain and/or Sarah Palin will not matter much in my home state of Illinois; it is a safe bet that the junior Senator from Illinois will win this state’s electoral votes.

But the issue is not electoral strategizing. The issue is good governance. John McCain and Sarah Palin have a responsibility to live up to the standards of good governance. Unless they do, they will not merit my vote. And unless they do, they will not merit the votes of others.


Category: ,

RSS feed

46 Comments Leave a comment

Pejman, you disappoint me.

c17wife (Diary) Sunday, August 31st at 3:54AM EST (link)

There is not one single, solitary human being out there in the GOP that would hae been 100% perfect for this job. No, not even my beloved Fred! All carry some type of negative to someone.
That being said, you lay out your critique. Fine, I got no issues with your opinions. I would like to remind you that she is the sitting governor of Alaska and that her #1 priority is to fight for the citizens of Alaska. IMO, her positions thus far are in line with looking out for her state.
As to school choice, seriously, this issue shouldn’t even be an issue for a VP at this point in the game. Let’s see how she matches up on some of the biggies first.
Lastly, this whole “I may not vote meme” is just ridiculous. And I really don’t care where you live.
This is an election with great consequences. Find the candidate that best supports your views and vote for that candidate. If it isn’t John McCain, fine, but don’t lay it in Sarah Palin’s lap. She’s not the one running for president. And just remember, if Barack Obama wins, you get nothing you want.

Duty is ours, outcomes belong to God.~Mike Pence

 

Pejman, this is a strong diary

Rod_Patrick (Diary) Sunday, August 31st at 3:59AM EST (link)

but I take your challenge.

The issue is good governance. John McCain and Sarah Palin have a responsibility to live up to the standards of good governance. Unless they do, they will not merit my vote. And unless they do, they will not merit the votes of others.

But, I hope you give the McCain/Palin Ticket enough time before November to prove their commitments to your ideals.

5.

NightTwister (Diary) Sunday, August 31st at 4:04AM EST (link)

I have to admit this bothered me also. Most of us are here to help elect the Republican ticket. Those of us that have had many qualms with McCain (me less than others) have kept quiet for a long time because we’re behind the effort.

The analysis was good, and there are a couple of concerns that I have, but overall she was an outstanding choice, which has reignited an excitement in this race I haven’t had for some time.

The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter. – Winston Churchill

 
 

I like Palin

zazzle Sunday, August 31st at 4:39AM EST (link)

Many Republicans, including southerners, believe Bush and Cheney moved too far right and some of them have gravitated to Obama’s camp.
They’re glad McCain chose someone far removed from Washington with more moderate approaches to governance – and they’re dropping Obama like hot potatoes.
Palin doesn’t fit neatly into Bush Republican boxes and she’s very refreshing.

McCain/Palin08!

 

To alleviate one fear

edryden838 Sunday, August 31st at 4:45AM EST (link)

The windfall profits tax in Alaska appears to be a bit of an anomaly related to Alaska’s unique relationship with oil companies. In an August 4, 2008 press release, in which she expressed satisfaction with Obama’s call for the creation of a new natural gass pipeline in Alaska, she questioned Obama’s decision to give people rebates based on windfall profits. The Governor did question the means to pay for Obama’s proposed rebate — a windfall profits tax on oil companies. Specifically, “In Alaska, the state’s resource valuation system, ACES, provides strong incentives for companies to re-invest their profits in new production.”

“Windfall profits taxes alone prevent additional investment in domestic production. Without new supplies from American reserves, our dependency and addiction to foreign sources of oil will continue,” Governor Palin said.
http://gov.state.ak.us/print_news-53432.html

So regardless of what happened in Alaska, and I’m sure there’s more to the story than we know, she is not on board with doing this nationally. Rest easy.

Erich
Austin, Texas

Really?

drjecdo Sunday, August 31st at 5:39AM EST (link)

“Many Republicans, including southerners, believe Bush and Cheney moved too far right…”

Now that’s something you don’t here every day, especially since GWB’s reign has been closer to LBJ than RWR. Someone needs to think for themselves instead of sop up the MSM narrative.

If Palin is a quick study on trivia, which is what she’ll be questioned on, i.e. What’s the name of the major mineral import to Mugaboo? She will wow the nation and Obama’s rice paper thin resume will be magnified.

All she has to say on foreign policy is, “Weren’t you two ‘experts’ the morons that wanted to surrender in Iraq. And the senior moron over there wanted to divide the country into 3 warring states! Is that what 32 years of ‘foreign policy experience’ gets ya? Fuggetaboutit.”

Short but perfect!

Rod_Patrick (Diary) Sunday, August 31st at 5:45AM EST (link)
 
 

One thing you didn't mention

ncnc Sunday, August 31st at 5:57AM EST (link)

Any discussion of Palin’s possible economic policies should mention that as a small business owner herself, she should bring a practical understanding of economics to the White House that none of the other three ticket holders have. According to the Small Business and Entrepreneurship Council:

According to the 2008 edition of “The Almanac of American Politics,” Palin was the owner of a snow machine, watercraft and all-terrain vehicle business, and co-owns with her husband a commercial fishing business. A small business owner on a major party ticket – how refreshing!

Another 5.

scotteiland (Diary) Sunday, August 31st at 6:09AM EST (link)

Pejman, this is a well researched diary and some of your points I agree with. However, I think that c17wife is absolutely right in saying there is no PERFECT pick.

Judging by the reaction of my friends here in North Carolina (which is leaning McCain, but not a slam dunk by any means) Sarah Palin hit a tape-measure home run in her announcement address.

I believe she will follow that up with an equally excellent speech this week in St. Paul and cleans Biden’s clock in the debate (which we have every reason to expect, because Biden couldn’t even debate OBAMA very well, and Barack isn’t exactly a good debator…also, having the facts on your side helps).

I’m confident that positions as Governor of Alaska don’t mesh completely with positions as POTUS. She has served her citizens VERY well. She knocked off the Murkowski regime from within! That should earn her PLENTY of points from conservatives interested in good governance.

Jump on in, Pejman. The water’s warm!

“Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”
– John Adams

Not resting easy.

Remington_Steele (Diary) Sunday, August 31st at 6:14AM EST (link)

Did you miss John’s introduction of Sarah? Where he said that she fought against oil companies? Sarah herself said that she took that windfall profit and returned it back to the citizens of Alaska (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKByFPy7-RU&feature=related around 17:15 timewise). Well that’s all fine and great except it sounds a lot like Obama’s rebates which you said she criticized. It may be a case of what happens in Alaska stays in Alaska, but that engenders no trust from me and sounded quite a bit hypocritical given the criticism from her you describe.

 
 
 

Education

mdc (Diary) Sunday, August 31st at 6:20AM EST (link)

This is from her State of State address 2008

We will enable schools to finally focus on innovation and accountability to see superior results. We’re asking lawmakers to pass a new K-12 funding plan early this year. This is a significant investment that is needed to increase the base student allocation, district cost factors and intensive needs students. It includes $100 million in school construction and deferred maintenance. There is awesome potential to improve education, respect good teachers, and embrace choice for parents. This potential will prime Alaska to compete in a global economy that is so competitive it will blow us away if we are not prepared. Beyond high school, we will boost job training and University options. We are proposing more than $10 million in new funding for apprenticeship programs, expansion of construction, engineering and health care degrees to meet demands. But it must be about more than funds, it must be a change in philosophy. It is time to shift focus, from just dollars and cents to “caliyulriit,” which is Yupik for “people who want to work.” Work for pride in supporting our families, in and out of the home. Work for purpose and for action, and ultimately destiny fulfilled by being fruitful. It’s about results and getting kids excited about their future – whether it is college, trade school or military. The Lieutenant Governor and I are working on a plan to make attending Alaska’s universities and trade schools a reality for more Alaskans through merit scholarships

Sorry, but kill the meme, lose the leverage.

Remington_Steele (Diary) Sunday, August 31st at 6:28AM EST (link)

*There have been many posts about the *”I may not vote meme”. The general feeling here is why would any conservative possibly allow Obama a 1/2 vote if McCain won’t budge on some key conservative issue(s) when Obama is obviously the worst choice?

The consensus has been that this meme is dangerous, selfish and unproductive. I’m starting to think that this meme is like the nuclear option. Would we ever want to use the nuclear option? No. But when as Republicans have we EVER taken it off the table?

I agree, John McCain is our guy, and folks should get excited about him. Yet, he is not nor has been 100% conservative and Sarah, although exciting, has issues that should be discussed.

McCain’s folks read Redstate and other blogs for a “pulse” on what the conservatives are saying. I for one do not want us to ditch all our leverage we have as conservatives. Taking this meme off the table completely takes away any motivation for McCain/Palin to lean right when it comes to those certain important issues. In the 11th hour, we may not be pushing the Nuclear button, but let’s not act like Democrats and take it off the table just yet.

Just my two conservative cents.

More details please.

Remington_Steele (Diary) Sunday, August 31st at 6:36AM EST (link)

She said, *”embrace choice for parents”. *That’s a good statement, but none of her programs proposed increases choice outside of government run schools. What education details are there from her on the issue of school vouchers?

searching

mdc (Diary) Sunday, August 31st at 7:45AM EST (link)

I am searching the net trying to find actual statements from her on this subject, to see where she stands.

Palin on issues

  1. Would you support amending the state constitution to allow private school vouchers?
    My priorities are to support options for education as allowable within the current funding formula – including home schools, charter schools and vocational training. This doesn’t require amending the constitution.
 
 
 
 

brilliant but flawed

mikeleader (Diary) Sunday, August 31st at 7:57AM EST (link)

Pejman, intellectuals, albeit brilliant ones such as yourself sometimes miss the point…Willie Mays was once asked how was he able to achieve all he did during his baseball career, he replied “You throw the ball, I hit the ball you hit the ball I cath the ball.”

Sadly, we are engaged in a philosophical war which could alter America and jeopardize our lives, and those of our descendants..

If liberalism(socialiism) wins, free trade dies, education of americans becomes buried in a “glorious mosaic” of america is always wrong…diversity beats merit, and religious and moral values are meaningless…Pailin has an anchor in her faith and family .I’ll trust her foreign policy instincts…what she doesn’t know she’ll learn…

This is the battle, Pejman..You are one of our front line commanders..consider yourself lightly slapped, ala Patton!

mikeleader

Palin will need to speak to all of these issues soon enough

red_oakster (Diary) Sunday, August 31st at 8:09AM EST (link)

McCain’s selection of Palin is a high risk move with potentially huge rewards or huge costs. She is going to need to speak on trade, on Iran, on education, and much more. It’s not surprising there are many silences in the record of an Alaska governor.

Right now we’re reading tea leaves. I know oil revenue policy is very different in Alaska. And I’d like to know more about the local education debate before I condemn her policy (thought the NEA blessing makes me squirm too).

If she shows herself to be an effective proponent of conservative principles-economic, foreign policy, and social-she’ll be away to the races. If she can’t or won’t, both she and McCain will suffer.

That said, her political instincts look very good, so I would not bet against her.

Would she have to..

ricbach229 Sunday, August 31st at 8:47AM EST (link)

divest her interest in the snow mobile and ATV repair business to keep from being accused of playing favorites with those industries?

It’d be fun to see an attack ad on her for having a small business when Obama is pushing money on his wifes employer.

 
 
 

That's OUR oil, Pejman.

Achance (Diary) Sunday, August 31st at 8:47AM EST (link)

Though styled as taxes, royalties, and severance, the revenue scheme just establishes the price at which we will part with OUR property.

The TAPS and Prudhoe Bay field were built to be profitable with oil at $7.50 bbl. in mid-’70s dollars, that would be $30 or so in today’s dollars. The oil from the legacy fields doesn’t cost any more to produce today than it did then, adjusting for inflation. Now that it is more valuable on the market, we want more for it when it rises above the historic levels. It’s called selling for what the market will bear.

In Vino Veritas

I recommend you read some of Achance's diaries on this

Elizabeth (Diary) Sunday, August 31st at 8:47AM EST (link)

From what I understand, Alaska is not typical of other states in its relations with oil companies. As the owner of the resources that the oil companies are tapping, its relationship is more that of a corporate entity dealing with other corporate entities, than that of a state to commercial enterprises. I recommend you read up on material by Achance here on RedState and also take a look at this article over on BeldarBlog.

“‘You come of the Lord Adam and the Lady Eve,’ said Aslan. ‘And that is both honour enough to erect the head of the poorest beggar, and shame enough to bow the shoulders of the greatest emperor on earth. Be content.’” — C.S. Lewis’ “Prince Caspian”

 
 

Education

morbie5 Sunday, August 31st at 9:23AM EST (link)

When the NEA thinks that you have done a good job on the issue of education policy, chances are that you haven’t. By denying parents and children the many benefits of school choice, Governor Palin betrayed–yes, that is the proper word–the people of Alaska and their efforts to seek either for themselves or for their children the best education possible.

Alaska is a sparsely populated state. The vast unorganized borough is directly controlled by the state. What are you going to have a remote village with as many people as schools?

 

Not the time Pejman

paint_it_red (Diary) Sunday, August 31st at 9:58AM EST (link)

Now you choose to “break your silence”?? The time to do so would have been before she was the nominee. Nominee selections are kind of like marriage – go into it with 2 eyes wide open, and afterwards have 1 eye half shut.

You present a false choice between McCain/Palin and McCain/(candidate who agrees with you on school choice, free trade, etc.). The real choice is between McCain/Palin and Obama/Biden. And there is not enough to go on to say Palin violates a sine qua non on any issue as yet.

On school choice and free trade I agree with you, but Palin has not had occasion to take a stand on free trade as yet, and school choice issues in sparsely populate Alaska where the public schools are not under attack and failing like they are elsewhere in the country make it a rather poor predictor of how she’ll approach the issue on a national scale.

Nor did she execute a Obama type windfall profits tax on big oil. Obama’s plan would stifle the profit incentives of oil companies to drill at all. Alaska returns its oil revenues to the citizens of the state beyond their 0% income tax, (despite which she still managed to lower property taxes), and in Alaska, oil companies gladly make that trade because it garners them the requisite support for drilling and the new transcontinental pipeline she spearheaded. There is probably no politician in America as Governor Palin in achieving progress towards independence from foreign oil.

Betrayed is not the right word for her stance on school choice at all. For goodness sake, give her a chance.

Yes, she has to prove herself in the debates, and I believe she will do so admirably. She is consistently more impressive than Biden.

“It is not good to cultivate a respect so much for the law as for the right. The only obligation which I have a right to assume is to do at any time what I think is right.” Henry David Thoreau

“The means we use must be as pure as the ends we seek.” Martin Luther King Jr.

“If you want peace, work for Justice.” Pope John Paul II

Great, all things that should be done at the State level

Beez Sunday, August 31st at 10:03AM EST (link)

if so decided by its residents and not by the Federal government.

Well

Rod_Patrick (Diary) Sunday, August 31st at 10:06AM EST (link)

the energy relief will come from gas “royalties”. That is consistent with the TRADITIONAL NATURAL RESOURCES LAW that the state owns all resources, with the caveat that it is for the benefit of the people.

Palin like true conservative is only giving back to the people what is theirs in the first place.

It is not tax per se.

 
 
 

Thank you, Pejman Yousefzadeh, seriously!

ZootSuit (Diary) Sunday, August 31st at 11:25AM EST (link)

Your diary is the first one that even begins to address my concerns. Let me make the following perfectly clear:

1) I like Sarah Palin and think she is a good, strong conservative. Indeed, in fairness to her, I think there are a few legitimate countra-indicants to explain some of the “non-conservative” positions and statements of her’s that you cite. As I have said many, many times before, I think she has a bright future within the GOP.

2) Sorry but despite my general agreement with her policies, I do not think she is ready to be President if something should happen to John McCain.

2a) And because John McCain has repeatedly said that his first criterion for selecting a Vice President would be there ability to take over from “day one” if something happened to him, I think John McCain has failed on that promise.

But the above are not the reasons for my disagreements with many here and why I referred to this place as “Bizarro RedState.” My reasons are:

3) The explicit and blatant way that many here (not all but many) have argued for and now support Sarah Palin’s nomination as a way to appeal to women voters and specifically “Hillary Clinton’s ‘disgruntled’ supporters.” That is wrong.

4) The way most people here (maybe not all, but definitely most) have argued that “experience matters” and that Obama does not have the experience (an argment that I wholeheartedly agree with) but who are now saying that, no experience really isn’t all that important or that it is really “executive experience” that matters. This is hypocritical.

For the record, I raedily admit that I may be wrong — indeed, I vry much hope I am wrong — in that Sarah Palin does not have the experience to take over on “day one.” To me, that is not the issue.

What I personally find so discouraging is that apparently many so-called principled conservatives are willing — no wanting — to nominate someone to the second highest office of the land based on their gender and/or are willing to completely deny — no, reverse — their position on the the issue of experience.

My sincerest congradulations and kudos for you, Pejman Yousefzadeh. Who knows, we may both end up voting or not voting this year, or one of us may vote and the other not, but I give you the utmost respect for raising the issues that many on this board seem hellbent on avoiding.

***** Unrepentant African-American nationalist, Unapologetic African-American conservative!

 

It's the Accomplishments Stupid

wiseprince (Diary) Sunday, August 31st at 11:31AM EST (link)

To play off Bill Clinton’s meme in ’92.

Firstly, there are no well defined requirements for what it takes to be VP, no job description. If John McCain thinks she is ready then she is ready to be his backup.

Someone please define for me what exactly it requires to “pass the commander in chief” threshold from a VP perspective and please tell me how Obama meets that threshold any more than Palin.

Republicans aren’t doing the best job defend her “experience”. It isn’t how long you have been doing something it’s what you have accomplished!

[Subscribe Now](http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/voicesinthewilderness/UQcm/~6/1)![Voices in the Wilderness](http://feeds.feedburner.com/voicesinthewilderness/UQcm.1.gif)

She did.

ConservaGeek (Diary) Sunday, August 31st at 11:48AM EST (link)

If Palin was in the pocket of “Big Oil,” as the Dems no doubt will try to portray her, would she have charged them any sort of tax? Absolutely not.

The fact that she imposed this tax–and let us be clear, it’s a severance tax, not a windfall profits tax–shows clearly that she’s not “in the pockets of Big Oil.”

The fact that many people, particularly those on the left, will confuse and conflate a severance tax with a windfall profits tax may actually be a net benefit to her, since the MoveOnMedia won’t want to question any tax, and those people that are in favor of taxing “Big Oil” will take some comfort in this tax.

All in all, the whole oil tax thing is either a non-issue or one that may mildly assist the McCain-Palin ticket.

Richard Carlson as Geoff Montgomery: It’s worse than horrible because a zombie has no will of his own. You see them sometimes walking around blindly with dead eyes, following orders, not knowing what they do, not caring.

**Bob Hope as Larry Lawrence: You mean like Democrats?**

*”The Ghost Breakers,”* 1940.

a quibble with one sentence

pilgrim (Diary) Sunday, August 31st at 12:00PM EST (link)

You posted -

Republicans aren’t doing the best job defend her “experience”.

I would suggest changing the word defend to the word define. Pej and Zoot both make a rational point that Palin’s experience credentials are slim to non-existent when it comes to dealing with other countries.

My only counter argument on this point is to say that no one who is not now or at any time been a Pres., VP, or major Cabinet Sec’y has this type of experience.

The political elites in DC define experience by spending time and energy going to forums and network talk shows talking.

Republicans can define her “experience” by informing the public of her judgements. Gov. Palin had the good judgement when she took a trip to Germany to visit the Landestuhl Military Hospital instead of cancel like Sen Obama did. Sarah Palin had the good judgement to fight corruption in the Alaska Republican Party instead of going along with corruption in the Illinois Democratic Party like Obama did.


Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots

 
 
 

It's not a windfall profits tax, nor a new tax, Pej, but a slight increase in a slightly progressive severance tax

Beldar Sunday, August 31st at 12:03PM EST (link)

Pej, this post is as beautifully written and tightly reasoned as I’ve come to expect from you. But I think on one portion of it — the portion relating to “windfall taxes” — you’ve been misled.

The tax in question isn’t a windfall profits tax. It wasn’t designed based on a perception that one element of society was reaping a windfall that needs to be seized and re-distributed (which is Barack Obama’s plan).

Rather, this is a severance tax. You may be a far better tax lawyer than I am — that’s likely if you have any expertise in tax law at all! — but I did have occasion a few years ago to learn something about severance taxes. I was representing Conoco in a lawsuit against Mobil involving jointly owned oil and gas leases in Idaho. The contract between them made one kind of provision for sharing the expense of paying “property taxes,” and a different kind of provision for “income taxes.” So the question arose whether the Idaho severance tax was a “property tax” or an “income tax.” The answer was “property tax,” because severance taxes are, by their nature, a tax on certain types of property — typically subsurface oil, gas, and minerals — that cannot be accurately measured for taxation purposes until they’re produced. Once they’re produced, however, they’re typically carted off outside the state’s borders, so traditional forms of property tax don’t capture them in the state’s tax base. Severance taxes therefore are imposed on those substances when they’re produced, and they’re typically calculated based on the market value when produced.

Sarah Palin didn’t pass a new type of tax at all. Alaska, like most oil-producing states, had long had a severance tax. But the rate for Alaska’s pre-existing severance tax, 22.5%, had been set in closed-door negotiations between the energy companies who rule the roost in Alaska (ExxonMobil, ConocoPhillips, and BP) and an ethically challenged governor and legislature. One of Sarah Palin’s campaign planks when she ran against that governor (Frank Murkowski) was that she would re-visit that entire subject, and replace it with a new tax that was the product of transparent negotiations and discussions fully disinfected by the sunlight of publicity. As a result, the new structure that the legislature passed and that she signed drew wide support from both Republicans and Democrats.

So how much of a tax increase is it, compared to what went before? From 22.5%, it went up to 25%. That’s a very modest, almost symbolic, increase.

The Alaska severance tax was previously progressive, and it became slightly more progressive. Under Palin, the additional tax imposed above the base rate went from 0.25% on proceeds above $30/bbl up to 0.4% — again, hardly a confiscatory increase! On proceeds above $92.50/bbl, the rate drops back down to 0.1%, which was actually a tax reduction compared to what had gone before, and a very significant one when oil is up in the $130-$140/bbl range.

My main source for this information is one with which you’re probably familiar, cchtaxgroup.com. I’ve previously posted on this at my own blog, here and here. By no stretch of the imagination is Sarah Palin engaged in class warfare, nor is she demonizing energy companies. Rather, she’s incentivizing them, and setting them up at competitive purposes against one another for the benefit of the taxpaying public. I think she’s done a job that any committed conservative can, and should, applaud. I hope you’ll consider revising your own views in light of these additional facts.

———————
BeldarBlog

let me counter your points a bit

kyle8 (Diary) Sunday, August 31st at 12:19PM EST (link)

Palin is not running for the top slot like Obama, she is running for the vp in which if something would happen to the president she would have the advantage of whatever time she had on that job and an already in place cabinet and advisors.

Furthermore it has to be stated she is the ONLY one running who has any actual executive experience.

Finally, identity politics are much less of a factor IMO as the fact that she brings a lot of reluctant conservative like me into the fold. I like her reform mindedness, and I very much like her western state individualistic ideals.

“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle

 
 

Foreign policy experience

xuyi Sunday, August 31st at 1:08PM EST (link)

About as much as Hillary or Barack. Also, Bosnian snipers wouldn’t dare take a pot shot.

 

I don't get the "experience" bit.

kchand Sunday, August 31st at 1:22PM EST (link)

I happen to believe that 40 years of being wrong is not better than having little or no experience.

Biden voted against the first Gulf War. He even voted against the Alaskan pipeline that has brought us billions of barrels of oil. In Joe Biden’s world; Saddam would be in Kuwait; and likely in Saudi Arabia. Imagine our oil supply issues without the pipeline.

It’s more about effectiveness and judgment than experience.

NOW compare the 2 tickets.

——————–
The ‘N’ word is November! Nov 6, 2012 will be the next cleansing.

 

The Point is

Crankcase (Diary) Sunday, August 31st at 1:33PM EST (link)

We are not here to debate her qualifications! We are here to help get the ticket elected. Redstate does not engage in arguments that tear us down. Otherwise all the sock puppets would play here all day. IMHO you can take you’re negativity to some watered down newspaper forum!

There is a balance to be struck

GaryL Sunday, August 31st at 1:49PM EST (link)

The original post comments regarding the tax voted on by Gov. Palin and the Alaska legislature shows a lack of understanding in how oil royalties and the relationship between that state and the oil companies actually works. Also, to generalize this to the national level and what the Democrats have been trying to pass as a WPT is like comparing a screwdriver to a toilet plunger… completely different.

I am as much a free trader as anyone, But, I take exception to the characterization that anyone who suggests that trying to keep jobs in this country by changing tax laws to encourage companies to keep them here as being “protectionist”… misses the point. Keeping as many jobs as we can here and/or creating new ones has nothing to do with free trade nor protectionism… it has everything to do with national security from an economic standpoint. We are fast becoming a nation of consumers only. The more we keep going down the road of not actually producing anything, the more we imperil ourselves.

This election will be won or lost on economic security issues. Despite what the politicians (on both sides of the aisle) believe of us, the American people are not stupid. The American people sense that our economic national security is being chipped away by unbridled corporate special interests. I think both McCain and Palin understand this. They understand that there is a balance to be struck between free trade and national economic security.

Joe (Diary) Sunday, August 31st at 2:27PM EST (link)

The price of gas in Alaska is currently still around $4.50, I don’t know what it was at the time prices were peaked and she sent most of the proceeds back, but if you think gas prices were a hardship here, you can only imagine what it was in Alaska.

Personally, I don’t like the concept, but I didn’t ask for a perfect pick, and after trying to prepare myself for settling for something less and then Palin comes roaring in with all the good things she does bring to the table, I’m extremely pleased with her selection.

Regarding oil, its just better to let the market correct itself whether you are talking about ipods, cans of beans, or barrels of oil. In the end, people cut back on driving, oil supplies bulged at the seams, demand from refineries dropped leaving ships full of oil waiting to be unloaded, the dollar plummeted which ate away profit values to the oil exporters and so just about everybody suffered except the speculators. I sure hope they enjoyed their tidy little profit, it was certainly at our expense.

How such a thing can be avoided? I don’t see a legal solution. The only weapon we have to fight back with is the gas pedal. When we stopped driving at the drop of a hat, the bubble burst and prices plummeted. We do have the power to make it stop.

INTERPRETATION: “Made in the USA”

1. Parts imported from China
2. Assembled by illegal aliens
3. Shipped to and sold by “Dollar” stores
4. Some yuppy in Jersey is very rich

 
 
 

I am a former Republican voter!!!

sockscrash Sunday, August 31st at 10:42PM EST (link)

I have voted Republican in the past and honestly believe my govenor in Michigan that is Democrat is seriously failing us. However I have seen how bad Bush is and the fact that John McCain has supported him 95% of the time and he is against equal pay. He even called Hillary a b** tells me that he could care less about Sarah and her great work that people are saying she has done. Also that he believes our economy is doing great is pure truth that he is out of touch. I have several family members that have lost their homes in foreclosure and they are working everyday. My family has suffered since me and my spouse both lost our job since the is no market for new sales in our area, we have a 11%+ unemployment rate and the government is saying that we have to wait till we lose it all before they will help. We have a young daughter too! I honestly thought I would stick with the party but then this crap with Palin happened. I think she is probably a women that has done great things and one day will be great for government but anyone who cant see that she is being used is crazy. Watch the speech from Ohio my family noticed that McCain was checking out Sarah’s backside through most of that speech. She dont deserve such disrespect. McCain could have choose so many overly qualified women or men that have everything in expierence and he only picked Sarah since she was a women no one knew about and he could get her to support to start drilling in Alaska,and could ty to pull in Hillary people. It seems that if you get the govenor from the state that has the most oil influence on your side then you can get what you want through her. Seriously that is a huge disrespect to us women. I am a proud women and we all put the country first. Honestly so does Huckabee, Thompson, Romney, Biden and Obama and Hillary and well anyone who lives here duh! Dont you care about this country? I know I do and I want my daughter to have the best education atleast I am hearing that the Democrats can feel my pain. The Republicans are telling me that me losing my home and my daughter not having food at the dinner table is OK since the big shots and those making $5 million are OK so everything is just fine. I am out everyday looking for a new job and I am not a whiner. I have Fibromyalsia and also Conjunctive Sleep Apnea and more than I can explain but I have worked everyday for my little girl. I am determine to work till it kills me just like it did my dad. I cant even get help to get therapy for my Fibro. Tell me that life is great the way it is! I am sorry but the disrespect and poor judgement on the part of the republicans has told me they dont care about me in the Middle Class thats Falling Fast!

Actual and True Republicans don't want the government to intervene...

randy streu (Diary) Sunday, August 31st at 10:46PM EST (link)

If you used to be a Republican and have now decided that the government needs to step up and take care of you, the failing is yours; not the government’s.

But since I suspect you are being insincere, this is all a moot point.

Great! Now you can become a former Redstate poster.

Bill S (Diary) Sunday, August 31st at 10:48PM EST (link)

Be gone, troll. You can find more of your friends here.

“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins

Those democrats in MI sure have been successful

phxg (Diary) Sunday, August 31st at 10:59PM EST (link)

But this stands out:

atleast I am hearing that the Democrats can feel my pain.

Oh you made me laugh. Obama is proposing higher tax rates, the potential to appoint SCOTUS judges that would make the Warren court look positively conservative, and programs that will make the Carter years look good.

But it’s cool, cause anyone who has to qualify that they are willing to abandon the political ideals over just the VP selection…… well, we call that a moby.

It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. –Aristotle

 
 
 
 

Obama supporting Libertarian

TheeLibertarian Sunday, August 31st at 11:51PM EST (link)

When it comes to the Republican party, I can identify with many of their fiscal policies, I actually love them. Limited government spending, keeping government out of the private sector to a certain extent (in my opinion), small government, and that competition injected anywhere including schools will only bring about better results.

The only problem is that history proves since Reagan this has not been the case. Republicans have not been fiscally conservative, and government actually grew while they were in office and so did the deficit. It grew under Carter as well but not even close to the astronomical levels of Reagan, and the Bush’s. The principles that the Republican party claim to have inspire me, but as they say, actions speak louder then words, and I can’t detect any sign of life. Bush and McCain don’t seem to posses what true Republicans believe in. For the better part of 26 years McCain was not a traditional Republican by any measure. Recently he has changed to appeal to the base. There is a difference between capaigning and governing and McCain knows this. Get into the White House and he will be back to the maverick that turned off so many true conservatives. Bush did the same thing and I cannot take the chance that McCain might turn his back on his pledges.

The reason that I as a libertarian is supporting a democrat is that I believe the country needs someone with a plan to bring about stability. Cutting taxes when we are in a deficit will not help. How will cutting taxes, the income to an underfunded government which pays for the military, infrastructure, and many other aspects that a free market need to flourish help? When the problem is so large, the market cannot fix itself without a counter balance.

I thoroughly enjoyed reading this entry. You did not give Palin a pass just because she might help the Republicans win office. You looked at her policies with an objective eye. I really applaud that. Many blogs are on the polar opposite of positions. I do not agree that the McCain ticket is something I can trust. Her main standing point of the bridge to nowhere, showing she is a maverick against wasteful spending, has already turned out to be a faux. She only rescinded her position when she found out the federal government would not completely fund it.

Every morning I wake up upset thinking that McCain would feel comfortable putting the country in the hands of someone that he only saw as useful to get elected and not lead with. If anyone argues that a man that met this woman once before deciding on her believes she can help him lead, then that someone is a person I would rather not waste my time on. Thank you for the great read.

you are misleading

TheeLibertarian Monday, September 1st at 12:07AM EST (link)

On what income bracket is he proposing tax increases? What percentage of an increase would it be, and what increase would he apply to capital gains and dividends?

You are misleading “sockscrash” by saying Obama would raise her taxes. By reading her post you can safely assume she makes less then $200,000 as a single woman. If she did make more then that can you tell me how much her tax rate would increase by?

In actuality if she is making less then $200,000 as a single person she would get more money back then she would have this year under Bush’s tax cuts.

 
 

Ahhhhhh Michigan

Gary (Diary) Monday, September 1st at 12:10AM EST (link)

The place I love yet at the same time would love to escape. Born and raised in the land of the handout. The place where the UAW, the biggest hustle ever perpetrated on American workers, thrives. Forget the fact they sold all the workers out so they could get in on some of the money. Yet the hopeless masses hang on there every word like a baby on its mommys teet. Lets blame the corporation that the plany closed. And forget the fact they offer to pay for said worker to go to school. Blame blame blame and vote for Obama. Thats all you get out of good ol Michigan these days. Well that and a thug Mayor of Detroit who fights cops, one of the worst Governors in the USA who has done nothing but raise taxes, and a Senator who gets a bill passed for Detroit River restoration. But ignores the fact that no one comes to enjoy a beautiful river when they are scared of getting attacked by a crackhead. With an economy so bad you would think that people would of wised up and elected a guy who was a champion of business like say, o I dont know Devos. But nooooo they give old Jenny the Canuck another chance to make it right. Or maybe they put her back in office so they could still bitch and moan about EVERYTHING! I am so disappointed since Engler left that it makes me sick. All of the major population centers are chock full of handout libs and it disgust me that this great state has turned blue. People like the poster above blame Bush when the real problem is the government of this state. And just so you know sockscrash. And I know this will shock you. The government isnt supposed to help your kid go to college, or your friends that lost there home, or your fibromyalgia. And the middle class is not falling fast. Its just that the middle class people have now moved up into rich category. Thats the part they fail to tell you about. When I worked for GM I saw that the company was looking to other more cost efficient places to produce cars. So I did what any self respecting self sufficient American would do. I went to school on there dime and moved into a more stable field. Problem solved. Now I hear all those people with the same chance I had griping that there plant is closing. Go to your family, go to your church, go to school, go do something. Just dont depend on the government to solve your problems. Thats not what they are there for.

What good will it be for a man if he gains the whole world, yet forfeits his soul? ~Bible~

You know why there’s a Second Amendment? In case the government fails to follow the first one. -Rush Limbaugh~

Only half the patients who go into an abortion clinic come out alive. ~Unknown~

Well, let's look at how it works.

phxg (Diary) Monday, September 1st at 12:34AM EST (link)

Your simplistic approach to income only taxes is why Obama is a threat to the American economy.

He says he plans to add $50Bn to the economy. Where do you think that money will come from? And if you believe that only the $200K plus family will get hit you are deluded.

There are plenty of diaries here that can go into great detail of how Obama’s policies are bad for Americans. But I am sure that as a 1 Hour moby you’re not interested in what we say.

It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. –Aristotle

A little known fact...

Josh Painter (Diary) Monday, September 1st at 1:06AM EST (link)

With the increase in the production tax from 22.5% to 25%, tax credits allowed for qualified exploration expenditures were increased from 20% to 30%.

  • JP

“An armed society is a polite society” – Robert A. Heinlein, “Beyond This Horizon” (1942)

Capitol gains and divedends

TheeLibertarian Monday, September 1st at 6:02AM EST (link)

I am familiar with capitol gains and divedends taxation. I asked you those specific question to see if you have read the policies of of either John McCain or Barack Obama. I have. I can tell you their tax proposals on those issues. I am sure you cannot, or you just looked it up after you read this.

Wrong Thread, bucko

Raven (Diary) Monday, September 1st at 12:15PM EST (link)

This is a thread about Sarah Palin and the comment you replied to was in response to a specific part of the OP.

If you want to talk economic security, find a thread about economic security or start one yourself.

Alternatively, wait for an Open Thread and post your concerns there.

In response to your comment, however, you’re the one missing the point. But if you want an explanation of why, follow the above advice.

“If you do not have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one.”
Luke 22:36

Good links.

Remington_Steele (Diary) Monday, September 1st at 12:26PM EST (link)

Thanks Elizabeth. The blog link was very helpful.