Or something like that–journalists realize that they actually have to be tough on Obama.
Better late than never, I suppose. But they should have realized this during the campaign. Oh, and speaking of which . . . It’s fun watching reality dawn on these people.
Don't get fooled
Warner Todd Huston Wednesday, December 17th at 2:37AM EST (link)I don’t think we’ll have to worry much about the media beating up too much on The One. We will surely see a hit here and there, but it will pale in comparison to the way the media beat up Reagan and G.W. Bush.
———-
Be sure and Visit my Home blog Publius’ Forum. It’s what’s happening NOW!
Yes ...
John Steele Wednesday, December 17th at 4:19AM EST (link)… their idea of being tough on The Obama™ is to keep asking how many eggs he had for breakfast.
John - Miami
KJ4NSE
Member NRA | GOA | SAF | ARRL
———-
Why would God invent something like whiskey? To keep the Irish from ruling the world of course.
except
gazill Wednesday, December 17th at 8:27AM EST (link)he eats waffles…
so sickntired of hopenchange
Sorry, no bite there. Not even sure the press would be the man in this case.
The_Gadfly Thursday, December 18th at 7:18AM EST (link)Biting would involve actual investigative reporting, and since the only people they will be able to incriminate in that particular investigation will be Dems, there is not now, and there will not be in the future, any investigative reporting occurring.
We’ve been called racists enough now that it shouldn’t bother us any more.
-AChance, http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2009/11/03/what-men-may-do-we-have-done/#comment-24463
If NY23 was a beat down for Conservatives, what do you call what happened to Progressives in NJ and VA?
inspired by ColdWarrior, http://www.redstate.com/hooah_mac/2009/11/04/ny-23-the-agony-of-defeat-not-so-much/#comment-156