Valentine for Condoleezza Rice from Peter Dow. Roses Are Red. (YouTube)

This is a Valentine Day’s video for Condoleezza Rice from Peter Dow.

Photographs of Condoleezza Rice, flowers etc. set to the song “Roses Are Red” sung by Jim Reeves.

The video is dedicated as follows -

Condoleezza Rice
Be my Valentine
This day February 14, 2013
And for ever more
Love from Peter Dow

Condi Rice on CBS Face the Nation with Bob Schieffer January 2013.
Condi Rice on CBS This Morning with Charlie Rose and Norah O’Donnell.

A new term dawns for President Obama and Condi sets the scene to the tune of La Bamba.

“Condoleezza Rice for President. Join this group of supporters from everywhere on the world wide web.

Rice for President Yahoo Group

Condoleezza Rice for President Video Playlist

BBC: US ambassador ‘killed in Libya’
The US ambassador to Libya has died after being attacked by militiamen storming the US consulate in the eastern city of Benghazi, reports say.

I am shocked and horrified at this if it is confirmed and my sincere condolences to our American friends and loved ones.

This incident confirms my concerns that diplomatic missions in “war-on-terror” countries are not being properly secured by being located in properly secured and defended military bases.

This reminds me of the storming of a UN base in Mazar-e-Sharif when 7 UN workers were killed in April 2011. The guy responsible at the time for UN security – Gregory B. Starr, the United Nations Under-Secretary-General for Safety and Security, is an American who used to be employed as the person responsible for the security of US diplomatic bases.

I have further concerns that the US & NATO countries’ military these days lack the military knowledge and competence even to able to secure our military bases. Bases can’t be properly secured in or near an urban area. You need a security zone of cleared and controlled ground of at least 6 miles, but 10 miles is better, around a military base to keep enemy fire from rockets and mortars out of range.

If you don’t control the ground around a base this happens – 3 were killed at Bagram Air Base, Afghanistan yesterday.

Afghanistan Attacks: Insurgents Attack Bagram Air Base

KABUL, Afghanistan — Afghan insurgents bombarded a U.S. base and destroyed a NATO helicopter, killing three Afghan intelligence employees, officials said Tuesday. There were also NATO personnel aboard and wounded, the coalition said without providing further details.

We’ve been at war in Afghanistan for nearly 11 years now and still the US and NATO military are operating out of insecure bases! Our supply routes in Afghanistan have never been secured and recently a decision by NATO-ISAF (commanded by a US general) was taken to close bases along the main highways in Afghanistan making the roads even more insecure.

The military and security leaders we are depending on to keep our personnel safe during this war on terror are incompetent and our diplomats would be well advised to have no faith in them. If I was a diplomat in a country with security problems I would quit and come home until we get proper military and security people in charge.

So there is a pattern here of incompetence at the very highest levels of leadership in the United States, NATO and the United Nations.

The people in charge are incompetent and this is very serious folks. We need urgent action to get competent people in post. We need a shake up at the highest levels of government on the military and security side especially. This can’t be allowed to go on.

My ApPak Military Strategy Blog: Afghanistan – Pakistan (AfPak) military strategy and the war on terror

“VP Rice” is a game-changer for Romney

The experts agree that the polls are telling us that the additional votes Rice could bring to the Romney ticket change the expectations of who will win the electoral game.

Without Rice, with any of the other VP possible picks, Romney looks weak against Obama and Romney’s game looks losing unless something big happens in his favor.

With Rice, Romney’s ticket looks as strong as Obama-Biden. Romney-Rice could beat Obama-Biden but the polling results in so far are so closely tied between those two tickets that there appears to be no clear favorite as yet.

Rice can carry Romney to the White House!

The polls say that Condi Rice is a very unusually popular political figure and it looks like she could carry Romney to victory in the 2012 Presidential election if anyone can.

Here are the two polls

Fox News Poll

Click to see bigger image

Fox News poll: Voters pick Condi Rice as Romney running mate

Fox News Poll Full Details

Public Policy Polling Poll

Click to see a bigger image

Daily Caller: With Condi on ticket, Romney tied with Obama in Pennsylvania, says PPP poll

Two new surveys by Public Policy Poling show that former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice could greatly benefit Mitt Romney as his running mate in the battleground states of Pennsylvania and Michigan.

The poll of Pennsylvania voters shows that while President Obama leads Romney in the state 49 percent to 43 percent, that lead is entirely erased when Rice is listed as Romney’s vice presidential candidate. Not since George H.W. Bush topped Michael Dukakis in the the state in 1988 has a Republican presidential nominee carried Pennsylvania.

Swing state Pennsylvania too close to call

Could Romney-Rice win states last won for the Republicans in the 1988 Republican landslide?

The electoral college map the last time the Republicans took Pennsylvania. 1988: G.H.W.Bush (426 votes) beats M. Dukakis (111 votes)

PPP: Stable presidential race in Michigan and Pennsylvania

One thing that could be a huge game changer in both of these states? Mitt Romney selecting Condoleezza Rice as his running mate. She would give him a 6 point advantage both places, pulling him into a tie in Pennsylvania at 45-45 and narrowing the gap in Michigan to 50/42. Rice is a very unusually popular political figure. In Pennsylvania her favorability rating is 60/27 and in Michigan it’s 56/28. She’s even seen favorably by Democrats- 47/38 in Pennsylvania and 41/40 in Michigan- in both states. Her selection has the potential to be a game changer.

“Mitt Romney should pick Condoleezza Rice as his running mate for the 2012 U.S. Presidential election.
Romney Rice 2012!”

Romney Rice 2012 YouTube Channel

“Condoleezza Rice for President/VP in 2012/16. Join this group of supporters from everywhere on the world wide web.”

Rice for President Yahoo Group

Condoleezza Rice for President/VP Video Playlist

This is a snapshot view of the Drudge poll results some time late on July 13.

SHOULD ROMNEY PICK CONDOLEEZZA RICE FOR VP?

YES 63.77% (309,716 votes)
NO 36.23% (175,950 votes)

Total Votes: 485,666

My Romney Rice 2012 channel on YouTube

Introducing a new channel on YouTube…

Romney Rice 2012 @ RomneyRiceUSA YouTube channel

About Romney Rice

Mitt Romney should pick Condoleezza Rice as his running mate for the 2012 U.S. Presidential election.

Romney Rice 2012!

My new Romney Rice 2012 channel is unofficial. It’s not authorised by Romney nor Rice and it’s an independent effort in the style of a “Draft Condi” campaign.

The top 3 most admired women in America – Oprah Winfrey, Hillary Clinton, Michelle Obama – all back Obama for re-election.

If something big were to happen with one of those three then maybe Obama might lose his hold on the women’s vote. If say, Romney went on TV with Oprah and convinced her and her viewers to vote Romney, if Hillary Clinton ran against Obama for the 2012 Democrat nomination, if Michelle Obama filed for divorce – that kind of thing, then maybe Obama would be vulnerable.

Right now, Obama has the women’s vote all but sewn up so Romney needs to do something big to recruit women to his ticket.

Picking Condoleezza Rice to run on the Republican ticket would be Romney’s best move to attract women voters and boost his ticket’s foreign policy experience at the same time.

But Romney needs more women voters’ support. Oprah is the most admired woman with republican women so when she endorsed Obama for re-election that hurt the GOP ticket with women voters.

Romney Rice 2012. Condi – “the right person for the #2 place on the ticket” (YouTube)

June 26, 2012. Condoleezza Rice is interviewed by Greta Van Susteren for ‘ON THE RECORD’ on the Fox News Channel.

Transcript of the Video

Greta Van Susteren:

At this — in Utah — at a Romney event, you took down the house — people .. Apparently, you got a standing ovation.
You got a huge amount of warmth and support.
If asked, would you agree to be on the ticket with the Governor Romney – if asked?

Condoleezza Rice:

Greta, I shouldn’t be asked and .. because I don’t want to run for office. I ..

Greta Van Susteren:

I know you I don’t want to – but – I know you don’t want to. There are a lot of things that we – people don’t want to do in life but I’m try to sort of gauge, sort of like, if you got, sort of, cornered?

Condoleezza Rice:

I don’t think I’m going to get cornered because I’ve made it as clear as I possibly can this isn’t what I am equipped to do or what I want to do.
I love public service. I loved my time in government. I love policy.
I’m really not a politician. I wasn’t cut out that way. I never ran for student government when I was in high school and so I’ll find my ways to serve but this isn’t the right thing for me.

Greta Van Susteren:

But .. but if you look at the — I would think that when I think one of the things that Governor Romney would look at in terms of enhancing his ticket is he’d look for someone with foreign policy experience. I mean that’s got to be one consideration in this very volatile world.

There’s no denying your foreign policy experience.

Condoleezza Rice:

But there are many ways to put together an administration so that you represent all of the challenges that the President of the United States will face.
And it doesn’t all have to be in the presidency and in the vice presidency.

I am quite certain because I know him and I admire him and I trust his judgment.
Governor Romney is going to find the right person for the number two place on the ticket.

The most important thing is going to be that it’s somebody who is ready to serve should something – God .. God forbid – happen to the president.
That’s the most important characteristic of the vice president and I know he’s going to make a good choice but I know it won’t be me.

Condi is the right person for the number two place on the ticket.

Rice for President Yahoo Group

June 26, 2012. Condoleezza Rice is interviewed for CBS’s “This Morning” by Erica Hill and Charlie Rose days after giving a well-received speech at Mitt Romney’s weekend donors’ meeting in Utah.

The CBS video is embedded in a background suggesting a possible “Romney – Rice 2012″ Republican ticket for the United States Presidential elections and in support of that idea, the results of April 2012 polls indicating the percentage of U.S. voters with a favorable opinion of

Condoleezza Rice – 66%
Barack Obama – 54%
Mitt Romney – 40%

This is a link to the CBS report of the interview

Rice for President/VP Yahoo Group:

Video Playlist:

The Condoleezza Rice forum in the For Freedom Forums:

Video produced by Peter Dow

Condi Ride A White Swan. Condoleezza Rice flies the World. (YouTube)

Music video with photographs of Condoleezza Rice flying around the world, in aeroplanes and helicopters in her role as Secretary of State of the United States of America. Also included are photoshopped and graphical art featuring Condi.

The music is “Ride A White Swan” by Marc Bolan and T. Rex.
Thanks to numerous photographers and graphic artists.

“Condoleezza Rice for President/VP in 2012/16. Join this group of supporters from everywhere on the world wide web.”
Rice for President Yahoo Group

Condoleezza Rice for President/VP Video Playlist

Music video.
5 & 6th June 2012. Photographs of the planet Venus in transit across the face of the Sun. Photographs of Condoleezza Rice.
Set to music “Bright Eyes” by Art Garfunkel.

Rice for President Yahoo Group

Click here or on the image to see a bigger image

Poll results: For Condoleezza Rice, (34% very) + (32% somewhat) favorable = 66% (total) favorable view from likely U.S. voters, from Rasmussen Reports April 27, 2012.

Poll results: For Barack Obama, 54% favorable impression & Mitt Romney 40% favorable impression “among registered voters” say ABC News, April 16, 2012 though the ABC News / Washington Post poll data quoted is for a random national sample of adults with impressions of Obama 56% favorable and Romney 35% favorable.

My conclusion is that Mitt Romney or whoever finally secures the GOP nomination to be the Republican candidate for president in 2012 can add the popular appeal to the GOP ticket needed to beat Barack Obama by picking Condoleezza Rice to run for Vice President.

Sources
Rasmussen Reports – Condi for Veep? 66% View Former Secretary of State Favorably

THE HILL – Opinion: Condoleezza Rice would be game changer as Romney VP pick

ABC News – Mitt Romney Shows Record Shortfall in Personal Popularity in ABC News/Washington Post Poll

Condoleezza Rice topped the poll with 26%.

Another question asked Republican voters if they had a favourable or unfavorable opinion of certain people in the news and again Condoleezza Rice topped the poll with an 80% favorable result.

The detailed results from the poll as regards Condoleezza Rice are included below.

As well as a link to the CNN Politics – Political Ticker webpage which reports the poll finding, other political and news websites have reported the results of this poll and many bloggers have commented and two example excerpts (from Politico & Hot Air) are included here.

View this post as a message in Rice for President Yahoo Group (with width enough to view all the images)

POLITICO

Poll Findings

PDF Download

The result of this poll is not a surprise because the voters confidence in Condi in the White House is nothing new.

The only thing which changed this week is that the pollster on this occasion put the name “Condoleezza Rice” in as a poll option in the questions.

Most of the political polls don’t name “Condoleezza Rice” as someone to think about voting for and that’s the main reason why Condi isn’t regularly topping many political polls, especially when voters are asked to pick their favorite Republican for President or VP.

Rice for President Yahoo Group

“Condoleezza Rice for President/VP in 2012/16. Join this group of supporters from everywhere on the world wide web.”

Condoleezza Rice for President Video Playlist

The Condoleezza Rice forum in the For Freedom Forums

Facebook

Video clips of various American TV interviewers asking Condoleezza Rice if she would run for Vice President if invited to do so by the Republican nominee for President.

“Condoleezza Rice for President/VP in 2012/16. Join this group of supporters from everywhere on the world wide web.”

Rice for President Yahoo Group

Peter Dow’s “no” to Taliban’s surrender terms. Afpak strategy for victory in war on terror. (YouTube)

CBS News: Divisions within Taliban make peace elusive

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta made news Wednesday when he said the combat role for U.S. troops in Afghanistan could end next year instead of 2014. On Thursday, he took a step back — insisting U.S. forces will remain combat ready — even as they transition into their new role of training Afghan troops.

Another part of the U.S. strategy involves getting the Taliban to hold peace talks with the Afghan government. CBS News correspondent Clarissa Ward spoke with some top Taliban representatives where they live in Pakistan.

They call Sami ul Haq the “Father of the Taliban,” one of Pakistan’s most well-known and hard-line Islamists.

Ward visited ul Haq at his religious school near the Afghan border. Many Afghan Taliban leaders and fighters studied there, earning it the nickname the “University of Jihad.”

Ul Haq said that top Taliban figures are receptive to the idea of peace talks, but that three key conditions must be met first: The Americans must leave Afghanistan, he told Ward. Secondly, Taliban leaders should be released from Guantonamo. The third demand is there should be no outside interference in Afghanistan.

It’s unlikely that American negotiators will accept these terms, though a release of some prisoners from Guantanamo Bay has been discussed.

While some elements of the Taliban’s leadership may be supportive of peace talks, there are clear signs that divisions exist within the group. Many of the younger, more militant foot soldiers insisting that they are not ready to stop fighting.

At a small guesthouse on the outskirts of Islamabad, CBS News had the rare chance to sit down with a young Taliban commander from Helmand province. For security reasons, he asked that his face be not shown.

“If these talks in Doha are successful and Taliban leaders tell you and your fighters to put down your arms, will you do it?” asked Ward.

“No, it will not happen,” he said. “And those who are talking to the political wing of the Taliban should understand that real peace is only possible by talking to the ground fighters.”

“So the bottom line is you’re not willing to compromise, you’re not willing to collaborate? Is there any chance of peace?”

“If the Afghan government announced tomorrow that strict Islamic law would be reinstated, we would accept that,” he said, “but those in power now will never go along with that.”

For the moment, there is a huge gulf between what the Taliban and their backers want and what America would be willing to accept.

So the Deans of Jihad have dictated terms to the West, the terms they propose of the West’s surrender to the Jihadis in the war on terror.

So what should the response of the West be? Should we surrender to the Jihadis, or should we fight to win?

This guy Sami ul Haq should be a prisoner at Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp along with his University of Jihad colleagues, his controllers from the Pakistani ISI and his financial backers from Saudi Arabia.

The US and Western allies ought to name Pakistan and Saudi Arabia as “state sponsors of terrorism”.

There ought to be drone strikes on the University of Jihad. (Darul Uloom Haqqania, Akora Khattak, Pakistan)

We ought to seize control of Pakistani and Saudi TV satellites and use them to broadcast propaganda calling for the arrest of all involved in waging terrorist war against the West.

It just seems very poor tactics for our military to be risking life and limb in the minefields of Afghanistan yet at the strategic level our governments and businesses are still “trading with the enemy”.

As the Star Trek character Commander Scott might have said -

“It’s war, Captain but not as we know it.”

Republican Intelligence forum of the For Freedom Forums

Rice for President Yahoo Group

Quote: AllGov

Lloyd’s Sues Members of Saudi Royal Family for Funding Al-Qaeda in 9/11 Attacks
Tuesday, September 13, 2011

Prince Salman Bin Abdul-Aziz Al Saud

Leaders of Saudi Arabia are being sued by Lloyd’s insurance for playing a key role in the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

Lloyd’s has paid more than $215 million in claims filed by families of those killed in the attacks, and wants Saudi leaders to reimburse the company.

As far as the insurer is concerned, 9/11 never would have happened without “the sponsorship” of Saudi Arabia, which provided al-Qaeda with the means “to conceive, plan and execute the September 11th Attacks,” says the Lloyd’s lawsuit.

In addition to the Saudi government, defendants in the case are the Saudi High Commission for Relief of Bosnia & Herzegovina, the Saudi Joint Relief Committee for Kosovo and Chechnya (SJRC), the Saudi Red Crescent Society, National Commercial Bank, Al Rajhi Banking and Investment Company, Prince Salman Bin Abdul-Aziz Al Saud, Suleiman Abdel Aziz Al Rajhi (CEO of al Rajhi Bank), and Yassin Al Qadi (an employee of al Rajhi Bank and founder of the Muwaffaq Foundation). Salman Bin Abdul-Aziz Al Saud is currently the Governor of Riyadh Province.

The SJRC is included because, according to Lloyd’s, the organization between 1998 and 2000 diverted more than $74 million to al-Qaeda members and loyalists. At that time the committee “was under the supervision and control of Saudi Interior Minister Prince Naif bin Abdul Aziz.”

Peter Dow of Rice for President and the For Freedom Forums comments.

I’ll applaud Lloyd’s and salute their coat of arms. Nice one.

The Arms of Lloyd’s
LLOYD’S website

Now wouldn’t it be refreshing to see Western leaders squaring up to the Saudi royals with that kind of backbone instead of grovelling down to make arms deals with them?

I posted the above in the US Message board and here is a part of the debate there that followed.

Quote: High_Gravity

Hmm I wonder how far this will really go, those Saudis have A LOT of oil money and could probably pay a pretty outrageous price to settle this out of court.

Yes you are right because if the Saudis admit liability and pay what is small change for them to settle this Lloyd’s claim in court then everyone else with a claim of loss following 9/11 – so that is not just losses suffered on 9/11 but arguably all those who lost loved-ones in Afghanistan, which was a war on terror consequential after 9/11 (possibly the Iraq war too) – also will find it much easier to prove their claim against the Saudis.

Add up the entire US and allied military and diplomatic service costs for the Afghanistan and Iraq wars, compensation for those serving there who were killed and injured, so that’s life time support for all the families of the killed, plus compensation for loss of earnings and quality of life losses for all those injured ..

That adds up into the trillions of dollars, serious money which amounts to quite a boost to the western economies in fact.

Hence why I suspect you are right that the Saudis will want to settle this out of court with no admission of liability.

It occurs to me that Lloyds of London insurers are not as well resourced as say the CIA and MI6 intelligence services. It seems to me that our intelligence services should have got around to blaming the Saudis for funding this before Lloyd’s did.

If they did, if they informed US presidents Bush and Obama, why is it business as usual with the Saudis?

Just yesterday another arms deal between the US and Saudi Arabia was announced, 50 thousand American jobs saved apparently. Presumably this is why US presidents are making nice with the backstabbing Saudi royals, to keep the business deals coming?

It just looks wrong when US presidents make nice with our enemies.

The then US President George W. Bush (L) and Saudi Arabia’s Prince Salman Bin Abdul Aziz, brother of King Abdullah, watch a traditional celebration dance outside the Al Murabba Palace in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, January 15, 2008.

I think the West should stop turning the other cheek and instead man-up and confiscate the Saudi oil fields to pay our war costs for the war they started by funding Al Qaeda!

Quote: High_Gravity

The Saudis have $10 trillion in US Banks and own numerous properties and businesses here, its because of this that our government is very leery to stop doing business with them. Like you said in previous posts though, in reality though the Saudis are no friends to the us. The textbooks that preach firey Anti American and Anti Western hatred in the madrassas in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Indonesia and elsewhere are all printed out in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia produced the most foreign fighters to fight against our troops in Iraq not to mention most of the 9/11 hijackers were from the Kingdom. I personally would like to see the US start doing less and less business with the Saudis and the other Middle Eastern countries, but I don’t know how to even begin that process when we have so many ties and agreements with them.

Well a good start would be confiscating that $10 trillion to distribute to compensate US 9/11 victims and war on terror casualties.

The UK and other countries who have incurred jihadi terrorism or war on terror costs should do the same. (Actually I am a republican so I always need to add that the UK should be overthrown and British republics do whatever it is that the UK should be doing)

Now I haven’t really worked out the figures as to whether $10 trillion would cover all American costs.

If it does, if UK costs are covered by what we can confiscate of what the Saudis have invested in Britain and other countries get compensated this way, then fine, especially if the Saudis stop funding new jihadi terrorism, maybe that will be that, though I still think we should support a republican democratic revolution in Saudi Arabia.

Now supposing $10 trillion of Saudi assets invested in the US doesn’t compensate sufficiently. Supposing the fair compensation figure is more like $100 trillion all told.

Then the US, with allied backing, presents the Saudis with an ultimatum – you pay us X% (where “X” is maybe 50%, 75% or 90% depending on how much of a hurry we are in to get compensated) of all the taxes you collect from the Arabian oil industry in Saudi Arabia until such time as you have paid off your debt, or else.

The “or else” could be a Western military invasion of Saudi Arabia to seize the Arabian oil fields.

Such a war would not be easy as the Iraq war demonstrated and the war aims could be thwarted initially because the Saudis would probably sabotage the oil wells, like Saddam did, by the time our military took the oil fields but eventually the fires would be put out and the oil wells restored to working order and at that later time we’d start getting 100% of all the taxes and the percentage of that we gave to the Arabs would not go through the Saudi state – we’d fund Arabian democrats and republicans instead – so the Saudi kingdom would be bankrupt and finished as a viable entity. The Saudi royal family would be finished as a ruling class apart from ruling their camels.

At least this time there would be no argument about whether such an “or else” war would be a “war for oil” because it honestly would be.

From the Republican Intelligence forum in For Freedom Forums

Welcome Condoleezza Rice (YouTube)

This video is suitable to play to an assembly to introduce and to herald the entrance and the taking to the stage of Condoleezza Rice.

An American male speaker reads a CV-like list of Condoleezza Rice’s extraordinary professional accomplishments.

The speaker says -

A true American original, unlike any before her, Condoleezza Rice is revered for her place in our nation’s history, as well as for her lasting legacy as our country faced challenges never before experienced.

Born in Birmingham Alabama, Rice earned her Bachelor’s degree in political science from the University of Denver, her Master’s from the University of Notre Dame and her PhD from the Graduate School of International Studies at the University of Denver.

As a professor of political science, Rice has been on the Stanford faculty since 1981. She has won two of highest teaching honours, the Walter J. Gores Award for Excellence in Teaching and the School of Humanities and Sciences Dean’s Award for Distinguished Teaching.

Rice served on President George H. W. Bush’s National Security Council staff. She served as Senior Director of Soviet and East European Affairs and Special Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs.

Rice also served as President George W. Bush’s Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs from January 2001 to 2005 and was the first woman to hold the position.

During this time, she played a pivotal role in shaping foreign policy and kept America secure following the terrorist attacks of September 11th 2001.

From January 2005 to 2009 she served as the 66th Secretary of State of the United States, the second woman and the first African-American woman to hold the post.

She is currently a professor of political economy in the Graduate School of Business, the Thomas and Barbara Stephenson Senior Fellow on public policy at the Hoover Institution and a professor of political science at Stanford University.

Her tireless efforts and service to our country have won her nation-wide acclaim, as well as respect of those on both sides of the aisle.

Ladies and Gentlemen please welcome to the stage, the 66th U.S. Secretary of State, Dr. Condoleezza Rice.

Rice for President Yahoo Group

Music video on behalf of Condoleezza Rice for President of the USA campaign 2012.

Rice for President (Yahoo)

(Facebook)

Condi videos

The Condoleezza Rice forum in the For Freedom Forums

ABC – Christiane Amanpour – Condoleezza Rice’s Global View

CBS – Norah O’Donnell – Rice loath to credit Obama for foreign policy success

CBS – Norah O’Donnell – Condoleezza Rice: “Politics doesn’t appeal to me”

CBS – Norah O’Donnell – Rice: Cain shouldn’t play the “race card”

David Letterman – Condoleezza Rice – No Higher Honor *Interview (Nov.2/11) Part 1

David Letterman – Condoleezza Rice – No Higher Honor *Interview (Nov.2/11) Part 2

Condoleezza Rice On Piers Morgan Tonight Part 1 Of 3

Condoleezza Rice On Piers Morgan Tonight Part 2 Of 3

Condoleezza Rice On Piers Morgan Tonight Part 3 Of 3

Bill O’Reilly – Fox – Condoleezza Rice on Iraq War

Condoleezza Rice to O’Reilly on Cheney & Rumsfeld in ‘No Higher Honor’

Ron Kessler – Condoleezza Rice ‘No Higher Honor’ interview for Newsmax

Gwen Ifill – PBS – Rice on Bush Years: ‘We Were Under a lot of Stress and Strain’

Steve Gill – Condoleezza Rice In Studio Interview – Part 1, 11/07/11.

Steve Gill – Condoleezza Rice In Studio Interview – Part 2, 11/07/11.

Scott Hennen – Condoleeza Rice on her book “No Higher Honor: A Memoir of My Years in Washington”

Buy ‘No Higher Honor’ by Condoleezza Rice: Hardback / Audio CD

Condoleezza Rice for President

Yahoo Group
“Condoleezza Rice for President in 2012. Join this group of supporters from everywhere on the world wide web.”

Facebook

Condi videos on YouTube

The Condoleezza Rice forum in the For Freedom Forums

A BIG country needs a president who thinks BIG!

Condoleezza Rice for President 2012