« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Apology to Redstate

didnot mean to offend anyone

This diary may be short. So I will apologize for that as well. This morning I posted a diary running with an idea that Moe Lane had about Gun Control, which was to come up with other silly ideas and pass them off as real. It was meant like Moe’s diary to be “tongue in cheek”. It is quite clear Mr Lane is better at comedy than I am. Please understand that I wish not to harm this site or bring any will. I will not pull any stunt like this in the future, especially if the majority of the Red Staters see it as such. Again I am not only sorry for for the offense, I am sorry for posting that.

 

 

COMMENTS

  • Melody Warbington

    plumely, we all makes mistakes, but often are not willing to admit them. Kudos for doing so. I hope kowalski sees this.

    • plumely

      Whether kowalski sees this doesn’t really matter. Glad you both see I am not a bad guy. I just glom onto great ideas and in this case took it alittle too far. It was early in the morning and by afternoon I read what I wrote and understood how it could be perceived wrongly. Thank you both for responding.

  • westcoastpatriette

    It takes a great person to write a diary like this. Just for the record, I was not offended by your diary — took it in the same vein as Moe’s — and was surprised at kowalski’s (over)reaction. kowalski also reacted strongly to Moe’s diary, so, I wouldn’t worry too much about it. He feels strongly about the gun-control threat right now, I think, and is having a hard time seeing the humor in what you and Moe wrote. I thought Moe’s diary was hilarious and said so. So, be at peace about it.

  • kowalski

    I accept your apology and I think you’re sincere. I don’t think I overreacted, though. I think part of the problem right now is that our side isn’t really apprised of just how serious this is, and how serious it’s going to get. Calling for people to go on organized disinformation campaigns on Twitter and Facebook, that people can trackback to a diary entry on the most prominent Conservative blog in the country, isn’t going to help our side – particularly in the coming weeks. Being seen as the disseminators of misinformation (officially or not) isn’t going to be a feather in our cap.

    Michael Bloomberg and all of the people who are convening today in Baltimore at Johns Hopkins University are *not* joking around. And neither was the legislature in New York State yesterday.

    Look at the law that was passed yesterday in New York – by both houses of the Legislature – in literally one day, just 140 miles from where I live. It bans all “assault weapons”, enacts sweeping new capacity restrictions, and moreover it’s the beginning of a de facto confiscation system – your existing weapons are “grandfathered in” under the law, but they must be registered – and they can never be transferred or sold. So they will all eventually be surrendered to the State. Read that again: the State is eventually going to seize all of that lawfully owned private property. It has been so decreed. Magazine capacities are now set at 7 rounds. You can keep your 10-rounders but you can only put 7 rounds in them. I wonder how they intend to enforce that? With sting operations at shooting ranges? Undercover agents watching you push the bullets into the magazine and if you miscount and load 8 instead of 7 they slap the cuffs on you and haul you away to jail? And I’ll guarantee they won’t have the undercover agents at the gangbanger crib watching those guys load their magazines.

    Also, my reading of the law is that it is ambiguous whether it really actually bans all semiautomatic handguns with a picatinny rail for a light or a laser, too. Because the law says: “One military style feature” makes the gun an “assault weapon” whether it is a *handgun* OR a rifle. So your new Smith & Wesson pistol with a picatinny rail for a flashlight….is that illegal now? In other words – everything other than revolvers and bolt action rifles. I think what they’ve really done, is to enact some hard and absolute restrictions combined with a gigantic grey area where the vast majority of modern defensive handguns could, maybe be classified as “assault weapons” under the law, depending on how the wind blows. Right up to the edge and then extend the grey area over the edge, in other words.

    We’ll see when the first prosecution happens, which I expect to be any minute now.

    The new Massachusetts laws are coming – I expect the bills to hit the State house in the next 48-72 hours. My guess is that they’re going to be even stricter. Right now in Massachusetts, there are reports that it’s taking between 5 and 6 months for people who already have licenses to renew them. That was supposed to have been a maximum of 40 days with the new electronic systems that Romney ushered in. Now, 150 and even 180 days to renew a license is becoming more commonplace – and during that time, you exist in legal limbo. And the legislators here have their ears all perked up about slapping gun owners with gigantic liability insurance requirements. The goal is exactly what I said: it’s the boa constrictor principle.

    They’ll see your “Don’t Tread on Me” rattlesnake and raise you a boa constrictor. It really is the Year of the Snake – and not just in the Chinese zodiac.

    There’s no humor in what is going on, unfortunately. Not even gallows humor. It’s gotten to the point that I’m thinking of curtailing my writing about it because I’m giving people ideas – the other side. Instead what we need is a really well-organized campaign of political pressure to respond to these new laws. No jokes, no calls for a “disinformation campaign” on Twitter and Facebook.

    Sorry if I sounded harsh, but these aren’t joking matters and we’re not living in joking times. The people who are coming to restrict and/or constrain your right to own guns – or take them away from you completely – are very, very serious about it.

    In other words, plumely, I suppose this is one of those (relatively rare) situations where I don’t have much of a sense of humor, and actually I think that making fun of the situation or whatever, isn’t very helpful. And with that I say: “Dont Panic!” :)

    • Melody Warbington

      I agree with you, kowalski. While I agree there is a time and place for humor, this isn’t it.

    • plumely

      Kowalski,
      thank you for the post. Just so you know I have a very thick skin… I am not joking about this either and for the record feel that the establishment members of Congress on our side are not taking this seriously. I am not sure they regard the 2nd ammendment as a necessary component in our bill of rights. I am all for political pressure. I just am looking for new and effective ways to go about applying it. So, yes I can come up with some crazy ideas, but it is guys like you who keep me in check and bring me down to earth. Maybe we can meet in the middle soemwhere… but I ramble. I think and hope we are straight on this issue. Please know I am on your side.

      • kowalski

        There are a lot of members of Congress who treat our rights as bargaining chips because they really don’t believe in them as anything else. To many of them, they’re in Washington, they love Washington, and most especially they love those pulpy Legislative Hero stories in the Washington Post about how an intrepid bipartisan group of legislators got together when the chips were down at the 11th hour, not having shaved or showered, sleeping on cots with rolled up sleeves and 4 day old underwear, and managed to hammer out a deal, saving the Republic when everything was just about to come to an end, rescuing the Fair American Maiden just before the deadline.

        They live for that stuff. And to them, everything’s a bargaining chip.

        Most of the real Conservatives *do* believe in our rights as something a bit more substantial than that, however. And I absolutely didn’t want this place to become the starting point for any kind of shenanigans. I’m not even a front-pager here, but I have been around for a long time, and I kinda like the place. I don’t command the kind of power to have people’s diaries deleted that often, and I didn’t enjoy asking for it. But sometimes I have to act.

        The people we need on our side – very urgently – are the people in Congress who are inclined to post here at Redstate, and to bring along many others. With all of this coming to a head, we don’t need people “going off half cocked” as it were. Condition One, my friend. The half-cocked position isn’t safe for carry.

  • revtm

    satire is all but dead now a days due to overreaction.