« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

No Reince! NO!

Just my Sally, Dick & Jane way of saying that as a Wisconsin resident, grassroots activist, and Republican Party member, I would sooner chop off my own right arm than see Reince Priebus attain the heights of RNC Chairman. Priebus’ candidacy for national leadership is so egregious to me, in fact, that I’m breaking months of silence here on RedState to stand against it.

Much public discussion has unfolded in the past couple weeks about little Reince’s allegiances and dealings. There’s plenty to give anyone serious pause:

  • Working for a law firm that supports Obamacare and considers it constitutional
  • Serving as part of a designated team at said law firm to help clients obtain stimulus funds
  • Attempting to scrub evidence of his involvement on said team
  • Clerking for the not-so-conservative NAACP in the past
  • Pushing Michael Steele’s disastrous election to the RNC chairmanship
  • Enabling Michael Steele’s numerous failings and obvious incompetence

For me, all of that pales in comparison to Priebus’ patterns here in Wisconsin. In fact, these patterns should alarm grassroots, conservative Republicans in every state, for they portend worse to come should this man achieve power at the national level.

Reince the Rigger, Part 1 – Tax Day

Reince Priebus has a history of collusion, manipulation, subterfuge, and co-option in the service of getting his candidates and agendas pushed through. And it’s almost always at the expense of delegates and voters. If he wasn’t behind the matters I’m about to describe, there can be little or no doubt that he gave his blessing to them. The only other explanation? He’d lost control of his party and was totally oblivious to what others around him were doing. Is anyone really foolish enough to believe that Michael Steele’s general counsel and fix-it man didn’t have a clue…?

Some of you may be aware of the co-option of the April 2010 Tax Day Rally at Wisconsin’s State Capitol in Madison. What should have been a grassroots event dedicated to lower taxes, reduced government, and free-market principles was turned into a sordid publicity stunt headlined by big-government Republican Tommy Thompson—all to achieve a photo op and “tea party” credentials for not-yet-announced but already RPW-annointed Senate candidate Ron Johnson. Footage from the event later showed up in Johnson’s nomination video—surprise, surprise—to give him a helpful “tea party” veneer.

There’s much more to that story, but I have no room for it here if I’m going to cover…

Reince the Rigger, Part 2 – State Convention

That Priebus’ hand had been fully in the sorry Tax Day co-option became pretty darned clear a month later at the RPW’s State Convention.

Though Johnson officially entered the Senate race just a few short days prior to convention, robocalls from not one but two big-name establishment Republicans—former governor Scott McCallum and former lieutenant governor Margaret Farrow—went out on Johnson’s behalf in the short window between his announcement and the opening of the convention.

That means those calls were already produced and in the can well before Johnson’s announcement. Which, in turn, means that Reince Priebus, at the helm of the RPW, had already decided for convention delegates—and the voting public at large—the candidate for whom they’d be graced with the opportunity to vote in the general election. [The story was relatively similar in the governor’s race, though there it became obvious several months prior to the convention who the RPW was backing—and that they’d much prefer the other serious contender just to clear off.]

A record number of delegates attended the 2010 convention. Almost none of them knew anything of substance about Johnson going into that weekend. Yet somehow, after some very crazy Kabuki theatre—and you can’t possibly conceive just how completely crazy unless you were present in the hall to witness it—Johnson walked away with the endorsement.

There were, well…irregularities. First, the 2010 rules had changed, though no one seemed fully to understand precisely why this had perhaps been done until it was too late: The vote percentage neessary to obtain the endorsement had been lowered, while the percentage required to ensure a “no endorsement” result had been raised. The Republican Liberty Caucus has actually done an excellent job of summarizing the problem with this and other decisions and trends under Reince Priebus’ leadership.

Second, in one of the most backwards decisions of all time, candidates had to give their nomination presentations in the order in which they’d entered the race. If anything, it should have been the other way around in order to give some momentum and heft to candidates who’d been in longest. But this rule, too had a purpose. It set up a perfectly staged scene in which Senate candidate # 3, Dick Leinenkugel, a recently “converted” Democrat who’d recently resigned as Governor Jim Doyle’s Commerce Secretary no less, bowed out and threw his support to Johnson—at which point the hall spookily erupted in wild cheering and applause for final candidate Johnson, a man delegates had not yet had any opportunity to vet.

The endorsement was clinched for Johnson on the second ballot–though some of the balloting still doesn’t make any sense. This win was followed by a “surprise” appearance by…Tommy Thompson, who, having colluded in providing Johnson with false grassroots credentials and a photo op on Tax Day, now gave his public blessing to Johnson right on cue.

The third and most important irregularity? The balloting for the Senate endorsement mysteriously got bumped to Sunday…when most delegates had already gone home. Only about a third of registered delegates, in fact, remained to decide this extremely important matter, about 500 people with proportional voting. That means only about 300 of them or fewer voted for Johnson—though you’d never know that from the way the endorsement was waved around in the media.

You’d also never guess it from Reince Priebus’ comment when interviewed just days afterward: “It doesn’t matter if you are in the race for two years or two months,” he told the Wisconsin State Journal. “This proves that it’s about the right message and the right candidate.”

Seems like an innocuous comment, yes? Except that to the trained eye, it’s an impossible one. There was as of that point no substantive message, which means there was no substantive candidate. Moreover, Johnson managed to avoid putting up a single issue statement on his campaign website for about two months post-convention. So, substance didn’t exactly burgeon quickly. And no wonder. A few short weeks after convention, Johnson admitted on camera that he found the Constitution a difficult document to read. Unsurprisingly, the closer the grassroots looked, the more the RPW’s chosen one was seen to have major flaws, many of them progressive tendencies.

So, you see, Reince’s comment about “the right candidate and the right message,” printed just three days after the convention’s weird conclusion…? That remark could only have been written in advance for a public that the Wisconsin chair assumed to be blind and stupid.

The whole affair was an establishment production from start to finish. It centralized decision-making at the top levels of the party, put a false face on a poor candidate, and neatly co-opted the grassroots. And the only person—the ONLY one—who could have orchestrated it, who had access to all of the elements necessary to make this pig fly, was Wisconsin’s party chair, Reince Priebus.

That included collusion with the media…

Reince the Rigger, Part 3 – The Media

Now, again, do I have black and white proof on this score. Nope. But it’s all a little too neat.

If they hadn’t been doing so prior to convention, the three heaviest hitters in the Madison and Milwaukee talk radio markets—Sykes, Belling, and McKenna—certainly started shilling hard for Johnson immediately thereafter. In fact, every one of them ceased to give any time or attention to other candidates in the race. They simply refused to do so. [That, too, was the same in the governor’s race.] There was never discussion of Johnson’s foibles or flaws. It was a flat-out love-fest. At least two of these hosts went so far as to publicly attack individuals and groups that voiced objections or concerns about Johnson. The tune the three of them were all whistling sounded remarkably similar. Coincidence? Based on the similarities I heard with my own ears, I’d put my money on behind-the-scenes agreements and shared talking points.

Reince the Rigger, Part 4 – What to Expect from Him as RNC Chair

The picture I’ve painted for you here lines up quite well with whispers that are now flying around about other unseemly arrangements and double-dealings in which Reince Priebus may have been involved.

If RNC delegates and other top Republican leadership enjoy discovering they’ve been had, they should definitely cast their votes for Priebus, as they’ll be able to feel that way regularly. You think the way he’s maneuvered in, around, over, and on top of his good buddy Michael Steele has been interesting?  Just wait till you see what he can do for…and then TO…you. Oh he’s cute and little. He looks harmless. But you’ll never, ever be able to count on a word that comes out of his mouth or a single agreement you strike with him. He’s congenitally fork-tongued.

If you’re a mere mortal—a rank-and-file Republican or some low-level schlub like a county or district chair—get used to having even more candidate and policy decisions moved to somewhere well beyond your reach. That’s not theory. In whatever state you live, you should be contacting your committee members pronto to tell them Reince Priebus is the worst replacement for Steele possible.

In my experience, character flaws like Reince’s don’t get better with more room to maneuver; they get worse. A lot worse…

Caveat emptor.

COMMENTS

  • http://www.alexashrugged.com/ AlexaShrugged

    Sen. Johnson so much?

    • pompadour

      it’s that he is not what he and the RPW have claimed he is. And I and my colleagues worked very hard to vet him–even without his cooperation. What we found was not what we hoped, and the only responsible thing to do was sound the alarm. We’ll see what he does when he’s seated this month, but I plan to keep a close eye on him.

  • itrytobenice

    This is a critical race for the Republican party and having survived (maybe?) the last two years of MSteele, Superstar, I am *very* interested in getting a competent and conservative leader for the party.

    Enough of these manipulative power mongers who are interested in nothing else so much as their own self-aggrandizement.

    We must capitalize on the grassroots interest in gov’t and convince newly interested citizens that the R party is the party of the Constitution and limited gov’t, not insider dealings and big payouts to people and organizations with connections; and I don’t trust Reince to do anything other than continue the current corrupt procedures.

  • JadedByPolitics

    Huntsman, Romney or some other elite RINO as the Republican candidate. I don’t think for one moment this guy (child really) has the grassroots, you know the one’s who do the hard lifting in his radar and that will be a HUGE mistake for the RNC!

  • http://teapartisan.wordpress.com Socrates

    There are those driven by ideology and those driven by the lust for power.

    People of moderate politics do not become professional political operatives to advance their ideology.

    Some people, such as John Cornyn and Karl Rove, are Rovites: conservative in belief but willing to subordinate their personal beliefs to achieve power. They have crossed the line: no longer do they seek power to advance their agenda, but give lip service to an agenda as a means to achieve power.

    They may dislike that characterization, but their actions betray them.

    Ideological “movement conservatives” are battling both moderates and Rovites (and there is overlap). We know that we need to take control of our party not for its own sake but to advance our ideals.

    That is the real schism. We’ll always have to fight it, because power corrupts. But we must keep our eyes open and not be fooled by those who profess their own conservatism as a means to fool us.

    RNC chair candidates: the issue is not whether you’re pro-life or pro-gun or for small government or a strong defense. The issue is why you’re running.

  • fpete13527
  • itrytobenice
  • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

    Go here:

    http://rncdebate.server281.com/

    Starts at 11:00 am Eastern.

    Thanks,

    CW

  • fpete13527

    http://dailycaller.com/

    No debate for me. NOT Steele and NOT Priebus.

    My choice is Anuzis.

  • fpete13527

    I didnt see your post.

    PS I owe some more writing. Trying to put together something worth people reading

  • fpete13527
  • http://www.theamericanmind.com Sean Hackbarth

    First my caveat: I’m a Wisconsin native who had friends who were high up in both the Scott Walker and Ron Johnson campaigns.

    I can’t comment on the dealings at the Tax Day event or the state convention. I will comment on the radio talkers. I’ve listened to Mark Belling for over 20 years. He is too cantankerous and independent to take talking points from anyone. The same can be said for Sykes.

    I like Priebus for the fact that he got the Walker and Johnson campaigns in sync with the state party. He saw the volunteer strength of Walker and the positive media message of Johnson and coordinated it with party efforts. He got everyone to buy in and coordinate instead of having replication and inefficiencies. It resulted in political success. That’s the kind of approach and results that would be very helpful in the RNC.

  • pompadour

    as long as the means employed don’t marginalize and/or disenfranchise rank-and-file members who, by rights, should have the most power in the selection process–much like in our representative republic.

    Reince instead prefers to pre-select for people. He just emphasized that point again during the RNC Chairman debate this afternoon. I’m not comfortable with having party leadership make my choices about policy and candidates for me…just like I’m not comfortable with central financial planning.

    Central planning/decision-making certainly does unite people…but not necessarily in good ways. Just ask Friedrich Hayek.

    In relationship to the subject at hand, take the new Wisconsin rule to eliminate the “no endorsement” option. The reason that was so important is because if none of the available candidates was worth a dee-doodle, convention delegates could opt not to support any of them. Now, they will have to support someone, even if they’re faced with several piles of dog doo-doo. That’s great for party leadership who pre-select for the rank-and-file, because the elites can shove an establishment candidate down our throats even more easily.

    Not cool…

  • http://redmerrimack.blogspot.com/ charliebravoNH

    You diary was the one I was waiting for today. I will be contacting my State Party Chair and National Committee people about Reince Priebus .The NH slate is uncommitted at this time so it is not too late.

  • pompadour

    Thanks for making that call and for letting me know that my post has made a difference. I’m very grateful.

  • themarathonman

    by your hatred for Reince Priebus. I admit, I am a friend of Reince’s. This gives me some perspective to rate your blog on this topic as so full of contrivances, half-truths, circumstantial evidence, and out-and-out distortions of the truth that it borders on slander. That’s OK – Erick Erickson, Anne Coulter, and others have been similarly jaded.

    It’s truly disgusting the type of liberal-style, off-the-reservation psychobabbling Reince’s candidacy has caused among you establishment types on this board. Try to do a little more background work, and maybe try to get to know the man first before passing judgment of this degree. I would pass the same message on to Erick and Anne.

  • themarathonman

    by your hatred for Reince Priebus. I admit, I am a friend of Reince’s. This gives me some perspective to rate your blog on this topic as so full of contrivances, half-truths, circumstantial evidence, and out-and-out distortions of the truth that it borders on slander. That’s OK – Erick Erickson, Anne Coulter, and others have been similarly jaded.

    It’s truly disgusting the type of liberal-style, off-the-reservation psychobabbling Reince’s candidacy has caused among you establishment types on this board. Try to do a little more background work, and maybe try to get to know the man first before passing judgment of this degree. I would pass the same message on to Erick and Anne.

  • http://thesandsinstitute.org Vassar Bushmills

    VB

  • pompadour

    Wow, are you ever off base. That literally makes me chortle. I’m about as far from establishment as you can get. Apparently you’re the one who needs to do the background research before you start pecking away at your keyboard. Taketh the log out of thine own eye…

    REINCE is the one you should be labeling as establishment. Hell, he’s buddy buddy with the entire establishment machine in Wisconsin. Ask anyone. Is he an improvement over some of the people we’ve had in the past. Sure. But that sure ain’t saying much here in Wisconsin…

    It certainly does seem I’ve hit a nerve by calling Reince exactly what he is. If you’re a friend of his, you might want to watch your back. Some say that Michael Steele is realizing that all too clearly now. Not that I’m feeling sorry for him, mind you. You reap what you sow.

    Thanks for playing, themarathonman. Perhaps your luck will be better another day.

  • Jon E. Schultz II (IlliniJon)

    …”the Senate endorsement mysteriously got bumped to Sunday”

    What was mysterious about this? Endorsements were supposed to have been done by 4:30 or something. Instead, Lieutenant Gov took forever and Senate wasn’t even ready to begin until what, 7:30? 8 PM? They had already pushed back the dinner with speaker Karl Rove by somewhere between 30 to 60 minutes. What were they going to do, tell him sorry, but we don’t need him anymore? I was tired as hell of endorsements by that point, and I, like many other people, was glad Senate got moved to Sunday.

    This myth of some big conspiracy to move the endorsement to Sunday keeps getting perpetuated. I see a lot of it hear, heard a lot of it at the RedState Gathering…I just don’t buy it. I was there (as were some of you), and it was simply late, nothing else.

    - Jon

  • pompadour

    Anyone with two neurons to rub together knew that the Lt. Governor balloting would be contentious, take a lot of ballots, and waste a ton of time. Now, if you knew you had to get the most important balloting in on Saturday while most delegates were still present, what would you have opted to have last on the agenda in the event that it might get bumped to the next day?

    Lieutenant Governor has largely been a figurehead position in the state of Wisconsin. Senator…? Now that’s a big deal.

    The Senate balloting should have been handled on Saturday with a full complement of delegates. The fact that it was not is more than suspect.

  • pompadour

    First chance I’ve had to check in for a couple of days, so only just now seeing your comment. It is lovely to be in agreement with someone whose thoughts I always value.