« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Senate Race Analysis

With the key primaries in the books, now is as good a time as any to take a look at the key Senate races.  Some are more pessimistic than I am about the Republicans taking the Senate, but I’m a Cubs fan, so optimism is to be expected from me.  I think the answer isn’t whether or not the Republicans will take the Senate, but by how much.  As it stands right now, a swing of three seats would make it 50-50 (good enough if Romney and Ryan win), and four would give them outright control regardless of who wins.

As a note, if I don’t mention the race, you can assume I consider the incumbent safe.

 

Republican-Held Seats (10)

When a year goes as badly as 2006 did for the Republicans, any incumbent who survived it can be considered about as safe as can be.  Such is the case here, as no Republicans who won their races in 2006 are even on the radar to be knocked off.  There are still three races of interest for seats that are currently held by Republicans, though.

 

Reasonably Safe

Nevada (Dean Heller):  Jon Ensign resigned this seat, and Heller was appointed by Gov. Brian Sandoval to replace him.  His opponent in this race, Rep. Shelley Berkley, is currently involved in an ethics investigation in the House, and in this climate, I do not consider her a significant threat.  This one is on the watch list just to be safe, but I anticipate that Heller keeps the seat easily.

 

The Odd Race

Maine (Open):  Olympia Snowe is retiring, and conservatives everywhere are crying in our drinks of choice over that one.  OK, not really.  Anyway, the three candidates to replace her are Republican Charles Summers, Democrat Cynthia Dill and independent Angus King, the former Governor.  Odds are very good King wins this one.  By all accounts I’ve read, King is quite liberal, but he has not stated who he will caucus with as of yet.  On principle, it would seem he’d fit better with the Democrats, but he could also just be waiting to see who wins, or he could just be purely independent.  We’ll just have to wait and see.

 

The Big Showdown

Massachusetts (Scott Brown):  We all know by now how this came about:  Ted Kennedy died, Massachusetts had a special election to fill the seat during the heat of the Obamacare debate in 2010, and Scott Brown shocked Democrat Martha Coakley, who ran an uninspired campaign assuming that she’d win easily.  This should have been the “canary in the coal mine” for the Democrats in 2010, but they didn’t pay attention.

This time around, the Democrats are running the uber-liberal Elizabeth Warren, who is somehow managing to be an even worse candidate than Coakley.  Coakley’s laziness is continually trumped by Warren’s habit of opening her mouth solely to change feet.  Brown, meanwhile, is no Tea Partier by any means, and he’s liberal enough to represent Massachusetts, but he’s also conservative enough to provide a stark contrast to the uber-left Warren.  While polls still indicate the race to be close, it will boil down to this:  whatever you may believe about either of their views, Scott Brown is an excellent politician, and Elizabeth Warren is not.  That’s why I believe Brown will win.

——

So to wrap that up, there are only three Republican seats in play, and the Democrats’ best chance of gaining a vote appears to be hoping that Angus King sides with them despite being an independent.  I’ll say that he does, which means I project one Democrat pickup.

 

Democrat-Held Seats (24)

The situation here, of course, is precisely the opposite of the Republicans:  with as well as the Democrats did in 2006, you know there will be a few places where someone won in a place you wouldn’t have expected.  And if the circumstances are different six years later – which they undoubtedly are – then you can probably expect a bit of a “correction”.  Such is the case here.

 

Locks To Flip (Barring Scandal)

Nebraska (Open):  Ben Nelson signed his political death warrant by taking the infamous “Cornhusker Kickback” to break the Obamacare filibuster, and decided to retire instead of running again.  Tea Partier Deb Fischer represents the Republicans, while the Democrats are running the reanimated corpse of Bob Kerrey since they have no one better to run.  Polls have shown Fischer to be leading handily, and there’s no reason to think she won’t win.

North Dakota (Open):  Four-term incumbent Kent Conrad is vacating this seat.  The Republicans are running Rick Berg, while the Democrats offer up Heidi Heitkamp.  North Dakota is pretty solidly red, and outside of one outlier poll in June that showed Heitkamp up one, Berg has led the polls by solid margins and should win easily.

Missouri (Claire McCaskill):  Claire McCaskill appears to be the 2012 version of 2010’s Blanche Lincoln: the incumbent who should have bailed out, but decided to run again in what appears to be a futile effort.  Prior to the recent Republican primary, all three potential challengers were leading McCaskill by anywhere from 5 to 11 points, and primary winner Todd Akin is currently polling very well against McCaskill, who is basically dead meat if nothing drastic happens.

Wisconsin (Open):  Herb Kohl concludes his unremarkable Senate career by retiring this year.  The Democrats will run Tammy Baldwin, who plays well in Madison, but pretty much nowhere else, while the Republicans run popular former Governor Tommy Thompson.  While Thompson isn’t the guy the Tea Party folks wanted, it can safely be said that Thompson is more or less a lock to defeat Baldwin, while Eric Hovde or Mark Neumann would have a tougher road.  That’s not to say that either of them couldn’t have beaten Baldwin, but it would have been a tough race.  Thompson, however, will have no trouble at all.

 

The Course Correction

Montana (Jon Tester):  This is very much a case of, “Wait…that state has a Democratic Senator?” which falls into the category of “wins in odd places” from 2006 for the Democrats.  Unlike Ben Nelson, Tester hasn’t done anything to embarrass himself particularly, but he has been a fairly reliable liberal vote in a decidedly non-liberal state, and that will likely be enough to be his undoing. The Republicans are running Rep. Denny Rehberg, a very solid candidate.  The race hasn’t been heavily polled to this point, but most polls have Rehberg ahead by a small margin, and I anticipate that this will remain the case through Election Day, especially with Republicans being more enthusiastic about voting this time around.

 

Swing States And Coattails

Virginia (Open):  Jim Webb is retiring instead of running again, and the battle here is between former Governor and DNC chair Tim Kaine (Democrat) and former Senator George Allen (Republican). 

Ohio (Sherrod Brown):  Brown, the incumbent, is being opposed by Ohio state Treasurer Josh Mandel, a Tea Party favorite.

Florida (Bill Nelson):  Nelson is being challenged by U.S. Representative Connie Mack.

All three of these races are very close, two of the three challengers have won statewide election in the past, and all three are definite “swing states” in the Presidential election.  Personally, I believe all three of these races are likely to mirror the Presidential outcomes.  If Obama is to hold on, he probably needs to win two of these three states, and if he does, the incumbents probably remain.  On the other hand, if Romney gains momentum and wins handily, all three challengers could ride the wave to victory as well.

 

Other Possibilities

New Mexico (Open):  Jeff Bingaman is retiring, and the race to replace him is between Democrat Rep. Martin Heinrich and Republican former Rep. Heather Wilson.  Only two polling firms have had any polls on this race to this point:  Public Policy Polling (PPP), which tends to lean somewhat Democratic, has Heinrich up by about 5 points over average, while Rasmussen has Wilson within the margin of error.  New Mexico is a bit less of a swing state than the other three above, but certainly far from a lock for Obama, and New Mexico elected Tea Party favorite Susana Martinez as its Governor in 2010.  I’d place Heinrich as a slight favorite, but Wilson is by no means out of this race.

Hawaii (Open):  Daniel Akaka is retiring here, and while this would normally be a thoroughly safe Democratic seat, the popular former Republican Governor Linda Lingle is taking a run at this seat, which definitely puts it in play.  The Democrats offer up U.S. Rep. Mazie Hirono.  Polling data shows Hirono ahead by a fairly safe margin, but it hasn’t been polled by many places other than Honolulu newspapers and PPP, so it’s hard to be entirely sure.  Still, I predict this will likely be a Democrat hold, but it isn’t a safe one just yet.

Wild Card?:  If the Presidential race turns into a Romney rout, is there another candidate we’re not talking about that could come out of nowhere to win?  It’s possible.  Who saw Ron Johnson beating Russ Feingold in 2010 at this point, for example?  I can’t really name any names, precisely because we just don’t know them yet.  There are always possibilities, though, and such an upset is far more likely to happen to a Democrat than a Republican this year based both on numbers and the general mood.

——

To wrap up the above, I’ve got four “locks”, one more that I feel good about, three that will hinge on the Presidential outcome, and two more “in play”, though one much more so than the other.  That’s anywhere between five and nine Republican pickups (leaving out Hawaii), so we’ll split the difference and predict seven seats flipping for the Republicans.  Combine that with the one pseudo-Democrat pickup predicted above, and we’re looking at a 53-47 Republican majority.  That should be good enough to get things done.

Crosspost

COMMENTS

  • wrongwaybama

    Lets help them out. If we all give a few bucks it will make a big difference. Any thoughts on giving to the Green Party? Looks like they will be on the ballots in many of the swing states.

  • http://qsclues.wordpress.com qsclues

    First time atop the “Recommended Diaries” section. I guess people like optimism. :-)

  • http://qsclues.wordpress.com qsclues

    First time atop the “Recommended Diaries” section. I guess people like optimism. :-)

    • gracie

      I had just come back from a Tea Party meeting wherein a member opened her iPad and read an article stating Ryan is hurting the party so badly that we will probably not get the Senate! Sorry I do not have the cite but she verified it right there. Then coming home depressed I find your article on the Senate. Since I am on a daily emotional roller coaster you gave me a much needed night’s sleep. Thanks!

  • gekster

    Well done.
    I hope your perspective is correct. ;)

  • http://qsclues.wordpress.com qsclues

    n/t

  • Kyle-MI

    Very few polls out. Rasmussen has Mourdock up by only 2.

    I would also keep my eye on New Jersey. While he has a big lead, Menendez is only polling at 45%, terrible for an incumbent. Sure, it is a very blue state, but there are a lot of other blue state incumbents doing much, much better.

  • earlgrey

    to SCF when I can, and then let them distribute the cash as they see fit. I noticed Mourdock was getting 10%, the lowest of the all the candidates on the page at the time. Either Mourdock has a lot of money already, they think he is likely to lose, they think he is likely to win or more likely, I don’t know what I am talking about.

  • http://qsclues.wordpress.com qsclues

    I probably should have included that in the list. Frankly, though, I’m not that worried on that one. Indiana is a state that everyone has pretty much assumed Obama will lose this time, and I don’t see Mourdock losing there if Obama loses. But it’s close enough that it should probably be on the list.

  • RealQuiet

    Kyle is right in regards to being worried about Indiana but I think Romney’s coattails pull Mourdock across.

  • kowalski

    I’ve been amazed for months at the sheer incompetency of the Warren campaign and it all comes back to the candidate herself. Scott Brown hasn’t done a great job and he hasn’t done a bad job but you’re right – he knows how to campaign, and I think he’s going to continue to ramp up the enthusiasm as the race gets tighter.

    He hasn’t made any big mistakes and Warren can’t seem to get up in the morning without embarrassing herself.

    Let’s put it this way: If Brown was running against a challenger who was *as good* a campaigner as he is, he’d be packing his bags in Massachusetts. But he’s not, he’s running against Elizabeth Warren, who has made herself a literal laughingstock.

    That’s not to say Brown can’t blow it or the race is sewn up, but it’s really his to lose.

  • Viet71

    I lurk on FDL, where they are far to the left of D-Kos and despise Obama for being a Rightist. These folks also despise Warren. They see her as a traditional Dem sellout, completely without principle.

  • kowalski

    Particularly if Brown gets a little help. Right now in a town near me the Warren campaign has blanketed the place with signage trying to lock in the voters there early, but Brown can reverse that in a single day if he wants. He has to maintain his work ethic and not be complacent at all. His tactics in the last election were excellent and he needs to say:

    “I’m a Senator now, but I still drive this pickup truck around and I still want your vote.” And he’ll get it.

  • liberty17

    I don’t always agree with him, but he is one of the best senators we have. Yes, I know he tends toward the center, but what I love about him is you get what he says he is. He says he is beholden to noone, and he isn’t. Not the Reps. and not the Dems.
    I sure hope he wins. If Elisabeth Warren keeps up the way she is going, I think he will.

  • avgjo

    You know, I had fallen into that ‘I supported him and helped with phone calls last time, but he’s sold out and I won’t help him now’ mode after he did some stuff I seriously disagreed with. Ya’ll made me realize something, though. He obviously is the best we can currently expect in Mass.; for those who lament that he isn’t a ‘true conservative’, I entreat you to look at it thru the lens of incrementalism. Today, a very moderate Republican in office, tomorrow Mass is a deep red state, IF we take proper advantage of such wins.

    Thanks to all your pieces of insight, I realized I was being inconsistent: I’m always the guy saying we need to use incrementalism like the left does.If I really believe that, I need to support Scott Brown, with an eye to the future.

    Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa…

  • kowalski

    It’s just astounding to see the world from those kinds of perspectives – it’s one I remember pretty well because I used to share it. I can definitely see myself in 1992-93 calling Warren a “sellout” and disparaging her from the Left during my “Rage Against the Machine” days.

    But Scott Brown is pretty well respected even among Democrats here and I think if he is a little creative and stays on track he’s got a better than average chance of winning. The shock of having lost the Senate seat to a Republican still stings some people but every day the memory fades more, and as long as Brown continues to campaign well and proves (to the people in MA at least) that he doesn’t have “two heads” I think he’s got a better than even chance. I still like him. I couldn’t recommend him as a politician anywhere else but MA, but I think — for a Massachusetts Senator, an almost complete unknown — he’s held up his end of the bargain.

    I certainly don’t see much of what I would call a certainty of defeat for him manifesting itself in:

    1) Open antipathy for him combined with
    2) Great enthusiasm for his opponent

    In fact most people are lukewarm to tepid on her, and pretty much nonjudgmental on him, so as long as he doesn’t get sleepy and gets a little push, and uses his brain…he can make it.

  • acat

    Perhaps Sen. Brown could cut an and for these guys?

    Mew

  • kowalski

    No, what Scott Brown needs to do is keep driving around talking to MA business owners. He’ll find a lot of sympathetic ears. Elizabeth Warren is really going after the people who have already been lost to the welfare rolls….

  • Viet71

    That’s a compliment.

  • kowalski

    He’s as wobbly as that pudding is but here in MA, that’s what it TAKES! ;)

  • kowalski

    Let’s get over this whole seriousness thing about politics anyway. In 30 years, you’ll be able to vote using your Boston Dynamics robot.

    http://youtu.be/mclbVTIYG8E

    By 2100 I predict we’re not going to worry about “taxpayers.” We won’t need them.

  • Viet71

    …I’d ask myself, who will best represent me.

    A harmless, good-looking guy?

    Or a woman, also a lawyer, who has a lying problem?

  • kowalski

    She has a real credibility problem. Among certain cohorts of Massachusetts Liberals, *ANY* credibility problem will be overlooked as long as it returns the seat to a (D) but there are, thankfully, a growing and substantial number of people who have had enough of that.

    He just has to make sure he doesn’t come across as “mean spirited.” And I think he’s doing a very good job at that so far. Also there are very few politicians in this State who are as effective and genuine on a 1-1 meetup basis as he is. It’s a real strength of his.

  • kowalski

    Yes, sure, Coakley didn’t try as hard as she needed to try and really made huge mistakes thinking the election was a foregone conclusion … but the flipside was that Scott Brown was willing to travel the miles and do the footwork personally to make the most of every one of her mistakes and at the same time make a connection with a lot of people.

    There were a lot of people who were energized by him in 2010 who will be again. I’m sure the people advising his campaign are well aware of that. He just cannot lose the work ethic and he can’t take anything for granted.

  • http://libertynews.com/ mbecker908

    Stand her next to Adolph Eichmann and she comes across as the less likable of the two.

    And yeah, I understand it’s Massachusetts.

  • kowalski

    And then some sports writers fretting about whether he was doped to do his times?

    That’s gonna like watching goldfish in a tank in 2050. Boston Dynamics is *building* the Terminator – right now – for DARPA.

  • http://qsclues.wordpress.com qsclues

    …are pretty much why I say he’s an excellent politician. He puts in the effort necessary and convinces people that he represents them regardless of whether they agree with him or not.

    The defining moment of the Coakley race was when she turned up her nose at the thought of standing outside Fenway Park and shaking hands with voters. Jon Stewart totally let her have it for that one. (Look up the “Mass Backwards” episode to see what I mean.)

  • acat

    as rather silly.

    He’s in Massachusetts, he’s not going to be anywhere near a Jim DeMint or even a Mark Kirk…. That was obvious when he was elected, it remains obvious now, and .. I am happy he’s in the Senate instead of Croakley .. and I hope he beats Fauxcohauntas.

    Mew

  • acat

    I just found it amusing.

    Mew

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    .

  • acat

    Non-augmented in even years, augmented in odd years….

    Mew

  • mikeymike143

    anyone who reads my postings knows how much i love jim demiint and richard mourdock, but there are liberal states like california and massachusetts where those men wouldnt be elected. thats just reality.

    in states like that, a man like scott brown is as good at it gets. and i say that as a conservative tea partier. plus, brown was elected last time with plenty of tea party support. and hopefully conservatives will unite behind his campiagn again.

  • mikeymike143

    i have a feeling that race will be at least a 4 to 5 point win for mack. maybe by double digits.

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    but Becker’s dead white cat would be better than Fauxcohontis. She is the Bride of Joe Stalin same politics, same evil crazy.

  • clintonformccain

    just what a miracle happened the day Scott Brown was elected. I mean, you can’t imagine a less probable place for a Republican win.

  • From ME to You

    Unfortunately former Gov. King has name recognition and the fact that he wasn’t TOO terribly unsuccessful (by conservative standards) gives him a decided edge. Mr. Summers is a competent, right of center politician. He would be a shift right from Olympia Snowe bu not much more right.

    The one bright spot in this is that Mr. King is drawing a significant percentage of ‘left of center’ votes away from ‘extreme left-winger’ Cynthia Dill who lines up almost left of Obama!

    As far as Gov. Kings being “purely independent”….ROFLMBO!

  • blueprint88

    This will be close but I too believe Mourdock will have a close race with Donnely.

    I am from SB which is Donnely district. A few points of interest

    Donnely is pro life and was one of the congressmen that was holding out on Obamacare and the flipped in the end when reassured on the abortion funding issue. Since Obama has flipped on Catholics and angered many conservative Dems who supported Donnely I don’t think voters forgot his roll in passing Obamacare and how it turned out for Catholics which Donnely is one.

    Repubs primaried Lugar and should show strong support for Mourdock to confirm their desire to do away with RINOs and replace with real conservatives

    IN will go back red helping with the coattails arguement

    We have an open governors seat after succesful and popular Mitch reaches term limits. 2 relatively low profile candidates so I am interested to see which way it goes….wish I had run myself…lol

    Donnelys vacated seat should assure a house pickup by Jackie Walorski who has run 2 times against Donnely and barely lost. Redistricting, no name dem, and her own name recognition should make her a shoe in but she still has to deal with South Bend being the city in her district and being the most liberal city in an otherwise red state.

    I hope for a republican sweep which seems possible.

  • http://qsclues.wordpress.com qsclues

    I don’t really have any idea exactly how King operates; all I know is that he’s left-of-center and has stated that he won’t choose which side to caucus with until after the election. I don’t know if he’s the type to play “front-runner” or not, or if he’s like our former Governor here (Ventura) who would more than likely have been a pure independent.

    My best guess is that he’ll side with the Democrats more often than not based on what little I know of him, but I’ll certainly defer to someone more knowledgeable.

  • acat

    And if the right-to-life voters in Indiana don’t see they’ve been played, with the clear example of Stupak, they are fools.

    Hopefully, there are some Hoosiers with the brains to point out the simple fact – a pro-life promise from a Dem has an expiration date.

    Mew

  • kowalski

    It was an amazing thing to witness.

    In addition to a lot of her other missteps, Coakley really didn’t understand the YEARS of pent-up frustration that was uncorked when Ted Kennedy passed on. There were people in this state who had wanted him out of office for a ***long*** time and suddenly it happened.

    That should tell people a thing or two about just how much “love” Kennedy inspired here in *reality*. It’s also why Coakley was taken so much by surprise – she assumed: “Everyone loved Ted Kennedy. Everyone will love me. I don’t have to work hard.”

    Wrong.

  • kowalski

    She had all the “right” endorsements in the bag at that point and the idea of getting out there and sealing the deal with real people wasn’t something she could devote her time to. It should worry people when the Attorney General in a state like Massachusetts is reluctant to mingle with the crowd at a major league baseball game.

  • acat

    So, do you think her career is over, or will she go into academia for a while, then re-emerge?

    Mew

  • kowalski

    No. I think Coakley has a clear path ahead for remaining the Attorney General of Massachusetts and I think there’s a reasonable chance she might easily run for Governor in 2014 if Deval Patrick continues to be vulnerable.

    An academic position is also very much in the cards for Coakley if she decides not to stay in public office. I think she might decide she’d be more effective shaping policy from an academic perch than she has been at running for popular office.

    As for Warren, I cannot venture to guess until the day after the Election. Presumably she has plans for what she’s going to do after she loses but I’d rather not speculate on them.

  • kowalski

    Here’s what I would *LIKE* them to do:

    I see them running a really nice antique trade business. Once a year they can have a tent at the Brimfield Flea/Antique Markets and spend the rest of the year traveling around the country gathering, collecting and selling authentic American Indian antiques and other items related to the Law and Law Enforcement.

    I’d be happy to print their flyers and banners for the show(s) and I’m sure we’d get along JUST FINE. :)

    http://www.journalofantiques.com/briminfo.htm

  • kowalski

    She’s already a Harvard professor and the University has expressed no intention or willingness to expel her, so she could very easily just go back to doing what she was doing and let someone who is a much better politician take over.

    I’ve wondered whether either of them will try for a U.S. House run…but I just don’t know enough to speculate intellgently about the chances. Conceivably Harvard could grant Warren a leave of absence that would allow her to pursue a House race. Kerry is up for re-election to the Senate in 2014 but I’d consider it to be the longest of long shots for Coakley to challenge him. Bizarro Universe type stuff.

    My best guess is academic careers/lecture circuit for both of them particularly if Warren loses. With the Wild Card being that PERHAPS Coakley will run for Governor.

    She’s just not that popular, though…Deval Patrick would have to screw up real bad…

  • kowalski

    Is to really go from one job where she executes policy to a job where she would WRITE policy (the Senate) and having failed that she can “fall back” to another very comfortable job shaping policy from her academic office. Her imprimatur on academic documents won’t be unnoticed and I’m sure she’ll have a lot of institutional support – it’ll be a great life. It’s not the U.S. Senate, but she’s proven she can’t get there from here.

  • kowalski

    Coakley might think about it. She could probably pull back together the endorsements she had and run an insurgent campaign against the Governor. Maybe.

  • kowalski

    Because I think the MA component of the thread has sucked too muck oxygen out of it, so to speak.

    Please make more comments about the other races mentioned. I’ve given you all I can about the MA stuff, and kudos to the author. Now that you’ve read what I had to say about MA, please say more about the other stuff.

  • gekster

    from two years ago Christmass.

    Your vid.

  • kowalski

    I want to present a “Video of the Day”

    I think it’s great advice for everyone, and it’s really from a much better and more dignified era of television comedy (and maybe a more dignified time, period):

    Assume Nothing, and Work Hard:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KEP1acj29-Y

  • kowalski

    Almost as good as the “Dog Story” scene. Which I consider to be one of the greatest moments in television, EVER.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wpoUhWI1Of0

    Get out there to 8:00

  • acat

    I was meaning whether Coakley’s career was scuttled by Brown; I was rather hoping we wouldn’t hear from her again. C’est la guerre.

    Mew

    p.s. While in Chicago, did you ever make it to the Berghoff?

  • kowalski

    The last time I was at the Berghoff unfortunately it was an unpleasant experience — not because of the restaurant — but (very sadly) because of the company. Long, long story. I also have a funny story about the Berghoff but it’s ribald and unrepeatable in a family atmosphere such as this blog. At least, more unrepeatable than the stories I have about the Chicago Hilton.

    I’d had several great meals with friends there prior to that sad occurence, and in the time I was working downtown I stopped in occasionally to have afterwork food and drink. I haven’t been there in years but I would love to have some of their pierogis tonight.

    I lived North side, up near Lakeview and farther North, so I eventually had to get home at night on the El, thus I’m more familiar with the restaurants in that area. Well, even the diners. I’ve eaten probably 50 lunches/dinners/breakfasts at the Melrose Restaurant (Diner) at Belmont and Brodway – all told probably more stops than any other restaurant in Chicago. Late, late at night usually like after 2:30 a.m. on the weekends, sometimes during the week with guests from out of town (my parents) and even a few times with my vegetarian former significant other.

    It’s funny because there was recently an article on CBS Chicago talking about the Best Grilled Cheese Sandwiches in Chicago and 3 of the joints are new to me since the last time I was there, but it was one of the things I ordered at the Melrose.

    http://chicago.cbslocal.com/top-lists/best-grilled-cheese-in-chicago/

    Comfort food is apparently in style in Chicago now and the Melrose made great grilled cheese sandwiches before it was “fashionable”.

    All in all, it’s very hard to go wrong in Chicago when it comes to food. It’s one of the things I really *do* miss about the place even though I never got used to their crazy version of pizza.

  • kowalski

    Is smack dab in the middle of the gayest neighborhood in the Midwest so if you’re going there to eat and have problems with the surroundings, I wouldn’t bother. The food is good, and they’re open pretty much 24/7. They also serve fresh bread with dinner/soup/salad which is always nice and one of the reasons I liked the place.

  • kowalski

    I will however vouch for some of the reviews that say the Melrose has variable service. If you read the reviews, it’s a place where if you know when to go/what to order/who to order from it’s great. If not, it’s caveat emptor.

    A lot of the people who rate the restaruant low were probably disruptive while they were there, didn’t like the service, and now complain about it. Be nice to your servers and waitstaff and you don’t have those problems. It can be a fickle place but I never had any trouble, I just usually went in, picked up a newspaper and sat down reading and treated the waitstaff well. Goes miles.

  • acat

    Service is always variable when you’re the new face.

    If I’m ever in the neighborhood, I’ll check out the Melrose. Heh, maybe I’ll surprise my gay communist associate and meet him there for lunch.

    Mew

  • emilyg_

    you

  • checkmate2012

    The pizza I miss. None here in TX that can compare. We have a Unos but still not the same.

  • kowalski

    The Melrose is fine for traditional “diner fare” but if you really want to impress him, drive a few extra miles north to the Blind Faith Caf

  • checkmate2012

    Isn’t it time for your beauty sleep????

  • checkmate2012

    I wouldn’t be trolling on websites!

    Hey- send pizza acat!

  • acat

    The repeat attempts to play at being my internet nanny are getting old.

    Mew

  • JSobieski

    Fed exed to your house. I get it once a year that way.

  • acat
  • kowalski

    Being served there and I doubt there ever will be in Evanston. In some senses, yes, people are very much the same, stereotypically speaking, even in some senses medically speaking – but once you’ve had enough brunches at the Blind Faith Caf

  • kowalski

    Sorry I backspaced over a phrase: “*could not* be more different in terms of their values,”

  • acat

    Inability to grasp that other values may also work, or may even work better.. explains even more.

    I will keep this eatery in mind.

    Mew

  • checkmate2012

    and uncalled for suggestion. It was intended as a joke but now I know I can order my own.

  • acat

    Enjoy!

    Mew

  • checkmate2012

    And, btw, I thought about my bad comment about pizza after you thought I was being a dog about your lactose intolerance condition. I never meant to be insensitve….truly and thanx for the forgiveness :)