« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Method behind the “madness” of 5% GDP…

Reforming the Tax Code, Limiting and Restructuring Federal Spending: An Outline

In a perfect world, total federal spending is constitutionally limited to 18% of GDP, and a balanced federal budget is mandated. The federal government is held accountable for the environment it fosters.

Allocation of Federal Expenditures

Defense and National Security – 5% GDP or 28% Total Federal Outlays
Entitlements – 5% GDP or 28% Total Federal Outlays
Remaining Departments – 5% GDP or 28% Total Federal Outlays
Debt Reduction – 3% GDP or 16% Total Federal Outlays**

Graduated Tax Structure

Personal – Business/Corporation – Capital Gains

Personal – Dependent Child and Mortgage Interest Deductions Only
Business/Corporation – Profit/Loss (By normal accounting practices.)
Capital Gains – Profit/Loss (By normal accounting practices.)
Payroll Tax, Inheritance Tax and Alternative Minimum Tax are eliminated.
Employer paid health and pension benefits are taxed as regular earnings.

Rate Structure

Earnings $100,000,000 and above – Are taxed at 24% – Minimum Liability $20,642,250
Earnings $10,000,000 – $99,999,999 – Are taxed at 21% – Maximum Liability $20,642,250
Earnings $1,000,000 – $9,999,999 – Are taxed at 18% – Maximum Liability $1,742,250
Earnings $500,000 – $999,999 – Are taxed at 15% – Maximum Liability $122,250
Earnings $250,000 – $499,999 – Are taxed at 12% – Maximum Liability $47,250
Earnings $100,000 – $249,999 – Are taxed at 9% – Maximum Liability $17,250
Earnings $50,000 – $99,999 – Are taxed at 6% – Maximum Liability $3,750
Earnings $25,000 – $49,999 – Are taxed at 3% – Maximum Liability $750
Earnings less than $25,000 – Exempt – No Tax Liability

Everyone “has skin in the game,” and everyone “pays their fair share.” Earnings less than $25,000 are exempted in a conscious effort to reduce dependency on government programs.

** — During a limited transition period established by statute, “Debt Reduction” funds shall be used in order to offset anticipated shortfalls in current/promised entitlements until they are replaced, and/or restructured and a viable path to solvency is established. From that point going forward, “Debt Reduction” funds shall be used to retire the public debt. Upon reaching surplus, a contingency fund is established, entitlements are enhanced, tax rates are restructured, and/or total federal outlays are reduced and restructured.

Note: The primary responsibility of the federal government is to “provide for the common defense.” Therefore, Defense and National Security deserve the lion’s share of total federal outlays. Federal Spending for Defense and National Security shall be at least 5% GDP or 28% Total Federal Outlays, except during time of war or catastrophic global event.

COMMENTS

  • Pingback: Melaine Mcmenamin

  • Pingback: Paul Cozzy

  • Pingback: aci Sarault

  • Pingback: Gail Mulligan

  • Pingback: Automotive Forum

  • Pingback: Welcome to My Blog

  • Pingback: Reverse Number Lookup

  • Pingback: distilling recipes

  • Pingback: strona z randkami

  • Pingback: odszukaj milosc swego zycia

  • Pingback: randki w warszawie

  • Pingback: randki za darmo

  • Pingback: rewelacyjny portla randkowy

  • Pingback: steel strapping

  • Pingback: darmowy serwis randkowy

  • Pingback: charles david boots

  • Pingback: Web Design

  • Pingback: Visit Here

  • Pingback: Find Out More

  • Pingback: You Can Try Here

  • Pingback: breastactives breast enhancement pills

  • Pingback: madamlux

  • Pingback: working from home uk

  • Pingback: desain interior rumah

  • Pingback: biaya bangun rumah

  • Pingback: Johnny Bobeck

  • Pingback: Wilmer Ammirati

  • Pingback: Store Fixture Installations

  • Pingback: Franklyn Solliday

  • Pingback: cv wzór

  • Pingback: wzór cv

  • Pingback: Luanne Courtney

  • Pingback: sofy rozkładane

  • Pingback: green coffee extract bean

  • Pingback: John Markin

  • Pingback: online phone numbers

  • Pingback: service PLC mitsubishi

  • Pingback: Auto Forum

  • Pingback: John Markin

  • Pingback: Teichfolie

  • Pingback: kids bikes

  • Pingback: koi

  • Pingback: Welcome to My Blog

  • Pingback: darmowa strona z randkami

  • aesthete

    to our earlier discussion about a hard GDP minimum for military spending. Let’s put aside the issue of “why” for the moment and ask “how”…

    Currently, entitlements (SS, Medicare, Medicaid) make up ~10% of GDP, and that percentage is expected to grow. (Here’s a handy chart from Heritage.org: http://www.heritage.org/budgetchartbook/defense-entitlement-spending). There are thus two questions that need to be asked:

    1) How do you cut that figure in half by next year?

    2) How do you make sure that your plan doesn’t have skyrocketing costs? Healthcare costs and the elderly as a % of the population have been going up over the years, after all.

    Discretionary spending generally averages 8-12% GDP/year. (Recently this % has increased due to TARP.) Rand Paul has a plan cutting, IIRC, 1/3 or 1/2 of this. This plan is currently not politically feasible.

    So again, how do you plan, politically, to get these changes and to get them to stick? See, the American public wasn’t what you’d call a fan of Bush, Clinton, or Obama- era foreign policy (at least, vis a vis their wars). How are you going to convince Americans that they should tear up their SS checks so that we can keep doing the same things we’ve been doing, which have proven so unpopular? Balancing the budget is easy to do mathematically; less so when political considerations come into play.

  • rbdwiggins

    How do you cut that figure in half by next year?

    It’s not possible under the current budget/entitlement structure, and I’m not making that argument.

    Let me premise the discussion: I chose 18% GDP as the spending cap because no matter what the tax structure has been in the past, the federal government has only been able to collect tax revenues of approximately 18% GDP.

    No one, certainly not me, is suggesting that we tear up Social Security checks in order to rebuild and modernize our Defense and National Security structure.

    Entitlement reform is going to happen one way or another. They’re simply unsustainable in their current form. I believe we should transition from an insurance plan to a personal retirement account. One in which the beneficiary secures accrued property rights, conveys the same status of valid public debt that bondholders enjoy and is isolated from the general account.

    Comprehensive medical liability reform and strengthening intellectual property rights will go a long way toward reducing the shyrocketing cost of health care. In order to further control spending, future health care benefits on the federal level will have to be means tested. Those that can afford private health insurance should not qualify for the federal program, but should see it as their personal responsibility, civic duty and moral obligation to provide for their own health care.

    The Debt Reduction fund is also the transition fund. Together, the Entitlement and Debt Reduction funds account for 8% GDP or 44% of total federal outlays under the proposed structure.There’s no way to completely restructure the federal bureaucracy overnight. Entire departments and agencies will necessarily have to be restructured and/or eliminated. I posit that cost/benefit analysis of every department, agency and federal program be undertaken and priorities for each department be set according to Article I, Section 8.

    I don’t believe that the federal government should be in the entitlement business, nor is it constitutionally authorized to spend other people’s money in such a manner. That said, Pandora’s box has already been opened. And, until the public can be weaned from its entitlement mentality, I’ve given Entitlements the same weight as Defense and National Security.

  • rbdwiggins

    See below. Reply To This is my friend…

    Let me just add: 5% GDP encompasses much more that just the military. I envision eliminating the Department of Homeland Security and integrating the National Security and Intelligence communities into the Defense and National Security structure.