« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Checkmate: No way out for President Narcissus Obama. The meltdown has begun

Unless things in the economy drastically change, the public still is solidly behind getting Obamacare repealed and cutting Washington spending, he will be a one-term president.  This is looking very likely that Barack Obama is in the last legs of his presidency.

The last two weeks, and in particular this past one, has shown a freefall plunge in the president’s approval ratings that have coincided with the skyrocketing rise of commodities such as food and oil/gas and rising jobless claims.  Guess what?  You guessed it.  Stagflation has set in.  As a result, in response to his first budget proposal getting crushed by Paul Ryan’s budget masterpiece which gained praise from liberal and conservative journalists, he delivered a highly partisan, dishonest, and regurgitated class warfare speech.  As Jay Cost rightly determined, this was a play to his leftist base to shore up bleeding support which was unhappy with him in regards to the war in Libya as well as any type of government spending being cut.  And now this:

One rider – Section 2262 — de-funds certain White House adviser positions – or “czars.” The president in his signing statement declares that he will not abide by it.

“The President has well-established authority to supervise and oversee the executive branch, and to obtain advice in furtherance of this supervisory authority,” he wrote. “The President also has the prerogative to obtain advice that will assist him in carrying out his constitutional responsibilities, and do so not only from executive branch officials and employees outside the White House, but also from advisers within it. Legislative efforts that significantly impede the President’s ability to exercise his supervisory and coordinating authorities or to obtain the views of the appropriate senior advisers violate the separation of powers by undermining the President’s ability to exercise his constitutional responsibilities and take care that the laws be faithfully executed.”…

In other words: we know what you wanted that provision to do, but we don’t think it’s constitutional, so we will interpret it differently than the way you meant it.

Whoa!  So in other words, we’re throwing aside respecting and abiding by each branch’s role in the Constitution regarding separation of powers?  Not only does this go back against his campaign rhetoric against presidential signing statements, but it only adds onto the petulant behavior he and his administration has exhibited recently. Contemptuously ignoring judge’s orders to lift oil drilling moratoriums and not consulting Congress via the War Powers Act in regards to Libya are a couple that come to mind.

Checkmate is the only phrase that comes to mind.  He has no voting segment he can pander to without alienating another one.  The country wants spending cut to start getting our debt down, Obamacare repealed, and the economy to improve again with more jobs and lower prices on daily necessities.  What the county wants is completely against his idealogy.  He knows this and his increasingly desperate actions reveal this.  He is the quintessential individual who has everybody else do the work and then rushes in to take credit so that he looks good and he can hold onto his precious….the Presidency.  This man is no leader.  There is only one thing he cares about and that is himself.

Is it any wonder why the Huffington Post is begging to Hillary run?

COMMENTS

  • acat

    but it pretty much requires Obama to withdraw his name from consideration. There’s no way she can beat him in the Dem primary and still have the voting blocs needed to carry the White House.

    My guess, though, is that the Dem plans are more focussed on Congress and the bureaucracies. They have to keep it close enough in the Senate to keep the House from going “too far” – they need to keep 45 seats and be able to split the GOP on social issues – i.e. if they can pick up votes from Graham (SC), the Maine Twins, Scott Brown, and Mark Kirk (IL) on social stuff, they can still hamstring the House and the White House.

    The bureaucracies are the real danger – if the next POTUS doesn’t come in ready to do battle simultaneously with the Dems and the bureaucrats, clearing house as completely as legally possible (and I’d argue to fire a few who aren’t legally protected, then fighting the case in public over whether they ought to be protected…) then .. I don’t see enough changing to make any difference.

    Mew

  • phlogiston

    That’s a perfect description of BHO. It would be funny if the stakes weren’t so high and the results so horrendous.

  • lukematthews

    I do believe you are right that Obama is rapidly painting himself into a corner politically. That ‘deficit reduction plan’ speech was a blatantly obvious pander to his leftwing kook base. It was a rehash of the American/Marxist narrative the left is so obsessed with. After the Great Compromise of 2011 on the .08% cut in the budget, the kooks were howling like it was a full moon. They are so wedded to the notion that government MUST be the purveyors of all things economic that they are immune to budget restraint arguments. When the Progressive Change Campaign Committee announced they wanted their supporters to withhold money from Obama’s campaign, Obama officials had to go to the store and buy more diapers for themselves. If they have to babysit the radical left, they are going to be in big trouble with the middle.

  • cyberrabid

    Obama in, Obama out; Hillary is Obama in a pant suit.

    With over $14 trllion in debt, no budget plan from any caucus addressing the debt, and our own Federal Reserve purchasing U.S.gov’t bonds to prop up financial markets;it’s only a matter of time before the next crash.

    America will not survive Obama.

  • OccamsRazor

    It’s rhetorical.

    Yet, let’s not underestimate anything-in any direction.