« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Ryan-Pawlenty — The Midwest ticket will win for the GOP?

The heck with a Romney-Cain ticket.

Some interesting things have been happening in the last week.  Paul Ryan apparently or possibly has come off his Shermanesque “No” position, saying he doesn’t intend to run for the presidency right now.  I have been wanting this guy to run for presidency since 2010.  Now Eric Cantor is throwing his support behind a Ryan candidacy.  You have to wonder what other prominent figures within the GOP are encouraging Paul Ryan to run now.

The key to this year’s presidency is the Midwest region consisting of the country consisting of Wisconsin, Indiana, Ohio, Michigan, and maybe even Minnesota.  Now in all fairness, you never want to say a presidential candidate has no chance in a region of the United States but with the exception possibly of Florida and Virginia, Barack Obama has no chance from the Carolinas on south and the Plains states this year.  You could throw a GOP candidate in which most people would really have to hold their noses and put in a vote for and that candidate would come out on top.

Tim Pawlenty has stated recently would sign onto Ryan’s plan though the way he stated was framed as being a choice between Barack Obama’s plan and Ryan’s plan, he would choose Ryan’s.  The money quote I found in this article was something Chuck Schumer said:

The Medicare issue contributed to last week’s upset victory of Democrat Kathy Hochul in a special election for a vacant House seat in a traditionally Republican district in western New York state. “If they continue this way, not only will we keep the Senate, but we’re likely to pick up the House,” Schumer said on “Meet the Press.”

Ahh, the unicorns and rainbows of Democratic spin.  The reason for the NY-26 loss wasn’t because of Ryan’s Medicare plan, it was because of the failure of the GOP candidate to really understand and articulate the Ryan plan to voters along with a fake Tea Party candidate that siphoned off a significant portion of votes from Jane Corwin.  This is illustrated perfectly in this article.

If Medicare, Obamacare, and the economy will be the defining issues in the 2012 presidential election, looking at Ryan’s plan and comparing it with Obamacare, the differences cannot be more stark:

Ryan’s plan actually puts the U.S. back on a track towards fiscal solvency and actually makes Medicare solvent.  To put it simply, his plan saves Medicare.  Obamacare and non-action BANKRUPT Medicare, making it insolvent.  If Medicare becomes insolvent, the rule of the day will be rationing and death panels:

“Obamacare kills Medicare as we know it,” Ryan said. “Obamacare raids $500 billion from Medicare to spend on Obamacare, puts in place a [15-member] board to ration Medicare. Our budget repeals the raiding, gets rid of the rationing board, preserves this program — makes no changes for a person 55 years of age or older, and saves Medicare.

Has anyone seen Harry Reid present a budget yet?  (Hint: He never will present one.)  One has to wonder if the Democratic party is only comfortable presenting nothing and criticizing everything the GOP presents.  One party is offering solutions, the other party is offering nothing while criticizing the opposing side at the same time.  Hmmmmmmmm…..
The GOP presidential candidate whom will take out Barack Obama in 2012 is the one whom not just takes a political position but understands and is able to articulate the economic perils our country faces, offers solutions to get our country back on the right track, and can cut right through the decades old Mediscare tactics the Democrats are currently engaged in.  There is no one better as a presidential frontman to do that than Paul Ryan.  Pairing him up with Tim Pawlenty as the VP candidate is potentially a very potent presidential ticket.  This ticket makes the most bold play for the Midwest that the GOP could conjure up.  The Weekly Standard perfectly illustrates this:

Among top-tier prospective nominees, Ryan would have the biggest geographical advantage in a race against Obama. To win the presidency, Ryan would just have to win his home state and hold GOP-leaning Florida, Ohio, and Virginia. That would be it: election over, Obama defeated, Ryan’s pen poised to sign the Obamacare-repeal legislation.

Ryan’s advantage in Wisconsin as a home-state candidate would fundamentally change the dynamic in that “must win” Democratic state. A Public Policy Polling survey in March showed Ryan having a higher net favorable rating in Wisconsin among independents, among Republicans, and among all respondents, than any other prospective GOP candidate included in the survey. Additionally, Wisconsin borders three other states in play: Michigan, Minnesota, and the important toss-up state of Iowa. The Badger State also isn’t far removed, geographically or culturally, from Ohio or western Pennsylvania.

Ryan’s competitiveness in Wisconsin would open up scenarios in which he could potentially survive even the loss of the most important state on the electoral map: Florida. Without winning Florida, a Republican who doesn’t win Wisconsin would absolutely have to win Pennsylvania. Even then, he or she would face an uphill battle, as Pennsylvania is worth 9 fewer electoral votes than the Sunshine State. Wisconsin’s 10 electoral votes, however, would more than make up that difference. Moreover, Ryan could potentially survive the loss of both Florida and Pennsylvania—which no other potential GOP nominee could realistically do—by sweeping Wisconsin, Nevada, and the three toss-up states of Colorado, Iowa, and New Hampshire. This would be a tall order, but a feasible one if the youthful and engaging Ryan were to catch fire in the West.

The only other potential top-rung nominee who would enjoy similar geographical advantages would be Minnesota’s Tim Pawlenty. But Minnesota would be harder for a Republican to win than Wisconsin, it doesn’t border Michigan, and it’s a little farther removed from Ohio and Pennsylvania.

Now if we paired Ryan with Pawlenty as the VP?  Oh boy, the Democratic party would have a very, very hard map to defend.  Takers anyone?

COMMENTS

  • http://theheartlander.wordpress.com/ heartlander

    “…from your mouth to God’s ears!”

    • http://theheartlander.wordpress.com/ heartlander

      Pawlenty’s not enough of an attack dog to be a good VP candidate. Pawlenty was a very good governor in Minnesota, and might even be a good President. But I can’t see him in the #2 spot. How about another great Midwesterner, Thad McCotter from Michigan? He has what some folks call “the sexiest brain in Congress” — he’s sharp, witty, a great explainer and totally fearless. Would be a fabulous VP pick.

      WHOEVER runs for the top spot needs to make it clear that they intend to appoint Allen West as Secretary of Defense. As great as all the guys we’re discussing here may be, none of them have very strong credentials on the anti-shariah front. They desperately need someone at their side who is willing and capable of taking on the Islamists.

      • RealQuiet

        That one certainly is interesting. I could see McCotter being that and would have no problem with it :)

        I don’t know where you think that Pawlenty is enough of an attack dog. Have you seen his ads, his appearances on TV, and the debate in South Carolina? His attacks on Obama have been relentless.

  • http://www.tooncesthecat.wordpress.com tooncesthecat

    Yes, the Midwest-RustBelt is in play this election. And yes you can get to 270 electoral votes without Florida by sweeping the Midwest except for Illinois. And yes a ticket of Midwesterners would be a winner. But a ticket led by Paul Ryan will mean an election fought essential over Mediscare rather than Obamacare. The focus needs to be kept on Obama and the deficit and we need to be on offense rather than playing defense. That’s why I favor a ticket led by Pawlenty and including another Midwestern, like John Engler. I could even accept, reluctantly a Romney-Pawlenty ticket because of the family connection to Michigan.

    • http://www.usdebateboard.com usdebateboard

      will mean an election fought essentially over Romneycare rather than Obamacare.

      I don’t know whether Ryan is ready, willing, or able, but the Medicare genie is already out of the bottle. Any ticket will have to support Medicare reform or feed the meme that Republicans can’t or won’t unify around it and exploit the infighting.

    • http://theheartlander.wordpress.com/ heartlander

      …the JOB of a leader is to PERSUADE them of what’s right? Paul Ryan explains his plan magnificently — and how his plan saves Medicare whereas the Dem plan makes it go bankrupt in 9 years, plus imposes “death panel” type rationing. Whenever and wherever Paul Ryan has been given a podium to explain his plan, he wins people over. Which is what true leaders DO.

      • RealQuiet

        Couldn’t agree more. This is why it has to scare the bejeebees out of Democrats if Ryan got the nomination. His plan is sound, thoroughly thought out, and fully understood from the standpoint of knowing all the levers that will make this plan work.

        People are scared only simply because of the unknown. Corwin didn’t know the plan and how it worked. She was a typical politician which was supporting something without understanding it. When Ryan explains what the GOP is going to do, is it any wonder why the plan scores its highest ratings among seniors?

        • http://theheartlander.wordpress.com/ heartlander

          Since I don’t have television, I’d not seen the wheelchair-over-the-cliff ads that I’d been hearing about until just the other day as an embed on some blog or other. It was so incredibly offensive, I thought I would puke. Some of the things that went through my head:
          * Only someone who has a sick sort of mean streak and contempt for older people could dream up that ad in the first place. (Hello, Leftists)
          * It’s insulting to the intelligence, and if I were a senior, I’d be pissed off at whoever made this ad.
          * Paul Ryan is one of the most big-hearted, kind, compassionate people in Washington. The whole reason he’s working so hard on reforming Medicare is precisely to prevent its going bankrupt and therefore to preserve the social safety net for the needy elderly. Anyone who would cast this wonderful man as a villain is projecting their own diabolical evil.

          • steve010

            not necessarily showing the face of the wheelchair pusher, but making sure the viewer knows that the pusher is an African-American. Then after granny goes off the cliff, the next scene would be Paul Ryan catching granny at the bottom of the cliff.

          • RealQuiet

            Send the idea to the RNC. Doubt they would run it but the howls from the Democrats would be well worth it.

  • silentcal2012

    Would ruin Paul Ryan and his Medicare message. He is fine where he is.