« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The first judicial atom bomb dropped by the Supreme Court on public sector unions: The Democratic Party is going to hate this

SEIU, NEA, and any other public sector union leadership, the Supreme Court just made funding Democratic candidate campaigns much more difficult from a competitive standpoint:

Therefore, when a public-sector union imposes a special assessment or dues increase, the union must provide a fresh Hudson notice and may not exact any funds from nonmembers without their affirmative consent.

Oof!!!  This blow is far more devastating than Scott Walker’s collective bargaining bill in Wisconsin.  This looks like a version of Right To Work Lite across all 50 states of the U.S. in any public sector union.  It’s going to take a much longer time replenishing all that money that was blown on trying to recall Scott Walker to give you a visual.  All those increase in dues assessments across the country such as what the NEA did to make up their deficit in 2011 now have to be refunded to their union members?

Faced with unfriendly legislatures and governors seeking to roll back the union’s influence, the NEA Executive Committee decided to double down – literally. It proposed raising each active member’s assessment to $20, effective in September 2011. The union’s board of directors ratified the decision, and it will go before the NEA Representative Assembly for a vote this July in Chicago. If passed, NEA’s national dues for teachers will total $178.

Did you catch that?  Representatives, not union workers, voted to increase dues on July 4th, 2011.  The union workers had no say.  Guess who has to refund $32 million to back to teachers with this Supreme Court ruling?  Feel free to send this news to every teacher you know.  And this is just one instance.  Any future increase in assessments must have a union member’s affirmative consent.  Can you imagine a union bigwig having to ask each worker individually for more money?  The dissension this is going to cause between union leadership and the workers they represent has the potential to be truly popcorn worthy.

I don’t know if anyone is really realizing the magnitude of this decision today.  It is absolutely huge.  Democratic Party politicians have to be cursing out the Supreme Court behind closed doors today across the country since they just took out a big leg of the fundraising apparatus.  I have to wonder what else is coming down the road with the immigration case relating to Arizona and Obamacare.

In closing, a shout out goes to davenj1 for his excellent work when this news broke.  I felt it would be important to give some sort of visual to just how significant this ruling today was.

COMMENTS

  • Viet71

    I went and read Knox v. SEIU after first reading your diary.

    In one respect, the case breaks no new ground. It affirms the rule that a nonmember payer of dues to a public employees union cannot be forced to pay for the union’s political advocacy. First Amendment right.

    Where the case does break new ground is in determining whether such a nonmember must only be given the opportunity to OPT OUT of paying for such advocacy or whether the nonmember must OPT IN to paying.

    The Court, 7-2, holds the nonmember must OPT IN. A great First Amendment victory. Sotomeyer and Ginsburg concurred with majority.

    • RealQuiet

      Her questioning during Obamacare was quite reasonable. She’s very direct and to the point. I am seeing some comments from leftists griping about Obama’s pick of her already. Don’t know if she’ll turn into a reverse David Souter or John Paul Stephens but her affirmative vote in this case was quite an eye opener. Ginsburg affirming was a bolt out of the blue. Didn’t expect that.

      • Dave_A

        They ruled for the same side, but for very different reasons, and then included in the concurrence that they agreed with the dissenters that the majority-opinion was wrong…

        Which is not good, because that makes this a very weak precedent…

        However, as precedent goes, this is alot bigger than it seems…

        The Majority’s ruling is logically one step away from ending compulsory payments by non-members all-together – essentially making the US right-to-work by Supreme Court ruling…

  • Pingback: Homepage

  • Pingback: play now

  • Pingback: installment loans online with low payments

  • Pingback: ??? ???

  • Pingback: Us Web Hosting

  • Pingback: Aerosol adhesive

  • Pingback: ??? ???

  • Pingback: let me watch this

  • Pingback: Party Packages Corona CA