« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

VP summation: If Romney wants to win, the pick is Marco Rubio

I have been jostling this around for at least a while now.  There are some really good picks Romney has to choose from.  With the race there for Romney to take, I’m pretty certain the Romney inner circle is leaving no stone unturned to make the best choice possible.  Here is whom I believe is on the short list or should be:

  1. Rob Portman — This is the choice among the GOP establishment and with good reason.  He has a large fundraising and GOTV ground game in arguably one of the most crucial swing states aside from Florida and Virginia.  He is a phenomenal debater, actually holding practice sessions for George W. Bush in his debate prep by playing John Kerry.  Lee Fisher was mauled in the debate forum in the recent Ohio Senate contest.  Portman is very, very seasoned.  He has held a variety of federal positions and knows Washington very well.  He would be a safe pick.  It wouldn’t really fire up the base but the argument could be that the base is already fired up just to get Obama out of office.
  2. Bobby Jindal — A two-term governor in Louisiana.  Highly popular in conservative circles, a Rhoades scholar, very well spoken and very knowledgeable on health care issues which will be a prominent issue aside from the economy this campaign.  He has obviously the executive experience to be picked as VP.  This would be a pick that would excite the GOP base even further.  His outspoken attacks on Obama regarding oil exploration would serve him well if Robert Costa’s source who commented that Condi Rice wasn’t being considered, stated that Romney is looking for an attack dog.
  3. Paul Ryan — 7 term congressman out of Wisconsin and one of the brightest stars who came to prominence in the health care conference.  The way he dismantled and pointed out the shady accounting of the health care law, causing Obama to stare daggers at him, made him an instant favorite among conservatives to run for president.  I am a huge Ryan fan.  I think he would bring a lot to the table for Romney and could be the difference in turning Wisconsin red in November in the vote for President.  To imagine him in a debate with Joe Biden makes me laugh.  However, seeing Joe Biden, or imagining him debating any of these potential VP picks could cause anyone to laugh.
  4. John Thune — He has not been talked about a lot but I wouldn’t be surprised to see him on the short list.  He could help put Iowa in the red column.  The South Dakota senator who took out Senate Democratic leader Tom Daschle, he is very well liked on both sides of the aisle.  Like Portman, he wouldn’t take away the spotlight from Romney.
  5. Marco Rubio — A former Speaker of the House in Florida, his meteoric rise is well noted.  Very well spoken, Hispanic, and for the most part solidly conservative (the only issue where he could be slightly in question is immigration), he would ensure that Florida would be a lock for Romney in November.  He is highly popular in conservative circles and would bring a lot to the table for Romney as well.  Since his takedown of John Kerry in the Senate and very good in his interview handling, he wouldn’t have a problem on the national stage.
  6. Tim Pawlenty — Two term governor of deep blue Minnesota, very well polished, very smooth in a good way.  Some past things I do have issue with which he has since corrected.  He has worked hard on the Romney campaign trail.  In the key Midwest states, he could be of help to Romney there.

I think Chris Christie and Kelly Ayotte are either on the outside looking in or are no longer in the VP picture.  Both would be fine picks.

The conclusion I have come to is that Paul Ryan is best where he is currently at.  There is no one I would rather have more dictating the fiscal direction of legislative policy that is originated in the House.  Portman, Pawlenty, and Thune would all be safe picks but don’t strike me as getting the conservative base into such an inferno of volunteers to knock on the doors to get out the vote.  The volunteer ground game is going to be huge this election.  Romney will need that so he can spend his campaign chest for the most part on the airwaves.  That leaves Bobby Jindal and Marco Rubio.   These two I believe could create this inferno volunteer ground game for Romney.

Here is the tie-breaker in my mind why Marco Rubio is the best pick for VP:

Obama currently enjoys a 2-1 advantage in polling among Hispanics.  Rubio would be impossible to attack because if the Obama campaign tries to attack, it would likely turn a number, however small or large, of Hispanics against Obama.

Picking Marco Rubio would hamstring the Obama campaign and the mainstream media to “Palinize” Rubio.  In other words, making the election about Romney’s pick for Vice President.  In an unusual roundabout way, it wouldn’t take away the spotlight on Romney or distract away from his message to the voters.  By taking away any attacks of this nature because doing so would imperil a must-have voting segment that Obama is going to need every bit of to just stay in the game this November, Marco Rubio is the best choice for VP.  I don’t think it is any coincidence the “concern about Rubio’s record or eligibility” or other concern bluffs we have heard from David Axelrod and other prominent media outlets in the recent past.  A solid, popular, well spoken conservative running candidate from a key swing state who cannot be attacked without the opponent putting himself in danger?  Works for me.  To make the Obama campaign walk on egg shells and be hedged in a permanent defensive posture would be perfect for Romney.  Rubio is the VP pick that the Obama campaign and media fear most, and Mitt Romney would be well served if he picks Marco Rubio to be his running mate.

COMMENTS

  • http://libertynews.com/ mbecker908

    That would be the Dead White Cat. I’m digging him up.

    • RealQuiet

      That was nice Becker. Good to see you :)

      • http://libertynews.com/ mbecker908

        And, FWIW, I’m serious.

        Just think of the VP debate. Biden v. DWC. DWC wins going away.

        • tnfriendofcoal101368

          Is more qualified than Obama to be President.

    • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

      I’d violate my HOA restrictions for that one.

      Romney DWC 2012!

  • Viet71

    Maybe female. Maybe from humble beginnings. A person with House or Senate or other D.C. experience. Someone with sense of humor. Someone not from the Midwest or Northeast.

    Rubio might be a great pick from the standpoint of knowledgeable conservatives; but he’d lack widespread name recognition IMO.

    I haven’t a clue.

    It’s clear to me, however, Romney’s got to move the focus from 1999 to the past 3.5 years.

  • westcoastpatriette

    is that he is a happy warrior and he boldly refuses to implement any aspect of OCare. I prefer him to Rubio as he has more executive experience and his personality is one that would not threaten Romney.

    From what I understand about Hispanics, Rubio is Cuban and may not be looked upon with favor by the majority of Mexicans. Also, I really don’t like catering to different races. I think conservatives do best when they stay focused on issues, not race.

    • RealQuiet

      Jindal would be a great pick as well. The thing is, there never has been a Hispanic candidate for VP or POTUS. Rubio articulates the issues very well too. Both have nothing but upside, but Rubio has that “tread on the tips of your toes” intangible that would make it very perilous for the Obama campaign to try to take out Rubio.

      • westcoastpatriette

        I’m sure Rubio could hold his own no matter how they tried to take him out.

    • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

      As for:

      “He has obviously the executive experience to be picked as VP. This would be a pick that would excite the GOP base even further.”

      All true.
      The ‘wow the base’ is is a factor that has not been considered or talked about enough by the inside the beltway types (the same ones who missed out how much Palin helped mccain from even worse disaster). Romney’s campaign has been too passive, too vague, and too kid-glove right now to excite the base … our excitement is wholly about jumping out of our skin over the horrific thought of 4 more years of BHO.

      Picking a non-conservative would put the Romney campaign as serious risk of giving obama a ‘base excitement’ edge. After all, everything obama has done this year has been about panders to his interest groups.
      We dont defeat that with milquetoast, but a choice.

      we shouldn’t underestimate the bonus that being a governor gives. He will have room to go into a fullbore critique from firsthand experience on the Obama admin’s attacks on states, busting state budgets with obamacare, and Obama’s screwups in teh gulf wrt oil drilling.
      … I would add that Jindal’s technocratic side would fit well with Romney’s governing style. I think that unlike some of the other picks, Romney’s pick of Jindal is great not just for the politics of it but for future governing.

      Jindal is ready to be President but would also be a great VP point man for Romney on a number of policies fronts.

      I’d be happy with any of Rubio/Jindal/Ryan(*), as all 3 would wipe the floor vs Biden, but I think Jindal would be one that clicks the best with a Romney campaign, and his exec experience makes him a ‘ready to lead’ VP.

      (*) And contrawise disappointed if it ends up Portman.

  • superpatriot

    …who is dead white cat?????????

    • RealQuiet

      n/t

  • superpatriot

    …would all be great VP picks. All are conservative and balance Romney well.

    I personally think Ryan would be an excellent choice, given his knowledge of Obama’s health care law and it’s unpopularity.

    • zachv

      I am looking forward to the announcement, which is hopefully upcoming.

  • checkmate2012

    which will be an issue and he doesn’t have the experience. I like him a lot and expect him to do good things and maybe be the prez one day. He’s not VP material yet.

    Many hispanics don’t like Cubans. Cubans are a small percentage of hispanics in the U.S. and get a free pass if they can get here.

    Also, per a Rasmussen poll taken on 6/19-6/20, he only has a 42% approval rating which is up a bit from April:

    “Forty-two percent (42%) of Likely U.S. Voters now share a favorable view of the first-term Republican senator, while 31% view him unfavorably. Twenty-eight percent (28%) are undecided. This compares to favorables of 35% and unfavorables of 28% in early April, with 37% undecided.

    The new findings include 22% with a Very Favorable opinion of Rubio and 11% with a Very Unfavorable one.”

    Quoted from http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/june_2012/rubio_s_favorables_are_rising_among_independents

    • Dave_A

      After all, in 3 months he’s gained 7% favorable, only picked up 3% unfavorable, and those pretty much came from the ‘undecided’ category.;..

      A good campaign will move most of the 28% still undecided to ‘favorable’…

      I’m not pro-Rubio because he’s Cuban (Cubans are a pretty solid GOP bloc, due to the whole “Communism’ issue), I like him because (A) he’s young enough to be President if he gets 8yrs of VP under his belt, and (B) he’s from Florida…

      If Rubio can deliver FL for Romney, then that’s a big, big deal…

      • checkmate2012

        that he will do that. We’ll see and again, I like him a lot but am not convinced he’ll help with the hispanic vote. Some but not a lot.

  • rabun1016

    I would take Paul Ryan or as a longer shot, Rand Paul. Either Paul would do. Unfortunately for Jindal, I don’t think an Alfred E. Newman lookalike will be a viable VP candidate. The world is too cosmetic unfortunately. Marco Rubio will be vilified by completely unfounded sexual rumors. That’s what Axelrod specializes in. Every good looking young man has scorned a woman or two in the dating process and that will become the campaign I am afraid if Rubio is nominated. Paul or Paul works for me.

    • Dave_A

      Some bargains are not worth making… Selling your soul to the Devil is one, the above would be another.

      • acat

        would be perfect if the apple is too close to the tree … and if the apple is far enough away as well.

        Mew

        • Dave_A

          Now, I’ll leave everyone’s opinions of Teddy Roosevelt out of this, but the fact is that back then, VP was an office where political careers went to die…

          That’s why Roosevelt was put there…

          Then, someone shot McKinley….

          Similarly, who EVER would have thought of putting Gore up as a Presidential candidate… If he hadn’t been BJ’s VP?

          I’d rather see Paul buried on some no-name, no-point Senate committee, than given the VP slot…

          • acat

            And also a misread of the trajectory Al Gore was on – he would, had he not decided to take the shortcut, have had to win the Tennessee governorship, something he was well positioned to do – prior to making a serious run at the White House. Remember, before Gore joined Team Clinton, he’d cultivated a rather good faux-Blue-Dog image….

            As for TR, is it San Juan Hill that you object to? His pro-conservation agenda? His opposition to corruption? Teddy is of a different era, Dave_A, and some of the labels have changed their meanings since. Go give this a read

            Finally, your assertion that “you’d rather” Rand be a do-nothing senator is nice and all, but .. how do you plan to get Rand to go along? He could be just as dangerous – if the apple isn’t far enough from the tree – as a Senator as he would be as the veep…

            Mew

          • Dave_A

            I didn’t want to side-track the post into a debate on the merits or non-merits of TR… But rather to point out the historical facts without getting into that.

            I actually think he was more ‘good’ President than bad – and see him as the great-grandfather of international American Exceptionalisim…

            But I know some Conservatives see him as the ‘beginning of the end’ or an ideological predecessor to FDR…. Didn’t want to go there, even though I disagree…

          • acat

            Only those, IMO, who look at Teddy’s time through today’s lenses poorly. FDR took things in a very different direction.

            Getting back to the main point, there’s three more modern examples:

            1) Dan Quayle. Became veep to calm conservatives under Bush 1.0, lacked experience and finesse needed, finished in ignominy.

            2) Dick Cheney. Became veep to calm conservatives under Bush 2.0, master of red meat throwing, had plenty of experience but biology prevented promotion.

            3) Al Gore. Noted (at the time) blue dog, became veep as a beard for Clinton among social conservatives, drifted ideologically quite far from both his alleged blue dog roots and from Clinton’s relatively business-neutral positions.

            None became President, only one mounted a serious campaign.

            Any of these would be one possible (more likely than Teddy) model for Rand Paul.

            Mew

  • superpatriot

    …I just was surfing the web and heard Romney has narrowed his VP choices to Pawlenty, Portman, and Jindal.

    Is Rubio out of the picture?????

    I really think the GOP has to energize the nation with it’s VP pick, and I don’t see Portman or Pawlenty adding too much to voter enthusiasm.

    Any thoughts????????????

  • Pingback: click here