Why can’t someone take HR 2454 to the Supreme Court?


Since the news yesterday that the House members voted on a bill that did not exist and could not be read in its entirety, why can’t someone or some group that is affected by the law bring suit in federal court to have the law struck down?


RSS feed | Trackback URI

4 Comments Leave a comment

RedDog, simple answer to your question...

Mr_Ed Sunday, June 28th at 8:16AM EDT (link)

…you can’t take it to the Supreme Court until it’s actually law. That won’t happen if/until the Senate passes its on bill, a joint conference committee approves a compromise and both House and Senate approve the compromise. Then Obama gets to sign it. After all that, hopefully someone will challenge the law’s constitutionality.

Mr. Ed
Straight from the Horse’s Mouth

So that means the 8 Quislings

djemi Sunday, June 28th at 8:31AM EDT (link)

..Get another chance to vote the right way then, the right way being NO. They can then claim a Kerry (flip flop) right.

“If I can’t shoot rabbits,then I can’t shoot fascist”
“With age, comes Wisdom, but only if you are paying Attention, son” my ‘Old Man’
RS Help files (h/t JLenardDetroit) Grassroots in Michigan
Moes Strategy

 

The non-bill that was voted on won't become the law - the compromise will

bk Sunday, June 28th at 8:45AM EDT (link)

So it’s not going to matter how we got to that point, not that the Supreme Court would want anything to do with internal House matters anyway.

And as for people flipping votes, they’ll just buy off someone else who voted no the first time. Anything that makes it that far will be slightly watered down anyway, so for every person who got scared off after voting for the original, there’s someone else who can get “convinced” to vote for the “improved” version that came out of the compromise.

 
 

However - standing not a problem

red4ever Sunday, June 28th at 10:00AM EDT (link)

Usually, getting standing to challenge a law is difficult. There is no general taxpayer standing to challenge a law. In this case though, the oil companies and the coal miners would be out of business. So they suffer actual injury from this law. Yes, there is no “right” to a particular occupation, but there must be a way to show how they are actually harmed by whatever law does pass.

The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who, in times of great moral crisis, maintain their neutrality.
Dante

 

Leave a Comment

 

Be respectful, or be banned. No Profanity.