« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Obama Is Running on Excuses

From the diaries.

Harry S. Truman famously said of the presidency, “The buck stops here.” President Obama might as well make his slogan: “Pass the Buck.”

His record of failures and broken promises has left him with no record to run on. But instead of holding himself accountable, the president blames everybody but himself.

Of course, as with many things, he promised it would be different.

As a newly inaugurated president in February 2009, he told a town hall meeting in Fort Myers, Florida, “I’m not going to make excuses. If stuff hasn’t worked and people don’t feel like I’ve led the country in the right direction, then you’ll have a new president.”

Now, he’s going back on his word, presumably because he sees that “stuff hasn’t worked” and that Americans do not feel we are heading in the “right direction.”

Indeed, more than three years into the Obama presidency we’re suffering from chronically high unemployment. Gas prices, groceries prices, and healthcare prices have skyrocketed. Far too many families are struggling just to make ends meet. Thanks to massive government regulations, out-of-control spending, ObamaCare, and higher taxes, the economy is weak and growth is sluggish. His $831 billion stimulus failed to create millions of jobs, but succeeded in creating government waste.

It is clear that President Obama’s policies have made things worse, not better. But who does the president blame? An earthquake, the Arab Spring, ATMs, airport kiosks, and “bad luck,” among other things.

Last June, in response to questions on the difficult economy, President Obama made this excuse: “There are some structural issues with our economy, where a lot of businesses have learned to become much more efficient, with a lot fewer workers. You see it when you go to the bank and use an ATM…or go to the airport, and you’re using a kiosk….”

In August, he pointed to “the Japanese earthquake and the tsunami’s effect on supply chains.”

President Obama blames his predecessor, ignoring the fact that he’s been in office for well over three years.

He blames Congress, apparently forgetting Democrats controlled Congress for two years and still control the Senate.

When confronted last month on the failure of Solyndra, President Obama replied, “But understand: this was not our program per se.” Of course, it was the Obama administration who gave the now-bankrupt company over half a billion dollars in taxpayer loans.

Before the company went under, President Obama was proud to take credit for Solyndra. Less than two years ago, at Solyndra headquarters, he declared, “The true engine of economic growth will always be companies like Solyndra.”

If that’s what the president believes, it’s no wonder the economy is stalled.

Only a president with a failed record would resort to such ridiculous excuses in trying to save his job. A successful incumbent could run on his record, but President Obama has to run on excuses.

In 2009, he promised that if he didn’t fix the economy in “three years,” then his presidency would be a “one-term proposition.” After 38 months of unemployment above 8 percent and with 12.7 million Americans out of work, he’s now changed his tune.

Last December, with that three year mark approaching, he attempted to backtrack: “We understood that [the economy] was bad, but we didn’t know how bad it was.”

That’s not what he said at the time.

Here’s what candidate Obama had to say in September 2008: “We are going through the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression.”

In November 2008, President-Elect Obama declared, “We are facing an economic crisis of historic proportions.”

It certainly sounds like Obama knew “how bad it was.” He just didn’t know how to fix it.

Unfortunately for Americans, these excuses won’t pay the mortgage. They won’t create jobs. They won’t balance the budget.

And that’s why they won’t win Obama a second term.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • rabun1016

    While we have had two who are worse, I am very sorry you ran since it seems you lack the skills, style, and issue maturity that may come with age to effectively communicate the republican position on major points to the main media. Not your fault. I blame the dim talent level we must have at the RNC apparently. But, could you please kick it in to gear a little? The only way the conservative message will be sold is by buying time and bombarding ads. Look to Ron Pauls guy if you want some clever ads. His stuff did in Gingrich, not Romney’s stuff. Please do something worthwhile. America is dying.

  • gekster

    Would you be so kind as to send this to Mr. Romney?

  • ohiohistorian

    His medical care platform, from his site, is to:
    Mitt

  • momac

    I think it’s ‘Pass the Bo’

    That is all

  • ashland_avenue

    To those who whine about the prospect of being led by a former governor, born with sliver spoon, here are three letters: FDR.

    To those who complain about prospective First Lady who might never worked day in her life: Eleanor Roosevelt.

    To those who fear a first lady as attractive as Jane Romney: Jacqueline Kennedy.

    To those who think the economy is a mess, pls ask which they would prefer to lead us out of the mess: a community organizer or an MBA/lawyer with boatloads of experience turning around bad operations?

    To those who think an Ivy League grad is worth more than otherwise, pls ask them to suggest Barack Obama disclose his school transcripts for comparison with our guy’s.

    To those who believe the Barack Obama pledges that deficits will come down, pls give each and every one the back of an envelope and a no. 10 pencil.

  • http://www.timothy-bladel.com/ center77

    I cannot compare Anne’s attractiveness to Mr. Kennedy. There just no comparison, Jacky tops first ladies on when it comes to attractiveness. I’m not even sure where to place Anne.

  • Seedyrom

    Jimmy Carter did okay as a peanut farmer and made good as governor. Throw in the racist Woodrow Wilson and so on.

  • davenj1

    1. Why did he invest so much political capital in Obamacare for dubious results when jobs were first and foremost on the concerns of the public? He wasted a good year on this piece of junk legislation.

    2. What did he mean by his overheard comment with the Russians? What leeway does he assume to possess? What allies is he thinking of selling down the river?

    3. Why did Democrats like Barney Frank and Chris Dodd and Chuck Schumer oppose called for reforms of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac during the Bush Administration, reforms even the NYT said were necessary? Come to think of it, what are Obama’s proposed reforms here?

    4. Why does Obama believe that federal bureaucrats in Washington are better at establishing educational standards rather than local authorities closer to the problem and with better, low or no-cost solutions?

    5. Why is the unemployment rate so high among the black community and only getting worse under Obama?

    6. What exactly are his plans for the solvency of Social Security?

    7. Why is he and Democrats insistent upon 20th Century programs that do not address 21st century reality?

    8. Why is Obama insistent on perpetuating a culture of dependency upon the federal government through social welfare “safety nets?”

    9. Besides the Buffett rule and tinkering at the edges, does Obama have any plan for real, fundamental tax tax reform, or do we just add to and pick apart the existing tax code?

    10. Is Obama willing to confront rogue states like Iran and North Korea, or is he going to send them friendly letters in the hopes maniacal despots will “see the light?”

    11. Yes or no: Does he support amnesty for illegal immigrants without any reservations or provisos?

    12. Why does his Administration respect the integrity of a credit card transaction greater than the integrity of a vote cast in an election, and oppose commonsense voter ID laws?

    13. Why the opposition to the Keystone XL pipeline when it has passed two EPA studies thus far? Has “the environment” changed in six years?

    14. Obama railed against “unelected judges” striking down federal laws, yet why does he have no qualms against unelected federal bureaucrats writing regulations that stifle economic growth? Does he plan to reign in his EPA, NLRB, etc.?

    15. Does Obama support the strengthening of fundamental mortgage and loan underwriting practices even if it may statistically preclude a greater percentage of minorities getting loans or mortgages since they may lack or have negative credit histories?

    16. Does Obama still believe in the fallacy of global warming and does he really believe that American economic decline is the answer to lowering the average global temperature by a miniscule amount?

    17. Does Obama believe that agricultural subsidies are effective, or should they be abolished considering that most of them go to large agricultural concerns and to specific crops?

    18. We now know Obama disdains this Supreme Court (maybe more than Nixon disdained the Warren Court). Regardless, is he willing to uphold and respect their decisions on issues like gun control laws, free speech, the religious clauses of the First Amendment, and the possibility of near future decisions on abortion?

    19. Under a second term of Obama, what exactly would be the role of states since it appears he believes the Federal government is the be all/end all for resolution of every problem in this country?

    20. Why must Obama interject himself into every controversy of a local nature and does he not know how to stay out of the fray and deflect the question without a teleprompter? Specifically, I am thinking of the Trayvon Martin case and the “beer summit.”

    I can come up with more, but they could fill a book….

  • ashland_avenue

    I saw Ann closeup and she radiates grace and warmth. She is not an angry street fighter who asks SWhen is it my turn?

    My point here was just that there are so many ways in which our candidate is more competent and better credentialled. We hould make them bullet points.

    And to those Donks who complain Mitt is too successful, we should be comfortable in responding FDR, JFK

  • Seedyrom

    as well the RNC and political pac’s should to consider focusing on these ideas to weaken Obama while educating the public.

    Obama obstructed Banking Reform in 2005 and has never been asked why he voted against reform. Dems Obstructed banking reform in 2002 both of which added to the economic decline Obama and dems claim they had no part of. Yes Obama is running from his record so follow him with the haunted facts. Dem ruined the housing market with arcane schemes to loan too much money to the public. The gop has accepted responsibility, time for Obama and dems to face the facts and apologize. If he runs, no problem, Obama looks guilty either way and it wins over voters who may not know where fault lies.

    1- Obama needs to be held accountable for the total of cash printed plus money borrowed. Its around $10 trillion which when added to IRS receipts totals over $16 trillion in 4 years. Most don’t follow politics closely but they can do the math considering the inflation created as well as the fact Obama has fed his rich liberal buddies a lot of money at the tax payers expense.

    2- Compare the 2009 cost of milk, gas, meat, canned goods, shoes, and so on because many costs have near doubled or more. Ask the public are you any better of living with the cost of Trickle Down Obamanomics.

    3- Obama Tax Cuts, Obama owns the Bush tax cuts. Fact, Obama agreed to extend the BTC in December 2010 so he owns them now so pin his name to the tax cuts and dare him to let them expire and drive up middle class living costs. We could settle for Obama/Bush Tax Cuts so they can’t complain since its bipartisan in nature and the most recent extension gives credit to Obama. Plus President Clinton had to hold Obama’s hand in teaching the public why the tax cuts were necessary to prevent a potential economic drop. Without Clinton the economy could be worse. More reason to vote Obama out, he doesn’t comprehend economics plus he would blame Clinton and Bush if the economy declined.

    4- Obama is using Trickle Down Economics whether he admits it or not. As did Clinton. Nail him because he now claims the bottom earners create jobs and wealth. Sort of true but those jobs come from people with investment capital not from shopping at Target or Macy’s.

  • rabun1016

    I approve of this message.

  • mkozikowski

    As long as Mr. Romney does not push each failed promise Over and Over and Over.

    If Mr. Romney takes the tact that he will win just because he is not Mr. Obama, then we get a second Obama term.

    If Mr. Romney runs the rest of his campain in the same non-confrontational manor as Mr. McCain, then we are doomed.

    He has to start now, push, push, push. Press each failure until the main street media has no choice but to react.

  • rightlane1111

    Higher inflation, higher fuel prices, higher food bills…,.higher educational costs.

    Oh…you might say…yeah…but look what he has done for the housing market…meaning lower interest rates. OK…think about this…because this is my wheelhouse. Not only are these people paying un-Godly interest rates…somewhere around 2%…THEY DON’T REQUIRE DOWNPAYMENTS. I just heard…150% LTV (loan to value) on houses…and the market is still forecast to DIVE. Why…there aren’t any jobs. 50% over the loan value…for what…to buy a car? Where is the requirement for personal responsibility?
    Many of these recent foreclosures are those that have been refinanced…and they failed because we are still doing the “Barney Frank Dance”.

    I’m not a Ron Paul voter…but he does have a point with “bubbles”. We have two coming…another housing bubble…based on the above…and the Sallie Mae (educational fund) wherein students will not be able to pay back loans.

    Yes…Chariman Priebus…he passed the buck to us by way of debt. …and has been mentioned above…AND SO HAVE THE REPUBLICANS in the House by signing onto MORE AND MORE SPENDING.

    What Do The American People have to do…BURN THEMSELVES alive in mass protest of the constant SPENDING going on in Washington? I am asking a question…how do we stop the government from spending,spending, spending.

    We gave you a plurality in the House…we tried hard for the Senate…and what has happened? Obama has spent through REGULATION…and the Houses have SPENT through bills.

  • gwalt

    When Diane Sawyer asked Romeny if he was “too rich” to feel what average Aemricans do,, Romeny should have responded:

    Did you ask John Kerry that question in 2004? Because last I checked he is worth twenty times what I am. Every time someone dips a fry into a pile of ketchup he makes a buck. Ketchup Diane, ketchup.

  • darrius

    Obama inherited monthly job losses and has turned them into monthly job gains, but you want us to vote against him anyway?

    When Obama was sworn in, the country was losing jobs each month and had been losing them each month for a year before he was sworn in, and almost each month the job losses had been higher than the previous month. After Obama had been in office for a year the jobs losses stopped. Now the economy is adding jobs each month, and the unemployment rate is falling.

    But we are supposed to think he did a bad job with the economy???

    That doesn’t make sense.

    Was the economy supposed to go from steadily losing an increasing number of jobs monthly to suddenly adding jobs all at once?

    That’s not reasonable or fair.

    It takes time to stop recessions, and it takes time to grow economies. However, it takes less time to break things than it takes to build them. You want to blame Obama for the crash but not give him credit for the gains. I understand that this is RedState but the argument still doesn’t hold up under scrutiny.

    And please spare the name-calling and stick to the facts. Obviously, I like Obama and obviously most people here don’t, and clearly I don’t mind a debate. But I honestly don’t think this economic case against Obama holds up.

    I wouldn’t mind an honest discussion with someone who has an honest disagreement based on the issues.

  • gekster

    He’s had three years now. Remember when in the summer 0f 010 he declaired the recession was over.

    http://www.michaelgroff.com/obama-declares-recession-over-the-10-unemployed-beg-to-differ/

    excerpt:
    President Obama declares the recession is over! Might not want to tell that to the ten percent that are unemployed and many more underemployed

  • streiff

    but you are woefully misguided.

    This is not a site for debating Obama’s manifest failures. This is a site dedicated to sending him back to whatever handout job Bill Ayers can find for him.

  • Bill S

    Now that streiff has whacked you, you can go back to Kos and whine about how those mean ol’ Redstate people wouldn’t debate with you. And you know why? Because this ain’t Toastmasters. We don’t debate leftists. Your points are irrelevant. We don’t care what you think and we don’t give you a platform to argue your point.

    So to any of your Leftist Democrite buddies who read this: stay away. You don’t get to use Redstate as a platform to make your points.

  • rightlane1111

    Your argument is about jobs. I don’t agree with the way he counts them…but so what is new with that.

    Question: Why does the man lie? Does that have something to do with his character? I am talking about Obama. He does not misspeak…he outright lies.

    Question: Why does he believe in the Communistic Approach to government? This has nothing to do with jobs…it has to do with ideology.

    Question: Now that he has, under his administration amassed $5 TRILLION in debt, how are we going to pay for that with the number of jobs he has created (according to you…not me)?

    Question: Why does he not adhere to the U.S. Constitution and do you believe in it or not.

    The last question when answered should enable you to decide about your “honest discussion” statement.

  • darrius

    We have been adding jobs for about 2 years.

    So am I to understand your argument to be that the numbers are wrong?

    And can we spare the name calling.

  • checkmate2012

    from passing the buck any longer with one simple question:

    What does he take responsibility for during his term, that has helped grow this economy and generate jobs? It’s not enough for him to say he stabalized the financial markest, since Pres. Bush was responsible for implementing TARP.

    Mr. Obama CAN take credit for so many bad bills, regulations, executive orders, policies, no budget, weakened worldview of America, etc., but none that have made us better off and that’s what we need to keep voicing constantly.

    Per Obama on the campaign trail this week, “In this country, prosperity doesn’t trickle down,” “Prosperity grows from the bottom up and it grows from a strong middle class out.” Please ask him to explain how lower income folks create jobs for the rest of the middle class.

    Lastly, please call him out on his agenda that we, meaning his big government, need to invest in clean energy companies like the many failed Solydra’s, infrastructure projects that are shovel ready to create jobs like the Keystone pipeline, more education since the per child dollar allotment has skyrocketed yet test scores and dropouts are at an all time high and lastly a $40/week payroll taxcut that isn’t enough to fill a gas tank but accelerates the demise of Social Security as we know it. What is the return on these investments for the American people?

    So far, I see little hope or change for the direction he has taken this great country. Let’s give him credit where credit is due and insist he at least takes responsibity for all of his accomplishments in the last 3 1/2 years.

  • streiff

    ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/suppl/empsit.ceseeb1.txt

    and while you’re looking at that, find another site to post at.

  • davenj1

    The number of jobs added cannot account for the number of jobs lost by employees and the number of people entering the workforce. That is, the anemic rate of the job growth rate (as evidenced by their own numbers this month) is the problem. True, they are now on the positive side- albeit weakly so- but at what cost? Did the stimulus really add permanent jobs or was it nothing but triage? If he sold it as triage, then great. But, he didn’t! Remember the “summer of recovery?” That tag line faded before summer was even over.
    On way too many issues, Obama has failed and his response has been, “Its not my fault,” “I can’t do anything about it,” ad nauseum. I would have more respect for the man if he would simply admit a mistake and move on. I might even give him the benefit of the doubt, if not my vote, but he hasn’t and I doubt he will.
    Remember this: to the victor belongs the spoils, but more importantly, to the victor belongs responsibility. Obama shirks responsibility and resorts to blaming, finger pointing and class warfare tactics. Which proves another political dictum: never elect a community organizer.

  • funwithknives

    The ‘we’ that uses Gov/t U/E figures and totally blows off the thousands of unfortunates who’ve stopped looking, due to a 5 to 1 people to job ratio? ?

    The ‘we’ that blathers on endlessly about jobs added but ignores new U/E filings,to balance out their specious drivel?

    The ‘we’ that will flack for a self-indulgent narcissist who has no knowledge of Economics and even ignores truth in taxation when it is put right into his face?
    {i e, ‘Fairness’ in rates, Vs. real revenues derived}

    Whomever you call ‘we’, and you, can get it on down the road, Bub.
    Toot-Sweet. A M F, FWK

  • garfieldjl

    Increased Regulations, tax hikes, policies designed to cause energy prices to skyrocket.

    Contrary to what Democrats claim, Conservatives actually do want a clean environment. However, Democrats keep pushing for punishing the American people, and forcing the implimentation of things that:
    1. Don’t work
    2. Aren’t cost effective
    3. Artificially raise the price of current energy production to force people on technology that isn’t cost effective.
    4. Often cause damage to environment, so they get canned just as quickly.

    We would solve a lot of our problems if we built more Nuclear Power plants. There is even a way to re-use radioactive waste to contiue to get power from it.

    All you have to do:
    1. Don’t build plant on active fault line
    2. Don’t store the waste (when it can’t be used anymore) in a location where it can get into ground water.

    All this push for electric cars is silly, hybrids are one thing, totally electric cars probably are just as environmentally unfriendly (if not more so) than Gasoline powered cars (the electricity has to come from a Power Plant).

    Maybe there is global warming that is being accelerated by man, for the sake of argument.

    A few Nuclear Power plants would cut the carbon emissions from coal power plants by an enormous margin, because a Nuclear Power plant generates more electricity than coal power plants. It’s simple physics, a nuclear fission reaction releases more energy than a chemical reaction.

    But liberals are interested in only Windmills and Solar Panels, when battery technology isn’t advanced enough to store up the power for evening hours. Windmills also are dangerous to birds, and generate a dangerous amount of noise pollution.

    I could talk ad nausem about how Obamacare is destructive to the economy too, and how it is a blatent power grab.

    Blaming Bush at this point is laughable, Obama is responsible for turning this into a depression,

  • gwalt

    Said same thing to F-inlaw late last year. We have tried your ideas and leftist policies. You are angry because they don’t work and have been proven wrong. Lashing out at me won’t help you and everything you have ever stated or given me to read/watch has been debunked. ( including Inconvenenient Lie)

  • funwithknives

    but may I be so bold as to ask: Where is ‘the attack mode’, in The G O P’s overall makeup?
    Time after time Barry and Associates have handed their rears to you and in return you do little, to nothing.They literally give you the ordinance you can use against them, in really large amounts.
    But no evidence of you using it is apparent.

    Where is the message in periodicals? Major news organs? Electronic Broadcast Media?
    Where are the split-screen comparisons that demonsrate the absolute incompetence and demonstrated, proven lack of ability of this poseur-in-chief?
    Weekly, he hands you the tools to his downfall and all we hear is crickets and all we see is little,i f anything.

    This is The 21st Century ,Mr. Preibus. Let’s see some of it. Pretty -please? {See, I can be polite…}

  • rabun1016

    Facts are inconvenient when all you are interested in is a bias-laden opinion. BLS stats say it all.