American Made Energy = American Jobs


We’ve all seen the television ads saying every year America spends $700 billion on foreign oil, constituting the largest transfer of wealth in human history. It’s no coincidence that Congress is now considering the largest government bailout in American history. The current energy situation is bleeding the American economy and jeopardizing American security.

This week, Congress will likely pass legislation authorizing $700 billion to bailout Wall Street. Our economy is struggling. But, just a week ago, the Democrat-led Congress blocked the creation of thousands of American jobs, denied the American economy an influx of more than $900 billion, and refused close to $600 billion in federal taxes.

Despite the clear necessity for more American-made energy, and the overwhelming public support for increased domestic drilling, the Democrat energy bill kept much of our known resources in the Outer Continental Shelf off limits and failed to open ANWR and the Western United States to development. Their plan will not lead to the production of a single barrel of oil.


And, as a result, their plan will also not create much needed jobs or pump much needed money into our sluggish economy. For every one direct job in the oil and gas sector there are more than 4 jobs in other industries. It’s estimated that increasing American oil production by just one million barrels per day would lead to an increase in employment of 128,000 jobs. Boosting oil production by two million barrels a day will create an annual increase in Gross Domestic Product of $164 billion and consequently generate 270,000 jobs. And, development of the ANWR Coastal Plain alone would lead to 735,000 jobs throughout all fifty states. Tragically, the Democrat plan makes all of this impossible.

Instead, we’re creating jobs and wealth in other countries. And, all too often we benefit countries like Venezuela, an open enemy of the United States, or oil sheiks in the Middle East who bankroll Al-Qaeda.

The U.S. unemployment rate is at a four year high. In July, employers announced a 26% increase in planned job cuts. Sales for the auto industry fell 13% in just a year.

American families are struggling to make ends meet. More than three quarters of people say that the rise in prices at the pump is a financial hardship. Yet, for every $50 these Americans put in their tanks, they are now sending $19 overseas. And, that’s not the only place Americans are feeling the pinch. Food prices have risen by 5% in just one year—the largest increase in almost 20 years.

Nancy Pelosi and Democrat leaders can put a stop to this, but they have chosen not to. Although they have agreed to allow the moratoria on oil shale development and offshore drilling to expire, as scheduled, on October 1, 2008, they have not addressed obstructive environmental litigation. As a result, oil production will be blocked. For the past several years, fringe environmental groups have challenged 100% of leases in the Alaskan OCS, the entire five-year national OCS leasing program, and thousands of onshore leases in Alaska and the lower 48 states, effectively blocking any new production.

An amendment I attempted to offer to the Democrat plan would have allowed for expedited judicial review of environmental challenges to leases, but it was rejected. The Democrats don’t actually want drilling to occur and the radical environmentalists are their last line of defense. Speaker Pelosi and Democrat leaders have endangered the American economy so as to cater to fringe environmental special interests.

America must transition from fossil fuels towards clean renewables, yet this shift cannot happen over night. We cannot wean ourselves off the old energy source if the new is not yet viable. In ten years, the oil and natural gas industry invested $1.2 trillion in numerous long-term energy initiatives. The best way to speed the transition from fossil fuels to alternatives is to strengthen the American economy thereby encouraging critical investment in the new industries that will power our nation in the future.


Category: , , ,

RSS feed

8 Comments Leave a comment

I couldn't agree more and was on a liveblog...

JadedByPolitics (Diary) Thursday, September 25th at 1:58PM EST (link)

last night with Rep Bachmann and suggested that you get in front of the cameras as this bailout/whatever moves forward and actually talk about the JOBS that all of the above means for many states that are suffering NOW.

It is really a Mainstreet recovery as opposed to a Wall Street recovery!

 

Read Gov Huckabee's Blog

Soulsamurai Thursday, September 25th at 2:01PM EST (link)

“Bailing on our Principles” You can find it here:

http://www.huckpac.com/?FuseAction=Blogs.View&Blog_id=1899

Http://www.greatrancheswest.com

 

Amen!

Aaron Weatherford (Diary) Thursday, September 25th at 2:01PM EST (link)

Why can’t we get legislation like this attached to the bailout plan? Would dems not be forced to vote for it?

“My friends, it is coming to my attention that a great number of you are fearful of an Obama win. I must stress that you have nothing to fear from Obama winning the election as I have the greatest confidence he would be a most benevolent dictator.” – Hopefully John McCain

 

the usual Democrat inconsistency

JLenardDetroit (Diary) Thursday, September 25th at 2:33PM EST (link)

Nothing we don’t know, but too many in the Public Schools indoctrinated masses won’t reason through…

Dem’s always whining about Jobs going overseas, but they insist on forcing the additional jobs, that could be done by Americans here at home, exploration provides to be created elsewhere. Driving Federal funds into unready technologies that Dem’s are heavily invested in is their priority…

Dem’s always whining about Trade deficit, again forcing this $700 Billion to go overseas and toward the trade imbalance…

They have to continue to have the problems they create to fool those that follow them that they can be the solution. Shame so many have their head up their hind-side…

Regards from NoMoTown (the MOTORlessCITY)
“Liberals, looking to do for? America what they’ve done for? Detroit! which is DESTROY IT!”
“I think, therefore I am Conservative”
“Conservative by choice, Republican by necessity”
“You can lead a Liberal to the Truth/Facts, but you cannot make them THINK!”
“Romney [No, not my first choice] does NOT have a MORMON problem. He has a, far too many Americans; these days; are MORONS problem!”


(RS:Help) (JLD) (Hollyweird) (Brain-deads) (SPIN-cycle) (Obamaocare) (Party of kNOw) (Conservatism) (TEApeats) (respectful) (message) (Warning: Children Will Die!!)
Heil “O” Hell No Obamao is NOT MY PRESIDENT! “No U won’t”
I want “O” to FAIL (here, here, & whole Diary (Ofail) here, is why)
The first Liberal was Satan” – a Rush caller (other Quotes)

 

energy indeed

blueball Thursday, September 25th at 2:42PM EST (link)

Greetings from Blue State of Maryland:

We agree energy is the problem, although we disagree on the solution. Since we have 10 years to wait even if your idea passes, why not work on the energy problem through a massive alternative energy program? Put a trillion or so on the table and form a public corp to beat the world in cracking the alternative energy solution? It’s one thing we can do: we are Americans and we win global wars, go to the moon, safeguard democracy. Why cant we engineer our way into world energy dominance? (Instead of fighting over old style sources, oil, coal, or the wild card of nuclear energy.)

 

Why is this not a rider on the Bailout Bill?

Adelthemystic Thursday, September 25th at 2:58PM EST (link)

With Senator Reid about to attempt to extend the Drilling Ban, I wonder why this is not being made a rider on the bailout bill?

To blueball:

I wholeheartedly agree that more drilling is not a long term solution. However, the technology to make us truly a non oil based economy is at least five years away, most likely ten. Alternative energy has been in research and development since the first Gulf War. Many strides have been taken, but it is still a long way off, realistically. I would very much like to be wrong, but history is a good measuring rod for reality.

Even if we had the solution to the energy crisis in say, five years in the form of a technological breakthrough, there would be another five to ten years of wrangling over patents, laws governing implementation of infrastructure, tax burdens and incentives, environmental regulations of the new industry, etc., which would put a realistic alternative energy fifteen years away by the time we fully had the infrastructure, even with the best funding.

Now, I am not saying by any means ewe should not pursue, and pursue adamantly, alternative solutions. What I am saying is that we need three things that offshore drilling can provide RIGHT NOW, even though production would not be there for a few years. Those three things are:

Jobs
Revenue
Infrastructure

The jobs is pretty obvious. A simple glance through the original post makes that clear.

Revenue would be gained in not only the taxes paid on the machinery, contracts, permits, and legal fees, but also on the payroll taxes of the tens of thousands of people we could put to work getting this country energy independent in the short term, while pursuing long term oil independance.

Infrastructure is a no-brainer. It is already there, and has been for decades.

In summation, Mr. Shadegg, I would implore you to work to add this as a rider on the current economic bailout bill. The Democrats, if it was implemented, would have a very hard time voting against it in the face of so much pressure from not only their colleagues, but also the american taxpayer, many of whom are wringing their hands and wondering how we will weather this storm.

I have been asking that all week.

Aaron Weatherford (Diary) Thursday, September 25th at 3:14PM EST (link)

the dems are handing us a blank check and we must act…

“My friends, it is coming to my attention that a great number of you are fearful of an Obama win. I must stress that you have nothing to fear from Obama winning the election as I have the greatest confidence he would be a most benevolent dictator.” – Hopefully John McCain

Umm, no thanks ...

alchemist17 (Diary) Thursday, September 25th at 3:21PM EST (link)

You suggest the government grab another trillion dollars of our money to throw at an “alternative energy plan” that will inevitably end up run as well as Fannie/Freddie, Amtrak, or the like and certainly won’t be the target for politically-motivated earmarks and research “grants”. It didn’t work so well for Carter, and I see no evidence that the current crowd in control is any different.

I’d much rather open up existing land to energy companies who will pay us for the privilege, and in the process devalue the oil held by Putin, Chavez, and the like. American producers are among the cleanest in the world in extracting oil – how does one justify paying foreign nations to pollute instead of drilling ourselves with less pollution and calling it environmentally friendly?

I’d rather us use the “wild card nuclear energy” to enable plug-in hybrids without the need for massive increases in coal usage, and allow alternative energy research (funded by profits and venture capital attracted by high oil prices) to proceed until answers are found that are viable at current market prices.

Overall I’d rather trust the market that took us from the Model T and the Wright Flyer to the Corvette and the 707 in 40 years than the gov’t run space program that in 40 years took us from Apollo moon landings to space shuttle trips to low earth orbit.