« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Cliché Diplomacy: “Peace Through Speech”

In wake of revanchist Russia’s invasion of Georgia, a sovereign democracy allied with the United States and Europe, the stunned Bush administration’s response to this failure of “quiet diplomacy” and “engagement” policy with Comrade Putin – he of the soulful eyes – was initially one of stammered clichés, each of which is revelatory, juvenile and injurious.

Consequently, to further the cause of liberty and security, we are compelled to dispel the clichés fostering the failed policy of “peace through speech”; reassert the doctrine of “peace through strength”; and advance concrete actions to punish Russia for invading Georgia.

Regarding the clichés, first let us dispense with “Democracies don’t attack democracies.” Though belied by the War of 1812 (as but one example), this canard persisted until it came to rest in pieces beneath the boot heels of Georgia’s Russian invaders.

Next, we must refute how “This type of aggression is unacceptable in the 21st Century.” Excuse me, but welcome to the “end of the end of history”! It is insane to presume an arbitrary millennial date prevents nations from using force to attain perceived gains. For years it has been evident Comrade Putin disagrees with this false assumption; thus, who could be shocked this inanity has gained as little credence in Moscow as the Kellogg-Briand Pact once gained in Berlin?

Finally, let us end the myth aggressor nations measure their “international standing” in the same vein as do western democracies. Russia does not seek to be liked. Russia seeks to be feared. In sum, through intimidation and coercion Russia seeks what it cannot accomplish through cooperation and negotiation – the political subordination of central and eastern Europe’s sovereign, U.S. allied democracies within what Russia deems its “near abroad.” To gain this end, Russia invaded Georgia. In making this decision, Comrade Putin anticipated “The West’s” tepid words; and Comrade Putin didn’t give a damn. In fact, he was counting on them to bolster both his own domestic power within Russia and his nation’s external power over central and eastern European nations, who would be less than reassured by a weak-kneed US and EU response. (No doubt, too, Comrade Putin is laughing hysterically over some “sophisticated” foreign policy “experts” claiming the West’s harsh rhetoric will only inflame the situation. It looks like the Left hasn’t lost its “cold war” mindset, either!)


Frankly, the above clichés reveal the rot within both the administration’s and the Republican Party’s present foreign policy. Conflating the truth of Reagan’s dictum of “peace through strength” with the hope of “peace through speech”, the GOP has forgotten that words won’t stop tanks.

But “peace through strength” will. Nations must know pursing strategic aims through aggressive measures will cause them more harm than good. Then, if an aggressor nation miscalculates and strikes regardless, the harm to the aggressor nation must swiftly and surely outweigh its coveted benefits.

Therefore, in the wake of Russia’s invasion of Georgia, individually and collectively the United States and our allies must:

  1. Ensure the removal of all Russian troops, weapons, and intelligence officers from Georgian soil.
  2. Secure Russian reparations for the damages incurred by Georgia due to this illegal invasion.
  3. Invite Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili to address a joint session of the United States Congress and reaffirm the bond of solidarity between the free peoples of our democracies.
  4. Offer a NATO Membership Action Plan (MAP) to Georgia and the Ukraine.
  5. Suspend high-level NATO-Russia Council (NRC) meetings until all Russian troops, weapons, and intelligence officers are removed from Georgian soil; and Russian reparations for the damages incurred by Georgia due to this illegal invasion are tendered.
  6. Authorize Georgia, Ukraine, and all non-NATO central and eastern European allies to receive the Foreign Military Sales (FMS) the same preferential treatment as NATO+3 (Australia, Japan, and New Zeeland).
  7. Authorize large-scale Foreign Military Financing (FMF) assistance to central and eastern European NATO allies.
  8. Accelerate European Union accession and partnership negotiations with Ukraine and Georgia.
  9. Bar Russia from the G-8 until all Russian troops, weapons, and intelligence officers are removed from Georgian soil; and Russian reparations for the damages incurred by Georgia due to this illegal invasion are tendered.
  10. Refuse consideration of Russia’s entry into the World Trade Organization (WTO) until all Russian troops, weapons, and intelligence officers are removed from Georgian soil; and Russian reparations for the damages incurred by Georgia due to this illegal invasion are tendered.
  11. End Russia’s PNTR status and further sanction Russia with Column Two Tariffs until all Russian troops, weapons, and intelligence officers are removed from Georgian soil; and Russian reparations for the damages incurred by Georgia due to this illegal invasion are tendered.
  12. Provide the Economic Support Funding (ESF) to Georgia to repair their infrastructure, which will be repaid by Russian reparations for the damages incurred by Georgia due to this illegal invasion.
  13. Reauthorize programs under the Belarus Democracy Reauthorization Act.
  14. Assert that continued, large-scale, organized cyber attacks constitute an act of aggression.
  15. Direct the Department of Interior’s United States Board of Geographic Names to refer to the Kuril Islands by their Japanese name.
  16. Call upon the International Olympic Committee to relocate the 2014 Winter Olympics from Sochi, Russia, to a non-aggressor nation.

Well, there I go again, revealing my “cold war” mentality. Maybe the “peace through speech” sophisticates are right. Let’s pass some vapid resolutions accusing Russia of not being an international team player; importune Comrade Putin to return the soul behind his eyes to its rightful owner; and hope this rabid bear is coaxed back into hibernation.

Still, one must wonder if the Georgian people would appreciate the irony that our quiet diplomacy is premised upon loud publicity not their pained reality?

COMMENTS

  • Martin_A_Knight

    Speaking softly and carry a big stick has been transformed by our “sophisticates” into speak softly and beat yourself with the big stick.

  • kyle8

    Representative, How does it make any sense for the United States to be allied with Georgia? How can it possibly be in our interest to be allied with a nation which cannot help us, but can, and is likely to pull us into a war with Russia?

    How do you justify to the American people the huge burden of our fantastically large commitments around the world? How will you justify to the people when these commitments pull us into more wars?

    Where do you draw the line sir? Are there no corrupt pretend democracies whom we will not guarantee their security? Is there any part of the globe that we will not get involved in? Are there no limits to our manpower and resources? Why is there no similar commitment from our so called allies?

    Does ideology, idealism, and wishful thinking trump reality? And finally, how are you going to continue to sell this ideology to a war-weary public?

  • Section9

    Insuring the territorial integrity of Georgia by inviting her into NATO invites another 1914, imho, over South Ossetia and Abkhazia, territories over which the American people believe they have no compelling national interest.

    Kyle is quite correct in his post above: the United States Treasury has carried the European Allies on its back for quite some time, and has added to it the cost of the expedition to Iraq and Afghanistan. Bush and Rice have rightly concluded that we cannot make a stand in Georgia as we have neither the money, nor the troops to make such a national effort.

    Further, Georgia falls within Russia’s sphere of influence, and within Russia’s military zone. Our response has been fairly correct up to now; set the intellectual stage for a long term policy of “neo-containment” of Russia.

    Within three years, most of our troops will be home and the costs of the Iraq war will not burden the Treasury. But we cannot afford to underwrite Georgia’s defense, nor, I should add, Europe’s, for much longer.

    Nor should we. Our national interest lies in the defense of the United States. The Europeans are wealthy enough to defend themselves.

    • Jaded

      nt

      • Zigguratv

        The only pipeline not under Russian control which goes into Europe goes through Georgia.

        Is it sound policy to allow a KGB man who has dissidents and critics killed at home and abroad control the supply of energy into Europe? What happens to our economy when Putin flexes his muscles and brings Europe to its knees?

        • HerbC

          Georgia is already an ally and has sent troops
          to both Iraq and Afghanistan. When we buried our
          heads in the sand in 1975 in Vietnam, 1979 in Iran, and 1991 in Afghanistan, we see the results today.

          And they are already within ours, if not NATO’s,
          “sphere of influence”. Turkey is a member of NATO, and our troop deployments in the region are
          a little obvious.

  • rjd27

    Time to increase our defense budget. Big time. Something the Bush Admin. hasn’t done. Depending on the source, the U.S. is spending roughly 4% of GDP on defense. This needs to be closer to 6-7%, at least.

    America is the only country capable, and willing, to be the stalwart of freedom and liberty. Britain, France and Germany have seceded that responsibility to us – until those countries wake from their atrophy, the U.S. is in this alone.

    • FWGuy

      Finally a post on the Georgian War that tells things like they are.

      Putin has just kicked sand in Bushes face and Bush looks like the beach weakling. But, unfortunately the Iraq war has stretched this countries military resource way too thin.

      I agree with all of the 16 points but, most will not assure that point #1 will occur. But they are fitting punishment and should be pursued anyway.

      • Hooah_Mac

        We have more than enough military power in reserve to roll up Russia, Iraq and Afghanistan notwithstanding.
        The questions are ones of political expediency and cost benefit analysis, not military ability.
        Granted, our military is smaller than it should be, small enough that such an undertaking would be more painful than necessary.

        • Zigguratv

          Your leadoff question was that “How does it make any sense for the United States to be allied with Georgia?” I explained why.

          As to paying for it…well, I don’t buy into the Ronulan meme that we are nearly bankrupt from our military bases overseas. We spend less of our GDP on the military now than we did during the cold war we can easily increase our spending to that point.

          There are numerous creative ways we can address the problem. We can reconsolidate our forces from Germany to farther east. We can increase aid to train and equip Eastern Europeans for their own defense. We can widen our missle shield.

          Any staredown between us and Russia would hurt Russia far worse than it would hurt us.

          • kyle8

            for what? total global domination? Yeah in a stand up war we can kick ass, but it’s that pesky occupation part that always seems to be a problem.

            We do not have the military necessary to get involved in Georgia because in order to do any good we would have to keep those forces there as a deterrent. That means we would have to take them out of Iraq.

            Although I suppose we could also draw down the 50,000 in Germany, and the 26,000 in Korea, and the other forces in two dozen other places.

            I don’t see anyone making a realistic case as to just what our commitments ought to be, and if there are any limits to our ability to pay for it all.

          • Hooah_Mac

            You do what is right, necessary and just.
            We couldn’t afford WW2, but we did it because it was right and necessary and just.

            In this situation, occupation is completely unnecessary. One scenario is to decimate the Russian military and then let the Georgians – who have a very capable, if small, military – take care of themselves.

            The last time we tried out isolationism in all of its glory, 6 million+ jews died, millions of Russians died, unknown numbers of Chinese died, and that all doesn’t even count any of the war casualties and we still ended up paying in a lot of American blood to end it.

            I am no big of fan as America as the world’s policeman, but the consequences for not doing it far outweigh the costs of doing it.

          • wennejunk

            Europe is wealthy enough to carry themselves, yes indeed.

            Do they have the will to do so?

            I think not.

          • kyle8

            “The last time we tried isolationism Blah Blah Blah. “

            God that is so stupid.

            Who is saying anything about isolationism. YOU are the one saying we should do the “right” thing no matter what.

            Oh Really? Then what we ought to do is take control of nearly all of Africa, because it is controlled by evil warlords and dictators.

            The onus is upon you to define what is the right causes, and if there is any limitations to how we use force.

            And as for you saying no occupation of Georgia would be necessary. By that argument, why the hell do we have an occupation of Iraq, or Bosnia, or Haiti, or Germany, or S.Korea?

            All we really have to do is bomb the hell out of our potential enemies then sit back and relax.

            Honestly, I think that many conservatives have been arguing against the left for so long they have forgotten that {1) we are not always right, and (2) they sometimes have valid arguments. So instead we just gargle down the gung-ho kool aid without any consideration of the cost.

          • streiff

            I feel very confident in telling you that you simply don’t have the right to call any opinion “stupid.”

            Don’t do it again. Your fervent defense of Russian adventurism is wearisome in the extreme don’t compound the silliness with bad manners.

          • kyle8

            I am pretty tired of the argument myself, and since I seem to be the only one with an ounce of caution left in the conservative movement (at least as far as I can see).
            You won’t be getting any discussion at all except the typical gung ho stuff.

            It will be a nice clean sounding board, with all the voices in unison. And I’m sure you guys will have no problem convincing the rest of the country. Good luck with that.

  • Hooah_Mac

    Yesterday evening I had the privilege of arguing with Jason Lewis on his KTLK show. I think I did alright, and was frustrated that he tried several non-sequitors and straw man tactics.
    My point is this – We MUST expend whatever it takes to protect Georgia. Even if it means open war with Russia. When many of our “paper allies” snubbed their noses at us or presented a token assistance in Iraq, Georgia sent approximately the same number of troops, per capita, as we did. That’s right, with no interest of their own, they stood with us…put their blood and treasure on the line in that God-forsaken desert.
    We can talk about equivalency and proportion and whatever, but the reality is that they stood with us, and we need to stand with them. Whether or not it is easy or advantageous to us cannot be a factor.
    Based on what I saw of them overseas, I would more readily fight to defend the home of a Georgian soldier than that of a resident of Berkley, CA.
    War is not necessarily the answer, but if it comes to it, we owe the people of Georgia. Period.

    • kyle8

      If Georgia is important to our strategic defense then what will we give up in order to secure it? Or do you think that we can remain in the middle east, and Korea, and now put a large force into eastern Europe?

      And if we do get into Eastern Europe do you think there will be any possibility of exit from there?

  • streiff

    post, I can’t help but point out that having elections does not equal a democracy.

    Not that all is roses in Georgia, but the notion that Russia is a “democracy” and it’s invasion of Georgia disproves a “canard” about democracies attacking democracies is farfetched in the extreme. I’d also point out the the Brits during the War of 1812 was NOT, and did NOT consider themselves to be, a democracy, in fact, Britain and other monarchies tried to return a king to the throne of France during the French Revolutionary Wars.