« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The Tea Party – Level III Conservatism. (Is Glenn Beck Smarter Than He Acts on TV?)

My initial take on Glenn Beck has been mixed. He deserves credit for identifying that America’s elite has decayed into a sarcoma within the body of our glorious republic. Not only that, he has the guts to take them on. Somebody had to step up in America. The Rick Santellis, the Glenn Becks; they exist because they would eventually have to.

I’ve felt these people were admirable, but limited in their strategic thinking. They were people who went on with their lives and careers until one day the society they lived in got to the point where they slammed down the newspaper in utter disgust and decided something had to be done. What I haven’t seen enough from them is what.

Blogger, Lexington Green in a posting entitled “I Think I See What Glenn Beck is Doing” on The Chicago Boyz blog, suggests something that made me take a new measurement, perhaps, of Glenn Beck’s intellectual and spiritual depth. Excerpts from an entry that I would nominate as Blog Post of The Year 2010 follows below.

He is aiming far beyond what most people consider to be the goalposts. Using Boyd’s continuum for war: Material, Intellectual, Moral. Analogously for political change: Elections, Institutions, Culture.

Beck sees correctly that the Conservative movement had only limited success because it was good at level 1, for a while, weak on level 2, and barely touched level 3. Talk Radio and the Tea Party are level 3 phenomena, popular outbreaks, which are blowing back into politics.

(HT:Chicago Boyz as cited above)

Lexington Green just invented a new taxonomy. We have Level I conservatives who do brilliant jobs of winning elections. Level II conservatives who labor in the intellectual engine room on behalf of Conservative ideals. What we need and lack are Level III conservatives who connect with and change the popular culture to make it more amenable to Conservative values.

As examples of Level I Conservatives, I offer you Nikki Haley and Scott Brown. While I agree more with the stated political philosophies of Mrs Haley more than Mr. Brown, who can deny that either of these people did great good for the GOP by beating back corrupt challengers in difficult elections. It enhances the brand, so to speak, of the party when our “Good Guys” win a tough election.

We have our Level II operatives as well. Senator Jeff Sessions of Alabama probably knows and understands more about immigration policy then either George W. Bush or Barack Obama have ever forgotten. He is able to intelligently explain why the popular and seemingly kind policy of open borders has become an increasingly disastrous state of affairs for Working Class America. His is a sterling example of an intellect that will empower the GOP to swing the Jacksonian wrecking-ball into Nancy Pelosi’s corrupt and paternalistic House of Representatives Majority.

Senator Tom Coburn, and Congressman Paul Ryan, both have growing Level II Conservative credibility. Coburn led the fight against earmarking long before Senator McCain made it a cause célèbre of his diminutive campaign for the presidency. Congressman Ryan has laid out the best and thus far only economic and budgetary alternative to be put up against our current Keynesian Suicide Cocktail.

So the GOP has charismatic winners (Con Level I), and it has capable thinkers (Con Level II). What we haven’t done yet to any appreciable amount, is move America’s soul. Lexington Green credits Glenn Beck with an attempt to do just that.

Beck is building solidarity and cultural confidence in America, its Constitution, its military heritage, its freedom. This is a vision that is despised by the people who have long held the commanding heights of the culture. But is obviously alive and kicking.

Beck is creating positive themes of unity and patriotism and freedom and independence which are above mere political or policy choices, but not irrelevant to them. Political and policy choices rest on a foundation of philosophy, culture, self-image, ideals, religion. Change the foundation, and the rest will flow from that. Defeat the enemy on that plane, and any merely tactical defeat will always be reversible.

(HT: Chicago Boyz again).

This one makes me stop and say “Hmm…” If LG has this one right, and cognitively his idea does seem to “taste good”, that would make Glenn Beck a legitimate Existential Philosopher. He attempts to confer an existential authenticity to the Conservatism that we lost between 1994 and 2006. He seeks to dispel the existential angst that made John McCain willing to suspend a campaign for the presidency for several days in 2008.

This gets to the reason why the Left hates Beck. He doesn’t have to tell anyone to vote Republican and is too intelligent to fall into that trap. He goes one level beyond that by challenging what we have been ordered by our “betters” to mindlessly believe.

It’s when we make the collective American Mind go back and reevaluate the validity of the Postmodern assumptions that undergird Liberal thought that we can seriously argue for change. In undertaking this task, Glenn Beck is rebooting our social operating system with a different and better compilation of moral software.

At times Glenn Beck may remind me more of Al Snow than The Hardcore King, Mick Foley, but this time, if Lexington Green’s post is steel on target, he’s just reached up and caught the very lightning. Start bringing these “crazy” things like G_d back into the equation of how we make decisions, and maybe, just maybe the “Progressive” Democrats and the Assistant Democrats of the GOP Yacht Aristocracy, had better start to pray.

In the end, if Glenn Beck gets his way, and coincidentally, I get most of mine as a positive externality, I’ll have to eat some the words I wrote about Glenn Beck yesterday. I can eat that crow with a dash of Tobasco Sauce. But only after I’ve had time to digest a good, warm shot of brandy to make the humility go down better.

COMMENTS

  • http://stixblog.com Black River Wolf

    I do think he does a good job of pointing out the enemy and how they operate, but his personality just rubs me the wrong way.

    And I must admit I have not watched any of the shindig he had over the weekend, and like some thought that it was not the best thing to do. I am not an overly religious person and think that religion should be more a private matter, not a public one But after reading this and Greene’s post shed new light.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    epiphany to his lack of any shame to speak the Lord’s name in public and to his own re-education and teaching ability on US history. Love him and this blog.

    • ywhyvon1

      Beck makes it fun. I too Love the guy.

  • StandardCandle

    His broad appeal is simple… he speaks from the heart, apologizes when he needs to, admits when he’s wrong, and does his best to make coherent arguments against the threats as he sees them to freedom and the American way of life.

    He is quite careful not to offend the Christian core beliefs with overt Mormon theology… and I think this is where most Christians are wary of him… he speaks like a Christian, acts like a Christian, defends the Constitution like a Christian, but he is unabashedly a Mormon convert from Catholicism… I think it might be scary to think, for some, to agree with someone so much politically, and even sometimes rhetorically in things pertaining to faith, when you can’t really agree at all to their personal salvation.

    I think if most Christians relaxed a little bit they would see an ally, not some lunatic media icon that annoys people.

    • wrenhal

      can agree with him politically, but it’s scenes like this weekend where his religion was on display is a bit too much. For those who’ve had friends lost to or gained from mormonism you can tell the theology is on display. I also am not very sure as a Christian that I like his hands across the aisle Ecumenism that was also on display. There are certain times where you have to say “I don’t agree with you”, and if I’m standing in front of a Mormon, Joel Osteen, an Imam, or a Priest I’m going to say that to them.
      So let’s not forget that this weekend while was supposed to be about honor, was Over the TOP about religion and needs to be looked at through that lens.

      • exidore

        isn’t it best to focus on the political side of the equation?

        I have no religious beliefs whatsoever (which I know makes me suspect
        in most of you’alls view) but this is a political process.
        Maybe stop looking for perfection?

        Take Beck for what he’s worth to us, forget about any religious issues you
        may have with Mormonism. BTW, every singleMormon I have ever met is the closest thing you will ever find to being completely unconfused about their devotion to the USA.

        • wrenhal

          when he is now putting it up on display in conjunction with his conservative values as he did at the rally and behind the scenes. If you knew more about mormonism, even if you’re irreligious, I think you’d be more scrutinizing. Put it this way, the everyday mormon on the street knows NOTHING about what goes on in temples except what he is told because many never get to experience the temple rituals. And as for the prophet and his leaders (quorum)?? If you try to tell them how materialistic, and non-mormon they are they would try to kill you rather than believe it. These guys want nothing more than unrelenting power over their people. They are as bad and even sometimes worse than those money hungry tv preachers.

          • cactusjack

            or your perceptions of same, but this site is for political discussion and it seems to me you have gone over the line in going negative, without chance for fulsome discussion or answer from the LDS, on the LDS (Mormon) church. Please take it to another site and return here for conservative political commentary.

          • StandardCandle
          • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

            Take your religious debates to another site. It’s not relevant here.

            If you reply to me with more arguing on the topic you will be banned, no questions asked.

  • ywhyvon1
  • rws197

    nt

  • Mary Beth
  • dudette

    has tried to do albeit unknowingly—the fact that there is no “head” or leader per se–that it is common values that unite tea partiers who are of all stripes, parties, classes, etc…the values cut across all boundaries to unite and create a true “multi-cultural” phenomenon. Multi-cultural is not everyone doing their own ethnic thing–it is one symphony being played by Asians, by Africans, by Indians, by whatever, but all playing the SAME TUNE, united by the music, or in this case, by the values…..and the left knows they are powerless against it for the most part. One sensed the power behind the idea of tea party when we had our first ones out here—and it is not delusional to think that we might all be better as a people a nation if tea party takes over the political parties, all of them, and at least operates from a fundamental core with respective diffrences. dont know if it is possible tho.

  • baldbarian

    prefer to have a person of deep faith with a belief system somewhat like the Golden Rule than a statist, Islamist, communist or other thought system that sees humans as tools, slaves or taxpayers.

    Beck has his clownish moments but what he does is like none other at this point in our history.. bringing all the random data that we all get from the net, OldMedia, talk radio and putting it together in a way that is easy to understand if you but pay attention. He was a little slow getting it going but like he has said, he is on a journey with this info and he is taking millions with him.

    O’Reilly is way past his prime and one day Beck will take his time slot and find even more viewers.

    The TeaParty, those late to the conversion of sound money, true libertarian and / or conservative thought, constitutional grounding … need media support and no one is doing a better job of it than Beck at this point.

    • furious

      …Father-in-law nuts, going all McCarthyite about “sedition” and “un-American”. For that alone (oh, and staffer waiting by the Batphone to the White House) I like Beck.

  • The_Rebel

    “This gets to the reason why the Left hates Beck. He doesn?t have to tell anyone to vote Republican and is too intelligent to fall into that trap. He goes one level beyond that by challenging what we have been ordered by our ?betters? to mindlessly believe.”

    Santelli was the spark that helped ignite the Tea Party movement, and Beck has taken it to the next level. And since that rant early in 2009, Santelli has had additional rants, for example, this one about two months ago:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOJpF9aS1zo

    In each case, Santelli doesn’t have to tell viewers to vote Republican. When he uses phrases like “reward people who could carry the water instead of drink the water”, “stop spending, stop spending, stop spending”, and “November 2, November 2″, the voters know what he’s talking about. And he isn’t in a position at CNBC to be wearing his party on his sleeve.

    I say, keep if up Glenn and Rick. Show them no mercy over the next 60 days.

  • hilltop

    I believe that Beck is what he is, warts and all. I have a spiritual bent, I hope, not a religious one. I was an attendee 8/28 because I am an American and I believe my individual Liberty is threatened as never before. If you believe in The Constitution and the Principals of the Bill of Rights you had better quit arguing over the deck chairs. Restoring the orthodoxy of the Founding documents will preserve the Republic and Individual freedoms.

    Beck knows that it is the end game no matter why, We must unite to do the right thing because it is the Honorable thing.

    Have you ever heard 500,000 people succinctly in unison say Amen, Wow! it was powerful. Those people believe in something that I believe transcends religion and politics, it better.

  • grandma
  • grandma