« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Mr. Derbyshire; Two Wrongs *Bo Not* Make Anything Equal

Displaying Racism Towards Racists Is Like Throwing A Boomerang

As a sociology experiment this fine Monday I’d like everyone to watch a video. This video features an odious and detestable racist. Behold a man who has literally used racism to continue in public life despite a criminal record of prostitution and drugs. A man whose criminal defense argument when caught perusing said hookers and smoking a chemical derivative of said Bolivian Marching Powder was “The Canine of Feminine Gender* set me up.” Ladies and gentlemen, I give you the perspicacious Marion Barry to instruct us all on the entrepreneurial spirit of East Asian people.

So how does this make everybody feel? Like punching Mayor_For_Life in his crack-smoking kisser? Do you feel less felicitous towards Washington DC because as Marion Barry put it “He’s not perfect, but he’s perfect for DC?” Or do you generalize this man’s detestable conduct far more extensively than it deserves? Or to put this more bluntly, does Mayor Barry’s professional conduct as a stridently self-identifying representative of African Americans justify all of us telling our children to have a lower opinion of blacks?

Apparently former National Review writer John Derbyshire believes that such is the case. National Review Editor, Rich Lowry reacted by rapidly putting Mr. Derbyshire into the fiery NRO memory hole. In an NRO Blog Post entitled “Parting Ways.”

His latest provocation, in a webzine, lurches from the politically incorrect to the nasty and indefensible. We never would have published it, but the main reason that people noticed it is that it is by a National Review writer. Derb is effectively using our name to get more oxygen for views with which we’d never associate ourselves otherwise. So there has to be a parting of the ways.

This solved a micro-level problem. It solved Rich Lowry’s micro-level problem, but not the bigger one involving our divergence of national culture. In Lowry’s defense, his options were limited. He cut Derbyshire loose and stopped the bleeding. And don’t misunderstand me, Derbyshire should have been fired.

He should should have been fired for his obnoxiousness, but also for his intellectual laziness as well. He wrote what made him feel good instead of what intelligently addressed the problems of interracial relations. Reaching for the easy and emotionally satisfying solution will only make the problem worse. This reaction, opted for by John Derbyshire could be termed the Sistah Soljah Solution or S3. I call it S3 because a famous Sistah Soljah song “The Hate That Hate Produced.” It had the following lyrics.

Souljah was not born to make white people feel comfortable. I am African first. I am black first. I want what’s good for me and my people first. And if my survival means your total destruction, then so be it. You built this wicked system. They say two wrongs don’t make it right, but it damn sure makes it even.”

So Derbyshire responds by suggesting telling our kids that any black they meet is potentially a thug and has a high probability of landing on the wrong half of the IQ Bell Curve. Which accomplishes exactly what? Responding to Sistah Souljah in kind just helps her sell records. Demonstrating the hatred and racism that we’ve just been accused of only makes people like Sistah Souljah look somewhat logical. Perhaps she is in comparison to Mr. Derbyshire.

Doing what Derbyshire did provides the dying racialist left with a new boogeyman. Their cupboard was getting pretty bare. They now fear the wrath of gun-wielding “White-Hispanics” and have discovered a new hate group…The Pick-Up Artist! Absent John Derbyshire’s inexcusable stupidity, these idiots are Duke Faculty members out harassing Lacrosse Players.

So if anyone out there believes that race-baiting the racists on the left will actually help strengthen the right; please remove your cranial member from your impacted colon. It may generate lots of blog hits from the “HBD” community and it may feel really good to give Marion Barry a dose of his own venom, but it only serves to keep the failed Progressive Ideology on undeserved life-support. We shouldn’t need NICE, IPAB, or any other death panel to tell us that America can no longer afford that self-destructive luxury.

The only effective solution we as Conservatives have to the problem of race-baiting is to stand above it and simply point out that Marion Barry is evil. Be patient and point out that these stores he falsely maligns are either compliant or non-compliant with appropriate city ordinances respecting proper cleanliness and sanitation. What John Derbyshire does, despite his diction and affiliation, descends to Marion Barry’s level of cheap vituperation. Perhaps it is not entirely unfair or racially biased to ask if Mr. Derbyshire was smoking crack when he sat down and wrote such an utterly unintelligent screed.

*- Ok, so I paraphrased it a tad….

COMMENTS

  • Viet71

    You write: “The only effective solution we as Conservatives have to the problem of race-baiting is to stand above it and simply point out that Marion Barry is evil.”

    I would only add:”…is to stand above it, and unless necessary or advisable, ignore it.”

    • Repair_Man_Jack

      I would, however, offer one small quibble. I don’t think you can ignore Marion barry. I’m not Asian myself, and could claim to have no dog in that particular fight. Yet, I tend to feel that if Barry gets away with it, others will try it out on me at a later date.

      Thus, I tend to believe we need an intelligent and high-minded refutation in hand to counter it.

      • Viet71

        If he wants to attack me, personally or otherwise, fine; I’ve got a thick skin.

        If he slanders Asians, not so fine, but they’re quite capable of standing up for themselves.

        My basic point is that, as you indicate, Republicans should take the high road on all matters, especially including race.

        • acat

          The Chicago equivalent of Marion Berry have been complaining about non-african-american shop-owners in majority-black areas of the city for as long as I can remember.

          Nobody ever seems to ask the obvious question .. “why didn’t some enterprising young African-American set up a shop?”

          (the answers are always enlightening)

          Mew

          • Viet71

            No one at home or in school (especially school, which I blame a lot) has done a damn thing to teach young blacks about entrepreneurship. Much less the importance of learning math and English well.

            There’s lots of blame to go around here. I blame the leaders of the black communities who let their youngsters down. Young people need good teachers and good role models. If the role models are lacking at home, they need to be supplied from outside.

            One organization that does a great job of teaching and training inner-city youths is Boys & Girls Clubs. If it weren’t for Boys & Girls Clubs alums, Los Angeles would have suffered much worse in the wake of the Rodney King debacle.

          • acat

            of creating a division-sized unit – maybe larger – out of current and recent retirees from all branches of the service, and assigning them to do inner-city mentoring.

            I figure a fire team for grade schools, platoon-strength for high schools. Morning calisthenics, some basic mentoring throughout the day, as well as additional security… and yes, they’ll be armed and functioning as a police auxiliary.

            As far as “jobs” programs go, this one is shovel-ready…

            Mew

  • ashland_avenue

    This is compelling

  • avgjo

    I’ll catch hell for this, and I may even lose my RS account. Oh well.

    Unlike most of the whites writing about these issues, I grew up in a black neighborhood. It is interesting to note that my parents only ever had problems with some of the few white neighbors we had.

    I, on the other hand, had a few problems with some of the black kids my age. Most of the black kids were great, and most of my best friends in that period were black.

    But the ones I did have problems with were big into ‘gangsta’ culture. They listened to hate-filled, racist rap music. They were lawless, and not afraid of their mothers (or fathers when they were around), their teachers or even the police. At that time, even a lot of the older black folks I knew distrusted or were outright hostile to rap music and the associated ‘culture’. I did not see black racism among any of those older folks we knew.

    Since then, rap music has fully permeated our culture, with detrimental results. Further, internet, social media and black cable networks have proliferated. Read/Watch them. The racism there will turn your stomach. And the problem is that most black people are plugged into this crap because of identity politics and an identity culture based on radical individualism.

    Black racism in America is now institutionally protected, just as white racism was institutionally protected a generation ago. Add to that the election of BHO and his racial rhetoric, and black racism is manifesting itself all over, often violently.

    When I read Derbyshire’s article, I thought of two things: (1)replace ‘black’ with ‘white’ and (with the exception of the Fields Medal comment) have a pretty good primer for black folks living in the racist parts of America back in the old days when white racism was institutionally protected and (2) much of what he says is the attitude that many Americans take of Muslims – most of them are fine people, but you don’t know who has the tendency to violence. I’m not so sure he’s race-baiting as he is stating a few uncomfortable facts which reflect the current reality.

    If we found a document like Mr. Derbyshire’s from the old days, written for black folks instead of white folks, we’d shake our heads and talk about how sad it was that black people had to think that way, but how institutional and cultural racism necessitated it. But switch the colors, and its racism. I have to say, coming from Mr. Derbyshire, it seems more like caution along the lines of our cautious attitude towards Muslims. He did not advocate limiting the access of black folks to any public places, or institutional segregation. He did not advocate disenfrachisement of black people or cutting them out of social circles or institutions. The closest to anything racist I see in his article is his comment about scrutinizing black politicians more closely than white. I wish he had clarified this. Is it because he is worried about a higher occurrence of black racism? Or is he concerned that the media will cover up a black politician’s past more than a white, requiring more diligence in researching? He should have excluded black folk running as conservatives. Taking that risk alone gives them plenty of credibility with me. Also, I think he’s wrong about IQ . My own experience tells me it’s cultural, not inherent.

    It is nice to think that by taking the high road we could end the racial crap. But the same media-pop culture-activist complex that makes us scramble to dismiss Derbyshire as a racist and shun him without first thoughfully and carefully weighing what he says will call anything we do re: race relations racist. Call Marion Berry a racist, and you’re the racist. After all, only white people can be racists,
    right?

    I have been screaming from the mountaintop that the only hope for conservatism long-term is to take back the institutions. IF we don’t, we are relegated to playing the game on their terms. And we’ll lose. Determining our strategy on race problems in America based on what gutter trash activists and media will say about us is a losing proposition. What we will end up with is a race war. (And especially as a mixed-race person myself, that’s nothing to look forward to. Neither side likes you.) Our lack of progress or even a start in this area, coupled with our (collectively speaking) visceral reaction to anything negative (even where legitimate) said about blacks, homosexuals or any other ‘protected’ or ‘victimized’ group doesn not give me hope in this area.