Comments on: Battlefield 2012

By: Resource

Resource — Wed, 31 Oct 2012 01:19:47 +0000

hier…

http://www.questionnow.in/questions/550/how-can-i-use-gps-locator-on-my-son-if-i-dont-have-access-to-his-phone…

By: westcoastpatriette

westcoastpatriette — Wed, 06 Jun 2012 00:31:48 +0000

timez

By: APA Guy

APA Guy — Wed, 06 Jun 2012 00:30:34 +0000

By: rightlane1111

rightlane1111 — Wed, 06 Jun 2012 00:30:29 +0000

By: westcoastpatriette

westcoastpatriette — Wed, 06 Jun 2012 00:29:09 +0000

Eastern?

By: commonsenseobserver

commonsenseobserver — Wed, 06 Jun 2012 00:16:04 +0000

It seems my post correcting that didn’t get posted. I meant, less than an hour left to go! Believe in Wisconsin Again!

By: gekster

gekster — Wed, 06 Jun 2012 00:10:26 +0000

By: commonsenseobserver

commonsenseobserver — Wed, 06 Jun 2012 00:03:46 +0000

State law says 7am-8pm.

By: YnotNOW

YnotNOW — Tue, 05 Jun 2012 22:48:30 +0000

and to hope for such from Romney is asking to be disappointed. Ultimately, in a democratic Republic, the leadership reflects the culture of the people. If the people are always seeking a free lunch, then the politicians who get elected will be the ones that can most persuasively promise them a free lunch. So the long-term solution remains a cultural reform. I would assert that the best (only?) way toward this is a religious revival among the culture, but accept the perspective of others who disagree. But a cultural revival is truly what is needed to save our country.

By: DerKrieger

DerKrieger — Tue, 05 Jun 2012 18:38:38 +0000

I would actually prefer an amicable divorce from the Left so that we can go our way and they can go theirs. It gets rather tiring always having to be on the defensive against those who would turn us into subjects when basically all we ask is that we be left alone.

The USLA would descend rapidly into North Korea like tyranny and despotism and I hate to admit it but I would enjoy it from afar.

I have zero respect for Liberal ideas because they are always wrong. Always. We can’t compromise with them any longer. We must crush them and drive them from the field. Decades of weak kneed compromise has gotten us to where we are today, the brink of collapse. The GOP has consistently failed to roll back the gains of the statists and only succeeded in slowing them down now and then. It’s not enough any more.

If you want to be a serf then by all means, work with them. I for one regard them as mortal enemies.

By: hal2715

hal2715 — Tue, 05 Jun 2012 18:22:12 +0000

of this response to an article that says that “A negative externality from our current national angst consists of a genuine lack of good faith between Americans of differing philosophical perspective. We stopped disagreeing on principal and descended into a posture of antipathy and mutual disrespect. A nation featuring antipathetic mutual distrust will go the way of Abraham Lincoln?s house divided” is not lost on you.

By: renl57

renl57 — Tue, 05 Jun 2012 18:13:30 +0000

Repair_Man_Jack: “We stopped disagreeing on principal [sic] and descended into a posture of antipathy and mutual disrespect. ”

When was this Golden Age of “mutual respect” and civil disagreement on principle?

Was it in the 1980s when Ted Kennedy tried to strike a deal with the Soviets behind President Reagan’s back?

Was it in the 1970s when the Dems dragged out poor old Coretta Scott King to charge that if Reagan got elected President, he would unleash the KKK against blacks?

Was it in the 1960s when riots and assassinations tore the country apart?

Was it in the 1930s when isolationists said President FDR was “worse than Hitler”?

Was it when national hero Davy Crockett publicly accused President Martin Van Buren of being a cross-dresser?

American politics was never beanbag, and it was never a Periclean group of philosopher-kings debating the great issues in a civil way.

American politics was always lusty, often raw, and sometimes even violent.

We are definitely more polarized politically than we were before.

But politics was ALWAYS played for blood. Unfortunately, the history that kids are taught in school sanitizes that, as well as the sex lives of the great men and women of history who lived it.

By: lineholder

lineholder — Tue, 05 Jun 2012 18:09:27 +0000

Stauch SoCon I may be, but I have enough common sense to realize that if our economic situation improves, then it won’t leave as many opportunities for Dems to play the “victim” card on social issues. If they don’t have the “victim crises” to make use of, then we see less big government intervention type of activities. We help ourselves more in the long run by addressing the economic FIRST.

I may not like Romney all that much, but if he is an objective pragmatist who can and will evaluate what is currently taking place economically and make prioritized decisions based on what is needed most NOW….that isn’t necessarily a bad thing.

But yeah, it’s going to be frustrating to watch, because it could cross over in utilizing a broader approach than Conservatives would choose.

By: Repair_Man_Jack

Repair_Man_Jack — Tue, 05 Jun 2012 18:02:19 +0000

“Marxists have Marx in the mouth; Keynesians have Marx int heir bones.”

By: sulmak

sulmak — Tue, 05 Jun 2012 17:58:29 +0000

who is very willing to acquiesce to the legislature. He will manage success if congress is willing, or will manage decline if their hearts are set on it.

We need to make sure he does not have a democrat controlled legislature, even more than with other Presidents.

By: aesthete

aesthete — Tue, 05 Jun 2012 17:58:00 +0000

“Practical men, who believe themselves to be quite exempt from any intellectual influences, are usually the slaves of some defunct economist.”

John Maynard Keynes

By: DerKrieger

DerKrieger — Tue, 05 Jun 2012 17:50:12 +0000

…there are two outcomes.

If the Left wins 100% of us will be slaves. We will either be the hosts for the welfare state or its clients.

If the Right wins then 100% of us will be free to live as we see fit including those on the Left who may decide to enslave only themselves.

I won’t be a slave.

By: Repair_Man_Jack

Repair_Man_Jack — Tue, 05 Jun 2012 17:40:49 +0000

He has no great desire to be bound by anyone’s philosophy. It will frustrate us greatly some days.

By: aesthete

aesthete — Tue, 05 Jun 2012 17:35:38 +0000

Bush I and II, probably.

Romney, I’d say, straddles the line between Keynesian thought and the neo-classical school.

By: aesthete

aesthete — Tue, 05 Jun 2012 17:31:48 +0000

Also, can we *not* have this be one of those things where we put all our hopes and dreams into Romney to be a Great Leader who will Unite Us All Through the Healing Power of American Exceptionalism, Apple Pie, and Good Ol’ Fashioned ‘Murrikan Values?

Because that is, as is said above, a tall order.

I’m good with someone who can balance the frakking budget.