« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Guilty As Sin And Free As A Bird – Corzine Edition

He Simply Doesn?t Know Where The Money Is, But He?s Bored And Feels Like Starting A Hedge Fund

The Face of White Privalege In Barack Obama's America

Hey, I’ve got good news and bad news this fine and wonderful morning. The good news is that there may well be a new investment opportunity for those of us eager to improve our financial means. The bad news is that it consists of a hedge fund run by none other than Jon “I simply do not know where the money is” Corzine.

If this were not Barack Obama’s Wall Street money guy, the only thing Corzine would be hedging against would be repeated anal penetration in a Federal Prison. But he has friends and that particular risk is well under control. With that unfortunate unpleasantness suitably dealt with, Corzine is bored and wants more client funds to play with.

Sadly, others seem willing to acquiesce. When not busy sticking metallic objects into a nearby electrical socket, Anthony Scaramuchi offered up the following deep thoughts on his friend and former supervisor Jon Corzine.

YES. I trust Jon Corzine and think if he starts a fund he will make money and be very successful. We closed our seeding business so I couldn’t seed him, but he is a person that I would have no problem being partners with. We have different politics, but that would make it even more interesting.

I also have no doubts about Corzine’s eventual success. Jon Corzine always succeeds. It’s his associates and anyone else reliant upon his good judgments that need to stand in a nearby corner with one hand over their wallets and the other between his foot and their manhood. To understand this admonishment, one simply has to examine Corzine’s prior career.

Corzine originally earned his reputation as a young gun while trading for Goldman Sachs. He made large sums of money and was elevated to the position of CEO by 1994. The firm promptly lost $1.8Bn in earnings. (They declined from $2.3Bn in 1993 to $0.5 Bn in 1994). Corzine blamed this on his predecessor and sought to make up the difference by taking GS public.

Things were happy and remunerative for the next three years. Then Corzine grew itchy and felt like playing with Russian Rubles. He enjoyed considerably less success in currency gambling than George Soros had with the Thai Baht. GS lost $1Bn on the deal and decided Corzine should explore new career horizons in 1999.

Corzine took $400 million out of the firm along and used $62 million of this to LBO a New Jersey Senate Seat for himself and the Democratic Party. Rueters describes what a pleasure Corzine was to have in power.

Corzine later lost out to Paulson in a power struggle, though, and by May 1999, as the IPO went forward and made Goldman’s partners millionaires many times over, he resigned and soon turned to politics. Deploying $62 million of his IPO bounty, he campaigned as a Democrat dark-horse candidate in primary and general elections for a U.S. Senate seat from New Jersey. Despite refusing to release his income tax records and gaffes such as when he joked about Italians who make “cement shoes” and were defended by Jewish lawyers, he won the election..

Corzine ascended the Cursus Honorem to Governor of New Jersey in 2005. He spent the next four years raising taxes, getting in car wrecks involving more than just his marriage, and running New Jersey’s public finances into the ground. In 2009 New Jersey’s voters decided that Goldman Sachs had a point in showing Corzine the door.

Unlike normal human beings who receive a pink slip when they are fired, Jon Corzine was given MF Global to play with as a consolation prize. To understand the personal angst in Corzine’s life it’s best to hear from someone else who knows what it is like to be publically cashiered for his personal failings as a human being. The always morally upstanding Robert G. Torricelli explains how sad it all is to see Jon Corzine suffer below.

“That’s part of the tragedy here,” said Robert G. Torricelli, the former Democratic senator from New Jersey whose political career was also cut short. “Jon is very proud and this must be exceedingly difficult. You can lose an election and not take it as personally because it’s a reflection on issues and trends. But this is obviously different: all eyes are on him. It’s one thing to make financial misjudgments and to pay the price yourself. But it’s another when institutions are damaged.”

With the rise of Barack Obama, Corzine was once again a man of power and influence. Joe Biden (wouldn’t you just know it) sought out his advice on the economy. “Literally, the first guy I called was Jon Corzine. It’s not a joke. It’s not a joke. First of all, he’s the smartest guy I know in terms of the economy and on finance, and I really mean that.”

Even after his success in launching Chris Christie into political stardom, most experts felt that the fix was still in on behalf of Jon Corzine. Sander O’Niell Partners issued a research paper that summed up Corzine’s presumed niche. “We suspect that his contacts in Washington could prove useful as MF Global navigates a shifting regulatory environment.”

Corzine serves the Obama Administration well. He has nervous backers out there like Warren Buffett, George Soros and Andrew Lewis who some days wonder if President Obama really means it when he criticizes the nefarious impact of White Privilege on Modern America. You can relax in the Tides Foundation Boardroom. The continued failure to incarcerate Mr. Corzine shows us all that this one issue where the former community organizer doesn’t even come close to believing his own bull****.

But that’s understandable. After all Nino Brown described Barack Obama’s true commitment to social equality better than anyone in the modern media. “Money talks, and bull**** runs a marathon. So, see ya and I wouldn’t want to be ya.” The true face of “hope and change” in Obama’s America is Jon Corzine.

COMMENTS

  • Jack_Savage

    The poster inovrmihd has tried to make this point, but ends up missing completely, as do the OWS crowd. At the risk of jogging on thin ice, I agree with inovrmihd in that this could be a great campaign issue for Romney.

    In my view, Corzine should have been in jail *before* he became governor, but alas, he wasn’t. He is responsible for mismanaging funds that belonged to normal people, including farmers, and I think the Justce Department of Mitt Romney should pursue a civil case against him.

    Wall Street is broken. No one has confidence in markets any more, and as Francis Cianfrocca (sp?) put it, equities are financial instruments that have had all the value squeezed out of them. Private equity and VC is the only place anyone makes any money any more, and Wall Street is reduced to bleating about QE3 and whining about the effect cutting government spending will have on GDP.

    Corzine should be in jail. Period. And if we were honest with ourselves, there should be buses going from Manhattan to federal penitentaries all over this country, stopping to pick up people who owned certain banks – like Maxine Waters’ husband.

    OWS almost had this part right, if they had been able to suppress the Communism, anarchy, violence and drug use, this theme might have resonated. Obama had the power to pursue people like Corzine, and he didn’t. That should be the issue.

    • Repair_Man_Jack

      This is why Dodd-Frank, Sarbanes-Oxley, et al. are such total jokes. When nobody enforces the current laws that now exist; why should people put any faith whatsoever in new ones? The implicit threat that persecutions of financial criminals will lead to a 2,000 pt + insta-crash on the Dow followed by a deep recession prevents many in government from considering enforcing the law.

      • inovrmihd

        I am absoluitely conviced that everything the Obama admisinstration does is with one eye on the stock market. That is why he agreed to extend the Bush tax cuts last year (which all the libs couldn’t understand). He was worried that to even threaten to do otherwise would result in people in the higher brackets selling their stocks to lock in lower cap gains rates. This is also the reason for no serious criminal prosecutions of the banks.

        • acat

          In what way does prosecuting a few guilty people threaten the stability of the market? Arguably, the *lack* of prosecution is more harmful as it erodes trust….

          Mew

          • inovrmihd

            The lack of prosecution is more harmful, but Obama’s stock market centric “advisors” have convinced him that actal prosecution will hamr the markets (in the short, not long, term they may be right, as the stock market did take a nosedive after the 2011 state of the union speach when Obama talked tough about the bankers, and again when the DOJ filed charges against GS)

          • acat

            what the market was reacting to?

            Even if we say that you’re correct, all Obama was doing in his speech was a pander to #OWS.

            Mew

          • Viet71

            I support fighters.

            I want Romney to be a fighter.

    • Viet71

      n/t

  • inovrmihd

    I don’t think Wall Street is evil, and I am not a part of the OWS crowd. I just think that there were a lot of crimes committed by certain Wall Street bankers and that the Obama administration keeps looking the other way. How is the MF Global scandal worse then the Standard Charter scandal (trading with Iran for 10 years and so far having to pay a .14 penalty for every $100 dollars worth of transactions.), or Goldman making fraudulent representations when selling MBS, or bank of New York and State Street skimming from pension funds when doing foreign currency transactions? I am not against Wall Street, just against people on Wall Street getting slap on the wrist for actions that would send you or me to prison.

    • acat

      (yes, this is a repeat question)

      Mew

      • inovrmihd

        How is this link for a start:

        http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Wall_Street_crimes

        These are all settlements to avoid criminal prosecutions.

        Then there is this:

        http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-05-12/sec-probes-state-street-foreign-exchange-pricing.html

        and then there is this:

        http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390443404004577581131388820026.html

        • Repair_Man_Jack

          http://www.alecexposed.org/wiki/ALEC_Exposed

          I see you’ve got lot’s of data from an anti-Koch Brothers paranoia site. I just wondered what Alex Jones and Kos would have to say and why you’ve chosen to leave them out of the discussion.

          • inovrmihd

            I have been reading about these wrist slaps for the last 3 years. When asked for details, I just did a google seach. Bloomberg and WSJ are not cosnpiracy sites, and the source watch link was just the list of settlements. Was there anythign on the list that was factually inaccurate? If you don’t like that source, how about these:

            http://www.nationalreview.com/kudlows-money-politics/4037/case-against-goldman-sachs

            (discusses the SEC’s case against GS, which aultimately resulted in a fine and no criminal prosecution.

            http://www.forbes.com/sites/billsinger/2011/11/29/judge-rakoff-rejects-secs-contrivances-in-citigroup-settlement/

            (Judge rejects citibank settlement as a slap on the wrist).

            Let me ask you a question; Are you arguing that the Obama adminsitration has not been easy on the investment and money center banks? Are you arguing that the Holder justice departmenthas not let them off with slaps on the wrist?

          • Repair_Man_Jack

            I’m just pointing out that Sourcewatch is no more credible than say Kos, Infowars or World Net Daily.

        • acat

          Settlements *are* punishment.

          Therefore, the guilty *have been* punished.

          You just think they should be punished *more* … and are looking to demonize an entire group based on the actions of a few.

          I see a couple problems there.

          Mew

          • inovrmihd

            My point is that the Holder justice department accuses banks of serious criminal fraud and then settles for the equivalent of a parking fine. In other words, he goes easy on them. Obama gives them a slap on the wrist and then pretends that he has brought them to justice. Romney should be hammering him on this. Instead, he cedes the issue to Obama.

          • acat

            The Obama/Holder justice department accuses banks of serious criminal fraud *that may or may not be true*.

            By your statement, the fines are small enough to be seen as a cost of doing business, and cheaper than surviving a “fishing expedition” type discovery process.

            The problem is that you – an uninformed citizen – are not withholding judgement – you want to, and this is based on your statements, re-try the banks for crimes they’ve already paid for…

            Further, you haven’t cited any evidence about whether the flaw is on Wall Street or in the Holder DoJ.

            Mew

          • inovrmihd

            I am not sure to what extent you are asking me to establish guilt. I suppose you could say everything was just a fishing expedition prior to trial. Does this story move you at alll:

            http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203499704576623210606537564.html

            As for who is guilty,crimes were committed, and the holder DOJ looked the other way or gave wrist slaps.

            Again, I would ask you to read this link:

            http://www.forbes.com/sites/billsinger/2011/11/29/judge-rakoff-rejects-secs-contrivances-in-citigroup-settlement/

            I really can’t understand how anyone can defend the handling of these cases by the Obama administration (and why Romney shouldn’t be speaking up about it).

          • acat

            If people, corporations, or football programs break the law, they need to be punished.

            I am a law-and-order kind of cat, I fully expect the DoJ to do its’ job and be pretty bipartisan, and I’ll agree that the Obama DoJ isn’t living up to either standard.

            However.

            The burden of proof remains upon the accuser, i.e. the DoJ, and for you to assert that the proven lying scumbags of the Obama DoJ are on the side of the angels just doesn’t fly.

            This is one of those cases where, instead of cheering for either side, I’m over by the concession stand shouting “IN JUR IES! IN JUR IES! IN JUR IES!”

            Further, at a tactical level, I don’t see where Romney could peel off much #OWS support by going after Wall Street … and do I see where Romney could (and has .. check the donations) peel off quite a bit of Wall Street support by not being stupid.

            As has been frequently said around here, we can’t change the Obama Administration policies without first replacing the Obama Administration.

            Mew

          • inovrmihd

            I am not saying Holder’s DOJ are on the side of the angels. I am saying that every time they accuse a bank of committing criminal acts, they settle for a slap on the wrist. Take Standard Charter, for example. They have admitted violating our sanctions against Iran, and when the NY AG was going to take away their banking license, there was pressure put on them by the Obama administration to settle for a minor penalty with no prosecutions. I already linked you to the whistleblower story on the trust banks ripping off pensions on foreign currency transactions, and you can read the lawsuit filed against GS re: the abacus structured product (or read the link to Kudlow to get an overview. If you want to believe that no crimes were committed by any of the money center banks, I suggest you do a little more research.

          • acat

            However, what you’re describing are the actions of a protection racket, being run by Holder. … and you’re demanding prosecution for only one of the guilty parties.

            The onus remains on you to present your case, not on me to do your job for you.

            Mew

          • PowerToThePeople

            that could be applied to you or thrown your way, many who would also apply to me, but you are not an idiot. The poster inovrmihd named himself or herself well and he/she is way in over their head.

            Until he/she understands many of the simple explanations offered to them during this whole conversation, they will continue to post like a moron. I do not expect the idiot to ever get to that point before the powers run out of patience.

          • acat

            Although I have to say, the curiosity is reaching dangerous levels…..

            Mew

          • audax

            ….and then you burst out laughing!

          • inovrmihd

            For Standard Cahrter, who turned themselves in?

          • PowerToThePeople

            I only set aside so much time for stupid and you wasted it all already.Check back with me on Monday when the allotment of time will be replenished and I will see what I can do to explain everything to you on a level you may be able to understand.

          • emptybucket

            the out loud laugh fest. Man you really do not like stupid do you. LOL

            You never fail to either educate or move someone along who is wasting time here at RS.

          • inovrmihd

            Why do you say I am only demanding prosecution for only one of the guilty parties? I think Holder should be impeached ofr avariety of reasons. I really think you don’t understand what I am saying. As for the burden being on me to prove guilt, Standard Cahrter which turned themselves in, there is a smoking gun (email) that was inthe last link, and there was a public whistle blower referred in the previous link.

          • acat

            that I’m calling you out on.

            The only potential audience Romney can play to *by threatening perp-walks* is #OWS… and most of them that can vote won’t vote for Romney.

            Mew

          • emptybucket

            Great comparison for Holder. Protection racket.

          • inovrmihd

            If I gave you that impression, it was my fault for using the term Wall Street. My problem is with teh people in the structured finance department at GS which sold the Paulson MBS product. It is with the individuals at State Street and Bank of New York which reported false prices on currency transactions they did on behalf of pension funds. My problem is with John Corzine, not teh hundreds of people who worked at MF Global. My problem is with probably less than 100 individuals working at the money center banks. But those individuals who broke the law should have been prosecuted, and they weren’t. Instead the banks were able to settle for nuiosance fees.

          • acat

            What laws, for instance, did Corzine break, and what punishment has he skated on?

            (hint: see Repair Man Jack’s diary, above, if you need help)

            Mew

          • inovrmihd

            I don’t have a citation, but commingling customer and firm money is very illegal. here is some background for you to read if you are actually interested. By the way, the key is the internal email half way through the story indicating that the wire transfers were done at the behest of “JC”

            http://dailybail.com/home/we-havent-forgotten-you-jon-corzine.html

  • inovrmihd

    The best part of attacking Obama on this (aside from the fact that it is totally true and that on memebr of the main stream press will defend him) is that it wil move the focus away from the Romney fat cat meme to Obama as defender of Wall Street criminals (plus you get to play the clip of Obam telling bloomberg news that Loloyd Blankfein and Jamie Dimon are “very savvy businesmen” (Chicago politics code for guys that can work the system) and saying that they deserve to ge multimillion dollar slaries because they are like star atheletes..

    http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aKGZkktzkAlA

    • Repair_Man_Jack

      The Next Crossroads Ad or RNC Weekly could be entitled “The Day Hope and Change” died and run that particular interview.

  • fotophun

    Romney about his taxes, but yet this man cannot find the money and goes scott free and we are suppose to take these clowns serious??

    • inovrmihd

      If Romney speaks out about it, it becomes a topic on the weekend news shows, one that the liberals won’t be able to defend. If he remains silent, it gets forgotten in a few days.

      • rabun1016

        The issue is one of accountability to citizens who invested in a business.

  • sbm1

    because anyone who invests in his hedge fund deserves to lose all their money, and then maybe he could possibly go to jail where he belongs.

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    Otherwise, I’ll have to avoid RS on my work computer altogether.

  • dukefergus

    As laws continue to be passed giving government ever greater tentacles into every aspect of life, our government is increasingly behaving like any other centrally planned, totalitarian government does. The politburo types are exempted from application of the laws and the the laws are selectively applied to others in furtherance of the political ideals, goals or even whims of those in power.
    For example, when the deep water rig exploded in the Gulf, there were criminal investigations, billion dollar trust funds set up and people criminally prosecuted. Yet Google, a company with an office in the White House intentionally violates federal law on the importation of drugs. All the way to the CEO were aware that their helping market and sell the drugs were illegal and continued the practice for nearly a decade and their punishment? they forfeited the profit they made on the transactions and apologized.
    And now Corzine, apparently signed off or at least knowingly allowed investor’s money to be illegally hijacked and moved into other accounts and now can’t find it, but he gets nothing?
    The CEO of Amazon gives millions to pro gay marriage amendment, and not a peep. But Dan CAthy from Chick Fil-A merely says he believes in the Bible and the politburo goes into action. One gets the right to expression the other does not.
    Despite thousands of peaceful protests by Tea Party, when a deranged shooter goes on a rampage in CO they immediately try to tie it to the Tea Party and demand eradication of the 2nd Amendment. But Occupy Cleveland tries to blow up a bridge –50 Occupy members show up on court as a show of solidarity wit those accused–and no one is willing to say they are violent. An LGBT activist walks into FRC with 15 bags of chickfila, tells them he doesn’t like their position and starts shooting, but MSM and left refuse to say it was motivated by Politics?
    There is the pattern. And for all the talk of the financial implications of growing government these are the real harms. The only way to stop it is to take away the power from the politburo.

  • PaladinLostHour

    … what’s with the chortling reference to homosexual gang rape. There’s nothing funny about that.

    This isn’t the Daily Kos. We’re better than them, and that.

  • Pingback: Charles Wish

  • Pingback: Waldo Gibney

  • Pingback: electronic cigarette

  • Pingback: Welcome to My Blog

  • Pingback: Auto Forum

  • Pingback: click this

  • Pingback: noclegi zakopane

  • Pingback: Proactol customer reviews

  • Pingback: Egal Gabbay Los Angeles, CA

  • Pingback: wedding hairstyle

  • Pingback: ropa para bebes para bautizo

  • Pingback: sbobet

  • Pingback: Links Eintragen

  • Pingback: musica cristiana online gratis

  • Pingback: BBCAT

  • Pingback: descargar musica gratis facil mp3

  • Pingback: ps3

  • Pingback: assassins creed 3

  • Pingback: click here

  • Pingback: comfortable bridal shoes

  • Pingback: bankruptcy lawyer

  • Pingback: hydratacne kremy

  • Pingback: diet recipes with chicken

  • Pingback: Aquaristik Bücher

  • Pingback: a alternative

  • Pingback: Fusevision.com.sg

  • Pingback: finish repair dallas

  • Pingback: Pool Shop

  • Pingback: over right here

  • Pingback: randka

  • Pingback: Video on Demand

  • Pingback: serwis randkowy

  • Pingback: rewelacyjny portla randkowy

  • Pingback: portal randkowy za darmo

  • Pingback: mobile phone advertising

  • Pingback: Ross Waldenberg

  • Pingback: umow sie na randke

  • Pingback: payday loans

  • Pingback: portal randkowy

  • Pingback: aquarium filter

  • Pingback: darmowy serwis randkowy

  • Pingback: randka

  • Pingback: Power Point

  • Pingback: instant credit card processing

  • Pingback: ford extended warranty reviews

  • Pingback: drawing lessons from the great masters

  • Pingback: web usability testing checklist

  • Pingback: shamrock vacuum services

  • Pingback: eye shields football

  • Pingback: proven task management application

  • Pingback: Click Here For More Info

  • Pingback: umow sie na randke

  • Pingback: randki

  • Pingback: odszukaj milosc swego zycia

  • Pingback: Arkadas Ara

  • Pingback: wielu ludzi w jednym miejscu

  • Pingback: umow sie na randke

  • Pingback: rzeszow randki

  • Pingback: dredge repair

  • Pingback: one-time offer you

  • Pingback: payday loan online

  • Pingback: Investment House

  • Pingback: produced below

  • Pingback: pmu quinté du jour pronostic presse

  • Pingback: wedding planner toscana

  • Pingback: veteran

  • Pingback: Setup

  • Pingback: acknowledged affirmation

  • Pingback: study this upload here

  • Pingback: Diamanta

  • Pingback: Belk

  • Pingback: Kira Sturdy

  • Pingback: helpful website

  • Pingback: Diseño web barato

  • Pingback: Franklyn Solliday

  • Pingback: Brier

  • Pingback: Cyprien

  • Pingback: Benita Pinedo

  • Pingback: Claudie Strange

  • Pingback: adult friends

  • Pingback: Alcohol Detox at Home

  • Pingback: URL

  • Pingback: sofy rozkładane

  • Pingback: John Markin

  • Pingback: las vegas chapter 11 bankruptcy

  • Pingback: weight loss

  • Pingback: Teichfolie

  • Pingback: Very yrev test

  • Pingback: Website development in delhi

  • Pingback: xenon auto

  • Pingback: กล้องวงจรปิด

  • Pingback: Forest

  • Pingback: facebook likes, no username or password needed

  • Pingback: Your #1 urban lifestyle destination

  • Pingback: www.eztraffic.org

  • Pingback: koi

  • Pingback: Shoz tech

  • Pingback: randka

  • Pingback: Zero Wall Street Executives Have Been Arrested, While Over 7,700 Wall Street Protesters Have | Too Big Has Failed