« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

IRS Harassment of Tea Party Groups

IRS Harassment of Tea Party Groups
Remarks by Congressman Tom McClintock

House Chamber, Washington D.C.
April 17, 2012
Mr. Speaker:

A defining aspect of the American tradition is that groups of citizens band together for a wide variety of civic purposes.  They recruit volunteers, raise funds and spend those funds to promote whatever project or cause brings them together.

For more than a century, our tax laws have recognized that such voluntary associations – non-profits, we call them today – should not be taxed, because their proceeds are devoted entirely to improve our communities through education, advocacy, and civic action.  Section 501 of the Internal Revenue code recognizes them today, and civic groups like Move-on-dot-org, the League of Conservation Voters, the ACLU, the National Rifle Association and various taxpayer groups have always been included in this definition. 

We don’t apply a political test to these civic groups – we recognize the fundamental right of Americans to organize and to pool their resources to promote whatever causes they believe in – left or right.  Indeed, whatever their political persuasion, these civic groups perform an absolutely indispensible role in our democracy by raising public awareness, defining issues, educating voters, promoting reforms, holding officials accountable and petitioning their government to redress grievances.   Abolition, Women’s Suffrage, the Civil Rights movement – all would have been impossible without them. 

In order to be recognized as non-profit groups, these organizations must register with the IRS – a purely ministerial function that has, in the past, been applied evenly and without regard to their political views.     

At least until now.

It seems that Tea Party groups are now being treated very differently than their counterparts on the political Left.  For the last two years, many have been stone-walled by the IRS when they have sought to register as non-profits and most recently, they have been barraged with increasingly aggressive and threatening demands vastly outside the legal authority of the IRS.  Indeed, the only conceivable purpose of some of these demands could be to intimidate and harass.
 
A Tea Party group in my district is typical of the reports we are hearing from all across the country.  This group submitted articles of incorporation as a non-profit to the state of California, and received approval within a month.  Then, they tried to register as a non-profit with the IRS.  Despite repeated and numerous inquiries, the IRS stonewalled this group for a year and a half, at which time it demanded thousands of pages of documentation – and gave the group less than three weeks to produce it. 

The IRS demanded the names of every participant at every meeting held over the last two years, transcripts of every speech given at those meetings, what positions they had taken on issues, the names of their volunteers and donors, and copies of  communications they had with elected officials and on and on. 

Perhaps most chilling of all, the organizer of this particular group soon found herself the object of a personal income tax audit by the IRS.

Mr. Speaker, these are groups of volunteers who pass the hat at meetings to pay for renting the hall.  They give of their own time to research issues and pay out of their own pockets for printing fliers. 

The donations made to them aren’t tax deductible, so there is no legitimate purpose for asking the names of their donors, let alone of their volunteers – unless – and this is the fine point of it – unless the intention is to harass and intimidate. 

Ironically, the same tactics we now see used by the IRS against the tea parties were once used by the most abusive of the southern states in the 1950’s to intimidate civil rights groups like the NAACP.
   
No such tactics have been reported by any similar civic groups on the political left, so the conclusion is inescapable – that this administration is very clearly, very pointedly and very deliberately attempting to intimidate, harass and threaten civic minded groups with which they disagree using one of the most feared and powerful agencies of the United States Government to do so.  
   
Mr. Speaker, these facts speak for themselves and need no embellishment or interpretation.  They should alarm every American of good will regardless of political philosophy, for if this precedent is allowed to stand, no one’s freedom is safe.  I bring these facts to the attention of the House today and ask that they be rigorously investigated; and if found accurate that those officials responsible be exposed, disgraced, dismissed and debarred from any further position of trust or power within our government. 

# # #

Video link:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Bwb29bM838

COMMENTS

  • renny

    and denied their existence even when under subpoena. To what purpose, we never knew but obviously to blackmail and extort the owners of the reports.

    The left went nuts when Nixon had an “enemies’ list,” but none is better at using gov power to thwart, intimidate, harass, and bully than the commies in charge.

    • funwithknives

      and if memory serves it was three, The Clinton IRS attempted repeatedly to force the NRA’s entire membership list from them.

      It never happened, but the NRA used to print out every little happening concerning this crap, and the correspondence was tremendous.

      I know that TEA-Pers heart’s are in the right place, but always keep in mind when you decide to ally yourselves with BigGov’t, even with something as inoccuous as non-profit registration,it can bite you in The Gluteous Maximous.
      You’ve decided that you are going to play by Their Rules and all that {that] entails.Never forget Unintended Consequences, and our ever-changing battlegrounds.
      Makes forming yourselves into a bowling league-type organization look pretty good about now, doesn’ t it??

      Wonder if *Media Matters of america*, needed to do all this…….????

  • lastgopinillinois

    Can you fit in an investigation somewhere between F&F and GSA ?

  • lastgopinillinois

    to Tea Party groups for considering their status as 501c4 organizations, but I’m not going to spoil your day and make your blood boil.
    I’ll just be nice and say that it is clearly intelligence-gathering, financially punitive and intimidating. Beyond that, the IRS is also using tactics to stall their status (where TP groups attemp to comply with their demands), and they make it practically impossible to comply with very short filing deadlines.

    The IRS has all the bases covered. Many TP groups have withdrawn their requests to file as tax-exempt organizations (thus, they will have to pay taxes on their accounts). Those few who do attempt to comply are facing an uphill battle, the least of which is the attention required to comply (which is costly and takes away funds and attention from the groups core purpose).

    The Liberty Defense foundation was created in an attempt to battle this new disease affecting our freedom.

    The ACLJ (American Center for Law and Justice) is involved in looking into legal action against the IRS

    Regardless of who or what energy springs forth to fight the injustice, precious time and money will be wasted fighting the onslaught against the Tea Party.

    The 0bama administration wins any way you look at it.
    If the ACLJ is ever able to get the demands rescinded, it will have cost voters much precious $$$ which would have otherwise been contributed to Tea Party and donated to conservative campaigns.

    It is a fail-proof strategy to harm the opposition, and the dems know that the Republicans are too cowardly to call for so much as a reprimand against those responsible for orchestrating this calamity.

  • westcoastpatriette

    The abuse of power extending from the Obama administration has reached levels that warrant impeachment, IMO. The list of abuses and blatant lawlessness is alarming. From suing states to ignoring court orders, President Obama’s reckless disregard for his limited authority can no longer be tolerated.

    All politics aside, at what point will action be taken against the President himself to stop the harassment and bullying of citizens, state governments, businesses and churches? How much more harassment and intimidation are we expected to take before Congress takes action beyond simple “investigations”? What can the average citizen do to help bring about formal actions against this president?

    A response to my questions here on this forum would be appreciated.

    Thank you.

  • checkmate2012

    Where is the quid pro quo for left groups? Nonexistent is the answer.