« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Newt Gingrich: Talking Head or the Smartest Man in the Race? (What Have You Done For Me Lately?)

There’s been a lot of discussion during this primary season about the candidates and their speeches, records, electability, baggage, and so on. Upon reading a comment today from a Romney shill (who was ceremonially banned for the third time) that Newt is nothing more than a “talking head,” I recalled the Speaker’s comments in a speech he gave the night before the Alabama primary last week. You can listen to Newt’s speech as well as Senator Santorum’s Speeches (Video playlist is linked on the right of the page.) Though a transcript of the speeches is not available, parts of both have been summarized in my previous diary and the comments thereto AL Forum.

However, the purpose of this diary is to directly refute the talking head comment. To do that, I went back and listened specifically to Newt’s response to the question from Bill Armistead, AL-GOP State Chairman, who asked him to explain to Alabamians why he is the most conservative candidate in the race who can win. Forgive the paraphrasing, but here’s the gist of Newt’s comments which start around the 1:19 minute mark in the video linked above.

Look at Romney’s ratings when he left MA. Look at Santorum’s defeat in PA. Contrast with my [Newt's] record in the GOP. I helped create the GA GOP. I worked in the GA GOP when there was none. I ran for Congress and won in the middle of Watergate. I worked 16 years to help create a national majority for the GOP.

He went on to outline the following:

1980 – I helped design the first Capitol Steps event in history. We won 6 U.S. Senate seats by a combined margin of 75,000 votes. We won the Senate when nobody thought we could.

1984 – I helped design a campaign that set a record. We carried 49 states and picked up 33 House seats.

1988 – We were behind Dukakis 19 points in May. We designed a Reagan style campaign. We didn’t try to go to the middle. If George Bush had run as moderate, he’d have gotten beat. He ran as a Reagan conservative promising no new taxes and standing for national defense and attacking the Massachusetts liberalism of Dukakis. We switched 25% of the country. 1 in 4 voters during that campaign switched their view.

1994 – We designed and presented the Contract with America in a positive way to the American people. I would do the same this fall and offer paychecks rather than food stamps, the Constitution rather than Alinsky, $2.50 a gallon gas and drilling rather than algae. Real choices.

Since 1982, Speaker Gingrich has authored or co-authored 18 non-fiction books, 9 fiction books and produced 8 series and one film. His opponents like to point out that one of these, A Contract with the Earth, suggests that conservatives should embrace environmentalism, leaving one to assume that Newt himself embraced the liberal views of all things green. However, I recall that Newt pointed out in 2007 interview with salon.com (Interview):

One of the major reasons that Terry Maple and I wrote “A Contract With the Earth” was to reopen the debate, and to say that there are solutions which involve incentives, science and technology and markets. Entrepreneurs are potentially much more powerful and successful than regulatory and litigation solutions. We ought to be having a dialogue about which solution works better rather than being engaged in a purely partisan debate to see who can yell “anti-environmentalist” more.

It’s a fascinating interview which no doubt can be dissected down to Newt’s believes in global warming or remember Newt sat on a couch with Nancy for those who refuse to look at his entire record of achievements.

But back to the subject at hand, Newt’s accomplishments. Consider Newt’s other non-fiction books:

• The Government’s Role in Solving Societal Problems
• Window of Opportunity
• Contract with America (co-editor)
• Restoring the Dream
• Quotations from Speaker Newt
• To Renew America
• Lessons Learned The Hard Way
• Presidential Determination Regarding Certification of the Thirty-Two Major Illicit Narcotics Producing and Transit Countries
• Saving Lives and Saving Money
• Winning the Future
• Rediscovering God in America: Reflections on the Role of Faith in Our Nation’s History and Future
• The Art of Transformation
• A Contract with the Earth
• Real Change: From the World That Fails to the World That Works
• Drill Here, Drill Now, Pay Less: A Handbook for Slashing Gas Prices and Solving Our Energy Crisis
• 5 Principles for a Successful Life: From Our Family to Yours, with Jackie Gingrich Cushman
• To Save America: Stopping Obama’s Secular-Socialist Machine, with Joe DeSantis
• A Nation Like No Other: Why American Exceptionalism Matters

The vast majority, if not all, of Gingrich’s other books are textbook conservative. Read the reviews at amazon for yourself. Better yet, read the books.

After leaving Congress in 1999 (and yes, I know all about the “cloud” under which he left), Newt amassed a personal fortune writing books, giving speeches, and founding an empire of companies and nonprofits which he ultimately left in order to run for President. The cloud doesn’t appear to have been too big of an issue considering the invitations he received to speak and the number of groups which solicited his thoughts and advice on various matters.

From 2007 to 2011, Newt chaired the organization, American Solutions, which he founded for the purpose of engaging citizens and elected officials in a dialogue intended to propose solutions to problems affecting American society. It was one of the nation’s largest grassroots efforts with 3 main initiatives. “Drill Here. Drill Now. Pay Less.” “Jobs Here. Jobs Now. Jobs First.” and “No More Obamacare.” Sounds pretty conservative to me. And yes, I’m going to use Wikipedia as a source for a good summary of AmericanSolutions.

Since Speaker Gingrich threw his hat back into the proverbial political arena, he continues to articulate the 3 basic tenets of conservatism (fiscal, social and strong defense). He offers real and practical solutions to the problems we are facing as outlined at Newt’s Solutions.

This diary is not about Newt’s baggage, political or personal. You may not agree with his policies or solutions. You may abhor his failures. You may not like or support Newt. What I suggest you cannot do is ignore his accomplishments which is what this diary is all about. In that regard, please tell me what have you done for me, conservatism and the GOP lately? Better still, what has your candidate done lately or in the last 34 years like Newt?

COMMENTS

  • recentlyenlightened

    Newt and his supporters are very lucky to have you in our corner! Another post that will be going out to my people. Thank you.

  • Pingback: more...

  • Pingback: Paul Cozzy

  • Pingback: Brady Twyman

  • Pingback: SEO Services Australia

  • Pingback: Welcome to My Blog

  • Pingback: alcohol distilling

  • Pingback: Reverse Number Lookup

  • Pingback: rewelacyjny portla randkowy

  • Pingback: serwis randkowy

  • Pingback: how to homebrew beer

  • Pingback: najlepsza randka

  • Pingback: rewelacyjny portla randkowy

  • Pingback: กล้องวงจรปิด

  • Pingback: randki internetowe

  • Pingback: steel strapping

  • Pingback: randka przez internet

  • Pingback: rubinetteria

  • Pingback: Media Streaming

  • Pingback: watch this video

  • Pingback: You Can Try This Out

  • Pingback: Hop Over To Here

  • Pingback: web design barrow

  • Pingback: karos registraciya

  • Pingback: property in india

  • Pingback: desain interior rumah

  • Pingback: online jobs uk

  • Pingback: biaya bangun rumah

  • Pingback: Bret Sharperson

  • Pingback: Rolf Brais

  • Pingback: Store Fixture Installations

  • Pingback: growing aloe vera

  • Pingback: Rosamaria Froebe

  • Pingback: cv wzór

  • Pingback: thel Addison

  • Pingback: wzór cv

  • Pingback: Annett Blowe

  • Pingback: madam lux

  • Pingback: sofy rozkładane

  • Pingback: John Markin

  • Pingback: John Markin

  • Pingback: website

  • Pingback: Automotive Forum

  • Pingback: free reverse look

  • Pingback: Repair and Troubleshoot PLC

  • Pingback: John Markin

  • Pingback: Teichfolie

  • Pingback: payday advance lenders no checking account top payday advance lenders top payday advance top payday advance loans top payday advance sites top payday advance companies top payday advance websites top payday advance providers top rated payday advance loans

  • Pingback: payday loan reviews

  • Pingback: Scooters

  • Pingback: darmowa strona z randkami

  • garfieldjl

    That instead of pushing to nominate the person with the ideas on how to fix the country, we’re on the verge of nominating Mr. inevitably unelectable.

    Bain Capital

    All Obama needs is pictures of some kid crying about how mommy or daddy lost their job because Bain Capital gutted the company their parent worked at. It wouldn’t surprise me if Obama already has had those videos filmed.

    Face the facts people Romney can’t win the general.

  • lastgopinillinois

    I was in my 30′s when Newt was in congress during the 90′s. I was always a news junkie, especially with regard to politics.
    I dare you to find a way to tell the story of the Clinton administration without telling more about Newt that you would about Clinton.
    Newt DOMINATED the whole White House scene back then.
    Newt had Clinton in a stranglehold, as I recall. He is a fighter. He is a doer. He has bold ideas and has a plan, (most of which I like).
    I fail to see how most people dismiss him over Romney or Santo.

  • lineholder

    (You just had to use that particular song reference in your title, didn’t you, Melody? Now I have it streaming through my head)

    Yes, Newt is the smartest in the bunch. The man has forgotten more about American History, our Constitution, and the development of public policy positions in this nation than most of us ever learned. He’s bold. He doesn’t cotton to the PC-death-grip that the Dems have had on Repubs. (Breaking away from that particular oppressive influence would do wonders in this nation!)

    He may not pull of winning the nomination, but I sure as the dickens hope (for all our sakes) that he stays in the fight. We need all the fighters we can get.

  • demsaresatanic

    I doubt that there are many great men without significant flaws; the truly great ones admit it, the lessor ones lie about it or make excuses. If this country is denied a leader of such intellect because of a narrow-minded inability to forgive such a human failing as Newt’s it will be a tragedy of epic proportion, complete with the irony that it is fellow conservatives who have done him in. Thanks for holding true.

  • lynnotting

    If this party showed even a tenth of the respect that Newt has given to conservatism, we would not be nominating someone that doesn’t even know what it means to hold such principles…and that goes for all the candidates still in this race. Newt is a true champion of this cause and has proven, time and time again, he accomplishes his goals.

  • cbartlett

    I just can’t figure out what is so bad about being the smartest person in the room. I subscribed to Newt’s emails from American Solutions back when Obamacare was first being introduced. I have always thought that Newt had the best chance of defeating the liberal cause – on all issues. He knows how to speak – and teach – conservatism. It seems like there is a list a mile long of Romney’s non-conservative stands, flip-flops and just plain creepy opponent bashing tactics. The only negative I keep seeing repeated about Newt is the 3 wives thing and how “women will NEVER vote for him” because of it. Well – I am a female and I can overlook the personal marriage failings a whole lot easier than I can overlook the destruction of this country. I sure hope he stays in through the Texas primary. Romney may inevitable – and I will absolutely support him if he is the nominee in the fall – but I will still vote for Newt in May.

  • avagreen

    - Better than Romney
    - Better than Sanitorium

    Let me add my accolades…Excellent article, melody.

  • gracie

    Melody not only do I envy you meeting him but hey he answered YOU in his diary! you re cool girl.

    And hawt with the diaries!

    Today was a sad day…Seems like everybody is giving up.

  • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

    I read in another comment somewhere that you are also a member of the church of Christ, so I know you understand the struggle to support someone with the baggage Newt has. I admit to having a difficult time of ignoring the pull of speeches like those from Senator Santorum that focus on God and family. However, liberal policies are destroying our society and families. I came to the conclusion that despite Newt’s own personal failures, he is the best man to fight those policies and protect our country from them. I do not regret voting for him on 3/13/2012. I’m hoping and praying I’ll get the chance to do so in November even though that continues to look unlikely.

  • LDahl752

    The most common line I hear is “I just don’t trust him.” And, usually the same old reasons, his position on climate change, supporting Scozzafava, sitting on the couch with Nancy, etal. He has given explanations for every mistake and how he learned from them. That’s something we don’t hear from Mitt or Rick. In fact, Rick paints himself as the “true conservative” when he is nothing like that, and makes excuses for his big labor votes because he representing PA. Well, if he knew that Davis-Bacon is wrong for cities and right-to-work laws are good for those seeking a job, it was his job to explain it to his constituents and convince them he was doing what was right. Newt is the only one who will fight hard to get this country back on track, and I’m sad that so many don’t even bother to get to know the man.

  • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

    and/or recommended. Writing does not come naturally to me, so the encouragement and kind words are very much appreciated.

  • sandollar

    Great diary, Melody! (I guess I can’t recommend yet- or ??)

    :-) I guess your title is a rhetorical question. Even Newt’s detractors know the truth.

    No one but Newt!

  • demsaresatanic

    “the struggle to support someone with the baggage Newt has,” is a subject that crops up here from Romney and Santorum people almost constantly, and I’m interested to hear a Newt supporter’s perspective.

    What is hard about forgiving Newt if you believe in scripture? It should be automatic should it not, Newt has admitted his sin and sought forgiveness; there is no evidence whatever that Newt’s request for forgiveness was anything other than sincere; what more can anyone ask of him. This is by no means a criticism of you, I am simply curious.

  • recentlyenlightened

    I too have a hard time understanding why people can not get over Newt’s “baggage” as it pertains to his marriages. I have talked to several people (christians) about it in an attempt to boil it down and here’s what I’ve come up with.

    When asked, my christian friends say they believe in forgiveness and redemption, that these are gifts from God delivered in the form of his earthly son. They believe, as christians, they have and will continue to receive it themselves. I agree, of course. However, they still can’t get over it. Best I can figure, they don’t believe he is sincere.

    What they miss, in my opinion, is that it is not up to us to judge whether or not he is sincere. As christians we should take other christians at their word and leave it to God to make the judgement as to whether or not the sinner is sincere. Trusting that He knows every heart and that He will redeem based on that knowledge. It is not up to us to pass judgement,

    What frustrates me most are the people who seem to think they are doing the “christian thing” by not supporting Newt because he is a sinner. That is the exact opposite of the “christian thing” to me. I support Newt 100% and believe he is the perfect man for this time. He is the only one with the specific skill set to do the things that must be done to ensure the survival of this nation. I also know he has flaws. There are plenty of things in his past to rail against if you don’t like the guy. Railing against him for being a sinner is disingenuous as we are all sinners. Sin is sin, there is no grading curve. If you can’t accept what Newt says as truth and forgive him then I think you are, in essence, saying you know better than God who should be forgiven.

    There’s my take, fwiw. You are right, as christians we should look to scripture and scripture tells us that in fact he had been forgiven before he ever sinned. That goes for all christians. All that’s left to do is confess and ask for it.

  • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

    forgiveness. Anyone who knows me will tell you I’m a pretty forgiving person. I typically don’t hold grudges, and I like to resolve things and move on. Further, where Newt is concerned, I consider his sin to be against his family and not me personally, so according to scripture, I have nothing to forgive. And for the record, I think Newt is sincere as well.

    However, when someone asks for my vote for the highest office in the land, or for my county commissioner for that matter, I consider their character in addition to other criteria. As far as being a good husband and father, Newt falls short compared to other candidates. Fortunately for Newt, I balanced that against everything else and considered the impact his past behavior would have on me and my family, if any. In this case, I’d say that impact is none, but it’s a gamble. He might very well have an affair while in office that might cause harm to the conservatism movement and what we hope to accomplish. So while I would prefer that Newt have no “baggage” or risk, Obamacare and big government is a much bigger threat to my family and the country,

    The two biggest issues for me with Romney are is record of appointing liberal judges and Romneycare which he won’t disown. Based on his record, I think he’s likely to be squishy on these matters, and if I take that gamble and lose, each would have a direct impact on my family.

    With Santorum, it’s his “tendency” to be a team player like he was during the Bush years. I think he would go after Obama and Obamacare, but I don’t see him challenging Boehner or McConnell or any of the other squishes on the GOP team. This would likely result in more of the status quo, meaning no real effort to curb spending or enact real reform. This would also have a direct impact on my family.

  • WillWong

    For the longest time, Newt called himself an Evangelical Christian and committed all those sins while being an Evangelical Christian and he converted to Roman Catholicism for redemption. While there have been huge strides made in the Ecumenical movement to make Roman Catholicism more acceptable to Evangelicals, there are countless people who still has problems with the theological practices of the Roman Catholic Church.

    His conversion to Roman Catholicism from Evangelical Christianity may be a stumbling block to Evangelicals. Many Evangelicals have coalesce to the other Catholic in the race, Santorum because he lives his Catholicsim on his sleeves.

    For me personally, Newt is the only person with the demonstrated skill sets to turn this country around and I will vote for him in California.

  • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

    is that during this primary season, whenever I’ve talked politics with anyone, whether it’s church friends, co-workers, family, tea partiers, Republicans, conservatives, whoever, it’s been all about their policies and the effects they have on our families. I’m telling you religion has not been an issue at all. For any of them. If it’s even been mentioned, it was only in passing.

    From a personal standpoint, I’ve said before that all things being equal (that being the operative phrase), I prefer a candidate whose experiences, religion, background, etc., most closely resemble my own. Frankly, however, I have no idea what religion many of my favorite conservatives are (DeMint, Rubio, West, Jindal, Pence, Lee, just to name a few). I would have assumed Rubio was Catholic, but somebody posted that he’s Baptist. One might assume Jindal is something other than traditional Christian. Isn’t Lee a Mormon? And Newt’s conversion to Catholicism? On a political level, I don’t care. If we’re talking theology, that’s a different conversation entirely.

  • WillWong

    the take away is that many are confused why so many people are unwilling to consider Newt based on his policies and I am trying to provide a possible explanation.

  • WillWong

    Love reading your stuff! Keep it going! Newt would be really proud of you and us all!

  • GeneralAl

    What makes you think the Gingrich can? Do you not realize, people hate him in all political spectrums? Just because you like him is irrelevant. Politics is about turning everyone to your side. Gingrich, as well as Santorum are big failures at that game.

  • Flagstaff

    Thoughtful. Organized. Effective.

    It reinforces the good things I like about Newt. I can accept and agree with the arguments you provide on his behalf. I wish I could answer definitively the question, “Why isn’t Newt leading everybody else?”

    Sadly, the only answer I can come up with is “Newt.”

    Obviously, he started out with a financing deficit, but that isn’t really an excuse. He’s written 18 books that you list, and maybe dozens more that you didn’t. He is a real conservative, and he never supported Arlen Specter. He didn’t vote for Romneycare in Massachusetts. (Of course he did make other mistakes, but they didn’t result in bad legislation.)

    Yet, as smart as he is, as many books as he sold, as much money as he made advising Freddie, he doesn’t have enough money to compete (he says, by implication). Why is that? Howard Dean made enough, and who the heck was he? He claimed it came from the “little people.” Aren’t the conservative version of the “little people” exactly the ones that Newt appeals to? You have to figure there is something about Newt that has kept him too poor to compete.

    Then there was the little matter of the vacation in Italy when the other guys were consolidating their bases. What if he’d kept working then, instead? Would he be stronger now? We don’t know, but whatever the answer, the responsibility for the situation rests squarely on Newt’s shoulders.

    The same can be said for the turmoil within his staff. The changes may have been right and necessary, but they were necessary because he made the wrong decisions originally. And whose fault was it that Newt didn’t file in time in Virginia, the state where he lives? Newt’s!

    Finally, what we all say is making no difference at all. He is getting no traction in any state except SC and GA. He didn’t even win Florida or Louisiana. No matter what we say, the voters are not being convinced to vote for him. Whose fault is that? And why is it happening this way?

    If Newt’s so smart, why isn’t he winning?

  • Flagstaff

    According to other, equally credible pundits, neither Santorum nor Gingrich nor Paul can win, either.

  • Juggernaut

    Newt on small issues that no one cared about till he ran for office again showing how cheap and petty politicians and the media are. Romney is cheap and as petty as they come and he could careless what anyone thinks let alone care when he shifts his position time and again. Any man who doesn’t care about his dog could care less about voters. Obama is going to stomp him with class warfare attacks and the over a 1000 companies he closed…..according to Axelrod. We all have a relative or know someone who faced downsizing or saw a company move overseas.

    Makes Newt a better choice despite his so called antics while in office. But did the media ever go into detail and describe some of those situations, nope, not really. So Newt outmaneuvered idiots and those who wouldn’t support spending cuts and the Bush congress gave us Obama. Romney shall give us 4 more years of Obama and all the tools who voted for him will pretend it was something else that caused the loss.

  • WillWong

    I suspect Romney if he becomes the nominee will just be a push as well!

  • papabear

    You may like Romney, but that doesn’t imply that he is likable. People only like him when they project their image onto him. However, as his communications director pointed out, he is an Etch a Sketch.

    I don’t recall having feelings for my Etch a Sketch …

  • Flagstaff

    Not as a reply to garfield.

  • http://www.AmericanThinker.com Hammer2008

    Sorry, a bit to harsh. Fine, he’s the “best” debater. Fine, he’s the “smartest” man on stage.

    He’s just the least wisest.

  • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

    about Newt’s accomplishments which did more for conservatism than Romney and Santorum put together.

    As others have noted, he seems to be the only candidate who has gotten inside of Obama’s head. Obama has given several speeches in response to Newt’s solutions, Carney has attacked Newt and then had to walk it back.

    I made no apologies for the things Newt has done that showed poor judgment, and he’s apologized for most if not all of them. Where is Romney’s apology for Romneycare? Where is Santorum’s for Sarbanes Oxley? And that’s just one example of a huge lack of judgment for each that actually impacted many, many lives, not just their own families.