« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Unleashing America’s Energy

President Obama’s flat-out rejection of the Keystone Pipeline is radical, irresponsible, and dumbfounding. Sadly though, It is yet another example of this President’s capitulation to the radical environmental fringe which puts our economy and national security at risk. Our nation needs to become energy independent and this pipeline would have been an important step in that direction. Instead of an estimated twenty thousand jobs going to Americans – those jobs will go to our international competitors like China.

This behavior is nothing new from President Obama – you don’t have to look any further than the failure of the green energy companies like Solyndra and Beacon Power.   President Obama had the arrogance to try and pick winners and losers at the taxpayer’s expense rather than to invest in proven energy sources that are also proven job creators.

While Barack Obama doesn’t understand the importance of energy security, our enemies sure do.  There is no coincidence that Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s first stop on a recent four-nation tour of Latin America was to meet Venezuela’s ruthless dictator Hugo Chavez.  Iran and Venezuela have vast cultural differences, but they share two similarities.  Both countries are among the world’s top crude-oil exporters, and both of their leaders share a relentless hatred for American values.  Chavez continues to threaten that he will cut off his oil supply even though the U.S. is his country’s number one consumer. Ahmadinejad is building an underground network in Latin America as well as with its neighbors in the Middle East.  He continues to use political leverage by threatening to close the Strait of Hormuz which provides passage for some 15.5 million barrels of crude oil per day, amounting to one third of the world’s seaborne oil shipments.

Dependence on foreign energy gives our enemies the ability to ignore America’s values, interests, ideals, feeds the beast of radical Islam, and weakens our political effectiveness globally.

Nevertheless, the president continues to refuse the expansion of domestic off-shore drilling.  He touts putting together a five-year plan but he drops the ball when it comes to opening areas to access, exploration, and drilling.  America is one of the few nations to put known large domestic supplies of oil and gas off-limits to exploration.  Meanwhile, the Chinese have purchased drilling leases from Cuba. They’ll be drilling 45 miles off the coast of Florida while American workers sit on the bench and watch Chinese workers perform their job.

My plan will unleash America’s energy production. It creates energy security that strengthens our national security and decreases reliance on unreliable and adversarial nations.  We need to expand domestic innovations and energy resources.  This includes oil, natural gas, hydro, biomass, wind, solar, clean coal, and nuclear energy.  As President, I will remove bans on drilling—both onshore and offshore.  This will immediately increase supply, create jobs, and bring revenues to federal and state governments.  I will immediately approve the construction of the Keystone pipeline, reduce the Environmental Protection Agency’s overreach by repealing its job-killing, bureaucratic regulations, and refocus its efforts on common-sense conservation goals such as preserving clean air and water.

Pennsylvania is a perfect template for the model: increase supply means lower prices.   Market forces are driving natural gas exploration there and as a result the price has dramatically dropped – from $13 per 1,000 cubic feet down to $2.60 per 1,000 cubic feet.  In addition, experts predict this could create up to 200,000 jobs by 2020 in Pennsylvania alone, and lower energy costs for families and businesses.

I will also restructure the priorities and cut the personnel of the Department of Energy.  Right now the government spends an exorbitant amount of money on technologies to reduce carbon dioxide emissions and alternative-energy vehicles.  All of these energy sources and technologies are currently available in the private sector, but they are not commercially viable because of burdensome regulations.  It is not the government’s role to force these technologies into the market place.  I, unlike President Obama, realize that market forces will create the most sustainable forms of energy.  This will encourage economic growth, create  U.S. jobs, lower costs to consumers, and will help bring us back on the road to growth and opportunity.

The message is clear.  We need a leader who understands that we must unleash our domestic energy production to enhance our national security and grow our economy. Unlike sending a man to the moon, this is not rocket science. Countries like Brazil, France, and Canada have largely achieved self sufficiency through biofuels, nuclear energy, and natural gas and oil respectively. Now is the time to unleash our great energy resources to expand American job opportunities, strengthen our national security,and preserve and grow our status as the leading economy in the world.

Rick Santorum, a former representative and senator from Pennsylvania, is a candidate for the Republican nomination for president.  

COMMENTS

  • aesthete

    France uses its own energy, but largely by subsidizing nuclear reactors and by artificially making gasoline incredibly expensive.

    Reducing the price of energy by deregulating energy here, and by allowing drilling and partnerships with our allies is a no-brainer. It is not, however, energy independence, and we should not be seeking energy independence: something which is only possible by greatly increasing the cost of energy in the US.

  • http://stevemaley.com Steve Maley

    Unfortunately, the current occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave has no expertise in the area and poor advice. We may as well turn policy over to a high school student council.

    And we know that when you say “energy independence” you mean “energy security”. Canada is an important part of our future.

    • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

      in principle with Common Cents in his comment above.

      While I agree with you on social issues, I’ve been disappointed in your fiscal record. However, I’ve come to believe that you would do everything in your power to push the repeal of Obamacare and that you would appoint more conservative judges than Gov. Romney. Having said that, it is my understanding that you have neither the money nor the campaign staff/organization it would take in order to defeat Romney in the primary. Further, I am not sure you are prepared to face the kind of vicious attacks Romney is ready to throw your way if and when he thinks that is necessary, not to mention the viciousness that will be heaped upon whoever the GOP nominee is by the liberals. Therefore, the question becomes why should you remain in the race? In my humble opinion, it would be a selfless act if you were to withdraw from the race and endorse Speaker Gingrich who has nothing to lose at this point. He and Mrs. Gingrich know what to expect and are prepared to deal with it.

      I believe it is almost as imperative to defeat Romney as it is Obama, and I do not say that lightly. The kind of campaign he has run has convinced me he is not the man I thought he was. Further, I simply do not believe he will work to repeal Obamacare, but rather will attempt to “fix” it. Neither do I believe, based on his record, that he will appoint judges like Justices Scalia, Thomas, Roberts or Alito. If I am right, these actions would have consequences for years to come. It’s risk I am not willing to take. I sincerely hope you’re not willing to do so either.

      I appreciate very much your passion for this country, and in particular, the remarks you made in the debate the other night about the part God and religion have played and should continue to play in our country.

  • acat

    Keystone starts in the tar sands north of the border.

    That’s .. kind of a blindingly obvious point to miss.

    Mew

  • deVere

    The pipeline certainly enhances energy security, and the jobs for building and operating the pipeline would go to Americans.

  • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

    Keystone XL will ship American crude from the bakken field as well. see:

    http://seekingalpha.com/article/321263-the-bakken-oilfield-transcanada-keystone-xl-project-may-bypass-federal-review

    So keystone not only helps us in securing supplies from a friendly neighbor, it helps the development of new american fields.

    It is accurate to say Keystone will help us move towards energy independence.

  • lineholder

    I just want to say thank you for the effort you made to draw attention to the similarities in the socialized health care program that Mitt Romney was instrumental in implementing in Massachusetts and the socialized health care program that President Obama has saddled us with on a national level

    This one piece of legislation will extend the scope and power of government beyond any that has been introduced in our nation to date, and it won’t take long before it consumes so much of our GDP that there will be no turning back.

    Regardless of how things go on Tuesday, I hope that you will continue to fight against this in one way or another. For all our sakes.

  • acat

    It provides short-term jobs in construction, long-term jobs in maintenance and refining, and it’s a lot harder to interrupt than tanker shipments.

    That said, the Senator’s point about Keystone being key to energy independence is a rather serious gaffe.

    Mew

  • Xasteius

    getting us away from dependence on unfriendly countries.

  • GregInFla

    You are a friend of the unborn. You have our votes in Florida.

  • renny

    and the oil industry domestically, and its success would help drive the development of our own tar sands that supposedly hold as much oil as Arabia. We have poured TRILLIONS into the Middle East since the 1930s to secure oil and have ended up making ourselves more vulnerable both to oil blackmail by countries that are not true allies and make us more insecure in defense by nations, some of which actively are adversaries and enemies.

    More GOP candidates should be addressing this issue which is a near guarantor for “kick starting” the US ec. again, unlike the stimuli that stole from taxation to boost friends of Dems. and gov’t.

  • cactusjack

    By comparison and point of information: the Alaska Pipeline which runs from the North Slope to Valdez AK, whence the crude is tankered to California. It , was built in the 1970s at estimated original cost of $2B which finished at actual $8B (1970s dollars). No matter. That pipeline has paid for itself many, many times over. It has already exceeded its design life. The fields are depleting but the throughput capacities are still enough to keep the oil moving in a pipeline which is still working. No engineer knows the throughput end of its capacity, it just keeps delivering crude to the Lower 48 market. Every barrel flowed through it has meant American jobs and a barrel not bought from the middle east. On security, on energy, on economic efficiency – and yes on environmentals, look at the thriving caribou herds which shelter under its warmth – the Alaska pipeline has been a win, win, win for the US that is performing long after its design life. #Ergo, we need to build Keystone and bring that crude to the Gulf refineries. Yesterday.

  • Common_Cents

    However, it is time to have an honest conversation with Redstate and America.

    As you know, the DC establishment is unleashing vicious attacks on conservatives/tea party. Currently aimed at Gingrich full force. But it would be aimed at you if you were the front runner.

    This is a battle for the GOP and for America as Romney and the DC establishment will give us largely more of the same and the destruction of the tea party gains, the real voice of the people.

    Florida might be the last stand for the anti Romney/ anti DC establishment faction. It will be nearly impossible to fight the establishment with split support.

    Please lay out your thoughts on your realistic path to victory. Please let us know how many states ballots you are on. What kind of organization do you have? Are you just banking on some implosion of another candidate?

    Time is of the essence, Florida might be the last stand for anyone. If Mitt Romney wins Florida, no candidate will be able to overtake him. Not you, Not Gingrich, not some new fantasy candidate entering the race.

    Governor Perry realistically recognized the big picture, and graciously stepped back in order to further the cause. Very admirable.

    Florida is a winner take all state and only the winner will get the momentum and money to continue. Coming in third or fourth will mean nothing but only guaranteeing a Romney win.

    If you can’t lay out a path to victory in Florida you are only handing the nomination to Romney.

    Please take a realistic look here. America truly hangs in the balance as the DC establishment has risen up showing its fangs to the American people. All the positive gains by the tea party in 2010 is about to be flushed down the toilet.

    I think you know in your heart and brain what to do. You could have a huge positive impact on the country in doing the right thing.

    Thanks for being a great American. I hope you consider doing the honorable thing in stepping back, to advance America!

  • acat

    That he chose not to … well …

    Mew

  • acat

    When it’s your candidate who gaffes, you’re all ready on defense, but let any other poster defend a different candidates’ misspeak …

    Typical candi-bot.

    Mew

  • redmymind

    I like both of you as impressive non-Romney candidates. I was particularly impressed with your take down of Romney on HC Thursday night. You clearly won that debate. That said, I don’t see how Romney’s nomination can be stopped without either one of you stepping aside. Am I missing something here? Is there another paradigm that I am not aware of that supplies a plausible reason for continuing to divide up the conservative vote?