« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The Sunshine State Needs Jobs Not Big Government

President Obama’s State of the Union speech confirmed that flowing rhetoric can’t compensate for failed economic policies.

In Florida, families are hurting and jobs are scarce with nearly 10 percent unemployment.  In Washington, politicians have nearly doubled their spending over the past 10 years and they plan to burn through $3.7 trillion this fiscal year alone, spending around 40% more than we have.  Through their economic and moral malpractice, our nation’s debt now stands at over $15 trillion, equivalent to a $135 thousand of debt on every American household.   This concerns Americans of all age and all incomelevels.  This out-of-control spending and growth of job-killing government regulations also destroy Florida’s jobs and concentrates extraordinary power in Washington.

For each penny spent by Washington, it must take one from the private sector.  Overspending, takes from our future as well.   Government spending – no matter how it is financed – represents a significant burden on the private sector.  Washington’s lack of fiscal discipline strips trillions from the real economy that could be used by entrepreneurs to hire employees and produce value. This means less money and fewer jobs for Florida’s families. That’s why raising taxes won’t solve the jobs problem in Florida; it will only worsen it.

President Obama quoted our first Republican President Abraham Lincoln to the effect that government should do for people only what they cannot do for themselves.  He then went on to list all of the ways that he was going to ignore this foundational American principle.  Under Obama, Washington, DC violates this principle of limited government and economic freedom on a daily basis and apparently he is committed to keep putting points on thatsame board.

The past few years have been tough on Florida’s families.  If they don’t benefit from Washington’s outrageous fiscal excess, who does?  The answer: Big Business, Big Labor, and Big Government.

In the ongoing Solyndra scandal, the Obama administration guaranteed $535 million to a company that’s only competitive advantage was its political connections.  Over a thousand working men and women lost their jobs, but the donors reaped a profit.  Administration officials knew about the company’s pending collapse, but failed to notify workers for purely political reasons.

At Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, once again it became political connections not the free market that determined their fate.  Executives paid themselves multi-million dollar bonuses while hiringlobbyists from both parties to help push substandard mortgages through the system.  As a result, Florida now suffers from a historic collapse in its housing market with 45% of homes “underwater” with the mortgages exceeding the current market value.   In 2006, I singed a letter with a handful of Senators warning of the pending disaster on the horizon – and demanded the system be reformed.  While that attempt fell on deaf ears, as President I will eliminate the federal housing role of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and help those seeking a fresh start by allowing deductions for losses from the sale of a home.

In South Carolina, the National Labor Relations Board intervened directly in Boeing’s business decisions.  While the NLRB dropped its case against Boeing last month, the threat to all Americans’ economic freedom continues.  I will make sure that they don’t have the resources to undermine the free market and jobs again.

Some say that these examples show capitalism in action.  I disagree.  Instead, each exemplifies a different aspect of abuse of the free market what some call crony capitalism.  In a free market, businesses create value for society by producing goods and services that make their customers’ lives better. If they do this, they make a profit and society benefits.

But we no longer have a free market in America.  Instead, Big Business, Big Government, and Big Labor have fused into a system where cronies benefit through backroom deals instead of through adding economic value.   Small businesses, entrepreneurs, and families lose in this system.

The Constitution does not give government the power to pick corporate winners and losers.  It does not give government the power to micromanage corporate decisions.   We need pro-growth economic freedom which will promote equality of opportunity for all Americans.

Government does, however, have a responsibility in these trying times to help working families.  At a minimum, government should defend private property rights, ensure a stable dollar, and protect families against fraudulent business practices.

That’s why my “Made in America” plan can be boiled down to a few basic points.   We will cut $5 trillion from the federal budget over 5 years, pass a Balanced Budget Amendment to force Congress and the President to live within our means, lower and simplify taxes on personal and corporate income and savings, and allow only commonsense, predictable regulations.   We will unleash America’s manufacturing sector and domestic energy production to create jobs.  This is the right way to increase revenue, through economic growth.  I will cut all personal taxes to two rates of 10% or 28%, the Reagan pro-growth maximum rate.  I will cut all corporate taxes in half to 17.5% so smaller businesses and big businesses can compete on a more level playing field.  I will have a zero rate on US based manufacturing.

To reinvigorate the economy, I will cut $5 trillion over 5 years and balance the budget within 4 years.  Left in the hands of American entrepreneurs and families, these dollars will be utilized more effectively than in the hands of Big Government.   As part of that effort, I will immediately reduce to 2008 levels all federal, non-defense discretionary spending and freeze defense spending at its current level.  I will ensure that defense spending goes no lower since protecting the nation is the primary responsibility of the federal government in the Constitution.  President Obama wants to cut $1 trillion from defense and not a meaningful penny from non-defense related federal bureaucrats and agencies.  This reflects his vision of Big Government rather than a vision for the greatness of American innovation, American entrepreneurship, American values, and the American people.

We didn’t hear anything from President Obama about the excesses of his signature initiative of ObamaCare or how to control rising healthcare costs.  Maybe he ran out of time.  He mentioned in passing with one line- the growing issue of entitlements which represent 60% of our current budget.   I have made clear that I will freeze Medicaid spending and fully block grant to the States for local solutions and innovation, I will build off of the best of Congressman Paul Ryan’s plan to improve and enhance Medicare through competition and choice, and I will lead the effort to make Social Security fiscally sustainable for seniors and young people.  Amazingly even now, we heard from President Obama about more government and more aggressive regulators such as his novel concept of a recess appointment without a Congressional recess, as if the stranglehold of Dodd-Frank was not enough.  Most schoolchildren would point out that saying you had a recess without having one does not make it so.  The only recess was one taken from the Constitution.   To ease the regulatory burden on Florida, I will rein in the NLRB, EPA, and other regulatory agencies so that they can focus on their core missions, not micromanaging small businesses and entrepreneurs, or they will be eliminated.

Working with families, communities, churches, synagogues, and small businesses, I know that we can get spending under control and get Florida and the nation moving again.  Obamanomics, ObamaCare, ObamaRegs, and ObamaScare of our seniors rather than honestly addressing the unsustainability of our current path will not move our nation forward; it will not create jobs, it will not revive the housing sector.  Obamanomics seeks to “spread the wealth”- in reality as we have all seen- it spreads poverty and decline.  Under President Obama- 1 in 6 Americans is in poverty and 1 in 4 children receive food stamps.  Limiting government and expanding economic freedom is what will help create jobs.  My policies will free America once again to invest in a future which is better for our children, not worse.  It will expand opportunity and upward mobility for all American families.

Rick Santorum, a former representative and senator from Pennsylvania, is a candidate for the Republican nomination for president. 

 

COMMENTS

  • bluerose75

    Rick it is very questionable at best that you still have a chance to secure the nomination. But like other conservatives before you and others that will come after your pride may keep you in until the familiar swam song comes rolling along. I do not what it is about the conservative males for President but it seems you guys have no interest in conservatism and just in self adulation. If you and Newt were serious you would work together to defeat Mitt. But you will not and you will tell us with youe 12 percent that you are the true conservative and how you will win. I mean come on Rick….what do we have to wait until end of Feb for your swan song…you know as well as anybody that Mitt is not a conservative. So what will you do wait until you are down to 3 percent and then have your swan song and endorse Romney?? I pray not!

    How destructive! I could care less if Newt was down I would tell him the same thing. You are both good men but there is no way split you are going to defeat Mitt. Mitt is doing what McCain didand coming up the middle with the bologna about being the only one that can defeat Obama. This tin suit is becoming whatever he has to to swing this vote, lie about his record, pay millions to lie about being conservative, running ads that are so dishonest it is dishonorable and yet because he has the Establishment behind him he is the position of strength. Not because he is liked but because you and Newt are knocking each other out! What sense does that make?

    Maybe you are hoping Romney will promise you something?? Quite frankly that would be useless because Romney has no chance to beat Obama. This tin suit is as liberal as Obama and as phony!

    I wish you and Newt could sit like gentlemen and work together to further the conservative cause and American Exceptionalism, Both of you have good fundamental conservative beliefs. Work together to defeat the Establishment. Work together for the country…Work together because it is the RIGHT thing to do! Is that not what you would tell your own children??

    Failure leaves us with 2 Choices and neither are good. Obama for 4 more years or Mitt Romney for 4 years. The names are interchangeable, the policies the same, the interior belief systems utterly liberal and both will say anything for power. Power is what motivates both men. Just like the Boston Globe reporter that covered Romney and the Damon Corp Medicare Fraud said…”PEOPLE DO NOT KNOW THE REAL ROMNEY!!” This from a liberal reporter from the Boston Globe! He is not trust worthy, he is dishonorable and is not fit to sit in the Oval Office.

    Please take a moment to think about all the conservatives that haver fought for you, as well as Newt, over the years and realize how important the two of you working together is for all those families and business owners like your own! We need conservatism, we need American Exceptionalism, we do not a RINO from MASS or a Socialist from ILL(or where ever he was really from).

  • littlehouse18

    Newt may be better than Obama, but the thought of his presidency is still scary to me, with his temperament. You’ve got an uphill battle, but I think it is too early to tell yet how the electorate as a whole would respond to you. I’d like to see more information on that. I find myself agreeing with you in the debates more than anyone else.

    I’m praying for your family and for a complete recovery for little Bella.

    • jakeofalltrades

      He definitely fills a niche now that Newt has gone orbital.

      • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

        .

        • jakeofalltrades

          His brand of Republicanism needs to die. I’m just not seeing any good choices here. I may end up leaving the presidential nominee portion blank on my primary ballot.

        • acat

          have W’s executive experience, nor his relatively good grasp of domestic issues .. other than social ones, of course.

          If you’re saying Santorum is playing W Bush to Romney’s Forbes and Gingrich’s McCain … if I squint enough, I can see it …sorta.

          Mew

          • aesthete

            Perhaps you meant generally good foreign policy?

          • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

            … Santorum has a much more free market and detailed grasp of domestic issues than GWB ever did. Santorum *wrote* the welfare reform bill of 1995, he has been a champion of health savings accounts for almost 20 years, and his views / agenda on spending, education and taxes are far more credibly conservative than GWB ever was.

            It’s clear you are stuck with a charicature view of Santorum and not his real record, agenda and positions. This guy is moer conservative than GWB for sure and has indepth understanding of things GWB never expressed. You should check out more on his real agenda.

        • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

          Romney will be a smarter version of GHWBush, and we will experience way too many ‘conservative letdown moments’ akin to living in the Bush 41 and Bush 43 eras.

          This Redstate “Santorum = GWBush” is mistaken, led by extrapolating from the fact that Santorum joined 80% of Republicans in supporting key bush items, like medicare part D. Never mind that not a single presidential candidate promised or will repeal that. Reality is that Santorum has fought for conservative items like welfare reform and life in ways that the Romney/Bush wing never did. And never will. Santorum’s record has been more consistently conservative than Romney or Newt and his agenda is as well. e.g. Romney talks of getting spending to 20% of GDP, Santorum supports cutting it to 18% following House conservatives roadmap and Balanced Budget Amendment. Santorum is fully on board cut, cap and balance while Newt criticized Paul Ryan at the outset of his campaign.

          So while you can point to thing in anyones past as deviations, Santorum is both more conservative and more electable than Newt and shouldnt be getting a bum rap here.

  • Common_Cents

    Perry was wise and knew when his time was up and graciously stepped back to endorse Gingrich.

    Look at the big picture.

    I believe you are very passionate about our country so please do the right thing.

    If you disagree, please lay out your path to victory here, as nobody has any idea what it might be.

    You staying in only hands the nomination to Romney.

    Is this now your goal? Is this what you want?

    At LEAST do what Palin did in SC, and endorse Gingrich for one state, FL.

    If gingrich wins, you have a chance. If romney wins, you have no chance.

    • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

      This is what the polls are showing.

      The Santorum vote are those conservatives who have calculated that we need a real conservative not Romneycare Mitt, and a vote for Newt is a vote for an unpredictable guy who will lose to Obama.

      Half of them will hold their nose for Mitt. The other half will vote Newt, but as much as a protest vote.

      You can wish and claim otherwise but the polls are clear – Mitt is more electable than Newt, and GOP primary voters are loath to ‘throw’ this election.

    • hls87

      and yet you support Gingrich!? That’s delusional. Gingrich began as a vanity candidate and morphed into a protest candidate. There has never been any prospect that he might win the nomination. Ever since Iowa, the primary process has had all the genuine drama of big time professional wrestling. Gingrich and Santorum are just window dressing. They serve only to make the Romney coronation a bit more palatable. This race was over as soon as voters in Iowa and SC went for decoys instead of the only real alternative to Romney in the race.

      It would be futile for Santorum to endorse Gingrich. Unlike Perry Santorum has no political future to plan for. He can’t help himself by endorsing Gingrich nor can he help Newt the no-hoper. At this point, calling for Santorum to leave the race is pointless and pathetic. The Republican establishment has gamed conservatives yet again, and you still haven’t figured it out.

      • In The Hook

        Had Perry not self-immolated, he’d have been the nominee. Had Pawlenty not run a horrible campaign based on fiscal insanity he never presided over as governor of Minnesota, he’d be the compromise choice right now. Had Huntsman not run as MSNBC’s lapdog, he could be deemed a plausible alternative to Romney. Had Jindal, Daniels, McDonnell or even Pence had run, they could have stopped Romney.

        Folks this isn’t a case of conservatives getting gamed or run over by the establishment or anything like that. There were plausible conservative candidates in this race and they botched it badly. That’s hardly Mitt’s fault and hardly the conservative grassroots’ fault.

        The fact that Romney has some kind of political apparatus is really the only thing that makes me hopeful for November. At least we won’t be horribly outclassed when it comes to organization the way we were in 2008.

  • Vegas_Rick

    for your whole career.

    Can you sat Medicare Part D and No Child Left Behind?

    I knew you could.

  • izoneguy

    I think Newt is the better choice to go undo what Obama has done.
    Romney will only put lipstick on what Obama has done.
    Please follow the other Rick, drop out TODAY and endorse Newt.