« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

President Obama’s Abuse of Power

Barack Obama campaigned in 2008 on the promise that his administration would be transparent and that he would respect the Constitutional constraints on the executive branch.  In an effort to drive that message home, his surrogates often reminded us that then-Senator Obama had been a Constitutional law instructor.  Now in his fourth year in office, it is apparent that President Obama actually finds the Constitution an obstacle to his agenda.  He has circumvented it in order to implement his agenda, irrespective of Congress.  And in doing so, has shown his disdain rather than respect for the Constitution and for the principle of separation of powers.

One of the Constitution’s most important aspects is the system of checks and balances.  Our Founding Fathers understood that a threat to individual liberty was a government with consolidated powers.  They cleverly devised a system of divided government, where the powers would be divided between the states and the federal government; and at the federal government, the power would be separated among three distinct branches: the legislative (Congress), the executive (the President), and the judiciary (the Supreme Court).

While the Constitution is quite clear about the distinct and separate roles for each of these branches, President Obama has shown difficulty in remembering that his role as President is, by design, quite limited.  His administration has a tendency to ignore the law, circumvent the Constitution and checks and balances, and outright defy Congress.

Consider these examples:

  • After signing Obamacare into law in 2010, the Obama administration immediately began circumventing checks and balances.  Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius began to wield legislative authority, granting waivers to companies and establishing new bureaucracies.  Secretary Sebelius has set new budgets and new guidelines for implementing Obamacare, wholly without Congressional oversight.
  • In early 2012, President Obama’s HHS department announced the so-called “contraceptive mandate,” which requires all employers – including religious charities and institutions – to provide free contraception to all employees, a clear violation of the Constitution’s guarantees for freedom of conscience and freedom of religion.
  • In July of 2010, President Obama’s Justice Department filed a lawsuit against the state of Arizona for enforcing immigration laws rather than partnering with Arizona and other states to enforce federal immigration laws already on the books.  Arizona was just enforcing the law that Obama refused to enforce.  Under our system of checks and balances, presidents do not have the authority to pick and choose which laws they will enforce.  We need our Congressional leaders to bravely stand up to the President and remind him of this basic Constitutional principle that was designed to protect our freedoms.
  • In February of 2011, a federal judge in Louisiana held Obama’s Department of Interior in contempt of court for “dismissive conduct.”  In 2010, the judge had ruled that the Department of Interior could not place a moratorium on offshore drilling.  With utter disregard for the judge’s ruling, the Department of Interior implemented an identical ban on offshore drilling.
  • In that same month, President Obama instructed his Justice Department to stop enforcing DOMA, the Defense of Marriage Act, a law duly passed by Congress but inconsistent with President Obama’s liberal worldview.  Again, an example of his choosing to ignore the Constitution and separation of powers and not enforce the law.
  • In June of this year, President Obama announced that the U.S. Department of Homeland Security will no longer deport young illegal immigrants who meet certain criteria. The criteria was proposed by the controversial DREAM Act which has been working its way through Congress for years but has yet to be passed into law.  So rather than respecting and enforcing laws that have passed the legislative process, President Obama is moving ahead of the process, creating his own law that is politically convenient for him in an election year.
  • President Obama’s Environmental Protections Agency (EPA) has implemented one job-killing policy after another, largely without Congressional approval or oversight.
  • The president added another component to his job destroying machine when he blatantly violated constitutional law by making three recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) when the Senate was still in session.  This packed the board that was already excessively encroaching its duties when it filed a law suit against Boeing, claiming they illegally retaliated against union members in upon its decision to build an aircraft assembly plant in South Carolina.

In April of this year, the President began issuing warnings that the Supreme Court should not overturn his health care law. Unfortunately for the country, the Chief Justice joined with four of his liberal colleagues to undermine freedom and play costly games with the Constitution.

The House of Representatives voted last week to repeal Obamacare, pointing out that this decision is not only bad constitutional jurisprudence, but it is bad policy, and bad for America’s future freedom and prosperity.   It’s now in the hands of the Senate.

But that’s not all.  Just Friday, the HHS department blatantly expanded its power by changing the landmark welfare reform law that I coauthored back in 1996. Congress made clear then that mandatory work requirements for welfare recipients could snot be stripped without congressional action.  However, on President Obama’s watch, HHS has arrogantly gutted the work requirements from the bill and completely changed the intent of the law.

Barack Obama’s record as President shows his flippant disregard for the Constitution.  He has no need for separation of powers or checks and balances.  He is, quite simply, a law unto himself.  Acting as an authoritarian rather than an democratically-elected leader, he bullies and threatens the other branches of government. This disturbing and arrogant behavior is unbecoming of any president of any party. It is dangerous. And if this dangerous man has the opportunity to govern for four more years, I strongly believe our county’s future is at risk.

In November, we will have the opportunity to vote President Obama out of office and help restore the Constitution.   The abuses of King George should remain in the past rather than in our future.  It is time to stand for freedom once again.

 

Rick Santorum, a former representative and senator from Pennsylvania, ran as a candidate for the Republican nomination for president. He is the founder of Patriot Voices, an organization to mobilize one million conservatives committed to promoting faith, family, freedom, and opportunity.

COMMENTS

  • mikeymike143

    and obama is going to get voted out in a landslide in november.

  • YnotNOW

    Every member of Congress should be up in arms about Obama’s overreach of Executive Branch authority. It sets a precedent for future administrations. If not corrected, and quickly, then future Presidents will be tempted to similarly exceed the Constitutional limits on their power. From EITHER party, so this ought to be a bi-partisan interest.

  • From ME to You

    This can’t be broadcast loud enough and long enough!

  • timhawke

    This can’t be said enough. And you are absolutely right, Senator, that the fact that this man was teaching constitutional law at one of the nation’s best law schools is absolutely despicable.

  • pseudonym

    If one were violate an individual

  • kowalski

    .

    • kowalski

      Except you have to also do it with an imprimatur and the arrogance of power. All these things are widely known, and the dumber Americans have gotten the more susceptible they are to them. Obama’s campaign speeches now aren’t even spoken at the level of grade-school language. So all he really has to do is lie at the 5th Grade level and he sounds like an intellectual.

      “I brought Batman to school!” “No, Batman is a comic book!”

      “Some folks would say that, but I think it’s a game.”

      “My marbles are bluer than yours, but they’ll give you health care!”

      “Zoinks, Scooby Doo! Where are Josie and the Pussycats?”

      • kowalski

        That applied to 2nd grade kids when I grew up. I suppose people in Washington from both parties really enjoy that. It makes it easy.

        • kowalski

          He’s very good at making the case for people who have no idea of what is going on.

          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LbKKIi8WuUQ

  • Common_Cents

    If we keep focusing on the content/propaganda they keep putting out we are making it terribly difficult.

    It’s like having a hole in the boat, not plugging it but continually bailing. We need an effort to plug the media propaganda hole that lets obama and the left get away with almost anything.

  • kowalski

    About American politics in the past 5 years is that – just like Bob Shrum believes – simply lying to people actually does work.

    You guys sit in Washington and you lie to the American people and IT WORKS. We’re under your thumb. We’re under Obama’s thumb. The country has been turned into a very large, divisive group of morons and the least common denominator is what is winning.

    I never believed you could just plain LIE to the American people at the top of your lungs and not have to suffer for it, but I was WRONG.

    • kowalski

      And every single actor I’ve ever known will tell you, when they’re sober enough or drunk enough, regardless of what state of mind they’re in, that they’re essentially artful liars. The Democrats like Hollywood because they get the best liars available, and keep them happy. But what really has happened to America is that on a national level, most of the people we elect to Congress are *PURE* liars.

      It’s a second life. Being a politician is a little like running for Class President in High School. Nobody really knows you, it’s a pure fantasy they’re voting for. That has extended itself to almost every politician in this country and what we have as a result are angry, disaffected and powerless people shouting at a bunch of self-constructed and very well established liars.

      Here we sit at the beginning of the 21st Century, with the largest collection of nuclear weapons in the world and most of the world’s economy under our control and guess what, World? It’s all just a nightclub act.

      • kowalski

        And he’s a big liar too. But one of his best movies was on cable last night: the one with the husband who faked his death on a sailing ship and sent his wife to prison and then blew the girlfriend up so he could gallivant around in New Orleans, only to be confronted in New Orleans by his wife after she had been paroled.

        When I think of Washington today, I don’t know who is who any more. I don’t trust any of you. You’ve all got your fingers on money and power and in my view you’re all corrupt, and you can’t even explain why you’re so corrupt.

        Senator Santorum, you’re a little less corrupt than most but I have no faith in you guys at all. The People of this country want to be lied to.

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dlc3DEmlj9o

        • liberteen33

          Its just that average Joe/Jane American is probably depending on a handout (govt or otherwise) for their livelihood, and since they do not depend on their own value, they lack appreciation for real productivity and exhibit no outrage at the idea that some organization has a right to steal the fruits of a hard working man’s productive labor.

          They simply don’t care about government because they don’t have to pay for it. If they try to care, they neither know nor are capable of knowing what the issues are, and they are too lazy to really find out for themselves so they can form their own opinion.

          This is not just welfare recipients. It is nearly everyone.

  • kowalski

    Trying to explain to people that the more they allow the federal government to control their lives, the larger collection of liars they’re going to spawn. It’s an absolute necessity. One of the few groups of people who are enjoying a boom time right now are people who work in Washington and in Government generally.

    Looking at the Presidential race this year, and the Senate and House, I don’t know whether enough people care to understand that once you pass a certain point, the Government basically controls the country whether anyone likes it or not. For there and ever after, once you’ve got about 50% of the people dependent for their livelihood on government in one form or another, the game is LOST.

    It’s a very, very, very profound reversal from the way this country was founded and it’s happening right in front of our faces. All our politicians care about is getting reelected. It’s the best job in the world!

    • kowalski

      If it were up to me, Presidents and Presidential campaign challengers would be limited to no more than $10 million dollars of spending on advertising and campaigning across the country, in total.

      That’s it. $10 million dollars. Let everyone else alone and the people who actually care will read the position papers. You put your positions out on your website, if you want to, you drive around in your car and meet people, but otherwise you can’t use anything expensive to promote your candidacy.

      If people can’t read, they shouldn’t vote. We have the Internet and almost everyone can read, cheap. So put the position papers out there and there should be almost NO campaigning that isn’t funded by the candidates themselves.

      THAT would be honest. Frankly there’s nothing in either of our candidates’ positions that can’t be read and understood in an hour. Make them available at libraries and that’s how people should vote.

      • acat

        Unlimited free labor, very little expensive paid labor….?

        Why does this sound like a recipe for union activism?

        Mew

        • kowalski

          Look put your positions up on your website, have enough money left over to visit some states, drive around in the cars, etc., etc. But nobody should have a billion dollars to wage a Presidential campaign.

          We don’t really want debate in this country, we want to spend money. We want razzle-dazzle and baloney. $10 million dollars in an election year is plenty of money to make a few appearances, have your positions published well, and have people debate them.

          All the rest is HOLLYWOOD. That’s what we’re doing. We’re spending money to create THEATRICS that people think they’re voting for.

          • kowalski

            I decided three years ago that I wasn’t going to vote for Obama. I suspect that 80% of the people who are actually going to vote in this race for the President actually decided that three years ago, also.

            All the rest of the polling money, the talking head money, the theatrics, the rest of it – it’s just a waste of people’s money. If you don’t know who you’re going to vote for – right now – then you need to stop smoking dope and think for a couple of seconds. It won’t take longer than an hour, even if you’re stoned.

        • kowalski

          250 really core staff across all 50 states sounds about right. They’re the coordinators. People in those states can do what they like, but the people at the core of the campaign have only 250 heads.

          I’m all about reducing the size of government, and I’m serious about it. If you want to make the case for private citizens, individuals, then in each state of course they should be able to download campaign materials and print them out. But I believe in limiting government first by limiting the campaigns. We’re going to spend 2 billion dollars or more on this Presidential campaign and in the meantime a lot of Americans are going to continue to suffer hardship.

          It has to stop.

        • kowalski

          That what Americans like most about it, as painful as it all is, is the *spectacle* of it all. That’s WRONG. Politics is local and it should be local and it should also be relatively inexpensive, even for our most important national offices.

          $10 million for President
          $5 million for Senator
          $1 million for House of Representatives

          $1 million for State Governors
          $500,000 approx. for State Reps. and Senators

          $250,000 for local races

          Period.

          That’s the max we should ALLOW politicians to spend talking their talk. Because right now we’ve let them spend billions on BS.

        • kowalski

          Everyone is talking about how badly Citizen’s United reshaped the political landscape but frankly I don’t care about it. My feeling is that it should never have risen to that level because if we were being honest with ourselves we’d know we don’t need that much money to wage a campaign for President.

          It’s just mutual masturbation. That’s what Citizen’s United really means. “I’ll spend X, you have to spend X-10%”. Really America needs that money, and it doesn’t need it spent on political campaigns, which I’m sure the politicians themselves will tell you are extraordinarily expensive and artfully crafted pieces of crap that cost a lot more than they’re worth.

      • checkmate2012

        on the amount.. I say the gov’t wastes so much money already (sadly) that Congress should appropriate $50 million for every presidential candidate that gets past the primary. $1 m for every state and they can spend it at will. Also, there should be a 6-12 month window when campaigning is allowed- that’s it.

        6-12 months of campaigning should apply to all fed positions. No perpetual campaigning from the day after any politician gets elected. They don’t ever focus on the issues when they are trying to win the next election.

        • kowalski

          It’s so stupid, it’s so theatrical, it’s all overproduced at tremendous prices and frankly I don’t see how anyone benefits except the people who get paid for overproducing the overproduced.

          If the American people can’t read and think about who they need to elect as the President, saturation media coverage ain’t gonna help them. It hasn’t so far.

          • checkmate2012

            crooked union playing field such as it is. But if we could restrict the time and dollars, we wouldn’t need the wasteful theatrics that you speak of correctly.

            I’ll add that I love the debates in England with the PM when he/she gets peppered with questions and has to stand up and defend his/her policies. We could learn alot from that as we have lost the fine are of debate in politics. And it’s entertaining!

          • kowalski

            That’s fine. But I really believe in reducing the influence of government, in a much more serious way than a lot of people do. I really believe that our national offices and probably our state offices and local offices should be held to very, very strict limits on the amount of money they can spend.

            If constituents across the country don’t bother reading and don’t want to get involved, it will be NO WORSE than it is right now spending billions of dollars.

            Let’s say you’re a private person who wants to spend $20,000 on a mailing to help a candidate in your area win? That’s great. Write the check. But not a penny of it can come from the government, and not a penny of it can come from that candidate’s campaign fund beyond the cap.

            If it’s a local race then people not only shouldn’t be overwhelmed they should be able to fund or NOT fund the candidates of their choice. The government already HAS enough power.

            You really want to take the money out of politics? I can show you how to do it. It would result in a system that actually helps this country.

          • kowalski

            I was watching Cameron vs. Miliband last night, they were sparring about policy it was fun to watch. Miliband reminds me of Seinfeld and Cameron reminds me of a center/left mayor who nevertheless knows how to comb his hair and he speaks very well. I like him. It’s embarrassing to say this but they’re almost a sitcom.

            One thing about the British that I do enjoy is their seemingly endless zeal to at least speak about what they’re talking about and make it unintentionally funny. It’s all very serious but they do a nice job of making it look like fun and seem to enjoy it. Now they have to get their country out of the doldrums and stop listening to the Commies.

            Just like we have to. America really needs to be more open. It needs to be less expensive in terms of its politics, and it needs to be much, much, less Commie.

          • kowalski

            Watching Parliament in session sometimes makes me think: “OK, we’ve got the canny leftists versus the embattled leftists with a lot of dry humor.”

          • kowalski

            That no matter how much television I watch featuring members of Parliament I wouldn’t consider myself to be someone from England – because I am not there, and even if I watched several dozen more hours of Parliament I still wouldn’t consider myself to be an expert in any of the concerns that come before them.

            There is a great deal to be said for the independence of people who think and vote and act in the context of the things they know most intimately, and I wouldn’t arrogate that to myself. I know almost nothing about their problems and pressures. I can give some guidance, perhaps.

            There is no such thing as a world where we all share the same thoughts and prerogatives, and there should never be. Our system in the United States tends to frustrate oligarchs and power grabbers in the long term, because it simply does not allow them to achieve longstanding power. We have chosen the path of constant “churn” and that is what we believe in because we’d rather prevent tyranny from occuring than invite it. It’s low but solid ground.

            At least, that is what I think we believe in. That is what I was brought up to believe in. When I read the Declaration of Independence that is what I think.

            “When in the course of human events….”

            http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/07/Us_declaration_independence.jpg

    • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

      …as long as we put in a hard cap on the amount of our fortunes that we spend fighting for liberty.

      Come on.

  • kowalski

    It’s also not really surprising that every time Obama turns around he has a collection of True Believers who want to help him grow the government. That’s exactly what anyone who elected him or saw him elected should have expected, from the earliest New York Times articles about his courses at the University of Chicago to the discussions he had while he was conducting those courses and in every decision he’s made ever since.

    Nothing, absolutely nothing has shocked me about the way President Obama has conducted himself in office, except that to a certain extent he thought things would go a lot FASTER. There was a very concerted effort to have things be quite different by this time in his Presidency. If anything, America would have been several dozens of degrees more aligned with Europe by now, we’d all be paying European dilettantes through Cap n’ Trade (they wouldn’t have that debt problem now), the Assault Weapons ban would have been reenacted in more draconian form, and a lot of other things that I know you know very well. He didn’t get to do the things he wanted – yet.

    He’s angry because he didn’t get to do all the things he *wanted* to do and moreover saw as completely within his grasp after GWB left office in disgrace. The people who elected him saw Obama as the real Agent of Change. He was going to finally do it! That’s why the leftists are disappointed in him! It’s the only reason. He hasn’t lived up to their expectations of turning America into an almost pure Socialist state.

    But he might have four more years to keep working.

  • rightlane1111

    This is almost the identical sermon I heard at my Church also. My girlfriend in FL has heard the same thing. cut and paste…I can’t do the href thing on this board.

    http://www.stthomasmore.org/parish-clergy/video/invocation

    Uh..oh..

  • http://www.TerriersOfTheRight.blogspot.com Flagstaff

    Maybe this column could be a starting point and a strategy.

    Organize the campaign ads into “themes.” In this case, the theme is abuse of power and disregard of Constitutional restrictions. Each ad could hit one major or two minor examples.

    The strategy of lots of ads but each one significant provides variety, but still hammers home the idea that Obama is incompetent and/or corrupt.

  • zpatriot

    Really, release you tax returns already! You make it look like you are hiding something. And I really hope you aren’t. I’m already a little queasy with a guy who is off-shoring jobs and off-shoring money that the government needed to give our troops the helmuts and body armor that they were missing.

    Also, is the guy who invented Obama-care/Romney-care, the guy we want making the case on health care?

    Also, all this animal cruelty stuff really makes me uncomfortable. A dog on the roof? A drugged up horse? And where did you find that guy Malek who barbecued a dog?

    Ugh, we have to dump Romney before it’s too late!

    • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

      the tax return conversation is going on over here.

      Feel free to join in and answer all or any of the questions I posed to trimulchio.

      As for the other stuff, it’s all been asked and answered. Your “concern” is duly noted.

      • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

        The left create Moby’s and concern trolls to try and act like this is some real argument or that it really matters to anyone.

        Remember, they don’t know what reality is, so they try and create their own.

        • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

          that in this case (moby’s, trolls, etc.) practice does not make perfect. In fact, they can’t even get to smart.

    • PowerToThePeople

      and it is a very stupid one.

      Shove off fool.

      • tnfriendofcoal101368

        Is there a full moon out?

        • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

          somebody is full of something.

          The left are organized, you got to give them that. They actually get people to go on right wing sites and call right wing talk shows with these sort of silly arguments.

        • PowerToThePeople

          I tend to think home for the mentally impaired ran out of money and took many of their clients to the library and left them there on the computer.

    • acat

      On the off chance that you’re not actually some troll, I’ll just point out that every one of your statements is based on liberal talking points.

      Romney has released his returns, as required…. just like Obama and Biden. Why not demand that Obama release his returns back to 2000 as well? Rules should be evenly applied, eh?

      Obama’s DoE green grants offshored jobs too, zpatriot .. the difference is, Romney’s used private money, Obama spent *mine*.

      As for the troops, your argument is woeful. Romney increased profits, therefore Romney increased taxes paid. Further, it was Obama and the Senate Dems who have refused to pass a budget for three years, and who passed the resolution that’s going to result in drastic DoD cuts. You got a problem with troops not getting armor, take it up with the Dems.

      As for health insurance – because our health care is the envy of the planet – I’ll trust the guy who has said his plan doesn’t work over the guy who denies responsibility.

      For the dog thing, IIRC, it was Jim Treacher over at the Daily Caller who pointed out that Obama’s autobiography says he ate a dog… There’s only two ways out of that argument – either Obama lied (again) and his “autobiography” is a work of fiction or Obama really ate a dog.

      Mew

      • tnfriendofcoal101368

        near Obama and a fork. Speaking of which has anyone seen Bo recently?

      • tnfriendofcoal101368

        I guess Markos has the good ones out stalking Republican lawmakers or Swatting Erick Erickson.

      • zpatriot

        because I’m trying to find some “conservatives” that are actually focused on the truth and not on the talking points.

        I don’t want a vulture capitalist as President. I don’t want our jobs sent to China.

        The DoD cuts are based on the sequester, which both parties agreed to, in order to reduce the deficit, without making millionaires pay a penny more.

        I’m still waiting for all the jobs that we were promissed when Bush cut taxes, and then Obama cut taxes even more. I see the deficit, but I don’t see the jobs.

        I want to find out what Romney or whoever the nominee is, is going to cut in order to expand the DoD budget and cut taxes.

        I happen to think that paying taxes to fund a war is patriotic, and that cutting taxes and avoiding tax payments when we have troops on the ground is unpatriotic.

        All this bull by Romney with his flip-flopping on Bain, and off-shoring just makes me feel like we have no choices any more.

        • tnfriendofcoal101368

          Capitalism is bad – check
          Romney outsources jobs – check
          Millionaires don’t pay enough in taxes – check
          Bush bad/tax cuts bad – check
          DOD budget cuts good – check
          Raising taxes – patriotism – check
          Romney is a bad bainer vulture capitalist outsourcer – check

          A conservative might hold any of those positions conceivably but no conservative would hold them all.

          DKos troll – check

          • zpatriot

            We just have to make sure that good capitalists don’t hurt people in the process with pollution, dangerous equipment etc.

            Also, I don’t like big deficits, but it looks like you do, since you like tax cuts and more spending.

          • westcoastpatriette

            zmole.

        • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

          Then obviously you have never communicated with any before.

          Let me clue you in, as a conservative I know that trade with China or anyone else creates more jobs than it loses.

          I know that making Millionaires, or anyone else pay more will not reduce the deficit one bit because the problem is run away spending not tax receipts.

          And as a somewhat libertarian conservative I don’t think blindly fighting all wars is necessarily patriotic. But blindly letting any section of the government get way with ever more spending is idiotic.

          Romney is the guy we have, he might not be much, but as a businessman who has actually ran things, that makes him above Obama, and to top it off he doesn’t actually hate his own country.

          bye now mr. moby

          • zpatriot

            I did have a problem when Romney let his audience boo that gay soldier. I mean the guy is over there in a war zone protecting us, and the audience boos him because he is gay, and Romney doesn’t say a thing?

            If you can’t stand up for our troops in a war zone, how can you lead the country?

          • APA Guy

            Photobucket

          • Viet71

            Obama clearly has no regard for Separation of Powers.

            He shows the same regard for truth often.

            Maybe you’ll get four more years of him. You’re too young to know or appreciate what that means for your party in 2016.

          • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

            But don’t pretend you fell bad for the gay soldier who was RIGHTFULLY being booed because of his stupid ass question.

            I am sure just a few years ago you were marching with code pink and spitting on soldiers.

        • PowerToThePeople

          and do you actually think we are buying into your BS?

        • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

          to Russia (NASA) and Finland (taxpayer funded stimulus money).

          I think you are about to have more in common with Obama than you think. Both of you will be missing from redstate.

          missingjobscouncil

    • Bill S

      You’re zgone.

      Folks, get the message: Romney is the nominee. Now let’s figure out how to get him elected and get the Marxist out of there. It’s that simple.

  • zpatriot

    all the voters out of the Republican Party too?

    • tnfriendofcoal101368

      as does PTTP, you have already self selected out of the Republican Party. I suspect further that the mods will select you out of RedState and back to your favorite website over at DKos.

    • PowerToThePeople

      can only fit so many stupid people and the quota was filled long before you exposed yourself.

      So the answer to your question is a resounding yes. With comments such as yours, you would only be an embarrassment to our party and a distraction we can ill afford. You offer nothing, you bring nothing, hence you are worthless to our cause.

      Hope that answers your question clearly.

  • acat

    Obama has got to go.

    Mew

  • Pingback: Right wing sites – “Guns don’t kill people…” | lpnschoolss.info