« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Belief that Women are Inferior IS Inferior

      Mixing abortion with woman power is not an oxymoron. Women many times claim that a young baby they’re pregnant with (what else can they be pregnant with?) is only her body. She says she can do anything with her body she wants.

If she’s pregnant, she’s got a living, breathing, human within her body. But that living human is a totally separate entity, with a whole set of different chromosomes. It’s in her body, but it’s no longer her body.

One non-abortion group seems overly concerned with the “After Abortion” part. They believe abortion can be a direct or indirect result of an unwanted abortion, or coerced actions that can psychologically force the woman into aborting. 

Women are considered the stronger sex in many forms. Usually, they can withstand higher amounts of physical pain than their male counterparts, and many women would consider themselves equal or better than men in most instances, except with the possibility of brute strength.

Women are strong enough to withstand any coercion. Especially to do what is right. If they relinquish to coercion, they never fully believed in not doing what they were coerced into doing in the first place. Women are stronger than that. At any time, a woman can speak up, and physically say she doesn’t want an abortion. No one can abort when they say NO. We’re a still free country, at least so far.

Women may be scared of future occurrences, but none outweigh killing their own child. Well over 99% of abortion cases do not involve any forced abortion with zero approval from the mother. Somehow the mother was talked into it, putting the killing of her own child into a secondary, or tertiary position. Choosing, or allowing, the abortion kills the child every time. But the mother almost always has the last word.

It is believed 64% of all abortions involve some sort of coercion. That could result from  lack of money; lack of want or time for the child; others saying aborting the child was the best thing to do under the circumstances; parents, boyfriends, girlfriends, pastors, or anyone who has a degraded view of life, coercing the abortion.

People are shocked at the result on the aborted baby when contraceptives are used. They make the uterus inhospitable, and thus susceptible to a rejection and expulsion by the uterus of a newly formed baby. The baby may not look like a baby yet, but is fertilized, and has the necessary soul and DNA to continue into forming an adult human, if left to grow.

The problem is that at this young age, a baby is so small that a uterine rejection may go unnoticed. At this age, the baby is small enough that a full scale uterine operation is not necessary to clandestinely dispose of an unwanted baby. Millions believe they are pro-life, even though they may actually be aborting a baby because of contraceptive methods. It may be some time until most of America is really pro-life. Everyone will have to understand what contraception really does.

Theoretically, every man involved with coercion to abort a baby should be charged with accomplice to murder. And vice-versa—any man unknowledgeable of an abortion done on the baby he created, deserves recompense.   

The job is actually huge. The penal code needs to be altered. Roe vs. Wade needs to be rescinded. People’s minds need to be changed, to realize what a life is. Easily found, it’s stated as the first right (of 3) in the Declaration. The law must be changed to help people understand it’s not legal to kill a young baby.

We already have post-abortion healing available to those women and men who have undergone this horrific procedure: the Jericho Plan, Project Rachel, Jubilee Program and Rachel’s Vineyard to name a few. These are very beneficial programs for the recovering woman and man after an abortion. But they only deal with the aftermath of killing your own child.

What is more desperately needed, is something that addresses the problem of abortion in the first place. Strong women making themselves known, are the first thing. Certainly being 53% of the general population, and realizing your sexual leverage, gives you a front seat advantage.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————-

Kevin Roeten can be reached at roetenks@charter.net.

COMMENTS

  • monetlilies2002

    To imply that women are not inferior, and then go out of your way to prove that they are not capable of making a decision regarding their own bodies (until birth a fetus is not a “living, breathing human”, it requires the mothers body to survive.) is to imply that they that women are in fact inferior to the “men” who should have the right to impregnate them and then force them to carry the child to birth.
    To then further imply that women who use birth control are also killing “babies” is not only misinformed, but downright misogynist. You are sadly mistaken if you think that women would gladly go back to a day when women were punished for sex while the men got high fives in the locker room.
    Your thinking is more in line with the repression practiced by the Taliban in the mid east, than anything that should be tolerated in the US in 2011

    • lineholder

      you see a baby as “punishment for sex”. Liberals have been pushing that line year after year to justify abortions, always with an ulterior motive in mind, particularly in black communities.

      No, if there was ever a time to speak the truth with a roaring voice, it is now. And there’s no shame here at RS for being the ones to do it.

    • jerry39

      As your definition of life has no relevance to the existance of life. My 18 month old twins, my 4 year old, and my 6 year old all need their mother to live, doesn’t make them any less human, or detract from their right not to be killed.

      Your the one who sounds sexist to me, arguing that only one sex gets to decide who lives and who dies. Should women be banned from input on the question of whether rape should be legal? I mean how can you tell a man what to do with his own body?

    • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

      it’s pretty obvious that women are proven to be incapable about making a decision – at least a moral decision – about their own bodies.

    • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

      Still drinking your breakfast, are you? – No, no need to answer: that was just a rhetorical question to follow you into the abyss.

      • jerry39

        No pun intended

    • Uma Richie

      I don’t see a lot of commenting in your profile, but I assume that you lurk here at RS.

      There is much in your comment that I find troubling. It seems that you have received only the Hollywood version of sex education. I can’t address everything right now, but I wanted to give you a few starting points that may help you begin to question your assumptions about sex. I have linked my sources (the US Centers for Disease Control and the World Health Organization) at the bottom of this comment

      First, please consider that in 2011 women are punished for sex more than ever before. Men are still getting high-fives in the locker room. Women are getting daily doses of Class 1 carcinogens via hormonal birth control. They are also getting abnormal pap smear results and cervical cancer. The CDC reports that “[a]lmost all cervical cancers are caused by human papillomavirus (HPV), a common virus that can be passed from one person to another during sex,” and that “HPV can infect areas that are not covered by a condom – so condoms may not fully protect against HPV.”

      So to translate, every woman who is suffering from cervical cancer and every woman whose mind is tormented by a previous pap smear that revealed precancerous cells is taking a females-only punishment for having sex.

      Second, for just a moment, put yourself in the position of a pro-lifer who believes that life begins at conception. After being on hormonal birth control for five years, you discover that making the uterus hostile to implantation is one of the three functions of oral contraceptives. Wouldn’t you hate yourself? Further, do you think it is ethical of a drug company, a physician, or a medical clinic to prescribe hormonal birth control without first ascertaining how the woman feels about the risk of aborting a newly conceived precious little life? Where is the choice in that? As you said yourself, are women “not capable of making a decision”?

      Sources:
      http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/cervical/basic_info/risk_factors.htm
      http://www.cdc.gov/std/hpv/stdfact-hpv.htm
      http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol72/index.php

  • rightwingmom52

    I’d just like to point out that personally, I don’t consider women equal or better than men. Just different, and that’s the way God intended us to be.