![]()
Lately, the writer’s hometown of Asheville, NC., has attracted various environmental ‘wanabes’ into its environment. Chemophobia, the “fear of chemicals“, usually goes with the assumption that “chemicals” are harmful, but “natural” things are good. Chemophobia normally originates from incomplete knowledge, or a misunderstanding of science. Every substance in the universe is a chemical.
A major factor of chemophobia is increasing sensitivity of analytical techniques that can now detect extremely low levels. Typically, media only reports a chemical has been detected, not that it has exceeded harmful levels.
In 1997, “dihydrogen monoxide” [DHMO] was feared among the populace. The “DHMO Hoax” was nothing but water, if called by its common name. But “chemophobes” thought this sounded dangerous.
Just within the past two weeks, Greenpeace broke into the local Progress Energy Plant. Sixteen people entered, and 5 climbed a 300ft smokestack and unfurled their banner: “Duke and Progress Energy, Stop Destroying Mountains”.
CEO Jim Rogers, the lead fundraiser for the Democrat National Convention (Charlotte), lent the Democrats $10 million for that convention. Greenpeace actually claimed Duke Energy is responsible for 951 premature deaths, 1,447 heat attacks, and 15,714 asthma attacks caused by his power plants every year.
One wonders how Greenpeace came up with such exact numbers. If one looks at the typical ‘pollutants’ from coal-fired plants, one sees [CO2], [SO2], [NOx], [CO], and methyl mercury ["monomethylmercuric cation"].
[CO2] is a non-pollutant, and is necessary for life on earth. Concentrations of the others are negligible compared with their Threshold Limit Value [TLV]. Methyl mercury can be dangerous in high concentrations, but volcanoes are responsible for half of all mercury emissions. Eruptions usually result in a 4-6x increase in atmospheric mercury.[77]
The EPA TLV for mercury is 0.02 mg/m3 (~0.02ppm), but it also lists mercury as a Class A4-Not classifiable as a human carcinogen.
In the last few weeks, EPA has leveled the local CTS Plant in Arden, NC, at a cost of millions. This Superfund Site spread fear through South Asheville. The main chemical was trichloroethylene (e.g., TCE, ‘Trilene’, ‘Trike’), and chemophobes came out of the woodwork. Bulldozing the now ‘flat’ CTS plant by the EPA, did not improve TCE in the groundwater.
An EPA-sanctioned soil-vapor extraction system has been operating there since 2006. In that system, any TCE-laden groundwater is aerated, where TCE is removed from the water.
Why do so many forget TCE was used extensively in the 50’s and 60’s for extracting vegetable oils from palm, soy, and coconut? Typically used in coffee decaffeination? Worst of all, most forget it was used as a gas anesthetic. Millions have breathed 1% TCE through self-administered analgesia (i.e., childbirth difficulties).
It’s TLV stands at 50 ppm. The ACGIH lists it as: ‘”Not suspected to be a human carcinogen”. In California alone, there are over 73 facilities that have used TCE. Of the millions that have used it, there is no known case of a human getting cancer because of TCE.
In the most noted ‘chemophobe’ case in history, “dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane” became viewed as the most feared synthetic chemical ever made. Most remember it simply as “DDT’”. DDT FAQ shows many countries were pressured to eliminate DDT.
Silent Spring (1962) caused a technical uproar, and a ban of US DDT manufacture (1972). Even DDT – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia , now admits although DDT use had almost completely stopped, eggshell thickness remained 10–12% thinner before DDT was first used.
John Stossel accused USAID of not funding DDT, because it wasn’t “politically correct,” Anne Peterson (USAID) replied “I believe that the strategies we are using are as effective as spraying with DDT …”
In 2008, the World Health Organization (WHO) estimated almost 1,000,000 deaths due to lack of DDT not killing malarial-infected mosquitoes.
Malaria remains a major public health challenge in Africa, India, Brazil, and Mexico, where 69% of all reported cases of malaria occur. DDT has been called a “miracle weapon like Kryptonite to the mosquitoes, and serves as one indicator that repellency is very important in preventing indoor transmission of malaria.”
In the most absurd posturing of chemophobia in the 1960s, population control advocates blamed DDT for increasing third world population. WHO actually believed the only alternative to overpopulation was to assure that up to 40% of children in 3rd world countries would die of malaria. [Desowitz, RS. 1992. Malaria Capers, W.W. Norton & Company]
DDT has a current Permitted Exposure Level (PEL/OSHA) of 1 mg/m3 (or, ~1 ppm). In the billion or so DDT-exposed people, there is no confirmed case of cancer—ever.
As a Chemical Engineer, the writer knows some chemicals can be dangerous in certain amounts. Being cognizant of that fact should alleviate any unwarranted fears.
There are over 250 known phobias, and chemophobia seems to be the most common fear. Wasn’t it FDR who said: “The only thing we have to fear is fear itself?”
———————————————————————————————————————————————————–
Kevin Roeten can be reached at roetenks@charter.net.
Steve Maley
Caleb Howe
Jeff Emanuel
Mercury is toxic.
wbf (Diary) Thursday, February 23rd at 8:26PM EDT (link)I can only speak from personal experience. I had mercury amalgams in my mouth for many years. I never dreamed of the havoc that they were making of my body’s mineral balance.
http://www.arltma.com/MercuryToxDoc.htm
I had a hair analysis done and was placed on a mineral balancing program specifically designed for me. It was only after I had the amalgams removed that my body began releasing the mercury. The amount coming out in my hair tripled!!
Do I have a phobia about mercury? No. I just don’t want any in my body.
I would not have believed how toxic it could be if I had not been the one affected. I believe now. Do I believe that my dentist deliberately tried to harm me? No. But I think we know more now than we did years ago about mercury.
roetenks, I am not qualified to say any thing more than that. I am not a chemical engineer. However I am someone concerned about the health and well being of my family. I saw the word “Mercury” in your diary title and had to read it.
Several years ago a friend who works at an agricultural research station near where we live told us not to eat “organic” peanut butter. Peanuts are subject to a very toxic fungus. Only plants treated with a fungicide are free of it. It is possible to be exposed to the fungus in the organic peanut butter!! I have never bought organic peanut butter since he told me that!
Discernment, knowledge, and wisdom are our best defense!!
Thank you for your article.
So many problems with this post
smblues Friday, February 24th at 2:45PM EDT (link)So I will only point out a few:
1. Mercury may not be a cancer risk but it does have profoundly toxic effects, and the problems with coal is not acute poisoning but long term bio-accumulation
2. There are direct causal (not just correlations) between DDT and thinning of egg shells leading to reproductive failure and population decline of birds. The study wikipedia cites. The remaining 10-12% decline from pre DDT levels is still under investigation (as of 1995) but the removal of DDT had clear effects.
3. Likely the Greenpeace numbers came from taking EPA estimates for all deaths from coal plant air pollution and scaling it to the pollution amounts released by Duke power plants. In addition to the SOX (Acid Rain) and NOX (Ozone pollution aka smog) there is also particulate exposure from coal plants. The health effects of these air pollutants are not controversial. While the Clean Air Act has helped to clean things up so that things arent as bad in most parts of the US as they are in Beijing or say the problems in the 19th and 20th century london (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Smog_of_1952 ) there are still significant health effects.
smblues
roetenks (Diary) Wednesday, April 18th at 1:44PM EDT (link)It sounds as if you may be a direct contributor to a non-existent problem. Did you read what theTLV of mercury is? Does it bioaccumulate in everyone?
There is NO direct relation to the thinning of egg shells and DDT usage. But there is a relation between the removal of DDT . There are many more mosquitoes, and many more malaria-infected mosquitoes in Africa causing many more deaths.
Greenpeace said the deaths were DIRECTLY related to coal pant emmissions. ANY health effects have benn exaggerated so much that people are feeling fear from the cleanest technology we’ve ever had.
Unfortunately, it looks as if you need to be included in that bunch…
Kevin M. Roeten