« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

And the GOP Winner is…

 

File:Caricatures of GOP Presidential Debate Participants September 2011.jpg

 

It’s come down to four Republican candidates. They have survived the rigors of a presidential campaign–and there are many. It’s gotten nasty at times, with candidates attacking candidates of the same party. Something that Reagan warned ominously against. But that was when party was sacred, and the person to beat wasn’t Obama.

It wasn’t that Obama was a good president. After presiding over the biggest deficit in US history, he has the US teetering on the closest approach a country founded with a democratic-republic ever came to pure socialism.

But the remaining “four” Republicans have refused to bow to the minor option of ‘green energy’. More importantly, all are committed to reduce taxes, cut government spending, and cut ‘Big Government’ as a whole.

One is particularly good at business dealings, and money handling. One is a specifically good cost-cutter, spendthrift, and bean counter. The other is a specialized orator, who understands all the ins and outs of daily politics.

One candidate is different, though. He is good at all the aforementioned items, but has special claims to many of them.  Most understood Reagan conservatism was a three-legged stool with economic, social and national defense legs.

This candidate’s repeated calls for a Balanced Budget Amendment, unleashing America’s vast domestic energy, and eliminating restrictive regulations, has put forward more concrete proposals to create middle-income jobs than any other presidential possibility.

He stated the way to stop today’s runaway government is to realize it reflects the collapse of core values, and lacks any glue to keep families together. There is no candidate today clearer on this.

With his increase in popularity, many had anxiety attacks about his perceived spirituality. While trying to discuss his economic plans, the media seems only obsessed with his personal religious opinions.

Typically he always has to confront anti-Catholic prejudice, and accused of being too “far right” to win. He has a reverence for all life, heterosexual marriage, and devotion to a strong family life. He considers amniocentesis as a ‘Death Panel’ on deciding who lives and who dies.

He knows the words “separation of church and state” are not contained in the Constitution, and the phrase from Jefferson’s letter to the Danbury Baptists had a much different meaning than what’s construed.

The media hates him for it, and has launched an all-out attack against him. CNN’s John King told him he was a Democrat’s dream. “A lot of Democrats were celebrating, … last night, saying, in their view, you’re on the extreme right on many of these social issues and they think, for them, it’s a good thing that these issues will be front and center.”

Shockingly, ABC’s “GMA” sycophantically promoted “polyamory” (practice of having more than one open romantic relationship at a time) the morning after his electoral tie in Michigan.

Infuriatingly frustrating to the media, most of his campaigning was done with handshakes, gatherings, and door-to-door discussions. ‘Big bucks’ were never affordable for his campaign. 

Previous Obama campaigning shows Romney as the opponent Obama and the liberal machine wanted nominated. It seems that the difference in social issues alone, is what scares them the most.

When you think about it, one other person was typically chastised for His beliefs, and the elite hated Him as well.

As one realizes by now, the only non-named Republican in this race is Rick Santorum. He, and his wife Karen, have seven living children, and leave behind Gabriel who died prematurely after 20 weeks of pregnancy. Their eighth child, Isabella, was diagnosed with Edwards syndrome (Trisomy 18). She was recommended for abortion, having a 10% chance of survival to one year. The Santorums ignored that advice, and now live with their daughter.

What may be the most telling point of all, is one of the least publicized statements by Santorum that has rarely, if ever, been uttered by a politician running for the highest office in the land: “You may not like what I say and you may not like how I say it, but you can always know I will tell Americans the truth.”

Santorum meant what he said on 1/24/12 to that crowd >1000 people at the First Baptist Church (Naples, Fl). The question is, can the people of Naples, and the US, survive knowing that a politician will tell them the truth?

———————————————————————————————————————————————————–

Kevin Roeten can be reached at roetenks@charter.net.

COMMENTS

  • alliek

    We need to stick together and really do all we can to get Rick Santorum to the convention! We met him last night in Alamo,Ca. and honestly people should withhold judgement until they meet him. He is so authentic, so genuine! He walks in the room and talks to everyone! He looks you in the eye and is very personable! I liked him before meeting him but now I am so convinced we can win with him! Romney and Obama and all the libs should be afraid of him because he has a quality that they all lack and that would be authenticity! When the American people learn who he is and where he came from and what he stands for they will vote for him! There is a hunger out there to be the people God intended us to be, the kind of people the pilgrims, puritans were! To have a dauntless faith in God and our country. To be courageous against all odds, that is who Rick Santorum is, I am convinced of this! I would plead will all people of faith, vote your conscience not who you think can beat Obama! If we do our part, God will do his. Have faith in a mighty God, who always uses small numbers to make big changes!

    • CincoSolas_del_Bronx

      .,.

  • CincoSolas_del_Bronx

    which cover the field from out of context to anti-Scriptural to ambiguous to inaccurate to heretical, I seem to be left with your telling us that Rick Santorum is our ideal candidate because he is “authentic” and “courageous”. I’d like to know, and it might help your thinking as well, what will he actually do if elected President?

  • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

    on his website and has been talking about them while the other candidates were still giving speeches, not to mention he actually led Congress to pass legislation that did more for consertavism than any of the candidates has. And he’s successfully gotten in O’s head with those solutions.

  • morrigan

    >”When you think about it, one other person was typically chastised for His beliefs, and the elite hated Him as well.”

    This sort of thing is obviously not appealing to the non-religious, but even a lot of religious people are going to be turned off by it.

    I have a lot of sympathy for the religious right in general. And I can see where they are coming from in this particular case, at least to an extent. Santorum is the most genuinely Christian man to challenge for the presidency in a long time. It must be difficult to see him fall short.

    He’s young though, and a good campaign this year would set him up well for 2016 or even 2020. Unfortunately his own conduct and that of some of his supporters has been self-destructive of late. This attitude of “it’s either Santorum or Obama in 2012″ does not help Santorum, does not help Christianity, does not help the religious right, does not help the GOP, and does not help the country.

    • JSobieski

      So someone else makes it, and the someone else is tainted with the label of bad conduct?

      Romney’s campaign was so tepid, devoid of substance, etc. that this campaign turned out like no other in recent memory.

      Romney 2012: Because I want to prove that substance free campaigning can work

      Romney beat everyone into the ground on the stupid electability argument—who can blame rick for making the same argument in a slightly different way.

      • morrigan

        Do you really have to bring your canned anti-Romney talking points into a diary about Rick Santorum? And append them to a comment which made zero mention of Romney, a comment which actually said nice things about Santorum?

        >”Romney beat everyone into the ground on the stupid electability argument

      • morrigan

        Looks to me like it is turning out like just about every other campaign in history. One winner, several runners up. Same old complaints from the runners-up that they were robbed/cheated/hard done by. Back in 2000 the McCainiacs complained that they were robbed due to dirty tricks by the Bushies.