« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Fraud in Every Corner of 2012 Election

All of a sudden election results are coming to light showing massive fraud. Can election results be changed? According to Joseph Farah (WND) [Did Obama really win?], shows results for which the winner should disclaim victory. Bob Unruh said the same thing. In a WND Exclusive: Poll watcher sees Romney ballots changed, he confirmed election disparities.

Even with the massive fraud turning the election, there was no way Obama could declare his win a ‘mandate’. Even with the fraud, Obama only got 51% of the vote, to Romney’s 48%.

Obama’s election victory was heavily tainted by several anomalies. The most serious ones: 1) automated voting machines in many states (initially virtual ties) gave 5-10% votes from Romney, to Obama. 2) Democrat operatives had voters cast multiple ballots. 3) In a deliberate effort to suppress the military vote, ballots were systematically denied active-duty servicemen and women around the world. 4) In many cases, Democrats were granted open voting, requiring no identification (e.g., no photo ID).

Amazingly, one finds out after the election that Obama won every state that didn’t fully require photo ID to vote.

Obama claimed no new taxes, but Obamacare (per Rush Limbaugh; 11/14 EIB) adds another $1.79/ hr/ full-time-employee tax. And add another $0.98/ hr/ employee as a ‘fine’ for not having Obamacare.

It turns out 330,000 votes for Romney (instead of Obama), in 4 ‘swing’ states (Fl, Oh, Va, & NH), would have given Romney the decision by the Electoral College. That doesn’t include the millions of votes changed to Obama from Romney (errant voting machines), >10 other methods of voter fraud, 3 million Republicans countrywide that didn’t vote (thinking Romney had already won from polls taken), or the millions who didn’t register to vote for fear of being called for Jury Duty.

After the election, we hear all of the discrepancies in the official ‘Benghazi-gate’ story. When asked on television to give an account of Benghazi, Obama would not respond, but said an investigation was forthcoming. It’s known public knowledge about the exact happenings could have easily changed election results, even with all the fraud.

Obama and his campaign cohorts were sly in their election antics. It’s almost impossible to pin any of the voter fraud actions on the Democrat Party, even though they seemed to win every contested vote. It will be highly difficult to pin any blame of fraud due to circumstances, and the lack of hard facts in most cases.

It was unfortunate the country will be submitted to four more years of crushing debt, Christmas gifts to half the electorate for re-electing Obama, Marxist practices, likely Supreme Court Justices nominated by a pro-abortion crowd, overbearing regulations, higher tax rates for all, and higher unemployment.

For those of you who still voted for Obama because he’s [only 45%] Black , it may be wise to remember that to vote for someone only because he’s Black, is as racist not to vote for someone who IS Black.

And most importantly, it may be wise to pray for those aborted, especially under the Obama regime. If those aborted souls are still existing, as most Christians know they are, there will likely be h–l to pay for the unrepentant.

Even an entire country must hit ‘rock-bottom’ before it can return to glory. Designed by the Forefathers almost 250 years ago, this country was designed with God’s help, and will never fail.

—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————–

Kevin Roeten can be reached at roetenks@charter.net.

COMMENTS

  • dcobranchi

    “Amazingly, one finds out after the election that Obama won every state that didn’t fully require photo ID to vote.”

    West Virginia does NOT require photo ID. Romney carried it.

  • idontsleepidream

    missiouri does not have photo ID..romney won it…you lost..suck it up

    • Bill S

      This is an example of winning the battle but losing the war. You lose the war. Bye.

      • Jack_Savage

        I’m not really sure if he even won the battle. He is so unaware of his own circumstances that he finds no irony in supporting Obama but moving back home to Mom’s basement.

        • Bill S

          Well, he was right about photo ID in MO.

          The diarist’s claim about photo ID is plainly incorrect. And this does appear to be yet another borderline conspiracy theory diary about how we lost because of FRAUD!!!11!

          We lost primarily because our candidate sucked and secondarily because the campaign sucked.

          • Jack_Savage

            Yes. Ross Perot did report hearing that giant sucking sound again. And again, it comes from a GOP presidential campaign.

            He’s right about another thing. We lost, and to keep with the theme, there will definitely be a lot of “sucking it up” over the next four years. What he misses is exactly who will be doing it.

          • garfieldjl

            Bill, there is indications that Fraud may have tipped a Congressional Election in Florida in favor of the Democrat Candidate.
            While it is less likely that Romney lost due to fraud, it is certainly likely that a few congressional districts had their elections thrown due to fraud.

  • Dave_A

    1) Automated voting machines favor OUR SIDE and should be required nationwide.
    You cannot commit fraud if you have touch-screen voting, beyond the really inefficient, low-grade stuff like multiple-voting…

    The notion that the machines ‘gave votes to Obama’ is absurd.

    The true fraud-threat is ‘Election Fraud’ – the old Democrat mainstay where ‘extra’ paper ballots are ‘found’ just in time to win the election… BAN PAPER BALLOTS. AUTOMATED ONLY! – that’s the only way to stop it.

    2) Servicemen can vote by e-mail or fax, using a federal write-in ballot
    This is required because ‘over there’ the mail does NOT get delivered reliably, and in some places there is no way to send any mail back (no postal services at small COPs)….

    • garfieldjl

      Actually an automated machine is only as accurate as it is programmed to be. There is just as much of a potential for fraud with automated machines as there is for paper ballots.

      • streiff

        that really isn’t true. I’m an election judge in my state and we use Diebold machines. There are an incredible number of security checks build into the system. For the voting machines to be compromised a significant number of people have to be involved. It is much easier to manipulate paper ballots in a handful of precincts than the voting machines.

        • garfieldjl

          It really depends streiff, you are correct that in some ways it can be harder; however in other ways it is substancially easier. If the method to cheat has been programmed into it back at the manufacturer or where-ever they are stored, it would be surprisingly simple for the fraud to go unnoticed.
          Just program the machine to work normally up to election day, and then the program kicks in on election day. Not sure about the complexity of the machines but it is possible.
          Both methods have their potential for fraud, and that is why people have to be vigilent concerning this.

  • revtm

    WV, NC, Mississippi, Nebraska, and Wyoming have NO id requirement at all to vote, and Romney won those states.

    Missouri, Alabama, SC, Texas, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Utah, Arizona, Montana, ND, Kentucky and Alaska all have non-photo id requirements, and Romney won in those states.

    Michigan Hawaii and New Hampshire have a Photo ID requirement, and Romney lost there