[Read this. If you can live with it, hit the contact button and ask for reinstatement. Otherwise, have a nice life.]

Obama Election Cannot Be Official

Unproven yet, but the conclusion is inevitable. Obama likely lost the election. The Obama campaign willingly, or unknowingly, foisted the worst case of voter fraud in US history. Obama, being the recipient of the results, either had full knowledge of the planned results, or refused to acknowledge what happened during the election.

The President of the United States cannot be properly elected by fraud. It seems a far cry from the US efforts to have a democratic election after the overthrow of Hussein.

Fraud Turning up Everywhere

It’s Official: Obama Voter Fraud Reason for “Reelection”/growing … resentment is mounting. By each listed link in the previous example, fraud was undoubtedly committed.

The question—even with the fraud–was Obama still the victor? The known discrepancies gave 5–10% of the vote in ‘swing’ states, from Romney to Obama. If one checks, up to 330,000 votes for Obama were probably placed for Romney in 4 ‘swing’ states (Fl, Oh, Va, & NH). Electoral votes from just those 4 states would have given Romney the presidency.

Taking 5-10% of 124 million votes cast in the election, one gets 6-12 million votes Romney actually received instead of Obama. With those 4 swing-states so close in the election, 5-10% for Romney easily would change those states to Romney’s column.

Of the many voting frauds listed, it’s most interesting how Obama won every state that didn’t fully require photo ID to vote.

The Jag Hunter gives even more details scarier than the last.

Obama received 10 million votes less in 2012, than in 2008. Another fraud-pointing statistic.

“Consent Decree” a Game-Changer

Some external force was needed for fraud this massive. A race-based Consent Decree Democrat-negotiated against the RNC 30 years ago, still has eliminated their options. GOP officials could be cited for contempt (or fraud this election), if they tried to make sure American elections are fraud-free.

In fact, this case is the Democratic National Committee vs. the Republican National Committee, originally from 1982.

In 1982, Democrats alleged Republicans were attempting to intimidate minority voters in NJ. As a result, legal action somehow forced the RNC to agree to a Consent Decree before a Democrat judge, instead of fighting the claims.

A specific section has been used for 30 years to stop Republicans from any challenge to evidence of voter fraud in voting locations with “racial or ethnic populations”.

Attorney James Bopp (James Madison Center) said “It prevents the RNC from working with state parties in conducting voter integrity activities. It has been used by the DNC to harass the leadership of the RNC with false allegations of violations of the consent decree.”

Bopp said the agreement, even recently with reports of rampant countrywide fraud, prevents the RNC from doing any anti-voter fraud activity on Election Day. Used by the DNC to harass the RNC with false allegations of violations of the Consent Decree, risk of possible election tampering was certain.

From PushBackNow (11/18/12) [DNC Granted Permission to Cheat by RNC Begining 1982 « PBN ...], we get specifics from Chuck Norris on how to eliminate fraud from occurring again. It makes good points on eliminating voter fraud in future elections.

This agreement gives a carte blanche to the DNC to commit vote fraud in every voting district across America per the Consent Decree, with a substantial proportion of ‘racial or ethnic populations’.

The judge who denied the RNC’s appeal in 2010 to vacate the 1982 Consent Decree is an Obama appointee–Joseph Greenaway.

Since 1982, the Consent Decree has been renewed every year by the original judge (Dickinson Debevoise/now 88).  Retired, Debevoise returns yearly to renew that order.

Another Possible Revolution

It was obvious Romney was a talented, experienced, proven executive who could have shown America how to be prosperous again. Changing the enforced Decree looks grim. Until, of course, Debevoise dies.

One option would be for the GOP to retreat, or to join the Democrat Party. What GOP members cannot do, if they want to survive and prosper, is forget why they’re not Democrats.

Since the American Revolution itself, we’ve learned Americans do not give up easily, just because times are tough.

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Kevin Roeten can be reached at roetenks@charter.net.

Taking two separate surveys, on 2 different dates, two different unbiased organizations gave analyses on child-rearing with couples. This time, same-sex couples versus married husband-wife families were compared. Even Mike McManus elucidates how children of same-sex parents fare much worse than they usually do with a hetero-sexual couple.

Bob Unruh, states This 1 factor could cut child poverty 82% – Heritage Foundation .…. That factor is Mom and Dad being married. This does NOT include living together.

Heritage Foundation’s Robert Rector (Senior Research Fellow): “…But the nation does little or nothing to discourage births outside marriage or to encourage healthy marriage. In fact, the welfare system often sends the message that marriage has nothing to do with poverty.” As can be explained as The report noted, “As husbands disappear from the home, poverty and welfare dependence will increase, and children and parents will suffer as a result”.

In the above report Rector says: “The collapse of marriage, along with a dramatic rise in births to single women, is the most important cause of childhood poverty but government policy doesn’t reflect that reality”.

Instead of promoting marriage, government only deplors it. It offers numerous programs, specifically for the one-parent family. It’s already known $330 billion (2011) went to single-parents with children.

The Washington Times also reported real-time facts about same-sex marriages. Mark Regnerus (University of Texas Scholar), found differing aspects with comparisons. As compared to adults raised in married heterosexual families, adults raised by lesbian mothers had detrimental consequences (in 24 of 40 classifications), and raised by gay fathers–had detrimental consequences in 19 classifications.

Parents Forcing Sex on Kids

In Exposing Liberal Lies: Homosexuality Hurts the Kids, Michael McManus [President/Marriage Savers] has found results detrimental from same-sex marriage. He says there is 11 times the chance of being molested by a parent: “only two people of those with married parents were ever touched sexually by a parent or an adult – while 23% of those with a lesbian mother had that experience.”

Other facts he unearths, you may not want to know. Only 8% of kids from intact families had ever been “forced” to have sex, versus 31% with lesbian, and 25% of gay parents.

The obvious evidence from this research, is confirmation that when Mom and Dad are actually married, they usually have a very positive effect in a child’s life.

But gays believe 5-8 million years of human responses can be forgotten in the last 30, when gay marriage has attempted to re-define actual marriage.

Alleged Discrimination

Usually, scathing innuendo has plagued accepted marriage in the last 30 years. How about the charge of ‘Christians constantly trying to discriminate against same-sex unions’? This charge is disproved by the privilege advantage. Certain people meet particular standards that enable them to take advantage of privileges offered. Many jobs include certain additional characteristics.

Airline pilots, for example, cannot be acrophobic (fear of heights). They cannot have uncontrolled seizures (e.g.,epilepsy), and many other requirements. That doesn’t mean they are better people than anyone else. Many occupations have special needs: the ability for one to weld, to drive a large machine, to repair a human heart, etc., etc….

Meeting Necessary Requirements

The privilege of marriage usually requires the ability to procreate-to produce new human life. Same-sex marriage, by efinition, prohibits procreation. Maybe it’s possible to paint a $250M portrait, similar to an existing “Rembrandt”. If not, it’s always possible to sue for damages because of discrimination.

Naturally, same-sex couples typically think a Rembrandt is more valuable than a baby.

© Copyright by Kevin Roeten, 2012. All rights reserved.

Sweden striker Zlatan Ibrahimovic ran through the field on Thursday after scoring a shocking [Bicycle kick - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia] from 30 yards out on 11/15/12. A replay of the feat in the game itself: [http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/more-sports/soccer-world-toasts-ibrahimovic-goal-article-1.1202471#ixzz2CcEiKXT3]

For all those non-soccer players reading about a ‘bicycle’ kick, it is a kick of a ball towards a goal, while the kicker is in midair. The kicker’s head is usually closest to the ground, and facing away from the goal. Its mastery is so difficult, few soccer players even try it.

The acrobatic skill and handling of the ball generally required, has often made it nearly impossible for players to make the move in stressful situations. Only 17 players have ever scored more than once using a ‘bicycle’ kick (including Pele, Ronaldinho, David Arellano, Zlatan Ibrahimovic, and Billy Bremner) to name a few.

The soccer game was played In Stockholm, Sweden. A Swiss 4-2 win came after Ibrahimovic’s goal in a friendly (not official) match against England. In a truly masterful performance, Ibrahimovic scored all 4 of Sweden’s goals, initially having the extremely rare “hat trick” (3 goals in one game).  

Interpretations of this 90th-minute goal was, the greatest goal of the year. “Goal of the Century,” was the headline pasted in Daily Telegraph. The “hat trick” undoubtedly gave Ibrahimovic confidence to attempt such a recklessly bold shot. Chasing a long pass, Ibrahimovic held back when the England goalkeeper rushed to clear the ball with a header, just outside the penalty box. 

He turned, and leapt high before the ball touched the ground. His back to the goal, he kicked the ball overhead, looping over the goalie and two defenders. When he shot from the side of the field 30 yards away, he put the ball in the corner of the net.

Ibrahimovic is one of the few players who could pull off such an athletic feat of this much tenacity and co-ordination. As he scored his 39th goal for Sweden, the stadium became a massive eruption of joy, as only a soccer stadium can be. Ibrahimovic brazenly whipped off his shirt in celebration.

For those diehard football fans who think soccer is a boring, low-scoring sport, the above scenario should possibly change your mind. Throw in the video [http://bustasports.com/italian-soccer-commentator-goes-crazy-after-last-second-goal/], and you’ll find soccer excitement is in the eye of the beholder. 

For those not viewing the video, a last-minute goal has just been scored, with the announcer going absolutely apoplectic, and screaming the word ‘GOAL-GOAL-GOAL’—19 distinct times. This Italian commentator covering the Juventus/Roma game went crazy. Strange, the whole telecast was in Italian. But everyone knew what he was saying. After this goal, the commentator’s voice was measured to rise at least two octaves.

—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

Kevin Roeten can be reached at roetenks@charter.net.

Even with the massive fraud turning the election, there was no way Obama could declare his win a ‘mandate’. Even with the fraud, Obama only got 51% of the vote, to Romney’s 48%.

Obama’s election victory was heavily tainted by several anomalies. The most serious ones: 1) automated voting machines in many states (initially virtual ties) gave 5-10% votes from Romney, to Obama. 2) Democrat operatives had voters cast multiple ballots. 3) In a deliberate effort to suppress the military vote, ballots were systematically denied active-duty servicemen and women around the world. 4) In many cases, Democrats were granted open voting, requiring no identification (e.g., no photo ID).

Amazingly, one finds out after the election that Obama won every state that didn’t fully require photo ID to vote.

Obama claimed no new taxes, but Obamacare (per Rush Limbaugh; 11/14 EIB) adds another $1.79/ hr/ full-time-employee tax. And add another $0.98/ hr/ employee as a ‘fine’ for not having Obamacare.

It turns out 330,000 votes for Romney (instead of Obama), in 4 ‘swing’ states (Fl, Oh, Va, & NH), would have given Romney the decision by the Electoral College. That doesn’t include the millions of votes changed to Obama from Romney (errant voting machines), >10 other methods of voter fraud, 3 million Republicans countrywide that didn’t vote (thinking Romney had already won from polls taken), or the millions who didn’t register to vote for fear of being called for Jury Duty.

After the election, we hear all of the discrepancies in the official ‘Benghazi-gate’ story. When asked on television to give an account of Benghazi, Obama would not respond, but said an investigation was forthcoming. It’s known public knowledge about the exact happenings could have easily changed election results, even with all the fraud.

Obama and his campaign cohorts were sly in their election antics. It’s almost impossible to pin any of the voter fraud actions on the Democrat Party, even though they seemed to win every contested vote. It will be highly difficult to pin any blame of fraud due to circumstances, and the lack of hard facts in most cases.

It was unfortunate the country will be submitted to four more years of crushing debt, Christmas gifts to half the electorate for re-electing Obama, Marxist practices, likely Supreme Court Justices nominated by a pro-abortion crowd, overbearing regulations, higher tax rates for all, and higher unemployment.

For those of you who still voted for Obama because he’s [only 45%] Black , it may be wise to remember that to vote for someone only because he’s Black, is as racist not to vote for someone who IS Black.

And most importantly, it may be wise to pray for those aborted, especially under the Obama regime. If those aborted souls are still existing, as most Christians know they are, there will likely be h–l to pay for the unrepentant.

Even an entire country must hit ‘rock-bottom’ before it can return to glory. Designed by the Forefathers almost 250 years ago, this country was designed with God’s help, and will never fail.

—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————–

Kevin Roeten can be reached at roetenks@charter.net.

Unheard of Threat

A sure-fire method of nullifying the most ominous threat today–an Electro Magnetic Pulse (EMP) attack. A second Obama term heightens that risk dramatically. “An EMP attack on the American homeland, is one of only a few ways that the US could be defeated by its enemies – terrorist or otherwise,” wrote Sen. John Kyl, R-Ariz., in the Washington Post. This has been known since Kyle wrote that article in 2005.

The easiest is using a Scud missile, with only one nuclear bomb. Detonated at the right altitude (40-60 km) would produce an EMP at the speed of light. If detonated at the right altitude over the North American Continent, the effect would knock out power grids and electrical systems across the US for months, or even years, resulting in a rapid breakdown of social order.

Owners of the EMP Ability

Iran has that ability–as soon as it manufactures a ‘nuke’ for Scud arming. North Korea, an Iran ally, already claims this ability. By now, it’s a given at least all 28 nuclear-capable nations have the same ability.

Per Kyle, “Just launch a cheap missile from a freighter in international waters–al-Qaeda is believed to own about 80 such vessels–and make sure to get it a few miles in the air.”  Electrical power, and electronics and communications would cease to exist. Anarchy and blackouts are a certainty. Almost all vehicular activity would be gone.

Iran admittedly says enrichment produces fuel for nuclear reactors. But, it can also be used in nuclear bombs. Intelligence realizes nuclear-armed nations are quickly developing EMP weapons. Iran will likely demonstrate its ability to get the bomb at almost a moment’s notice.

Dr. William Graham, Reagan’s science adviser (chairman Commission Assessing Threat to US from EMP Attack), believes a large EMP above American territory would mean most Americans would either freeze, starve or die from disease.

Graham states Iran’s latest mid-air detonation of missiles are possible plans for an EMP attack. A rogue, or terrorist nation, can achieve EMP attack capability without having a high level of sophistication.

Sources of Secret Information

Very highly reliable sources, Reza Kahlili (ex-CIA agent), and Hamidreza Zakeri (Iran Intelligence defector) has irrefutable evidence from sources inside Iran on its nuclear weapons timetable. Iran has almost completed building a nuclear warhead, and successfully tested an implosion system at a secret site, while enriching uranium.

Kahlili and Zakeri confirmed Iranian intelligence (WND:“Watch Iranians, They Believe That War is Near, Expert Says”). Kahlili says Iran doesn’t believe US would attack (Obama actions), but they’re no so sure about Israel. Zakeri testified in a Manhattan federal court, giving proof Iran had materially aided and supported al-Qaeda, before and after 9/11.

Given reports from Kahlili, Zakeri, ISIS and IAEA, Netanyahu has much to worry about.

Missile Defense

General Habiger (former head US Strategic Command) has said the following about an EMP attack: “It is not a matter of if, it is a matter of when.” He relates how society would collapse into a collection of hostile self-styled militias, private armies and warring tribes. Shockingly, only a $20M upgrade of hardening all electronics could eliminate any EMP destruction.

Taking the American will out of the equation, Obama bypassed Americans when he clandestinely said to Russian President Medvedev:  “after he [Obama] is re-elected and need never face the voters again, he can be more “flexible” with the Russians about missile defense.”

The only sure savior to an EMP attack, would be Missile Defense. No one would be killed, but encroaching missiles towards the US would be blown out of the sky. The Department of Defense has missiles that can target rogue missiles (15,000 mph) on its way to a city.

Unfortunately, Obama was in the distinct position within the last year to shoot down a North Korean missile in test flight splashing close to a friendly location. Doing so, would have realized 3 things:

One:      a rogue missile would be proven destroyed by Missile Defense

Two:     North Korea would realize their missiles would likely be useless against the US , and US-protected states

Three:  terrorist entities (e.g., al-Qaeda, etc…) would also realize nuclear missiles would be useless for delivering, or threatening ‘terror’

With successful deployment, the possibility exists that any nuclear missile attack could be a thing of the past.

Action MUST Be Immediate

Now, WND has came out with an exclusive column from Michael Maloof (“Hezbollah plays Tit for Tat with Isreal”). Hezbollah (with drones received from Iran), has missiles capable  of emitting a non-nuclear “EMP”, with he ability to cause large electrical blackouts.  Hezbollah indicates however, that drones are only part of their total capability.   

 With the ability to reach Israel’s highly sensitive Dimona nuclear reactor, this shuffles the cards against Israel. Hezbollah overtly warned Israel an attack against Iran’s nuclear sites could lead to the “annihilation” of the “Tel Aviv regime.”

Strangely, Obama has cut an arm, and two legs, off  the existing American missile defense system with defense cuts. This does not include all intended future cuts by his administration. It also ignores any plans Obama may have with Arab and/or radical Islamic factions.

—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————–

Kevin Roeten can be reached at roetenks@charter.net.

It’s only happened to one president—and he resigned. Two presidents were impeached, the most recent was Bill Clinton. With Obama, impeachment (or indictment) charges have not yet been filed.

Obama’s actions concerning the Benghazi Consulate (Libya) were more than troubling. It’s known 4 Americans, including a still breathing Ambassador Chris Stevens, were killed in a terrorist attack on the embassy in a tactically coordinated offensive by Islamic terrorists. Obama knew this within 2 hours.

But Obama would not order the military to move in. In other words, Americans were left to die. The real scandal was how the administration–for days–continued to alter reality by pointing to an obscure video, instead of the actual terrorist uprising, occurring on the 9/11 Anniversary.

Obama actually watched the attacks on surveillance pictures from an American drone camera overhead.Lt. Col. Tony Schaefer reported to Fox News confirmed Obama watched the hideous attack occur ‘live’. “I hate to say this, according to my sources, yes, [the President] was one of those in the White House situation room in real-time watching this. And the question becomes, ‘What did the President do or not do in the moments he saw this unveiling?’ He — only he — could issue a directive to Secretary of Defense Panetta to do something.”

The New York Post also collaborates a military drone was over Benghazi at the time of the attacks, relaying real-time information back to D.C.  Bottom line, the president did absolutely nothing to protect the lives of Americans at the embassy. Urgent requests for military support were denied numerous times.

General David Petraeus discusses his witness of the attacks, and desperate requests for assistance, but was helpless to send any assistance without Obama’s direct order. From Petraeus: “…Moreover, no one at any level in the CIA told anybody not to help those in need; claims to the contrary are simply inaccurate. In fact, it is important to remember how many lives were saved by courageous Americans who put their own safety at risk that night—and that some of those selfless Americans gave their lives in the effort to rescue their comrades.”

The Constitution states: “[the president] shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.”

From Alexander Hamilton: “…those offences which proceed from the misconduct of public men, or, in other words, from the abuse or violation of some public trust.”

Impeachment: majority vote by the House; conviction 2/3 vote by the Senate. Majority Republican, the House would certainly impeach. With a Democrat Senate majority, conviction would be unlikely. 

Obama told a Denver TV station right after at the Consulate killings, “I gave three very clear directives. Number one, make sure that we are securing our personnel and doing whatever we need to.”

Impeachment charges:

1) allowing illegal trespassing

2) allowing death of 4 Americans

3) refusal to defend American territory [consulate]

4) not informing public of attack

5) lying about perpetrators of attack, and refusal for aide

6) not fulfilling promises made after attack

7) obstruction of justice

8) abuse of power

During this entire conflict, Washington was continually in touch [by email] with personnel in Benghazi. We learned that a closely associated al-Qaeda group claimed responsibility for the entire siege.

Per FoxNews’ Jennifer Griffin, Navy SEAL Tyrone Woods, part of a team about a mile from the consulate, heard gunshots emanating from the consulate. Urgently requesting backup, he asked permission to go to the embassy for help. He and his team were denied 3x, and told to “stand down.”

Woods had no doubt about his reactions to Americans under attack. He defied his orders and rushed to help, but could not find the ambassador. Returning back to the safe house, he made a desperate call again for military assistance, but was refused again. After 4 hours, he was killed on the roof by a mortar shell. No assistance was forthcoming. 

It’s known a fighter jet could have arrived within 1 hour, special forces within 3, but fighting raged continually for 7.

In What We Know About Benghazi: Obama Should Resign : The Daily … Ivan Kenneally (Editor/Daily Witness) gives another similar account.

Gary Halbert: What Really Happened in Benghazi on Sept. 11 – InvestorsInsight.com describes the same fiasco.

Halbert even admits the only plausible explanation: Obama knew it was too big a risk to admit to a major terrorist attack killing 4 Americans, he refused to protect. He wouldn’t allow this info publicized shortly before the election.

By the time the whole truth came out, it was called “old news”. Mainstream media treated it as such.

—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————–

Kevin Roeten can be reached at roetenks@charter.net.

Supporters of Planned Parenthood

Recently, Obama has been routing huge taxpayer monies to Planned Parenthood (PP).

He seems to have a very close relationship with PP, is convinced that abortion and contraception is the only solution to purported “overpopulation”, doesn’t believe abortion kills anything until the baby is out of the womb, doesn’t understand all those funds aren’t coming from government but the American taxpayer, and refuses to believe the overall debt is increasing.

The likely probability is all 5 apply.

Shockingly, some voters will vote for Obama, or justify their vote by relegating “right to life”–listed first in the Declaration–as a ‘twenty-third’ tier priority. Some Americans still have strong ties to their old British counterparts, who wanted to continue close ties with Britain in 1776, and maintain governmental control of their lives.

All American revolutionaries knew they would likely die from ‘treason’ in England for signing the Declaration and Constitution. Did Americans want George Washington, Patrick Henry, Jon Hancock, and millions of other Americans to go the way of death as all revolutionaries?

Per the Susan B. Anthony List (SBA List), a full one third of Congress is for abortion ‘on-demand’. In other words, it’s legal to kill the baby for any conceivable reason. That was true right up to the baby seeing the first light of day. Radical changes include assumed medical deficiency (e.g., Down Syndrome, etc…), race (e.g., Female, Black, Brown), and perceived need (e.g., money, want). These changes mean after the baby has seen its first light .

Already, 156 members of Congress shockingly voted against the Pain Capable Unborn Child Protection Act. After a baby is 20 weeks old in utero, it has been determined a baby can feel pain from the torment of an abortionist’s instruments. Unsaid, is whether a baby can feel pain before 20 weeks, because instrumentation cannot yet measure how much.

These votes reveal members who are controlled by PP, and other abortionists.

From Ben Bernacke (Federal Reserve), Fed says the economy is getting weaker » News – GOPUSA, and PP government donations have only intensified worries about the economy falling off the “fiscal cliff” at year’s end. Including all proposed Obamacare tax increases, and Bush income tax cuts scheduled to be eliminated, he says a major recession could follow.

After Gov. Chris Christi vetoed PP funding, The New Jersey Senate passed a measure to restore that $7.5 million in funding, with all of the Senate Democrats voting (26-13), to restore the PP funds.

(SBA List President) Marjorie Dannenfelser stated: “The President’s loyalty to Planned Parenthood – the nation’s largest abortion business and his top political ally – knows no limits.”

Dannenfelser revealed in the last year, Obama has demonstrated relentless loyalty to the abortion business, PP in particular. The Administration even threatened to shut down the federal government rather than cut PP’s taxpayer funding.

Marie Tasy (Executive Director/ NJ Right to Life) stated: “President Obama is clearly more concerned with protecting Planned Parenthood’s bottom line so they can continue to support his re-election campaign at the taxpayer’s expense than protecting women and girls from the violence of sex trafficking and abortion.”

As well as NJ, the Obama Administration has now directly assisted PP in 4 other states:

1) Obama threatened to pull $4.3 billion in Medicaid funding from Indiana after its legislature voted to defund PP. (6/11)

2) Obama contracted directly with PP after New Hampshire’s Executive Council voted to defund PP. (9/11)

3) Obama pulled $30 million in Medicaid waiver funds from Texas, after the legislature voted to defund PP from the waiver program. (3/12)

4) Obama bypassed Tennessee elected officials, and contracted directly with PP after they were defunded by the state. (7/12)

Evidently, the Obama Administration doesn’t believe in the benefit of the doubt when it comes to abortion, or making Americans pay for all those aborted babies.

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————–

Kevin Roeten can be reached at roetenks@charter.net.