« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The End of the Moderate Senate Democrat

What do Ben Nelson, Blanche Lincoln, Joe Lieberman and Mark Pryor have in common?

They remain the last bastions of so-called moderate Democrats in the United States Senate.  

As Harry Reid, John Kerry, Ted Kennedy, Chuck Schumer and Patrick Leahy become more and more ascendant, it is obvious that the Age of Moderates within the Democratic Party are coming to an end.

And, the potential victory — ill-begotten as it may be — by Al Franken will spell the final end to the chapter of their moderate Democrats influence in the United States Senate.

While Franken will still only get Democrats to 59 votes — it is a critical 59th vote for the Harry Reid Agenda.  

With Al Franken in the Senate, Harry Reid will achieve a vote he desperately needs to break multiple roadblocks to his pet political issues — the Employee Free Choice Act, raising taxes, increasing spending and further eroding our economic base by broadening the power of the federal government.

With Al Franken in the Senate, Harry Reid will be able to put even more pressure on the diminishing power of Moderate Democrats to abandon their principle and their positions.  

Who does he bend to get them to break?  Is it Pryor who has remained under the partisan radar as much as possible — generally being a voice of reason but who may have some potential national dreams some day.

Or, does he get Joe Lieberman as a test of loyalty to those he once had the courage to challenge to shift change and pass an agenda that more and more moderates are seeing spells disaster for the country?

How about Blanche Lincoln?  A smart, articulate woman who may be just a step away from a national perch, Lincoln must certainly be under intense pressure to simply toe the line.

As for Ben Nelson — he’s never been beneath cutting a deal to get what he wants.  And, while his state of Nebraska remains a staunch conservative place, Ben Nelson is a smart politico who can wiggle himself out of some pretty tough spots.  

And, with the ability to lure liberal Republicans like Susan Collins or Olympia Snowe to his side on some of these key issues, Harry Reid will effectively have his 60th vote in Al Franken.

Al Franken is Harry Reid’s 60th vote.  And, they both know it and that’s why Reid has been upping the anty every single day since the recount began.  

Al Franken is in the pocket of every liberal special interest group and his bidding isn’t a question of if — it’s a question of just how high will he jump for them!

Want the private sector completely out of student loan programs and have the government (taxpayer) carry the weight on its own?  Al Franken will jump high and often.

Want government health care paid for by the government (taxpayer)? Jump, Al, Jump!

Want union legislation that makes your private ballot subject to scutiny by labor bosses everywhere?  Al is jumping like a rope that just can’t stop!

Moderate Democrats without Al Franken in the Senate have amazing power. They force Harry Reid to have to negotiate with them — to come to them for compromises on key issues of the day.

With Al Franken in the Senate, they have to go to Harry ready and ask for compromises — to which Harry Reid will tell them which way the sun is shining and it isn’t on their faces.

And, if you look ahead to 2010 — when GOP ranks in the Senate are likely to thin out even more — the final straw that breaks the camel’s back will be complete.  With 59 Democrats in the Senate, with Al Franken in their anks, and the potential for picking up more liberal Democratic seats in 2010, the Moderate Democrat will cease to exist in the United Senate.

The Minnesota election is never likely to be fairly decided — particularly with a 3 court panel that seems meek and timid and unwilling to enforce the very rulings they have handed down.

With potentially thousands of illegal votes now being included in the election totals as a result of a Friday the 13th ruling by the 3 court contest judges, it is inconceivable that anyone will be able to declare victory.  

And, with thousands more votes not being counted, or some of them being counted twice, Minnesota stands on the edge of being seen as a national showcase for everything that is wrong with elections in our country today.

It’s been suggested that the only logical way to resolve this matter is a revote.  And, whether you are a Democrat or Republican, the idea of doing it over in order to get it right has to be a far better option than accepting the results that you know are flawed and tainted.

For the remaining moderate Democrats in the Senate, if confronted with having to seat Al Franken without an election certificate as Harry Reid continues to threaten, it will be clear that they no longer have power if they are rolled and follow his lead.

And, even more problematic for them, if they accept the results of the Minnesota election — tainted as it is — and Al Franken is seated — their days of influence will end as surely as the punchline:  Senator Al Franken.  

COMMENTS

  • candoo2

    moderate Republican Senator and a moderate Democratic Senator?

    This discussion has made me consider that perhaps neither party has a real answer to this question, therefore making the ideal of discussing this situation almost moot.

    Does a moderate Republican Senator do something other than a moderate Democratic Senator when votes come into play? Does one spend more time backing their party than the other?

    What are your feelings, as I’m still not understanding the question.

    • AKSteveB

      end up sticking with their party. The Moderate Repubs seem to stick with the Dems as well.

      • http://www.letfreedomringblog.com ggross56

        The entire post is based on delusion, not reality. First, it will be months before the Coleman-Franken race is decided, if that soon.

        I’d also suggest that RS Insider read up on EFCA. Ben Nelson has already said he’s voting against it. Mary Landrieu, Blanche Lincoln and Mark Pryor are wavering.

        Finally, it’s laughable to hear Insider talk about Reid seating Franken. The GOP has stated emphatically that they’d filibuster such a move. Even if Benedict Arlen were to betray Sen. Coleman, that’s still only 59 votes, which won’t break a filibuster. That’s one time I’m certain Collins & Snowe wouldn’t jump ship.

    • Praying

      a moderate Democrat will not abandon his democratic principles, even if he is personally uncomfortable, he is unwilling to defect from the group.

      A moderate Republican seems to enjoy defecting from his party, obviously suffering from such low self esteem that he “needs” the approval of democrats – which is a joke, since the democrats will never respect a republican no matter what they do. Moderate Republican don’t have any problem compromising their party principles, since they long ago lost track of what those principles were.

      • bs

        Claire McCaskill might qualify. She apparently opposes the ominbus spending bill due to earmarks. See here for some interesting insights. She also opposed the CIR legislation that Bush tried to ram through. Past that, though, I consider her as hard left as any of the current crop. It’s just odd what she picked to waver on.

        This all goes back to how you define “conservative” and “moderate”

    • JDidSaint

      http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/110/senate/party-voters/

      In the 110th congress, Joe Lieberman, an “Independent” voted with the DFL 86% of the time.

      On the other hand, the two “Republican” Maine senators voted R <70% of the time. Seven other “Republican” senators voted with the GOP <80% of the time. All of the DFL senators voted with their party more than 80% of the time.

      There are 12 RINOs before you get to the first possible DINO on the list. And you would have to go through the 32 most solid DFL votes to find the most solid GOP vote.THAT is the difference between moderate republicans and moderate democrats.

      In the 110th congress, the GOP average for voting on party lines was 80.7% while the DFL average was 87.5%.

      The inability to hold the line on the biggest spending binge in the history of the United States, the most radical and criminal cabinet appointments I’m aware of, and the 7000+ earmark omnibus that just escaped filibuster are the real world difference between the GOP slide and the DFL moderates.

  • zarathustra57

    Tester’s usually a good vote on immigration and gun issues…more so than some of the (now defunct) Northeast GOPers were. I might slap him in with the moderates as well.