« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Republicans and Short Term Memory Loss

A Snapshot From Georgia Politics

Earlier today, Erick posted an item asking “Did You Vote Republican For Nothing?” It’s a good and timely question, as is “did Republicans learn anything from this election, the rise of the Tea Party, and the crushing defeat of a liberal tax-and-spend agenda in November?”

Looking purely at recent national and local political news relevant to folks in just one state – Georgia – it now seems the answer to the first question is “yes” and the answer to the second might just be “no.”

Yesterday, House GOP leadership elevated Hal Rogers, infamous porker and earmark fan, to the post of Appropriations Committee Chairman, where he will be free to lard it up while Republicans seek to reclaim the mantle of fiscal conservatism—rhetorically, we must assume. In taking that step, the House GOP leadership passed over Georgia Rep. Jack Kingston, an infinitely better choice had they actually wanted to govern in a fiscally conservative manner, rather than preach spending restraint while enabling waste we can’t afford.

And in Kingston’s home state of Georgia, currently, a Tax Council has been reviewing the tax code and is widely expected to recommend in the very near future a number of actual or de facto tax hikes. These are rumored to include the “sunsetting” or enforced expiration of certain tax exemptions (so taxes will go up), as well as a hike in the state’s cigarette tax.

At least one Republican state representative, and rumor has it, outgoing Gov. Sonny Perdue, is fully on board with the idea of pursuing one or more tax hikes being weighed by the Council. This is despite the fact that it was reported last month that for five months straight, state revenue has been higher than during the same period last year. No doubt this kind of scene is being played out in states across the nation, where Republicans elected to cut spending, and oppose any and all tax hikes, are suddenly being tempted by tax increases as short-term fixes to budget woes. No doubt many Republicans in Congress now responsible for “governing” are easing into greater comfort with the idea of big spending, like we have seen with the debate about extending unemployment benefits again.

The message of the election was crystal clear to those of us who watched the defeat of people like Georgia Democratic Rep. Jim Marshall this November, but it looks like it is being forgotten already by some Republicans who we entrusted with power. It’s our job to make sure they remember

COMMENTS

  • fpete13527

    The message the House GOP is sending is that they are going to go on the BIG PORK train and show the Dems how to REALLY spend.

    The state GOP legislatures, many of which turned progressive porkers given the O regime, thought they would have to start demonstrating integrity again – thank God.

    But alas, now, the Federal Pork Brigade GOP Congress is saying “hell no, go ahead, spend and tax.” That fiscal conservative bologna was just to get conservative activists to get the job done for us during the mid-terms given the U.S. people knew/know we were/are Bozos .

    Go ahead and pork out you guys at State level, the water is fine.

    Pork and tax. Disgusting!!!

    Primaries start Feb 2011!!!!

  • rdelbov

    Jack Kingston?

    I have been wanting to post some thoughts these two committee chairman races. Perhaps I should gather a bit of information 1st.

    When I hear about budget and spending hawks among the republicans in the US house. Here are the names that I hear.

    Ryan
    Flack
    King
    Pence
    Chaffetz

    Am I missing any names? Who are the big budget hawks in the US congress?

    Before them it was Coburn and DeMint. I don’t hear “Jack Kingston” name in this conversation. I believe Kingston has been big on Sugar stuff but that’s all I ever recall him being a leader on.

    Here’s my two points and you think I am out of line just so say.

    1. The House GOP has been united in fighting Obama budgets but during 2001-2009 it was asleep-for the most part-and let Bush43 get his budgets passed. Unless you can help me out I think we about 5 or 6 house members who are really stand tall guys on spending.

    2. Kingston and Rogers are both currently on the wrong side of the spending ledger. You can certainly make a case that Kingston is no Hal Rogers(but who is?) but maybe its just because he lacks the seniority and committee positions. Kingston may be better then Rogers but he no Flack or Ryan or King or DeMint or Coburn.

    So while I do not downplay the choice of Apporiations committee the big-big -big chore ahead is changing the GOP caucus. We have 5 or 6 Budget Hawks and we need 242 of them in 2011. Lets be clear you have to move the leadership. I think Boehner & Cantor clearly see Rogers & Kingston as two peas in a pod. They both got Budget religion right now but both were earmark lovers in the past.

    Its the futute that counts. Hold the committee and its chairman responsible–hold the leadership responsible.

    I went a little beyond asking a question and got into opining.

  • Locked and Loaded

    You turncoats better get ready to be deluged with TEA!

  • http://www.erickerickson.org Erick Erickson

    The tax commission is advocating an increase in cigarette taxes not to raise revenue, but to provide a greater disincentive against smoking so that long term health care costs in Georgia, a substantial portion of which comes from smoking related health concerns, goes down.

    They aren’t trying to balance the budget with cigarette taxes and have been very open about that. If nothing else, they have learned from the previous experiment that increasing the cigarette tax never brings in the projected revenue.

    • Brian Simpson

      It also seems to rarely decrease an individual’s consumption of cigarettes. More often, it simply changes where they make their purchases.

  • elizabeth bennet

    I live in Georgia, and I have been livid at the GOP at the state level for some time now. For two or three years running now, absolutely NOTHING has gotten done because of squabbling and backbiting and scandals. Sonny P. and Casey Cagle and Glenn Richardson bickering, Richardson having a sordid affair with a lobbyist whose legislation he was pushing and then resigning when proof surfaced he had threatened his ex, Cagle’s rumored dalliances, etc., etc., etc. CRAP…at least with Democrats, you know what you’re getting. Even in my county, which is 70% conservative, the last county commission got the boot because outrageously stupid decisions on behalf of the county. So now, the new commission doesn’t appear to be doing a whole heck of a lot better.

    Well, I am sick of it. SICK. OF. IT. I don’t care if it takes 20 years, I am going to work tirelessly to get rid of all these morons who think that being an elected official is a mandate for doing whatever the heck you want to do at the expense of US, the taxpayers.

    :bangingheadondesk:

  • wattchildress

    Excellent post. Thank you. This softening of the Republican position mirrors the party’s apparent push to exclude transportation spending from a ban on earmarks (please see link below).

    http://www.redstate.com/wattchildress/2010/12/02/transportation-earmarks-turn-taxpayers-into-roadkill/

  • CJB68

       With the state and national GOP basically pulling the rugs out from under our candidates Urqhart and O’Donnel this year and thus ensuring a socialist-Dem lock on Delaware’s Congressional delegation, I’m pretty much aware that the battle is far from over.  This is something we may have to do for three or more election cycles until the right people are in the places they need to be to shove the Beltway Clubbers out.

       It also comes down to what we need to do about the socialist-Dem (and RINO) supporters.  I call them “housepets” for a reason — their mental conditioning to vote for the person who hands them free food, free housing, free clothes, ad nauseum.  Until something is done to get those people to throw off that yoke, they’ll continue to auto-rehire the representatives who’ve been leading them by that ring in their nose.

  • earlgrey

    Since you mentioned Hal Rogers for Appropriations committee I thought it would be OK to ask this question here. I have read the term “term limited” for opposng certain members to head committees. We have no term limits. Does this mean that the leadership does not expect these candidates to hold onto their seats in 2012?

    • ffc99

      has a term limit rule for committee chairs, which provides (I believe) that a member is limited to 6 years as Chairman or Ranking Member of a particular committee.

      • baserunr

        So at the end of Obama’s second term, which the Republicans are doing there apparent best here to insure, we can have a “New” head of Appropriations? I honestly thought that they were listening, that they got the message. So utterly depressing

        “Meet the new boss, same as the old boss!”

        Infuriating!

  • pamela1631

    Are they all menopausal?
    Walking around with brain fog?
    Maybe taking some funky meds with weird side effects?
    Got whacked on the head?

    The only thing lard is good for is cooking and the emergency greasing of wheel bearings, not spending money we don’t have.

    Blasted drunks! Only way to cure the Wretched Excess spending, is haul them into the middle of nowhere and drop them off for the cure.

  • froster

    Does he request earmarks? (Comparing someone to Hal Rogers in terms of earmarks is not appropriate in determining someone’s “fiscal conservatism”)

  • america1st

    the GOP establishment believes the election results this year were an endorsement of them rather than a repudiation of the wastrel habits of the axis of evil (pelosi – reid – 0bozo).

    One word for Boehner, Cantor, et. al. : PRIMARY

    If they expect they can go back to the halcyon days of the Potomac Pork Farm, they better have their retirement housing under agreement before mortgage rates move any higher.

  • smitch61

    For one hell of a tea party.. They thought we would go away. It was never about the democrat party, we know who they are. Had it not been for the tea party, the current GOP leadership would have went along with everything.. It just would have been faster…. How is Australia to live? It is pretty at least..