« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The Perry Questions

Like many conservatives, i have been researching and investigating the GOP Presidential candidates in order to make an informed decision when I pull the lever in the primaries. As of yet, I have not found any one candidate that I could get solidly behind. I have found several that I like (Bauchmann, Cain) and that I am considering voting for, but I am overall undecided.

Enter Rick Perry. Initially, when I heard that he was thinking of running, I was enthusiastic. I thought to myself, this might be the guy to unite the party and beat Obama. Needless to say, I was hoping that he would decide to run and waited anxiously to see if the rumors were true regarding his candidacy.

But as his announcement appears to be imminent, some issues have begun to crop up regarding Perry as a candidate. First it was the Gardasil issue, then it was his support of the TTC, and then I heard some questioning whether he reduced the budget in Texas or grew it. Added to that, he became the center of some rather bizarre conspiracy theories. I tried to research some of these issues, but much of the information was tainted by the above mentioned conspiracy theory websites. These theories are by and large bunk, but it would be dishonest for me to say that I was not a little disconcerted that his actions could even be grown into some sort of conspiracy theory.

Speaking of conspiracy theories, I would like to take a brief moment to explain how destructive to truth these things are. There are enough machinations and plots out there that are real and need to be exposed without these people running around with bizarre theories not based on fact. Their actions and words muddy the waters and actually make it more difficult for truth to win the day. People are off chasing rabbits that do not exist, while true evil goes on right under their noses. Conspiracists peddle fear and lies mixed with a sliver of truth, and only bring confusion and despair to their victims.

I will step off my soapbox now and return to the Perry question.

In light of these issues and the difficulty of finding an accurate and unbiased view of his governorship in Texas, I pondered some of the questions that I would like to have answered by Perry and/or asked of him. I might add that the way these questions are answered would determine whether I support him in the primaries.

1). Is Perry just another pro-life statist? I heard Erick coin this term on the radio yesterday and I though it an excellent description of many establishment Republicans. I do not want a pro-life statist for President! I want someone who is not only pro-life, but who is deeply committed to reducing the size of government in Washington. With all respect to former President GW Bush, I do not want another Republican President who actually grows government. I want the whole package: social conservative, fiscal conservative, and a staunch supporter of limited government. Isn’t that what conservatism is anyways?

2). What did he do in Texas to reduce the size and scope of government? A good indicator of how a candidate will govern his how he/she governed in their previous position.

3). What did Perry do in Texas to balance the state budget and reduce spending and/or cut entitlements?

4). Does he believe in American exceptionalism and is he nationalist in his thinking or a globalist?

5). What are his plans to expand private sector development and to decrease onerous regulations on businesses?

6). What are his views on immigration?

These are important questions to ask of Perry and that he will need to answer. Some of his actions, ie the Gardasil issue, place him at odds with a limited government perspective. He will have to address that issue and some others during his campaign. If he lands on the side of conservatism in his answers to these questions, he may very well be the next President of the United States.

One final thing I would like to add, is that these questions should not and do not just apply to Perry. We should be asking these of every candidate for the GOP nomination. We cannot just blindly follow a cult of personality, that is how Obama got elected. We must fully vet all candidates and place the most Conservative nominee who can win on the ticket. If we do that, Obama will be a one-term President. So help us God.

COMMENTS

  • izoneguy

    I live in Plano, TX. Near Dallas.
    You have to come here to believe what is happening.

    It looks like a boom town everywhere you go around Dallas and Fort Worth.

    Liberals everywhere would have you believe that Rick Perry is not
    responsible for the success of Texas. Here is the truth.
    Texans are responsible for the success of Texas. Rick Perry has not created a state like California or New York that looks to punish success. Rick Perry gets out of the way of business. He is a great cheerleader for Texas and would be a much better President than Obama could ever dream to be.

    The answer to your questions are out there. Do your own research and let us know what you come up with.

    • runner12

      So I am very familiar with Texas’ economic success. The problem is that I don’t know where to look for unbiased information, as. I am largely uninformed of the Texas political/ informational landscape. To be truthful, since you are one of the natives, I was hoping that you may be able to point me in some sort of direction to start my hunt for information.

      P.S. I must ask you one thing since you are from Texas that I have always wondered about. Why do Texans drive like they are on the Autobahn all of the time? Every time I go go Dallas/Ft. Worth I feel like I am risking life and limb!

  • BA Cyclone

    to which we all pour our greatest hopes of effective, conservative leadership.

    He does have a fantastic resume’, at least when it comes to relative economic success in his state. He has put out several stick-in-the-eye bills that demonstrate, at the very least a strong political acumen. He has also won several contested state-wide political contests.

    However, many of these qualities are also true of other political candidates in history. Much of this could all be said of George W. Bush before he was President.

    My concern is what kind of President will Rick Perry actually be, which I think is what you are asking here. He looks and acts strong. He talks a big game on conservatism. But what is his actual plan for walking the walk?

    Is he going to go up there and “get something done” with Democrats, or is he going to go to Washington and help lead conservatives who seek to recapture Liberty that has been lost?

    As of right now it seems like many are pouring their hopes of everything they don’t like about the currently announced candidates into this nice resume’ and gravitas that Rick Perry carries. I hope we have the patience to truly flesh out what a President Rick Perry would truly have to offer.

    • runner12

      NT

  • Pingback: Nilda Zeman

  • Pingback: Hisako Willes

  • Pingback: Scottie Coursey