« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

HERMAN CAIN-KINGMAKER

Or at least, it appears that is how he sees himself. As a supporter for Cain, this week has been a real eye opener. He was my second choice, but now has fallen to the bottom,below Bachmann if not completely off the list. I am somewhat at a loss to explain the past week’s actions unless I come to an unseemly conclusion that one of these scenarios is the truth:
1.) Cain was never serious about running for president, he was all along planning to be appointed Romney’s VP. It does not escape my notice that Romney owns Clear Channel Communications, which I believe, until recently, was Cain’s employer as a radio talk show host, whether or not this has any relevancy is up for debate. It still must be given some thought. Both men are business men,both are used to making back room deals- I believe I read somewhere that Cain even admitted in an interview that he and Romney had made a deal not to go after each other, which makes no sense if you consider there will only be ONE nominee and at some point  ,if Cain is serious, he will HAVE NO CHOICE but to go after Romney. Was he planning on going after Perry to challenge his conservative creds and after finishing him off, dropping out of the race for whatever reason,leaving Romney as the only candidate left standing-hence crowning himself as a kingmaker? Sounds loony, but what else makes sense?

2.) I read that Cain runs his campaign with basically a skeleton staff. I also read that after the last debate and straw poll win, that Cain’s communication adviser resigned and took her senior assistant with her. That absolutely baffles me. I cannot come up with a rational explanation for why a campaign adviser would leave a campaign after such a big win and leave him with no one to lead his communications team. Maybe SHE might resign based on reason’s having nothing to do with the campaign, but why would she take her senior assistant too? It doesn’t add up. Thus it tends to make me think these gaffes and participating in the racial smearing of a fellow Republican for political gain are either the product of an inexperienced political naif or the calculated attempts at gaining media coverage,albeit very,VERY,badly carried out in process. This plan might have been why this women packed up and left wanting no part of it. Cain is not a politician, so up until yesterday, I tried to give him the benefit of the doubt, a little bit of extra space to feel his way around the political stage. Then I watched him say he would support the voter’s choice of a nominee and would give everyone ELSE 100 percent ,except Perry. He went one further by stating he wouldn’t even entertain being Perry’s vice president if asked, anyone else but Perry. At that point,his campaign rocket that had been on the ascent, did a complete nose dive and crashed hard into the ground before bursting into all consuming flames. ARE these the actions of a rookie, or are they the actions of a cold mind trying to remove another candidate no matter what the consequence. It is clear that Cain does not just want to get the nod as the sole conservative, he wants to DESTROY Perry,ruin any political chance he has now or even in the future-PALIN STYLE. His actions speak louder than words. I can’t help but come to this conclusion but the real question is WHY?

3.) This leads me to my very last glimmer of an idea. It could be all wrong, it could not, but I think it has something to do with the Fed. Perry wants to get rid of the Fed, wants it audited and it’s books and members made public. We all know the Fed is compromised of the very wealthy banks,etc, it has even been said that some of those banks are foreign and some of those banks took government bail outs. People just don’t know WHO. Cain was the head of the Fed in Kansas, was for TARP and is against auditing the Fed. He did not like Perry’s remark about Bernanke printing more money and creating inflation, and his 999 plan amounts to a tax increase of 9 percent in addition to whatever other taxes you pay in your state and cities, thus supposedly keeping down inflation and perhaps allowing the fed to print MORE. But how about you keep down inflation by not printing more money instead? Could some of the big banks be behind Cain’s vehemence toward Perry? Much finer minds then my own could ponder this more deeply and come to an entirely different conclusion and I would welcome, in fact seek their input.

4.) ORRRR, Cain might, indeed, have decided to throw caution to the wind, and destroy all good will towards him and his campaign, by going extremely negative on a fellow candidate because he mistakenly thinks the tea party and conservatives who support him WANT to see that directed at OTHER Republicans, INSTEAD, of Obama. Where he could have gotten that idea is beyond me and shows an incredible lack of understanding of the feeling in this country. We don’t want to see one conservative participating in racially smearing another conservative. We don’t want to see intentionally misleading statements(soft on immigration) made  by a man who prefaces his statement with the line “I have not read all of his positions on immigration yet….BUT”, and we certainly don’t want to see a candidate actually FOMENT the rise of a third party candidate by saying he wouldn’t support a nominee 100 percent. That just screams of an amateur, someone without the necessary thinking capacity to realize when he has been played for a fool by the media and others. I would really appreciate other’s views on this, am not afraid of criticism, or debate.

COMMENTS

  • izoneguy
  • sayoung80913

    Thanks for the laugh-I needed it this morning after spraining my ankle last night:)

  • Scope

    Don’t know who came up with that but it sure didn’t take long to pin the correct title on the donkey did it.

  • izoneguy

    That is another izoneguy original Photoshoppe

  • Change Jar Conservative

    If Cain WAS the VP then he’d be ready to run in 2020 … he’d have that foreign policy and government experience.

  • congressworksforus

    Maybe I am not “hard core” enough or something, but I just don’t see the same things about Herman Cain you and others on here do.

    1. Given what he’s spending of his own money, this is nonsense.

    2. Given the burn through of cash by other candidates with large staff, who are languishing behind Cain the polls, I call this good business sense. Also, being a long-time communications director for a CEO and during the early nomination process is NOT the same as being in it for the long haul. She may be great, but can SHE stand up to what is going to be unleashed on her candidate in the coming months, and can she deal with it EFFECTIVELY. It’s fine to have a non-politician run, especially with Cain’s experience, but it is NOT OK to have neophyte staff if you’re serious about the WH. You need folks with experience. She didn’t have it and both she and Cain knew it.

    3. Cain was a CITIZEN director on the Kansas City Fed. He is also NOT against auditing the Fed. (Please, stop parroting the Paulnuts on this). Cain said he didn’t see the POINT in auditing the Fed because he didn’t think we’d find anything, but he wasn’t AGAINST it.

    4. I wouldn’t support Perry 100% either after his immigration snafu. Why? Because he insulted me by calling me heartless. And his apology was more for the media and the immigrants, not the people he insulted. I’d still support him though (as, let’s face it, all of us on here will support whomever the nominee ends up being, despite our occasional protestations otherwise). But just as Cain said, based on Perry’s current stance on issues, I wouldn’t throw my support behind him 100%. (Or any money for that matter….) Not until he apologizes to the right people…)

  • congressworksforus

    That cartoon is a disgrace.

    How is that any different from the way the media treated Palin in 2008?

    Really, some people on here need to get a clue and stop being so hypocritical…

  • dbkohl

    It’s Cheney all over again. Herman Cain was born 13 December 1945. At the time of the Presidential Election in 2012, he will be 66, almost 67. When it’s his turn in 2020, he’s 74 almost 75. So we would be hoping for 8 years out of him to a ripe old age of 83 when he steps down in 2028. I don’t know anything about his health, but the odds don’t get much better as time goes on. His time in NOW if it is at all. This doesn’t mean that he CAN’T be our POTUS for 2021-2029… it means there are things to consider before making that kind of move for a VP position. We want a VP that can carry the reigns of the party after 8 good years.

  • sayoung80913

    Could probably do with a little less snideness. IMHO, you are arguing semantics here. Saying you don’t see the point in auditing the fed is pretty much the same as being against auditing the fed. Anyone who knows me would laugh hysterically at your insinuation that I am parroting Ron Paul. I’ll laugh too. It’s kind of like me saying,
    well I don’t see the point of 99 weeks of unemployment benefits because it encourages unemployment. Clearly that suggests that I do not agree with unemployment wages hence the feeling that he is against auditing the fed. Again-my opinion. Also what does spending his own money have to do with it? Who wouldn’t pay a couple million of their own money to attain the office and power of Vice President, in fact, quite a few politicians have done just that. Senators,congressmen,presidential candidates and governors alike finance their own campaigns all the time. Huntsman right now is financing his. Do you think he really believes he will win, or is he angling for a cabinet position. You be the judge. i also don’t find being a CITIZEN director of the Kansas fed as contrary to what I posted. We’ll have to agree to disagree but again thanks for your input.