Obama’s Dept. of Interior: Criminal, Incompetent, or a Combination of Both – UPDATE

By: scipio62 (Diary)  |  November 10th at 01:18 PM  | 

Via Memeorandum, Politico reports that Interior’s Inspector General released a report of the Department of Interior’s politicized handling of the 6-month offshore drilling moratorium. In addition to personnel at the DOI, the IG skewers the White House’s unconfirmed “Energy Czar” Carol Browner and her staff. The IG report shows another example of the “Keystone Kops” method of running government used by the people in this | Read More »

Judge Walker’s Disregard For The Rule Of Law

By: scipio62 (Diary)  |  August 10th at 09:37 AM  | 

Disclosure: I am not a supporter of same-sex marriage. As a constitutional conservative and a traditionalist, I believe that the definition of marriage is that of a committed relationship between one man and one woman who are not directly related to each other by blood. This is the foundation of family stability (I haven’t helped in this since I did divorce my first wife; I’ve | Read More »

Vermont Legalizes Gay Marriage…Constitutionally – Open Thread

By: scipio62 (Diary)  |  April 7th at 12:32 PM  | 

Regardless of where you are in regards to marriage between people of the same sex (as I mentioned here, I am against it, Vermont constitutionally passed legislation legalizing such marriages. Vermont is the only state to have made them legal in the method approved of by conservatives, through the legislative process (and without a prior ruling by the state courts), while the other three, Massachusetts, | Read More »

Iowa and Civil Rights – A Rebuttal Against Gay “Marriage” Ruling

By: scipio62 (Diary)  |  April 6th at 08:54 PM  | 

As has already been reported, Iowa’s Supreme Court unanimously overturned a law defining marriage as a union between one man and one woman, thus granting same-sex couples to get “married”. The left defines this as a huge victory for “civil rights” and in the cause of “marriage equality”, and they proudly proclaim how the court followed the Constitution. There is a mention in the ruling | Read More »