“We have top men working on it right now.”
By: scipio62 (Diary) | February 28th at 09:46 AM |
I’ve seen arrogance before, but I’ve never seen such arrogance in the federal government as it is exhibited by the lawless Obama regime. Even after Gov. Rick Scott (R-FL) rejected $2.4 billion for what would eventually be the expensive high-speed rail boondoggle subsidized by Florida’s taxpayers, the attempt by U.S. Senator Bill Nelson (D-FL) to put the Democratic Party’s interest ahead of the state he | Read More »
A Ruling Based on the Constitution; Obamacare Mandate Unconstitutional
By: scipio62 (Diary) | December 14th at 08:50 AM |
Full Disclosure: I am not a lawyer nor a trained legal scholar. This is what a real judicial ruling looks like, one based on the U.S. Constitution, compared to other “rulings” based on the talking points of the Democratic Party. Judge Henry Hudson of the Eastern District of Virginia, appointed by President George W. Bush, overturned the Obamacare mandate requiring individuals to buy health insurance | Read More »
Obamacare Judge: Americans are the Federal Government’s Serfs – Part II
By: scipio62 (Diary) | December 2nd at 08:04 AM |
Full Disclosure: I am not a lawyer nor a trained legal scholar. As was the case with Thomas More Law Center v. Obama (TMLC), a Clinton-appointed Democratic political official masquerading as a federal judge issued a political statement of Democratic talking points masquerading as a judicial ruling. I don’t want to delve too much into the weeds of this “ruling” since Liberty University, et al. | Read More »
Obamacare Judge: Americans are the Federal Government’s Serfs
By: scipio62 (Diary) | October 8th at 11:23 AM |
Full Disclosure: I am not a lawyer nor a trained legal scholar. District Court Judge George Caram Steeh, a Clinton appointee, issued a ruling yesterday regarding Obamacare in Thomas More Law Center, et al. v. Obama, et al. (TMLC). Reading through his “judicial” opinion, I got the sense that the most pertinent parts were written by a Democratic political operative, not a judge; it’s the | Read More »
Judge Walker’s Disregard For The Rule Of Law
By: scipio62 (Diary) | August 10th at 09:37 AM |
Disclosure: I am not a supporter of same-sex marriage. As a constitutional conservative and a traditionalist, I believe that the definition of marriage is that of a committed relationship between one man and one woman who are not directly related to each other by blood. This is the foundation of family stability (I haven’t helped in this since I did divorce my first wife; I’ve | Read More »
Vermont Legalizes Gay Marriage…Constitutionally – Open Thread
By: scipio62 (Diary) | April 7th at 12:32 PM |
Regardless of where you are in regards to marriage between people of the same sex (as I mentioned here, I am against it, Vermont constitutionally passed legislation legalizing such marriages. Vermont is the only state to have made them legal in the method approved of by conservatives, through the legislative process (and without a prior ruling by the state courts), while the other three, Massachusetts, | Read More »
Tags:
14th amendment,
california,
connecticut,
equal protection,
homosexual lobby,
iowa,
judicial tyranny,
marriage,
minnesota,
supreme court,
u.s. constitution,
vermont
Iowa and Civil Rights – A Rebuttal Against Gay “Marriage” Ruling
By: scipio62 (Diary) | April 6th at 08:54 PM |
As has already been reported, Iowa’s Supreme Court unanimously overturned a law defining marriage as a union between one man and one woman, thus granting same-sex couples to get “married”. The left defines this as a huge victory for “civil rights” and in the cause of “marriage equality”, and they proudly proclaim how the court followed the Constitution. There is a mention in the ruling | Read More »
Tags:
14th amendment,
california,
connecticut,
equal protection,
homosexual lobby,
iowa,
judicial tyranny,
marriage,
minnesota,
moonbats,
slavery,
supreme court,
u.s. constitution