<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Student Loans:  A Political Prop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/sdemaura/2012/06/07/student-loans-a-political-prop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/sdemaura/2012/06/07/student-loans-a-political-prop/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 06:25:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave_A</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/sdemaura/2012/06/07/student-loans-a-political-prop/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave_A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 17:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/sdemaura/?p=116#comment-31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever since 2000-or-so the government has been the originating lender for Perkins, Stafford, and PLUS loans....

Not just a garantor... So the schools no longer get a cut...

The issue isn&#039;t making loans dischargable through bankruptcy... It&#039;s getting rid of federal student aid...

The reason that there is no &#039;accountability&#039; in higher ed pricing, is because schools KNOW that if they raise prices the government will just raise aid - ergo, no penalty for pricing absurdity.

Get rid of aid, and a proper, market-based balance between price and volume will be forced to occur (eg, if tuition doesn&#039;t go down or at least stop rising, schools won&#039;t have any students to charge)....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever since 2000-or-so the government has been the originating lender for Perkins, Stafford, and PLUS loans&#8230;.</p>
<p>Not just a garantor&#8230; So the schools no longer get a cut&#8230;</p>
<p>The issue isn&#8217;t making loans dischargable through bankruptcy&#8230; It&#8217;s getting rid of federal student aid&#8230;</p>
<p>The reason that there is no &#8216;accountability&#8217; in higher ed pricing, is because schools KNOW that if they raise prices the government will just raise aid &#8211; ergo, no penalty for pricing absurdity.</p>
<p>Get rid of aid, and a proper, market-based balance between price and volume will be forced to occur (eg, if tuition doesn&#8217;t go down or at least stop rising, schools won&#8217;t have any students to charge)&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: norris</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/sdemaura/2012/06/07/student-loans-a-political-prop/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>norris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 12:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/sdemaura/?p=116#comment-30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whenever student  loans  become cheaper school  fees rise.            If  the schools held the notes on their own students they could make a percentage to run the program. and keep the government out.      If the loans could be discharged through bankruptcy 5 years after graduation the schools would have a real incentive to council student  for more  courses  that  will help them earn a living.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whenever student  loans  become cheaper school  fees rise.            If  the schools held the notes on their own students they could make a percentage to run the program. and keep the government out.      If the loans could be discharged through bankruptcy 5 years after graduation the schools would have a real incentive to council student  for more  courses  that  will help them earn a living.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
