« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Why I Am Supporting Former Congressman John N. Hostettler for Indiana Senate

After long consideration, I have decided to endorse former Congressman John N. Hostettler for the Indiana Senate seat vacated by Evan Bayh, and here’s the issues and a list of his accomplishments in the House that bring me to my decision:

The Issues:

1. Taxes and Spending: Mr. Hostettler believes that it is not that the federal government taxes too little, it is that it spends too much. As a member of the House, Hostettler consistently voted for tax cuts including the creation of the child tax credit, lowering of capital gains rates and dividend tax rates, accelerated depreciation schedules and the phase out and outright elimination of the estate tax, and that fundamental tax reform is necessary to grow the economy and create long term job growth. He voted to repeal the Sixteenth Amendment to the Constitution, which authorized the income tax. He also believes that if all taxpaying Americans were compelled to write a check to the federal government for the taxes that are currently withheld, those same Americans would demand that Congress reduce spending and stop taking so much of their hard-earned income. If elected, he will work in the Senate to make permanent the tax cuts passed in 2001 and scheduled to sunset in 2011.

2. Health Care: Mr. Hostettler opposes the government takeover of the US health care system recently passed by Congress and signed into law by President Obama. He believes that Congress should allow for more competition and work to reduce health care costs by building on the success of Health Savings Accounts by making all health insurance premiums either deductible or a tax credit, creating Health Marts and Association Health Plans which allow individuals and families to negotiate collectively for health care services based on where they live and on their profession, religion, membership in an organization, etc., allowing health insurance plans to be purchased across state lines, and enacting tort reform, which will result in lower health care costs because medical professionals will not be compelled to practice “defensive medicine” which they do now for no other reason than to defend themselves in a potential lawsuit. If elected, Mr. Hostettler will work to repeal ObamaCare and work to bring our health care system out of the Federal Government’s grip.

3. Abortion: Mr. Hostettler is pro-life, period. He believes that we are endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable rights, and that first and most important of these God-given rights is the right to life. In Congress, Hostettler has voted for the Partial Birth Abortion Ban, the Mexico City Policy which prohibited the use of US taxpayer dollars for abortion and abortion counseling in foreign countries, and the Right to Life Act which would give legal protection to the unborn under the Fourteenth Amendment. As a result of this record, Mr. Hostettler’s election to the House of Representatives was consistently endorsed by the National Right to Life and Indiana Right to Life. If elected, he will not give his consent to a judicial nominee if he concludes that the nominee in question believes the constitution allows the destruction of innocent, unborn human life.

4. Marriage: Mr. Hostettler believes that marriage is between one man and one woman. In Congress, he co-sponsored and voted for the Defense of Marriage Act, the utilization of Congress’ authority under Article IV of the United States Constitution to regulate full faith and credit relationships and protects states that do not issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples from being compelled to recognize such licenses issued by states that do, and the Marriage Protection Act, the utilization of authority found in Article III to limit the appellate jurisdiction of the United States Supreme Court. If elected, he will introduce DOMA and MPA and push for their passage so that Indiana is not compelled by a federal court to recognize same-sex marriage licenses issued by another state.

5. Guns: Mr. Hostettler is a staunch defender of our Second Amendment Rights. He is a gun owner and hunter. As a Congressman, he voted to repeal the Clinton Gun Ban on semi-automatic firearms and magazines, led the effort to defund the Smith & Wesson agreement between that manufacturer and the Clinton Administration that would have given preferences to Smith & Wesson after its previous corporate leadership arranged a deal in order to get out of legal proceedings against the gun industry, led the effort to allow civilian airline pilots to carry firearms on board after the 9/11 tragedy was perpetrated by terrorists who were able to overpower pilots and fly airplanes into buildings and a rural field, and sponsored legislation to allow national reciprocity for conceal and carry of firearms. As a result of this record, Mr. Hostettler’s election to the U.S. House of Representatives was consistently endorsed by the National Rifle Association and Gun Owners of America. He will build on the above if he is elected.

6. Illegal Immigration: Mr. Hostettler opposed to amnesty that would grant legal status for the millions of aliens illegally in the United States. As a Congressman, he led the efforts to stop House consideration of the amnesty bill passed by the US Senate in 2006 and voted to build the fence along the southern border and to authorize military personnel to aid in securing the border from the massive influx of illicit drugs and potential movement of terrorists attempting to enter the country from Mexico. As a senator, he will lead the effort to oppose any attempt at amnesty, he will work to further strengthen our borders and give immigration law enforcement the resources and support they need as they protect us, and he will press the Executive Branch to aggressively enforce employer sanctions – in place since 1986 – and turn off the “jobs magnet” that attracts wave after wave of illegal migrants into the United States.

His Accomplishments:

1. In 1995, Mr. Hostettler successfully amended the District of Columbia Appropriations Bill to eliminate the “Domestic Partnership” policy of Washington.

2. In 1995, Mr. Hostettler voted for reinstatement of former President Ronald Reagan’s Mexico City Policy which prohibited the use of US taxpayer dollars for abortion and abortion counseling in foreign countries.

3. In 1996, Mr. Hostettler voted for the Defense of Marriage Act, which utilizes Congress’ authority under Article IV of the United States Constitution to regulate full faith and credit relationships and protects states that do not issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples from being compelled to recognize such licenses issued by states that do.

4. In 1998, Mr. Hostettler traveled to Moscow as part of a Congressional delegation to discuss US deployment of a national missile defense system with members of the Russian Duma.

5. In 2002, Mr. Hostettler was one of six GOP Members of the United States House of Representatives and one of three Conservative GOP Members to vote against the House resolution authorizing President George W. Bush to preemptively engage in military conflict with the nation of Iraq. At the time, in October 2002, Hostettler said the intelligence supporting the claim of a program of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq was “tenuous at best”.

6. In 2003, as Chairperson of the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Claims, Mr. Hostettler successfully amended the Department of State reauthorization bill to require the State Department to regulate the use of consular cards of foreign nations in the US.

7. In 2003, Mr. Hostettler successfully amended the Commerce, State and Justice appropriations bill to discontinue funding of the enforcement of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling which called for the removal of the Ten Commandments from the Alabama State Supreme Court House placed there by Alabama State Chief Justice Roy Moore.

8. In 2003, Mr. Hostettler sponsored and voted for the Marriage Protection Act, which utilized authority found in Article III to limit the appellate jurisdiction of the United States Supreme Court.

9. In 2004, the House passed Mr. Hostettler’s Marriage Protection Act (MPA) which would make it illegal for federal courts from imposing Massachusetts same-sex marriage licenses on any other state.

10. In 2005, Mr. Hostettler voted against the unprecedented disaster relief package that Republicans pushed after Hurricane Katrina struck the Gulf Coast.

11. In 2006, Mr. Hostettler led the efforts to stop House consideration of the amnesty bill passed by the US Senate.

12. In 2006, the House passed Mr. Hostettler’s Public Expression of Religion Act (PERA) which would make forbidden federal courts from requiring defendants such as a Board of County Commissioners to pay a plaintiff’s lawyers, such as the ACLU, fees after the federal courts order the removal of a religious symbol such as the Ten Commandments from the County courthouse lawn.

And in 2008, he wrote a book titled “Nothing for the Nation: Who Got What Out of Iraq”, a book that has received positive reviews from Conservative minded people. What I just mentioned above makes him, IMO, the best qualified candidate for IN-SEN. However, this is just my opinion, and I’d like to hear yours in the comments.

COMMENTS

  • txgho1911

    I will be breaking for Hostettler and hope many others do as well.
    That said it looks like you have followed or studied his history very well. What failings or flaws would you acknowledge.

    • http://conservativestateproject.blogspot.com/ SE-779

      Found much in the way of shortcomings on Hostettler…yet. I’ll post it to my site if I do.

      • ktsub

        fundraising, VERY poor.

        Seems he is repeating his house preformance in the money area.

  • JamesSmith130

    between Hostettler and Stutzman supporters will give the primary to Coats, who very well may be upset by fake-moderate/conservative Dem Ellsworth in the general.

    • e_rowe

      If Stutzman is a factor in this election it will be as a spoiler. I hope that doesn’t happen.

      • e_rowe

        Here’s my two cents to add to this:
        http://www.redstate.com/e_rowe/2010/05/03/hostettler-for-senate/

  • Scope

    stand on national security/foreign policy? You have left any talk of that waving in the wind. Does he support a strong military, and a strong presence of the US where they are strategically located?

    If, for some reason, he does not believe in those military positions, supported by the majority of people in this country, he doesn’t have a chance in hell, so to speak. Look at the polls. Not many have adopted those positions, except for the Paulbots.

    • http://conservativestateproject.blogspot.com/ SE-779

      To have stayed mum on the issue, or else I haven’t listened to him close enough. to have heard any statements on the issue.

      • Scope

        because he is a Ron Paul candidate, endorsed by the one and only Ron Paul. That is as good as a kiss of death for any campaign.

        • http://conservativestateproject.blogspot.com/ SE-779

          On the campaign trail, but Ron Paul gave Hostettler’s book on the Iraq War a favorable review, so that is very telling. I’d have to read it to know for certain, but if Mr. Paul gives a War book a favorable review, then pro-war minded people may be better off not reading it, unless if they, like me, want to see where the author is coming from on the issue.

          • e_rowe

            Why do you think he has stayed mum on the issue?

            There have been something like 10 debates this campaign season, and the issue has come up repeatedly. He has given detailed answers to a variety of questions on the subject. In fact, he’s probably given much more detailed explanations of his stances on defense related issues than any other candidate in the race, most of whom are content to answer questions about war (and most other things) with bumper sticker slogans.

            He holds to an America First type foreign policy. He was against the Iraq War and stands by that.

            But unlike other conservative Iraq War opponents, he consistently voted for full funding of the troops once the war started. He never supported an exit date. And he continues to maintain that the military is the only part of the federal budget he doesn’t want cut.

          • e_rowe

            He was a panelist in the 2008 CPAC round table on “What is a conservative foreign policy?” Unfortunately I haven’t been able to find a video of that.

            It’s probably safe to say that there is more information out there on Hostettler’s foreign policy views than any other candidate. Stutzman in contrast is pretty much a blank slate on the question of when he would commit American troops and taxpayers to another war.

          • http://conservativestateproject.blogspot.com/ SE-779

            Why I’m for Hostettler. We’d know what we’re getting from him on this specific issue, while we wouldn’t know what we’re getting from Stutzman on this issue. I’d rather know what kind of deal we’re getting from a candidate than not.

          • indyjohn

            A John McCain endorsement would have. Hostettler has a good conservative track record. I agree with about 95% his positions. Though he did not support the Iraqi invasion, at least he took a stand on principle. I like the fact that he didn’t make his decision based on the results of polls and focus groups. He is not a panderer/media whore – something I despise.
            The fact that Hostettler has served as a Congressman is a plus for me. He knows the system and can hit the ground running, something that will be of critical importance if the Obama agenda is to be stopped and reversed.
            I got an email from Fred Thompson, stating that he supported Dan Coats. What a disappointment. I know that they are old friends but, come on! Coats is a retread who believes in ‘bi-partisanship’ or put another way. walking down the path toward socialism along with the Dems, just doing so a little more slowly.
            Hostettler is a strong Constitutionalist, something (again) that is of supreme importance in combatting the Obama anti-Constitution onslaught.
            I like Stutzman but, all things considered, the edge goes to Hostettler.
            Call it a gut feeling.
            Sorry Red State.

          • http://conservativestateproject.blogspot.com/ SE-779

            I’m not an avid watcher of debates, I didn’t catch the part on Iraq. Stands to reason Paul would endorse him, then.

          • e_rowe

            I don’t really get into the debates either. Truth be told, most of the time, I can’t stand them. I think the rare exception was a recent one billed as a “job interview” that they did in Indianapolis. It gave candidates a chance to get into more specifics than most others. In that arena John came across as a man among boys. Stutzman, in contrast, looked way out of his league. It’s available in 12 parts here:
            http://www.youtube.com/user/IndianapolisTeaParty

            But it’s definitely not the case that Hostettler has been mum on really any issues at all. He’s done something like 25 town halls (some of which are available on youtube and others not), where he takes all questions and answers them quite extensively.

  • http://ruminationsaspirations.blogspot.com jonbingham

    We have two possible paths for ’10 and ’12:
    Coats & Lugar or Stutzman & Hostettler

    Hostettler leaners: Please consider.
    Marlin Stutzman is the strongest candidate for this race at this time. John Hostettler is the strongest candidate for retiring Lugar in 2012. Let’d get both instead of getting neither.

    Going with Hostettler now simply hands the race to last century’s Senator instead of raising up a new generation of conservative leadership. Let’s not abort IN’s future leadership at this pivotal moment. (Besides, Stutzman is a better opponent to Ellsworth than Hostettler would be.)

    We NEED someone who has the personality and background to be an effective contrast against Lugar in 2012. The person to retire Lugar is Hostettler.

    Do you want Coats & Lugar? Then stick with Hostettler.
    Does Stutzman & Hostettler sound like a better set of Senators to you? Then…
    Go Marlin! (2010)
    Hostettler (2012)

    Make it so!

    • e_rowe

      I’ve seen too many people repeat this meme lately for it not to be some kind of a campaign talking point.

      If you want to follow a strategy like this, it has to be the other way around. Stutzman’s political capital has gone up this campaign. He doesn’t stand a chance to win on Tuesday, like Hostettler does, but he’s turned enough heads that he’ll be in a good position for another shot at an office higher than state senate in 2012.

      But if Stutzman ends up playing the spoiler here and causes Hostettler to lose to Coats, I don’t think anybody expects Hostettler to try again.