« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Can The State Department Back Up Their Claim That North Korea Is Not Sponsoring Terrorism?

Last week, I led a group of Republican senators that wrote to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton urging her to immediately relist North Korea as a State Sponsor of Terrorism and we also introduced an amendment to force the Obama Administration into action.
 
Yesterday on ABC’s This Week, I was pleased to hear Secretary Clinton’s response that they are now considering relisting North Korea. This is a very important step that I hope President Obama will agree to.
 
However, just days before Secretary Clinton’s statement, her spokesman bluntly claimed the State Department doesn’t believe there are any recent acts by North Korea that can be defined as supporting terrorism:
 

REPORTER: A group of Republican senators has written a letter to the Secretary urging her to relist North Korea on the terror list. They specify certain unnamed ongoing terrorist activities. Do you share that assessment, and where do you want to go with that?

STATE DEPT. SPOKESMAN PHILIP CROWLEY: …As for North Korea, I think we’re aware of that letter. But as far as I know, firing off missiles and over-heated rhetoric is unwise and unhelpful, but does not meet the legal definition of terrorism.

REPORTER: They seem to say – but they don’t refer to those tests as a terrorist activity – to say that other ones are ongoing, that those are — Is there anything else that you’re aware of?

MR. CROWLEY: To list a country on the terrorism list, there’s a legal requirement there. And what we’ve seen so far, I don’t think meets that legal test.
 

Based on this statement, I eagerly await the State Department to certify:
 

  1. That it was not terrorism if North Korea did cross into China to kidnap American journalists, who will be sent to a North Korean labor camp.
  2. That reports from our ally Japan are wrong about North Korea currently helping to launder money for terrorist organizations.
  3. That the rockets Hamas continues to launch into Israel do not come from North Korea or contain North Korean parts.
  4. That North Korea has not aided Hezbollah with their attacks on Israel (CRS report pg. 17)
  5. That North Korea is no longer aiding Syria’s nuclear weapons development, a country still listed as a State Sponsor of Terrorism.
  6. That North Korea is no longer supporting Iranian Revolutionary Guards (CRS report pg. 21)
  7. That President Obama’s defense officials and United Nations officials quoted in the Wall Street Journal are incorrect in their warnings that renewed “fears about Pyongyang’s ability and need to smuggle weapons of mass destruction around the world… Iran and Pakistan have already used North Korean materials to develop domestic ballistic missiles. Syria, Yemen, Libya and Egypt have also purchased North Korean missile components in recent years.”
  8. like Libya, North Korea has renounced terrorism and is a party to all 12 of the international conventions and protocols relating to terrorism.
  9. That no representatives of the Iranian government have been present at North Korean nuclear and missile tests as they were believed to be in 2006.

 
Last year, in a move many of us strongly disagreed with, President Bush removed North Korea from the State Sponsors of Terrorism List, not because they had stopped supporting terrorists but in hopes it would be a carrot to encourage them to join negotiations and halt development of ballistic missiles and nuclear weapons.
 
They exploited Bush’s actions by accessing previously frozen funds and loans to speed along their weapons programs. In recent weeks, North Korea once again tested a nuclear weapon and proved to the world their program is alive and well and successfully launched a number of ballistic missiles. Right now, they are preparing to test another missile that has the capability of striking the United States.
 
The carrot didn’t work. It’s time for the stick.
 
Even Secretary Clinton agreed in her interview that North Korea wasn’t de-listed because they suddenly renounced terrorism.  The truth is that United States decided to look the other way in order to get North Korea to cease its nuclear activities, but North Korea has neither renounced terror nor given up its nuclear program. 
 
In recent days, it was also reported that the U.S. may finally impose some economic sanctions on North Korea. This is a step in the right direction, but we must go further. The sanctions that come with being listed on the State Sponsor of Terrorism list are tougher and urgently needed. It will send a strong message to North Korea and the rest of the world that the time for rhetoric is over. It’s time for action in defending the United States and our allies from North Korean aggression.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • The_Gadfly

    Personally, I’m in the camp that doesn’t merely say no, but h*** no. The answer you quoted above shows we moved back to the Gorelick era of a wall of separation between policy and reality. Although everyone at State and in The Big 0′s administration says they wish to stand firm with Israel, ‘me thinks they doth protest too much’ and I fully expect them to sell them out as soon as they can figure out a way to spin it. Having done so, I also fully expect them to declare that they ‘have achieved peace in our time’, although I expect them to muddy it up enough so that they can’t be directly connected to that quote.

    • daezy

      The spending & borrowing has to stop. We are going to drown. Please keep up the fight. We stand behind you.

      God bless

    • http://online.logcabin.org/about/ suzieQ

      I also want to thank Senator DeMint for taking the time to post this. But you are absolutely right Gadfly, they don’t care. If anything, this administration has shown that they side with the terrorists. If North Korea were to actually move on South Korea, Obama would probably go to North Korea and apologize. He is an appeaser, plain and simple. Rush warned everyone all through the election cycle. No one listened to him. Now look what has happened. As always, Rush was Right!

    • sybilll

      So, I will just add *ditto*, and thank you Senator DeMint.

    • 6eorge Jetson

      and with the Obama administration in place, why wouldn’t they?

  • Brian Hibbert

    Keep up the pressure.

  • http://cib4me.blogspot.com mrdadx6

    And he rocks! I hope we manage to get rid of Senator Graham and get another Senator DeMint one day!

    Keep up the good work, Senator DeMint. I support you even in the comment about prefering 30 serious conservative senators to 60 “squishes.”