« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Huckabee Voters Should Consider Pro-Life Record of Tim Pawlenty

With Governor Mike Huckabee deciding against running for the Republican nomination to face pro-abortion President Barack Obama, scores of pro-life conservatives are looking for a new candidate to support — especially in early election states like Iowa and South Carolina. Although most of the potential Republican candidates hold pro-life views, former Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty has a solid pro-life record Huckabee supporters should consider.

Like Huckabee, Pawlenty is a conservative former governor who won consecutive terms in a state that isn’t a lock for Republicans. As a fellow evangelical who takes his faith serious, Pawlenty is consistently pro-life and has a strong record combining signing pro-life bills and rejecting anti-life ones with a close relationship with pro-life leaders and a good track record on judges.

During his first year as governor in 2003, Pawlenty signed into law the Woman’s Right to Know Act, giving women information about abortion risks and alternatives as well as information on fetal development. The legislation included giving women information about the pain their babies feel during an abortion — something that is becoming a basis for other states like Nebraska that are enacting new bills to ban abortions after 20 weeks because of their consideration for unborn children. Pawlenty, in 2005, also signed a bill called the Unborn Child Pain Prevention Act in 2005 to give women even more information on the pain their babies feel during an abortion — hoping to help convince them to seek alternatives.

In 2005, Pawlenty also signed the Positive Alternatives to Abortion Act to make Minnesota one of just a handful of states that send public funds to pregnancy centers providing tangible support for pregnant women and abortion alternatives. Since then, it has helped more than 18,000 pregnant women and their families who may have otherwise decided on an abortion.

Governor Pawlenty’s pro-life record includes everything from promoting perinatal hospices as alternatives to abortion in cases when a baby is diagnosed with a severe medical condition, to declaring pro-life days recognizing the tragedy of Roe v. Wade, to speaking at rallies and events for key pro-life groups like Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life. He also signed a proclamation designating the month of April as “Abortion Recovery Month” to acknowledge how millions of women have significant regrets about their abortion decision and wish they could go back and undo it.

The governor also submitted an amicus brief to the U.S. Supreme Court in Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood
of Northern New England
. He supported the New Hampshire law at issue requiring parental
notification before abortions can be done  on minors.

Pawlenty also impressed pro-life advocates with his strong stand on bioethics issues like human cloning and stem cell research. He vetoed a cloning bill that would have legalized human cloning and forced taxpayers to pay for the destruction of human life, saying destroying human embryos crossed “core ethical and moral boundaries.” The governor also signed into law a ban on taxpayer funding of human cloning and he has consistently said he prefers adult stem cell research, which has helped patients, over the embryonic variety — which Pawlenty condemns because it destroys human life.

For pro-life voters, the biggest issue in the 2012 elections is judges — especially given the way in which Obama has stacked the courts with abortion advocates and installed two pro-abortion stalwarts on the Supreme Court in Elana Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor. In 2008, Governor Pawlenty appointed a pro-life advocate to lead the Minnesota Supreme Court. Eric Magnuson, who was named chief justice, had written an amicus brief for a pro-life group in a case arguing that taxpayers should not be forced to fund abortions with their tax money.

Governor Pawlenty also felt so strongly about appointing Jamie Anderson to the 4th Judicial District Court that he bypassed the state’s Commission on Judicial Selection to ensure the respected pro-life attorney had a seat.

Pawlenty seems to have an understanding of judges that moves beyond the typical responses of wanting strict constructionists. With the way in which conservatives have gotten burned on past Supreme Court nominees, Pawlenty has explained how he wants judges who have a decision and opinion record showing an understanding of the rule of law and that eliminates the guesswork of how they would likely rule in the future. His desire is to appoint potential justices with the kind of confidence that makes it unlikely the appointment will come back to haunt conservatives on pro-life and other key political issues.

Pawlenty’s track record has won him accolades from pro-life advocates, with Susan B. Anthony List president Marjorie Dannenfelser saying “The governor’s actions on behalf of Minnesota women and unborn
children are exemplary” and Scott Fischbach of Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life adding, “Under the leadership of Gov. Pawlenty, Minnesota now has the lowest teen abortion rate ever, and the lowest number of abortions performed since 1975. I know first-hand the lives that Tim Pawlenty saved as my governor.”

Ultimately, the Pawlenty pro-life track record has produced proven results: The Minnesota health department indicated last year that Minnesota abortions have dropped 14 percent and hit a 35-year low.

On judges, abortion, bioethics issues and showing care and concern for women struggling with or recovering from an abortion decision, Governor Pawlenty has been thoroughly and consistently pro-life. Like Huckabee, Pawlenty solidly rejected the notion of a truce on abortion and social issues and pro-life voters can rest assured they will have a friend in the White House for four years or beyond should they give Governor Pawlenty their support.

COMMENTS

  • nvrepub

    We just need a nominee who won’t eff it up.

  • Anteater

    We know that Pawlenty is one of us, a.k.a. a so-con.

    Take it from a Huck fan.

    I think Pawlenty is becoming my second choice … my only issue is that he might run a “milquetoast” campaign which might not be enough to beat Obama. Or even worse, he might try to overcompensate for his mild-mannered ways and in the process make some campaign blunders.

    On the other hand, Pawlenty did win in a deep-blue state so he definitely knows how to be tactful and reach out to more liberal voters. Plus he is a “Sam’s club” Republican and I am sure that populism will sell well in 2012 (with issues like jobs, gas, housing, etc).

    Just thinking out loud ;-)

  • Darin_H

    but I didn’t know all of this about his pro-life record. To do all of it in a blue-state (especially Minn!) and get reelected is quite amazing.

    Great diary, highly recommended – and this should be front paged :)

  • lineholder

    I’m someone who has watched what is taking place in the abortion industry, especially where PP is concerned. There’s a lot of going on behind the scenes in this industry that concerns me a great deal.

    Thank you for presenting this info re: Pawlenty’s stand on pro-life issues. I’ll check it out.

  • 20jan2013

    I want to see how he does in debates with Palin and fellow Minnesotan Bachmann. At least we know it won’t be a Pawlenty-Bachmann ticket! (or a Bachmann-Pawlenty ticket).

  • LDahl752

    but so many across the country aren’t even studying it. Many just ASSUME he is a moderate just because he was governor of such a blue state. But, considering he had so many battles with a dem-controlled legislature, and won, I truly believe he is a real fighter for conservative principles, both fiscally and socially. He’s worked hard to get informed about international/security issues, too, and knows the importance of securing our borders. If people will read articles about him and watch videos of his speeches and interviews, I think they’ll like what they see. I like Herman Cain, but I worry that a businessman may be hurt by the unending demonizing of corporations and their CEOs. That’s not fair, but it’s a reality. Excellent diary, BTW — thank you for all the info!

  • Spiral

    There are some good GOP candidates available in the Presidential race for 2012. But many of those candidates have not won a state wide race for public office before. Among those who have, Pawlenty seems like the best choice. Although, I like Santorum too.

  • http://www.erickerickson.org Erick Erickson

    I do think Huck’s departure helps Pawlenty.

  • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

    studying records. Way too early. At this point, we’re just watching to see who can get through an entire week without making a complete fool of themselves. Bad week: Romney, Newt & Daniels. Good week: nobody, but that’s not a big deal.

    This week gave us proof that lots of money and great hair are no substitute for strong core principles and a willingness to admit you really screwed up. It also showed that 30 plus years of media exposure and insider status in Washington are no substitute for common sense and conservative principles. And then there’s Mitch Daniels, who’s record in IN I happen to like, who can’t get through a sentence without stepping on his appendage.

    This early part of the silly season is where people take themselves out for reasons of stupidity, not where candidates step up and gain momentum through brilliance. Hang in there for a couple of more months.

  • southernpatriots

    We are of a similar mind. Admire Herman Cain, and most R candidates. There will be a contest of issues and support during primaries, but whoever the R nominee may be, he/she would be far better than what we have now. So, though we are interested and would like to get the best candidate who represents Christian conservative core values, we must nominate a candidate who will tirelessly campaign to win. The future of our country as we know it is at stake. The freedom of our children and grandchildren is at risk.

  • Common_Cents

    Yep, that will be a factor for Pawlenty. I have seen him try to act more forced aggressive/angry and it makes him look very unnatural and phony.

    He needs to ignore the media/campaign consultants and just be himself or he will turn people off.

    I sincerely hope America just might be fed up with slick talking teleprompter reader liars like obama and a reasoned calm Pawlenty could be cool again.

    The risk is, if that is not the case, the dumbed down American Idol voter might only respond to flashy objects.

    I have no doubt he’d make a fine President, but concerned about being able to rally the troops for election.

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    I find myself here agreeing with Anteater for probably the first time.

  • YnotNOW

    as the conservative activists in every state (and precincit), rather than ask for one person to be charismatic enough to reach every person in the country by themselvers. This should overcome any “milquetoast” tendency of a campaign. If we only get behind the candidate with all our energy.

  • southernpatriots

    If the troops need an emotional uplift from our candidate and if Pawlenty is that candidate, we would find it hard to believe that he could not “rally the troops for election”.

    However, if we need motivation from our candidate after these past years of Obama and his policies we need our heads and hearts examined.

  • YnotNOW

    and provides the best record to review of how they would lead the Federal govt. Not saying a Senator (or Congress Rep) couldn’t be a good President, but Governorship is the better proving ground.

  • southernpatriots

    Governorships are indeed good proving grounds for presidency because they provide executive experience. This experience includes balancing the state budget, dealing with crises, dealing with the legislature, etc. Often the governors were in private business at some time, gaining that invaluable experience as well.

    Given moral and ethical values which are compatible with conservatism, a governor is a good choice for presidential candidacy.

  • southernpatriots

    The great debater, Newt, should shine in debates. Though he has recently practiced shoe in the mouth syndrome, he may well “splain” his way out of this one but should avoid the temptation to snipe at other Rs on the campaign trail, if he wants to rise above the din and seem more statesmanlike. I am sure that he also considered that many conservatives will have difficulty supporting him after his marital infidelity and fiasco while trying to get Clinton.

    Herman Cain is definitely able to communicate in simple but effective language. It would be good to see other candidates hone their debate skills and articulate conservative core values and conservative alternatives to the present regime policies.

  • http://theminorityreportblog.com Repair_Man_Jack

    He can do a lot more for the Pro-Life Movement by leveraging his old contacts and his endorsement than he could have done by running a quixotic, symbolic campaign. If he is willing to work for the cause, when he isn’t also a beneficiary, I may have to reevaluate my current, low opinion of the man.

  • conservativecurmudgeon

    …should consider Governor Pawlenty’s 20% Ethanol Mandate.

    For myself, I am glad that Pawlenty is strongly pro-life, and is seemingly a steadfast defender of traditional behavioral norms. But, I want a fighter; a no-holds barred, never-flinching, iron-jawed conservative fighter…

    I want my Presidential Candidate to give bull-roaring defense of limited government, individual liberty and free market economics. I manifestly DO NOT want a candidate that gives obsequious nods to liberal statist interventionism. And ethanol subsidies that are actually implemented LAW (as they are in Minnesota, and were effected and supported by Pawlenty) are a mighty big skeleton in the closet.

    I am unmoved by Pawlenty’s mea culpa on the Climate Change crap. Anyone who was a thoughtful, steadfast, thoroughgoing believer in Milton Friedman’s free markets would NEVER entertain thoughts of gigantic bureaucracies trying to move markets and coerce populations into government proscribed behaviors. NEVER. And that goes for Newt, as well.

    Either we thoughtfully, methodically dismantle huge swaths of the Federal Government, or this society will collapse. This isn’t partisan conjecture– it is fact. And any candidate that has looked to government at ANY POINT in their careers as a substitute for the dynamism of the free market, I don’t believe, is up to the task at hand.

    –Which, by the by, is the reason I am fairly pessimistic about the whole exercise. Looking to politicians from the governmental sector to solve the political problems of government is rather like asking the alcoholic to look after the liquor inventory.

  • BA Cyclone

    by Pawlenty, it’s a huge demerit in my book. If you can be SO WRONG on what a government *should* be doing with respect to it’s citizens, your bona fides as a conservative are seriously suspect.

    OK, he says he was wrong and he was sorry. Put this guy in the WH for 4 years, what is he going to get funadamentally WRONG to that level in that liberal soundroom? It speaks to poor judgment and a lack of core conservative principles as a founding guidance.

    Being correct on the issue of pro-life is not enough of a counterbalance for me. I’m happy to watch and critique him further over the process, but fundamentally he begins with a score of -10 or something due to this fact alone. This is somewhere near 10X worse than doing a climate change commercial with Pelosi, because it had the force of actual legislation.

  • conservativecurmudgeon

    Re-read my comment again, and you will see this. While the pro-life aspect is important, how a candidate views the free market, and the role of government, is crucial. Pawlenty, as Ricky Ricardo would say, has some ‘splainin to do!

  • BA Cyclone

    Sorry if I implied otherwise!

    I just wanted to expand your one phrase there in a different way. For me it’s not that I find TP’s warmism unmoving as you said, it is a HUGE demerit. Maybe it’s the same thing in practice of course but I ran with it specifically to expand the point.

    I am pessimistic that any amount of ‘splainin will change my mind on TPaw, but I am happy to give him the chance.

  • BA Cyclone

    Sorry if I implied otherwise!

    I just wanted to expand your one phrase there in a different way. For me it’s not that I find TP’s warmism unmoving as you said, it is a HUGE demerit. Maybe it’s the same thing in practice of course but I ran with it specifically to expand the point.

    I am pessimistic that any amount of ‘splainin will change my mind on TPaw, but I am happy to give him the chance.