« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Did Charlie Crist break FL law in an attempt to ‘smear’ Marco Rubio?

Poor Charlie. I guess when you get desperate you get careless.

The state-funded public TV outlet known as the Florida Channel, licensed to Florida State University, filed a copyright infringement complaint Thursday with YouTube. The offending video contained a snippet of (Marco) Rubio discussing a tax on carbon emissions and cap-and-trade legislation in a 2008 edition of Florida Face to Face, the station’s weekly newsmaker program.

WFSU general manager Patrick Keating said it is well-known among Florida candidates that a state law prohibits using its product for political purposes. “I’m just trying to protect our product and live up to the terms of our agreement with the Legislature,” Keating said. He emphasized that “we found it” on Crist’s website, and the decision to demand its removal was not prompted by a third party.

Ben Ginsberg, a Washington lawyer representing the Crist campaign, said WFSU’s action was an out-and-out case of censorship. “The Florida Channel has exerted its commercial interests and censored the exchange of information between two political candidates,” Ginsberg said. He said the video’s use should be allowed under the so-called “fair use” provision of U.S. copyright law.

SOURCE: St. Petersburg Times, The Buzz

Talking point: since the video was generated by WFSU using state funds, is it a public record, or did Florida’s current Governor break a state law?

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • mschmitt

    The particular statute is 1001.25(3)(a)…

    None of the facilities, plant, or personnel of any educational television system that is supported in whole or in part by state funds shall be used directly or indirectly for the promotion, advertisement, or advancement of any political candidate for any municipal, county, legislative, congressional, or state office. However, fair, open, and free discussion between political candidates for municipal, county, legislative, congressional, or state office may be permitted in order to help materially reduce the excessive cost of campaigns and to ensure that the state’s citizens are fully informed about issues and candidates in campaigns. The provisions of this paragraph apply to the advocacy for, or opposition to, any specific program, existing or proposed, of governmental action which includes, but is not limited to, constitutional amendments, tax referenda, and bond issues. The provisions of this paragraph shall be in accordance with rules of the State Board of Education.

    My guess is “fair use” will turn on whether Crist actually misrepresented what Rubio said or not.