« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

MO-Sen: Rounding Up the Potential Candidates

Brilliant state roundup. Fronted by Erick. But don’t forget to put the state in the tags or it won’t show up on the state blogs.

With the announcement from Missouri’s Senior Senator Kit Bond, there is going to be something that hasn’t happened in Missouri for a very long time: a race for an open Senate seat in Missouri.  This has sparked some major interest, both here in Missouri and nationally as everyone starts to watch the jockeying for who will be the junior Senator. {Ugh, this means that Classy Claire McCaskill will be our senior Senator from Missouri.}  Here’s the rundown of those who are or ought to be considered for the post.

Sarah Steelman

Sarah Steelman is the former State Treasurer.  She served in that office from 2005 until inauguration day this year.  Prior to her term in the Treasurer’s office she was a State Senator, originally elected to office in 1998 representing Rolla and the surrounding area.  Mrs. Steelman was one of the two major candidates for the Republican nominee for Missouri’s Governor in the 2008 cycle.  She entered the election after Governor Blunt announced that he would not be seeking re-election.

Erick Erickson has already written about why there is much for conservatives to like about Mrs Steelman.  You can find out more about her positions by visiting her website. [Yes, it does appear to be left over from her Gubernatorial candidacy.]  One of her biggest accomplishments as Treasurer was the implementation of a terror free investing policy for the state’s pension funds.  The State no longer invests in companies that do business with state sponsors of terror.  Steelman managed to divest those funds without damaging the performance of the funds.

Steelman has already confirmed that she is considering a run for the vacated seat.  It appears that she will use much the same theme she used against Congressman Hulshof in the primary.

Outgoing State Treasurer Sarah Steelman is considering a run. In an interview with KY3 TV in Springfield, Steelman took a shot at both Senator Bond and Congressman Blunt, saying, “Senator Bond and Congressman Blunt represent the old ways of Washington. I don’t think people can tolerate that.” Bond endorsed Steelman’s opponent, Congressman Kenny Hulshof, in the Republican primary for Governor.

Peter Kinder

Peter Kinder is the current Lt Governor of the state of Missouri.  [He was the only Republican elected in a statewide election this year.  He will be serving his second term at this position.]  You can visit his official state biography here.  Kinder was the lone real bright spot in Missouri in 2008.  Every other statewide office either went to or was retained by the Democrats.  Kinder was able to keep his seat in the Lt Gov office by outperforming every other Republican in the St. Louis and Kansas City metro areas.  Kinder previously served as the State Senator from portions of Southeast Missouri.  He was elected as President Pro Tem in 2001 when the GOP took control of the Missouri Senate for the first time in over 50 years.

No one is really sure whether Kinder is considering running for the open seat.  He has long had his eyes on the Governor’s mansion.  Kinder was briefly a candidate in the Republican primary this last year, but dropped out of the race after Congressman Hulshof announced he was seeking the position.  One would imagine that should he choose not to run for Senate (or run and fail) that he would be the likely front runner for the nomination for Governor in 2012.

Kinder is a very strong candidate for the seat.  His ability to perform well in urban areas is not due to the normal graft and giveaways that many moderate candidates resort to when they are seeking votes in urban areas.  He gains his support by sticking to his principles and simply showing up at events and talking about issues that are important to all people like jobs and health care.  Unlike other politicians (even Democrats) Kinder attended the recent NAACP dinner in Missouri and stayed for the entire event on the weekend before the election.  It’s clear that his commitment to campaign anywhere and to anyone has paid dividends for him.

Kinder and Steelman have a soft spoken feud going on.  Just the other day Kinder responded to the above quote from Steelman (although not directly or by name, it’s safe to say that Steelman was the target):

But Kinder was closed-mouthed about whether he would try to replace Bond, saying, “I’m not going to join those in what I think is unseemly haste in taking potshots or announcing my plans today.”

He declined to name the official taking the potshots, but he did say he saw a statement on a blog that he considered shocking.

Roy Blunt

Congressman Roy Blunt (MO-07) has been involved in Missouri politics since 1979 when he was elected county clerk and chief election official of Greene County, MO.  He was then elected Secretary of State in 1984.  After a brief hiatus from politics from 1993 to 1996, Blunt was elected to his current position as one of Missouri’s delegation to the House of Representatives.  He served as the GOP Whip from 2006 until he stepped down recently.

Blunt stands to suffer some from “Blunt fatigue”.  Despite all the good that his son (the outgoing Governor Matt Blunt) has done for the state, he has become a villain of the left.  In much the same way that President-elect Obama ran against the third term of Bush, Governor Nixon ran against the second term of Blunt.  The constant abuse that the name Blunt took will likely mean that the Congressman would have a very steep uphill to climb in urban areas (which Senator McCaskill showed in 2004 that you need a strong showing in your opponents wheelhouse if you want to win in the very divided state of Missouri – urban blue and rural red).  He does however benefit from the name recognition that comes with having served the state of Missouri for as long as he has.

Jim Talent

Talent is the former occupant of the Senate seat that Claire McCaskill now occupies.  He began his political career when he was elected to the Missouri House of Representatives in 1984.  He was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives in 1992 and elevated to the Senate in 2002 (when he defeated Jean Carnahan – widow of Mel Carnahan who died just weeks before the election in 2000 and won anyway).  Since leaving the Senate, Talent has been a scholar with the Heritage Foundation and also was a member of Mitt Romney’s campaign for the 2008 Republican nomination for President.

It’s likely that both Blunt and Talent would not seek the office at the same time.  Neither would be very likely interested in a primary campaign against each other.  Expect only one of the two to actually enter this race.

Should Talent get back into this race he will clearly have to perform much better than he did against McCaskill.  Missouri Secretary of State Robin Carnahan is a much stronger opponent than McCaskill was in the previous race.  Talent will have to re-solidify his support in the rural parts of the state while trying to make ins in the urban areas of St. Louis and Kansas City (parts of the state that anyone with the name Carnahan has a virtual lock on)

Sam Graves

Congressman Graves serves Missouri’s 6th CD.  He was recently re-elected to his fourth term.  He easily defeated form Kansas City Mayor Kay Barnes in what was originally considered a pickup opportunity by the DNC.  Graves has been a steady Conservative while serving in Congress.  He recently voted against the $700B bailout.

Graves definitely suffers from a lack of name recognition.  I would be willing to bet that the average Joe outside of his Congressional District know much about the Congressman.  It would be quite surprising if Graves did decide to get into the race (especially if either Talent, Kenny Hulshof or Bond were to enter the race as they all have much more name recognition in the state).  The area where he does perform well (his district is in the northwestern part of the state) doesn’t exactly stand out as a population center that would give Graves a large base of support to launch a statewide campaign from.

His Congressional biography is here.

Kenny Hulshof

Former Congressman Hulshof (MO-09) was the Republican nominee for Governor in 2008.  He lost in a landslide to Jay Nixon.  He served in the House of Representatives from 1996 until giving up his seat this year in order to run for Governor.

Congressman Hulshof would likely not be involved in the race should either Congressman Blunt or former Senator Talent get into the race.  He may not have the resources or the energy to engage in a hotly contested race this soon after the tough Republican primary and the blow out from the general election.

John Loudon

John Loudon is a member of the Missouri Senate represending the seventh district of Missouri.  Prior to being elected to the Senate in 2000, Loudon served in the Missouri State House of Representatives from 1994 through 1998.

Loudon is one of the young stars of the GOP in Missouri.  Clearly, he would be at a very large disadvantage at this point in the game should he choose to get into this race.  He has very little name recognition statewide and would be easily out-fund raised and out-campaigned by any of the more experienced politicians.  Loudon’s future is bright, but a stop at a state wide office would be a wise choice before trying to jump to the national stage.

The Democrat Candidate

The likely Democrat candidate for the seat is current Secretary of State Robin Carnahan.  She is one in a long line of the very politically powerful Carnahan family.  She was already the likely Democrat candidate and Bond’s retirement makes Carnahan the current front runner.  Public Policy Polling recently polled three potential match-ups in this race and Carnahan is leading (although in the MOE on two):

Carnahan 47
Talent 43
Und 10

Carnahan 45
Blunt 44
Und 11

Carnahan 47
Steelman 36
Und 17

There is talk the Congressman Lacy Clay (MO-01) may throw his hat into the ring for the nomination, but this would appear to be futile.  It seems that the entire Missouri Democrat apparatus is gathering around Carnahan.  Clay would end up as the also-ran for the Democrats.

As I See It

At this point in the game, this race is shaping up to be a matchup that is very similar to the Republican primary for Governor from this year.  Sarah Steelman is likely to be involved in this campaign regardless of who she would have to face.  The only question would be who her competition would be.  Since Talent, Bond andHulshof would likely not want to face each other in a contest I forsee one of those three (probably with the backing of the other two) stepping in as the front runner.  I really don’t see Kinder getting into the race.  He is most likely to spend the next four years gathering his resources to make a run at the Governor’s mansion.  ASteelman v. Blunt/Hulshof /Talent race would likely be just as rough as the Governor’s primary.  That’s something that would not be good for the GOP considering the Democrats are going to be gunning hard for this seat in their quest to obtain absolute control over the Senate.

This seat is a must keep for the GOP.  It’s going to take a lot of work over the next two years.

save

Tags:

COMMENTS

  • zsmvf6

    Sarah Steelman and Talent are my picks for Senator, but I think that Steelman has a better chance to take on Carnahan. One, it takes away the politics of gender, a game that liberals are good at playing. Two, Steelman seems to be the reformed minded conservative ( ala Palin-type), although she does have a few scandals tied to her .

    I want to see Talent take on McCaskill in 2012 and tear her a new orifice with her lousy performance record. Given the fact that McCaskill is tied to the truth squads and is a overwhelming supporter of Obama, the albatrosses could be tied around her neck and she could go down.

    • http://www.theminorityreportblog.com/ Brian Simpson

      I really would love to see Steelman run for the Lt Gov seat when Kinder runs for Gov in 2012. A Kinder-Steelman team (even if they may have some bad blood from the primary) would be great for Missouri.

      • zsmvf6
        • http://www.theminorityreportblog.com/ Brian Simpson

          go here and scroll down the audio player until you find his name. It’s from shortly after the election.

    • bs

      Nice writeup, Brian. I’ve already voiced my opinion on this one on Erick’s Steelman post, and I haven’t changed my mind. I think Talent or Blunt are probably best equipped to beat Carnahan, if nothing else based on recognition alone. I agree with your “Blunt fatigue” comment, and that’s one reason I said before that I’d prefer Blunt not be the candidate. The Steelman/Hulshof primary was so divisive that I just wonder how positively either one would be received – I suppose by late this year/early next year, that’ll all be forgotten.

      • http://www.theminorityreportblog.com/ Brian Simpson

        and out of all the candidates I think that Talent or Blunt are the most likely choices.

        Hulshof just doesn’t seem to have the personality that it’s going to take to reach out beyond his home 9th CD.

        Steelman doesn’t have too many friends in the party (and rest assured that control of the party is still in the Blunt/Bond/etc wing of the party).

        Out of the major candidates that leaves Talent and Blunt. Neither has really won a hotly contested race (Blunt’s last tough race was when he won the seat and Talent lost his only real competitive race against McCaskill). Here’s hoping that over the next few months someone in either the MO GOP or at the national level helps get this down to either Blunt or Talent so the rest of the party can get lined up to support our nominee…we know the Dems already are.

  • red_oakster

    she can have one. But she would be advised to say she wants to run for either governor or senator in 2012. If she lays claim to either of those races, everyone else will back her. The alternative is a bruising 2010 primary and a nomination not worth having.

    Talent was a top flight conservative senator who lost narrowly in a terrible year for Republicans. He’ll be a formidable candidate with good name recognition.

    I’d encourage Steelman to take a pass and focus on 2012.

  • http://dezignworx-ae.com tsquare

    Where I am on this:

    I LOVE Jim Talent… I do. Bunches.

    Jim is not a good candidate.I’m not so sure Jim can ‘go the distance’ against Carnahan.

    The same can be said for Hulshof, and even more so for Loudon.

    I’d like to say that the state has ‘Blunt Fatigue’ but why then don’t we have ‘Carnahan Fatigue?’ While the most qualified, Roy would be roasted by the media in St. Louis and KC.

    Steelman? – I’m just not so sure.

    Clearly all this is still ‘up in the air’

    What is clear, at least to me is that we the MOGOP needs to start running against Carnahan NOW… and start POUNDING HER over her far left views… this should start this fall with the new TV season. The list of things to it her on is long and grows day-by-day.

    If we as a party have learned nothing else it should be to start early and fight hard and mean.

    (I see hitting her with the family ties head on… to the playing of ‘Thank Heaven for Little Girls’ remind voters of her Dad’s worse moments and her Mother’s term in the Senate where all she ever did with vote as she was told to… this should be great stuff!)

  • http://www.theminorityreportblog.com/ Brian Simpson

    the MOGOP doesn’t really seem to have it’s act together. Their press releases are pitiful (they read like seventh grade neener-neener stuff.) and they don’t seem to have any way of reaching out to activists other than people working in the party’s offices.

    Hopefully the new Executive Director gets things going into high gear real soon.

  • http://dezignworx-ae.com tsquare

    This had better be a ‘wake up call’

  • dld1717

    I think Kinder is best candidate he has proven himself to be elected

    I think Talent is a miss for us; he has lost 2 statewide races and won 1 in nail bitter

    If not him then Graves

  • bs

    …who even knows who Graves is. Brian’s diary is the first time I’ve even heard of the guy. And if Kinder locks horns with Steelman like she did with Hulshof, we’re toast.

  • dld1717

    MO is slated to lose a congressional district so one has to ponder if this will equate into who decides to run? Who do you think will get their district erased?

  • bs

    Even Bond himself was out of work for four years after losing to Joe Teasdale!

    Talent’s loss in 06 to Claire was in a GOP bloodbath year. Conditions in 2010 (fingers crossed) will be different after two years of the Obamunist and a hard-left Congress. If somehow that bunch of whack jobs manages to keep public opinion with them through the 2010 election, it won’t matter if it’s Talent, Blunt, Graves, or ME that run against Carnahan – she’ll win.

  • http://www.theminorityreportblog.com/ Brian Simpson

    but I really doubt that he wants the job. Governor is his desire.

  • MORepublican

    This would effect the 2012 races more than the 2010 races, I think, because we would have a Congressman without a district as of 2012. And we will have all the statewide races then minus the Auditor, along with McCaskill running for re-election.

    It really depends on the boundaries when redrawn. The 9th District’s is Blaine Luetkemeyer’s seat. Although mostly northeastern MO, his home is in Miller County, which is more central/SW. His district could be redrawn rather easily without him living in it, and he would probably be put into the 4th District, which is Ike Skelton’s district, or maybe the 7th, which is Roy Blunt’s district. The 9th would probably be split mainly to the 6th, 4th, and 3rd, with a few counties going to the 8th.

    For the Dems, Russ Carnahan in the 3rd is probably the most likely one to go, unless Ike Skelton can hold out a little longer. He can retire from the 4th in 2012, and not cause too much chaos amongst either party.

    This is why holding onto the state legislature is muy importante in MO in 2010. It’s bad enough with a Dem governor, but we will need to get more Republicans elected to the statehouse to help with this.

  • http://www.theminorityreportblog.com/ Brian Simpson

    it will probably be the 9th CD currently occupied by freshman Congressman Blaine Luetkemeyer. I see that seat getting dyvied up amongst the 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 districts that all surround it.

    That would probably mean that the very red CD 2 would give some more of St. Louis County (increasingly blue) to CD 1 (giving Clay an even tighter lock on his seat)

    The lose of that seat probably doesn’t really change the math too much in terms of the Senate seat as Luetkemeyer isn’t really even mentioned as a candidate.

  • http://www.theminorityreportblog.com/ Brian Simpson

    it would have to be a really bad year. Even in this last election the Republicans picked up seats in the Senate and retained control of the House.

  • MORepublican

    but those do happen, so our Republican leaders had better be careful.

    And I get the sense that Nixon and the Dems will do some sort of “Do-Nothing Legislature” attack in 2010 with Nixon at the bully pulpit. Don’t know why I’m sensing this; maybe my radar is being jammed or something (putting tin foil hat back on).

    This year, things will be quiet(er), but come next year, I expect an all-out blitz.

  • MORepublican
  • Princeliberty

    Steelman should run. Talent should take the pass. We don’t need the its my turn nonsense like Bob Dole in 96.

    I guy who was thrown out by the voters as a Senator is not a good candidate esp. for a party that’s needs to reform both in substance and in imagine.

    Steelman is a true conservative not afraid to take on the old guard of the party.

    She can run as a reforming, populist conservative and that can win the general election.

    Running as the “tell the voters that just messed up in the last two elections and the Republican party has done no wrong candidate” is the way to lose.

    Blunt and Talent both have a lot of baggage and sure can’t be reform candidates.

    The only reason she was lower in that poll was low name ID.

    The nominee will have high ID and a lot of money both parties willl fund this race.

    And a reformer will get a lot more small donations. So in the end she have a better chance to win in November, would be a better senator and would be a force for reforming the party nationally and making it a party of principle.

  • MORepublican

    She was Treasurer for four years from 2005-2009, and her name was all over the place during the primary.

    Talent has been out of the headlines since 2006, when he lost his seat. Roy Blunt has won statewide office, but it has been a while. The last name is familiar to Missourians, but not Roy Blunt (being young, I only know RB as a Congressman, not as Sec. of State).

    What I did find interesting is that after the November election, she was advertising the MOST program on TV and Internet (with her picture displayed or video of her). The MOST program is a product of the Treasurer’s office (so it’s fine with me that she did that in promoting a MO 529 program).

    So I viewed those actions as a way of keeping her name out there as much as possible for as long as possible for some future campaign.

  • Durangodarlin

    Low name ID can be rectified, philosophy cannot. The next US Senator from Missouri should:

    1. Promote fiscal responsibility.
    2. Promote limited federal government.
    3. Promote either fair tax or flat tax.
    4. Enforce current laws on illegal immigration.

  • bs

    so it may be hard for me to pay up…

    but I’ll bet you a venti coffee from Starbucks that if you asked 10 people on the street (at least around here in the STL area) who the MO state treasurer is, you would find no more than two who could tell you the name. I’ll bet you couldn’t find 3 who could tell you who ran against Hulshof in the election. Furthermore, I’d bet you that in six months, precious few would know who Kenny Hulshof is.The numbers might be higher for Steelman in SW MO since she’s from down that way. But as I’ve stated before, this race will come down to metro areas, not Springfield & Columbia and the rural areas. St. Louis and KC will be the deciding factor, like it or not.

    Remember, we’re talking about normal, everyday people – not politics freaks like ourselves. Name recognition means Governor and MAYBE Lt. Governor (I’ll bet only 4/10 would know that Kinder is the Lt. Gov), and statewide national office (ie. US Senator).

  • http://www.theminorityreportblog.com/ Brian Simpson

    Wow, I think you may be very generous on that one. I bet not even 1/10 could tell you the political party of the Lt Gov.

  • bs

    I agree with you. I was trying to be kind to our fellow Missourians.

    I am seriously thinking of going to Mid Rivers Mall in the next few days and trying this. I think I may have overestimated on all of them.

  • http://www.theminorityreportblog.com/ Brian Simpson

    If you are going to do it at the Mall we may be looking at 0/10