<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>RedState</title><link>https://redstate.com/simpson316/2010/10/06/the-choice-almost-nobody-wants/feed/</link><description>Conservative News &amp; Politics</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 05:59:41 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>The Choice Almost Nobody Wants</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[Far be it from me to not give credit where it is due.  Unlike what I detailed last night in the inaugural edition of the Choice and Competition Death Watch, it should be pointed out that the new federal health care legislation did actually create a new choice in many states.  A key piece of the legislation was the creation of a new set of high risk pools that would be administered by the states.  Skipping the myriad of problems with administering and funding an initiative like this, it is granted that the health care legislation did create one new choice for many Americans.  [Those keeping score at home will note that this is a net loss of three since I began tracking with the Choice and Competition Death Watch.]]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 23:45:44 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Brian Simpson]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://redstate.com/simpson316/2010/10/06/the-choice-almost-nobody-wants-n36515</link></item></channel></rss>