« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The US’s energy ultimate weapon, natural gas.

I’ve been a fan of natural gas for sometime, but read this article recently on the Amrican thinker and had to share it with the red staters: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/04/cheap_natural_gas_heralds_an_energy_revolution.html; and it is now obvious to me that the US’s use of natural gas will be the decider in making putting the US atop the energy world for decades.

 You are free to read the article, but here are just a few things that popped out to me:

 1.  It will be cheaper than coal at some point – “Consider the history of natural gas prices just in the last few years.  In mid-2008, the spot price (at Henry Hub) reached a peak of $13 per mcf (1,000 cubic feet, with a heat value of 1 million Btu — denoted as 1 MMBTU) — having doubled since mid-2007.  Since then, the price has decreased sharply, dipping to $2 in mid-March, and it now stands at $2.30.  If prices decline further, natural gas will be cheaper than the average steam coal, which up until now has been the lowest-cost fuel on a heat basis.”

 2. It could make coal and nuclear energy 2nd class – “With the pipeline problem solved (at least in the Lower 48), consider the consequences of having huge quantities of cheap gas available.  It will make new coal-fired power plants uneconomic, but it will also make new nuclear plants uneconomic.”

 3. It is better for the environment – “  On a BTU basis, gas emits about half as much CO2 as coal”

 4. It could be more efficient than coal or nuclear – “”Combined-cycle” gas power plants can reach efficiencies of 60% or more, compared to heat efficiencies of nuclear power plants of 35% or coal plants of 40%.”

 5. It can be used at a local basis. – “, a large apartment building of 1,000 units could use its own 10-megawatt power plant.  But once installed, it becomes possible to consider co-generation, with the waste heat used for space heating, air-conditioning, hot water, laundry, and other process-heat applications — and even desalination.  One can imagine energy efficiencies of as much as 80%, more than double what is achieved today.  It would also simplify the problem of waste-heat disposal.”

 6. It will make the US and not terrorist countries a peaceful alternative fore worldwide energy needs – “For example, Japan now depends on imported LNG (at $15 per MMBTU) for electricity generation; the U.S. is getting ready to export LNG, at much lower cost.”

 Add all that up and you want to bang your head on the desk for the US not going all out on natural gas production today. 

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • funwithknives

    can be used as feedstock to make high quality ethanol by a process now in use by the Celanese Corp.
    A form of distillation and molecular re-arrangement through catalysts is the method used.
    EPA will not allow this process in the classifications currently in use, in an effort to force Cellulostic Ethanol to markets. No one is currently making C E in any Quantity yet EPA is fining refiners and producers for not making it.
    Celanese has plans for a 8 Million /Gal/Yr ‘cracker’, in the U S but no clear signals or accomodation is forthcoming {there’s that pesky ‘uncertainty thing’ again.}

    But they Are in the process of building a 80 Million/ Gal./Yr unit in The PRC. {That’s Eight with a Zero, friend…}

    True, it’s not Barry’s Sacred Algae, but no prototyping is needed. Neither is corn.

    {see Forbes, last month for more info}

    • Common_Cents

  • audax

    http://www.bloomberg.com/energy/

  • brianr

    and I agree. It seems like a great next step to create the infrastructure (preferably via private investment and/or public/private partnerships) to support a transition to natural gas. It’s just too great a leap to get right from oil to renewables- Obama has clearly demonstrated that- but all of those benefits of natural gas you highlight should make it pretty clear it deserves more discussion than it gets… and another benefit you could mention: Jobs, should make everyone take notice. I hope the debate on natural gas expands- we should be demanding this be on the table in anyone’s energy policy.

  • norris

    is a more efficient fuel for transportation than electric or ethanol the technology is here. M any factory forklifts run on natural gas to limit carbon monoxide in the buildings. Delivery trucks, buses, cars,and trains can be cheaply converted. The only hold up is fuel stations.

  • audax

    today, and has traded under $2/MMBtu for several weeks now. May Henry Hub futures were trading at $1.96 this morning. Considering that the winter cold (heating) season is over, and US NG storage facilities are full, would expect prices to drop further during the summer.

  • http://stevemaley.com Steve Maley

    Economic forces are coming into play at these price levels. No one is targeting gas exclusively. As Singer points out, the price of oil & gas condensate are so high producers are indifferent to gas prices.

    Some producers began reducing gas production voluntarily when prices hit $2.50. Watch for that trend to accelerate with gas now below $2.00 & storage full.

  • Common_Cents

    conversions and home nat gas fueling? I’d think that big portion of homes are already piped with nat gas.

  • funwithknives

    Natural gas and storage of the fuel is a major drawback .Perhaps LNG or propane, but not N G. How about linking onto an Auto N G conversion contractor’s site and illustrating some prices? No ROI there, not by a long shot

    I receive several varying trade periodicals including “Construction Equipt.” and “Bus Ride” and the tankage alone is a major expense.These vehicles {to achieve any kind of range} have to have tankage ‘designed in’, not ‘added on’. A recent article in C. E., saw 6 concrete mixers costing $30,000 extra apiece and they were unusually long.{The tanks look like they have a glandular problem}. Some states and communities have dimensional restrictions for single unit {no trailer-type trucks} commercial vehicle, and this has to be taken into account.