« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell – Don’t Do It!

We’ve heard a lot of out and out B.S. about this. Let me put it as plainly and succinctly as I can. No one in a combat line outfit wants to be in a situation where he would have to serve with an openly gay person. You can cut out all the feel-good, touchy-feely crap about gays just wanting to serve their country too. Most gays are attracted to the military because there are a lot of healthy young men and women living in close proximity, in what can only be described as forced intimacy.

We all know there have been gays in the military from day one, but the military strictures against homosexual activity are severe and are there for very good reasons. They prevent, for one thing, the sexual predation of enlisted by higher ranks, from which they would have little or no defense. I have talked to people who have had such experiences. In the military you just don’t go around complaining about a higher rank. It has a tendency to make your military career miserable and short.

Opposing Views On ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ – Admiral Michael Mullen and John McCain.

There are conflicting themes here…the one the military and the government want out there and the day-to-day reality of life in the military.
When I was in the United States Marine Corps I was in what was then called the Fleet Marine Force. I was in a combat line outfit. You live in a squad bay (barracks) in close proximity with about thirty other men. It’s a pretty tight-knit group of guys. There are always rumors too. Many times the ’scuttlebutt’ mill would be surprisingly accurate, we would know about an impending operation or movement long before the actual orders would be issued.

There were other rumors too. There was always a story or two about one guy or another, but nothing anyone could prove… not often anyway. These people were always looked on with suspicion. The last thing anyone in a line outfit wanted to know was that the guy in the shower next to him was making calves eyes at him. Speaking for myself, the last thing I’d want to be concerned with was that the guy you were with in a fighting hole, depending on for your life for, was more interested in your equipment than the rifle he held to kill the enemy.

We know that the gays and gay advocates are highly placed throughout the government and the Pentagon and that an attitude of political correctness has invaded the highest ranks of our military, fostered in part by our weak and insipid Commander-in-Chief.
There is no Constitutional right to service in the military of the United States of America. If there is a right at all, it is of the military services to be very discriminatory, based on the nature of the mission.

We need to let our ultra dense leaders in Washington know that gay advocacy has no place in our military, or in government at all for that matter. It only further serves to weaken and divide us at a time in our history when we need all of our strength. Gays have all the freedom they could want in our society. There is no reason at all for creating a protected class, thereby partitioning them from criticism for a lifestyle most Americans find repugnant.

Semper Vigilans, Semper Fidelis

© Skip MacLure 2010

COMMENTS

  • Whitesands

    The military leadership should resist this constant attack on American institutions. I can only think that there is a concerted effort across many lines in breaking the will and pride of the American people. It starts with the breakdown of our institutions. America is awake and already on the mend.

  • AngryMatt

    Now that I’ve made it clear I never served in any branch of the armed forces, I have this to say; allowing the military to have requirements and discretion as to whom it allows into its ranks is fine. I think DADT has served its purpose, but frankly, it’s outdated now. Plenty of my friends in the military know or believe they know fellow soldiers who are gay. And plenty of those friends are conservative… but no one cares about their fellow soldiers being gay.

    Oh sure, there will always be biases and yes, I suppose showering if you know there is a gay guy in the room could be uncomfortable. But the military isn’t about comfort, it’s about conforming to the system and becoming a tool of national defense, isn’t it? I truly believe that the Pentagon has become a massive bureaucratic nightmare and in addition to wasting billions of dollars is also now a very politically correct institution, so I don’t necessarily trust the brass on this. But if the rank and file and their NCOs report that most of our fighting men and women have no problem with gays serving openly, why should we? As long as they aren’t committing homosexual acts, there’s nothing to discuss quite frankly. That would be like me wanting a parish priest banned for being gay or having same sex attraction despite the fact that he’s celibate. It makes no sense.

    Poll the rank and file. Poll their NCOs. Do so with the utmost attention to secrecy. And if the results are that a strong majority don’t care if their fellow men and women in uniform are homosexual, then change the policy. If not, then let’s leave the status quo. This isn’t a civil rights issue like the left has proclaimed, but it is a debate on how to make our military function at peak efficiency.

  • Ann_W

    There is sex between soldiers all the time with the coed military, it only becomes an issue when someone gets pregnant.

    It seems that taking the current situation from don’t ask don’t tell to everything out in the open means that you couldn’t complain about someone hitting on you. With political correctness being what it is if you said that someone was hitting on you and making your work place oppressive and that person was gay, would they really be able to do anything about it? Currently gay people can serve if they don’t make an issue out of it. What does gayness have to do w/ serving in the army? But when they start bringing it up that’s when there could be hitting on other people and really start messing up morale. I just don’t think sexual harrassment would be treated the same from a gay man as it is from a straight man in today’s political climate, and we all know that straight sexual harrassment can be a problem already.

  • dave_in_atl

    I think its funny that you think that gay people would automaticly be hitting on you if they were suddenly allowed to be open with their sexuality.

    Also there is a code of military conduct as it is… Don’t think that just because gay people are allowed in the military they suddenly get the right to do so in pink uniforms.

  • Ann_W

    about how they have sex?

    When you see the difference in media coverage of the Matthew Shepherd vs. Jesse Durkhising crimes you realize that this is not a level playing field for gay vs. straight people. Sexual harassment against women is very politically incorrect, yet it is very hard to root out in the military. Would someone complaining about same sex harassment just be accused of being a homophobe? I don’t know, but I don’t understand why that has to be an issue in the military. Why is it someone’s right to not only serve, but talk about how they like to have sex?

    I didn’t say gay people would automatically start hitting on you if they were allowed to be open, I said that harassment would be much harder to stop if it did happen.

  • Ann_W