« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Arizona Law Gains Favor.

It looks like Arizona has a lot of serious company out there just now. No fewer than twenty two states are in the process of drafting, or seeking to pass, legislation such as was passed by Arizona. Others are looking at the Arizona law with renewed interest.

Representative Debbie Riddle of Texas aims to pass a new immigration law in January.

The cash strapped municipalities, counties and states can ill afford the lavish largesse, once routinely offered to illegals by liberal governments. The gravy train is petering out for one reason… there is no money. Federal programs and make-work grants are fizzling out.

The stimulus simply didn’t work. That money is running out. The sectors favored most by the infusion of these federal dollars are of course the people to whom Obama and his DeMarxist Congress were most beholden… the public sector unions, the SEIU, the teachers’ unions. So far, they’ve largely avoided the brutal layoff / no job nightmare the rest of us have been living with, only because of repeated bail outs.

It will be increasingly difficult to keep these jobs off the chopping block as further bailouts seem unlikely, given the proximity of the elections and the mood in the country about any further deficit spending. Once the public sector starts to feel the bite, more dissatisfaction will be directed towards Obama and his government.

These twenty two states are legislating in the face of the government’s lawsuit which challenges the legality of Arizona’s ‘tough’ illegal immigration law, which is nothing more than federal law enforced. I think more states will start looking really hard at enacting similar laws, as they have to face how much catering to illegals is really costing them.

Encourage your lawmakers to consider Arizona-style legislation. If we dry up the goodies we won’t have to deport them, because they’ll go back where they came from if there’s no work or welfare to attract and hold them.

Semper Vigilans, Semper Fidelis

© Skip MacLure 2010

COMMENTS

  • Scope

    I’d love to see Holder trying to bring lawsuits in 22 or more states at the same time. I’d bet that the 22 states have Republican Governors.

    I believe that Holder said the feds didn’t want a patchwork of differing laws in various states. Hopefully the various states will all get on the same page, and write their laws in a similar manner. They also claimed that they didn’t have enough ICE officers to keep up with a slew of caught illegals.

    Our VA Governor wrote to Napolitano asking for permission to train some in state law enforcement officers to be ICE qualified. Don’t know how well that will work out. That’s like asking the dog if you could have his bone. Our Attorney General already gave any law enforcement officers in the state permission to ask the immigration status of anyone that is stopped for whatever reason. This state is where the Nun was killed by an illegal who already had 2 previous DUI’s, but was let go because of lack of holding facility space.

  • K.

    I think this lawsuit has pretty much taken the wind out of the sails of Arizona-style laws. Not that I’m unhappy with that outcome, because I don’t think they make much economic sense. What makes sense? I say allow current illegal aliens to become guest workers, and at the same time, end their milking of money from government programs. If they want to stay, that’s their decision, but we aren’t going to throw free services in their direction. Plus we need tighter border enforcement to prevent future illegal migration.

    • mriggio

      whether DOJ’s lawsuit slows/stops similar laws in other states; the OP says otherwise, so we’ll see. l disagree with your guest worker thought; why reward law-breakers, allowing them to remain here for any reason? And how can we possibly shut off the flow of services to them if we’re prevented from IDing them in the first place? Tighter border enforcement=BIG fence.

      I favor a 3 step approach: ICE/deport illegals as they’re found, draconian illegal employer punishments to dry up employment, and BIG fence.

      Cheers!

      • K.

        I’m an economic pragmatist here. If we deport all of them, we lose economically. On the other hand, the big problem with letting them stay is their milking of the government. So just stop the milking.

        You can stop it by just requiring proof of citizenship or legal permanent residency to get services. But pro-amnesty Democrats and even a few Republicans keep blocking simple measures to do this.

        Note that I am NOT advocating mass citizenship for lawbreakers, which is completely unacceptable. This is strictly guest worker status meant to serve only a pragmatic economic purpose.

        Cato Institute paper with a lot of good ideas:

        http://www.cato.org/pubs/tpa/tpa-040.pdf