« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Gambler In Chief

We all know the guy. He’s the one with money on every game, every Sunday. You know, he’s the one who takes your remote and changes back and forth between games with dizzying speed hanging on every last second; because he The Giants to kick one more field goal to cover, or The Bears to get that last big stop so they can run out the clock. Every week, he tells you how much he wins and how he’s taking his bookie to the cleaners. The problem is that he is the same guy asking if he can borrow a few grand, or selling stuff that he “doesn’t need anymore”. As it turns out, he’s also the President of the United States!

Yesterday, the “Gambler In Chief” was at it again. Like a husband who lost the mortgage payment telling his wife about the two games he won, and glossing over the six that he lost, he stepped behind his podium, looked up at his teleprompter and told the American people that the economy created 115,000 jobs last week, and the unemployment number dropped to 8.1%. He touted these numbers as victories despite the fact that 300,000 frustrated Americans had actually given up looking for work, skewing the figure downward by no longer being part of the calculation. His complete lack of honesty with the American people is truly breathtaking.

I feel like each and every time I listen to anything coming out of the President’s mouth, I have to fact check it. I do this, not because he is lying, but because I know I am only getting part of the story. Not only is the unemployment rate higher than when he was sworn in to office, but there are more eligible workers who have left the workforce. When a man can stand in front of the entire country and speak half-truths that can turn defeats into perceived victories, it makes me angry. When people believe them, it makes me shudder. I just hope that the country can figure out the truth before the “Gambler In Chief” gets us so far behind that we not only lose the house, but we lose our nation.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • The_Rebel

    every day, and will do so for the next 20 years. That’s 300,000 workers leaving the workforce every month, and almost 4,000,000 every year. Short of massive immigration over the next 20 years, there is no way to alleviate that shortfall every month. So all those people will not be part of the calculation of the unemployment number each month since they will have left the workforce. Thus, the unemployment rate, barring a return to recessionary times, will keep edging down. Don’t think Obama and his administration are oblivious to this.

    • snowshooze

      Plus all the kids coming on, those should at least cover the retirees, neither will be counted by the Official Obama Unemployment Index.
      Oh, I am sure a job vacated is a new hire, and a created job though, I mean if you are going cherry picking, you may as well get them all.

      • The_Rebel

        The kids coming on are at a rate nowhere near what the loss of retirees will be. The birth rate since the baby boom years has slowed considerably. The only way to make up the shortfall is through immigration. And I’m not talking illegal aliens.

      • acat

        Remember that those 60somethings retiring will be paid for by a much smaller pool of 30somethings…

        I .. don’t see it working out too well for either group.

        Mew

        • The_Rebel

          the birth rate is declining fast and has dropped 10% through 2011. The point is, the number of workers entering the workforce at age 16 are far fewer than the number of retirees leaving the workforce.

        • snowshooze

          And we are still over 8% on the Obama scale… ( Closer to 18% I’d bet )

  • snowshooze

    And they do not count because they have never had a job.

  • SmoovJC

    They let him get away with giving half of the story!