« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Pry my Burger and Fries Out of My Cold Dead Hands


Burgers, fries and other various deep fried foodstuffs. Yes, we like fried eats here in America. We even deep fry oreos, candy bars and Coke (that was, admittedly, a new one for me. People actually deep fry cola syrup. I bet it is delish which is why I will not even tempt myself and won’t give it a go.) And So What, you may ask? Well, evidently the FDA now wants to keep us safe…from our yummy cereals. OK, they are starting with Cheerios which aren’t THAT yummy, but still…I don’t like where it is headed. I knew it was coming, however, after I read some “news” articles quite some time ago lamenting our slip in life expectancy ranking , which has some wanting to get all up in our stuff!

WASHINGTON (AP) – Americans are living longer than ever, but not as long as people in 41 other countries. For decades, the United States has been slipping in international rankings of life expectancy, as other countries improve health care, nutrition and lifestyles.

Countries that surpass the U.S. include Japan and most of Europe, as well as Jordan, Guam and the Cayman Islands. A baby born in the United States in 2004 will live an average of 77.9 years. That life expectancy ranks 42nd, down from 11th two decades earlier, according to international numbers provided by the Census Bureau and domestic numbers from the National Center for Health Statistics.

One of the factors (besides the oh so tiresome lack of socialized medicine excuse) given……we are lazy and fat, allegedly.

- Adults in the United States have one of the highest obesity rates in the world. Nearly a third of U.S. adults 20 years and older are obese, while about two-thirds are overweight, according to the National Center for Health Statistics.

“The U.S. has the resources that allow people to get fat and lazy,” said Paul Terry, an assistant professor of epidemiology at Emory University in Atlanta. “We have the luxury of choosing a bad lifestyle as opposed to having one imposed on us by hard times.”

The bolded line says it all……..Jealous! Leave us alone disturbing researcher dudes. Obvy, we LIKE being fat and dying younger than some. And yet we still remain some of the richest and most productive of people, so if we choose to spend said riches on fatty foods, alcohol, cigarettes and cars to drive our fat asses through fast-food drive-through windows, then that is our right. Don’t worry, we’ll still save all your skinnier, older asses whenever necessary and will continue to give beaucoup foreign aid, as per usual. We just might have to take a quick snack break or stop to catch our breaths a little more often. Deal with it.

Plus, what is the big deal? Who the hell wants to live too long…..doddering around and breaking hips left and right? I’d prefer to enjoy myself now rather than have a few extra years at the tail end of my life, puttering around an empty house save about a dozen cats (I am fairly certain that I will turn into a crazy cat lady).

It isn’t really financially feasible anyway. We can retire at 62 years old and start collecting social security, which was clearly originally meant for short-term use. Not potentially Thirty Years (or more) worth of payments. Already, with just an average life expectancy of almost 78 years, that is 16 years post-retirement as it is.

Hmm, perhaps that is one of the reasons social security needs to be revamped? Which just goes to show how stupid our politicians are. Why are they all up in arms and trying to ban things like trans-fats, high-fructose corn syrup and smoking? Wouldn’t such “bad” things help to cull the herd and lessen the drain on social security and health care? Soon, we won’t have enough workers paying in to cover the people getting paid, right? Use your heads, politicians. ENCOURAGE the fatty foods and the smoking! Or if you persist in trying to “save” us, then in the alternative perhaps a change in the retirement age is called for. Wasn’t the life expectancy when social security was instituted way lower? (I probably should look that up, but as an American, I am far too fat and lazy to do so)

But, I digress, as always. I say leave our penchant for excess alone. It is a personal decision, a lifestyle choice if you will, and, frankly, not the business of old white lawyer dudes in Washington…..or even Half White lawyer dude Presidents (in collusion with the old white predominantly male special interest “health industry”).

Give me liberty or give me death! Or, give me liberty AND death. My stomach, my choice!

And pass the Ho-Hos. Thankies!

COMMENTS

  • JadedByPolitics

    give me liberty and death…heck yeah I would rather die fat and happy than skinny and miserable…they have moved on my cigarettes they will be on the fatties food soon :-) I just had a conversation today with a cashier who was talking about not liking cigarettes and I told her she might be happy with stopping smokers from doing something she doesn’t like but the government will be coming for something she likes in due time because the government eventually comes for EVEYTHING!

    • http://snarkandboobs.wordpress.com/ snarkandboobs

      And I hear ya! Don’t even get me started on smoking bans..wait, too late. I already ranted about that, but don’t want to bombard y’all with all my frothing at the mouth ire. Um, I frighten myself sometimes.

      First they came for the smokers……..then they came for the Trans-fatty Lovers……

  • http://www.RedState.com/ETCartman Kenny Solomon

    I’d comment, but I’m too busy with my new business….. producing and marketing chocolate covered bacon.

    ;)

    • http://snarkandboobs.wordpress.com/ snarkandboobs

      Kindly let me know as soon as you’ve produced that chocolate covered bacon. Two great tastes that go great together.

      • http://www.RedState.com/ETCartman Kenny Solomon

        Easy to search.

        There’s also a really great photo website for more ideas…….
        www. this is why youre fat .com
        (You know the deal… no spaces, etc.)

        Cheers !

      • MrsNachos

        I almost threw up when I heard of deep fried twinkies. It’s almost too much for me. Almost.

        • http://briansimpson.wordpress.com Brian Simpson

          A MrsNachos sighting. Long time, no see.

        • http://snarkandboobs.wordpress.com/ snarkandboobs

          “Almost”…same here. Also, deep-fried Snickers. My initial reaction was Oh, ick. Then it went to “hmmm, maybe”.

          Then I ate 3.

        • FortitudineVincimus

          It is ironic to me to read claims to the right of liberty and death juxtaposed with repudiation of the same for a researcher who uses his liberties to save others from death. If I have a right to my Twinkies, he surely has a right to understand the effect of such things on his health as well as share that knowledge with others. We indeed have every right to choose our lifestyle, but as hard as it might be for some to believe it, there are millions of people in this country who don’t understand or even have access to basic health information (ask my friends who work in the inner city to help prevent the unnecessary deaths and health complications that ruin the lives of these individuals and their families). If people choose death let it be out of a true choice and not ignorance. According to the CDC, cardiovascular and heart disease kills one person every minute here in the United States, making it the number one cause of death. It is also a major cause of disability. For those of us with family members who have suffered through and died from these consequences of choice, the reality is clear. It is certainly wishful thinking that that eating poorly will only knock a few years off the end of your life, leaving you untouched for the rest of it.

          I wish more people would find their adventure in life beyond the local fast food joint. The wonders are vast and there for all to experience. I wish you could join me and my friends who climb the tall mountain peaks, swim from island to island in the Caribbean, trek across the Gobi desert of Mongolia, complete triathlons in Hawaii, ride the coast of California on a bike, or even simply run in a local 5K. For me, eating in a way that fuels my passions is no sacrifice. Waking up each morning bursting with an energy that will last the entire day, without relying on caffeine for some pick-me-up, is my joy. Tell me I

          • $peciallist

            XX

          • http://snarkandboobs.wordpress.com/ snarkandboobs

            Yes, researchers of course have the right to share their information with others.

            The Government, however, has no right to tell someone how or what to eat. They also have no business thinking that they are smarter than everyone else and that poor wittle citizens can’t think and choose for themselves ’cause we just don’t like that book readin’ and haven’t been able to comprehend the endless droning about trans-fats and “healthy living” and such for decades.

            That said, I always have my tongue firmly planted in my cheek. Mostly to allow easier access to yummy fried things.

            Also, your line about finding adventure outside a fast-food place is awfully condescending. Just because someone doesn’t jump on the latest fad health food craze, doesn’t mean they don’t enjoy all that life has to offer fully.

            I would certainly be physically able to join you on your Sporty adventures (Um, I’m a size 0). However, I don’t much care for sports, as they are for boys. I’d lounge by the pool and watch though. Drink and burger firmly in hand! ;)

          • http://snarkandboobs.wordpress.com/ snarkandboobs

            It’s yet another reason to NOT allow “Universal Health Care”. Because if the Government is paying for it, then they WILL be able to tell us how to live our lives, including but not limited to what we choose to eat.

            And, as Thomas Jefferson once said

          • http://snarkandboobs.wordpress.com/ snarkandboobs

            I meant to say “if the Government THINKS it is paying for it”. Because, of course, we are actually the ones who pay.

          • FortitudineVincimus

            Sorry, didn’t mean to sound condescending. I was not speaking directly to *you* about finding adventure beyond fast food, but on my heart for many people who actually do find their only joy in life in such things (yes, they do exist). I often use the word “you” when speaking of or to people in general (such as the audience or society at large)l. The “you” in my invitation to try some of those adventures was also meant for people in general, not you specifically. I’ll defintely have to be more careful with that in the future. Thanks for making me aware of that.

            I am definitely a proponent of balance in all things, including enjoying one of the greatest gifts we have — great tasting food. I’ll join you by that pool and maybe will even give you a sip of my fad health food smoothie with wheat germ. ;-)

          • http://snarkandboobs.wordpress.com/ snarkandboobs

            I took the “you” the wrong way, most likely, as I’ve been know to use the general you often myself.

            And I do agree with everything in moderation. I just think that the Government has to remain out of it and individuals are best left to monitor their OWN lives.

            And I admit to loving veggies and fruit. Just no icky tofu or bean sprouts!

          • http://www.ssce.net/Web-Articles/Web-articles-indexed-authors.html#authors-l JLenardDetroit

            You can say that again ;-) lol did I mean “You” lol

            It is such a simple mistake to make (and most of us do OFTEN) putting “you” rather than a generic “for those” or “someone” or the like…. it has inflamed several bouts of people taking things personally. I tried to touch on how we are all sometimes a tad touchy in be respectful Diary

          • http://snarkandboobs.wordpress.com/ snarkandboobs

            I’m not grudge-y, but I probably am a little sensitive at times due to getting the old “don’t worry your purty ‘lil head” pats quite often. I’m working on it!

            Also….pre-emptively….I snark/joke A LOT. Sometimes it come across the wrong way or isn’t understood as joking. Mostly because things are more amusing in my own head than the come out “in type” sometimes. Apologies in advance for that!

          • http://snarkandboobs.wordpress.com/ snarkandboobs

            Good grief! come across should be comes across. The come out should be they come out.

            sorry!

    • blooch

      Try this lard-infused bourbon recipe…not bad stuff:

      http://www.smokingmeatforums.com/forums/showthread.php?p=306348

  • $peciallist

    s&b

  • http://snarkandboobs.wordpress.com/ snarkandboobs

    You don’t want to end up in the second stage, like Chris Matthews, whereby you are constantly mistaken for Mr. Maddow’s houseboy.

    • thegoodfight

      you’ll have twinkie cops on every corner.

    • $peciallist
      • http://snarkandboobs.wordpress.com/ snarkandboobs

        I do like Tommy, though. He’s pretty funny, for a Lib. A lib with a sense of humor…..I kept looking out my window for flying pigs. Then..

        Swine Flu!

        Ba dum dum. Thank you, I’m here all week!

  • http://www.ssce.net/Web-Articles/Web-articles-indexed-authors.html#authors-l JLenardDetroit

    anyone else see this TV ad going around for WWW.LETSACTNOW.ORG – I

    • http://snarkandboobs.wordpress.com/ snarkandboobs

      The Left needs some kind of “enemy” in order to rally the troops around their ideological beliefs. They are attempting to scare people with the Global Warming stuff (and here I thought the “politics of fear” was bad!) in order to push through all their agendas, including Socialized medicine and further taxation.

  • DONTREADONME

    America has a life expectancy of 77.9 years and Japan (which is #1) has 81.25 years. Let us examine these numbers? 3.35 years seperate the Japanese from the Americans, and Japan has a population of roughly 125 million people and the U.S. has 301 million. So, why did I bring up the years and the population, because the numbers were derived statistically from two seperate data sources with different samples. So if the error in the American sample is plus or minus 1.5% and the Japanese samples are +/- 1.5% than it can be shown that their statistically no difference. Again, I do not agree with the conclusion drawn by the writers of the story and the FDA is that 3 year difference is obviously showing a lack of equivalence. Also sample sizes are different, and to compare them without normalization is ambiguous. Keep in mind the 42 countries that beat America have to be somewhere in the 3 year difference. BTW 3 years is 3% of the life expectancy of Japan, not much in comparison with the absolute quantity.

    • Raven

      And cheesecake…
      and chocolate bars…
      and (when we want to be healthy about it) bananas and apples and other fruit…
      And we deep fry hard candy…
      and macaroni and cheese…
      and…
      and…
      and…

      • http://twitter.com/snarkandboobs snarkandboobs

        You are making me hungry. …And now I have a craving for apple fritters. Breakfast tomorrow!

  • Rod_Patrick
  • Finrod

    I don’t have a source because I read this years ago, but apparently the US does much more to save newborns than just about any other country. Most other countries, if a newborn doesn’t survive past a certain amount of time, they basically don’t count statistics-wise. Here, we do our best to save every infant (abortion debate aside) and count everyone, so our overall life expectancy is lower because of the newborns that only lived a very short time that aren’t counted in the statistics in other countries.

    Oh, btw, you have the best new username that I’ve seen in quite a while here. Well done!

    • http://twitter.com/snarkandboobs snarkandboobs

      And the infant mortality rate being weighed differently, sometimes not included at all, does mess with the stats.

      In addition, America isn’t a homogeneous nation,while others are for the most part, thus the longevity figures are skewed in comparison.