« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Obama and His Administration Lament America’s Superpower Status

Yesterday at his nuclear conference, Obama said the following (via Gateway Pundit):

Whether we like it or not, we remain a dominant military superpower.”

Whether we like it or not. That’s like what Mommies say when telling you to eat your yucky vegetables. Would he prefer that we be vulnerable and weak? Heck of an American Can-Do attitude, Barry!

It is, of course, being spun by those who still insist that we need to be above it all as “Oh, he meant we are drawn into conflicts due to being a superpower.” While perhaps true, one need only look to Obama’s associations and his very actions to see what he truly meant and what he believes.

Obama does not believe in American Exceptionalism and he is actively pursuing its decline. There, I said it. He has surrounded himself with people who hold these same beliefs. Further proof is evidenced by a speech – to young students – that his Science Czar gave the other day. (video after the jump)

Via Breitbart TV:

The Obama administration’s top science and technology official, who has argued for the economic de-development of America, warned science students last Friday that the United States cannot expect to be “number one” forever. “We can’t expect to be number one in everything indefinitely,” Dr. John P. Holdren said at the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).

We can’t expect to be number one in everything indefinitely. Because that would be meany pants, I suppose. And “not fair.” This isn’t the first time John Holdren has espoused such views. In the video at the link, from 2007, Holdren argues for a redistribution of wealth achieved in part by green policies. Oh yeah, he also says that America isn’t really Exceptional. I suppose everything that America has done as the greatest source for good in the World has really been a ruse perpetrated by nefarious racist, evil mongers. Or dum-dum crackers. I can’t really keep straight which one we are supposed to be. I’m also no longer sure if being called Un-American is an insult to the Left.

It is no wonder that Obama chose Holdren as one of his Czars. Obama’s entire career path was predicated on the belief that America is icky and needs “fixed.” That America needs to be more like Europe. He goes on apology tours grousing about all our delusionally perceived wrongs, for goodness sake. He can’t even bring himself to ever praise America. At the commemoration of the anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall, not only did he not bother attending, but he failed to even make mention of the fact that the tyranny was at the hands of the Soviet Union and was lifted due to the actions, will and exceptionalism of America. Nor did he make one mention of Margaret Thatcher or Ronald Reagan. I suppose he’s only sorry that he couldn’t figure out a way to BLAME America. He did, however, say this:

Obama on the Fall of Berlin Wall: No One Could Have Forseen on That Day That German Ally, America, Would Be Led By A Man of African Descent

We’ve seen everything that we warned prior to the election coming true. Obama, his administration and the Democrats are trying to Europe-inize us with a federal government involved and in control of every aspect of our lives, a weakened military, attempts to morally equate America with our enemies and a belief that America is not special.

Well, it is special. America IS that shining city on the hill. It is a beacon of light for the rest of the world and it shall remain so, despite their best efforts to “hope and change” that. Liz Cheney called all this at last year’s RedState gathering. I’ve often said that I strive to live up to my own personal motto and ideal of “walk softly. But carry a big lipstick”. Liz Cheney is that ideal. Thus, I’ll leave off with her words from the speech she gave last August:

We know that freedom isn’t free, that America’s armed forces are the best fighting force the world has ever known. And finally, we know that America is the best nation on earth, the best that has ever existed. We believe in her goodness, her strength, her hope and her example — for all who seek freedom in every corner of the world. Those are conservative values. Those are American values.

There is the difference. We believe in America’s goodness and strength. The Obama administration believes that to be a detriment.

She also said:

He cannot attempt to stand above America and our enemies. America needs a Commander-in-Chief, not a global community organizer.

The purpose of diplomacy is not to be liked. The purpose of foreign policy is not to get applause in foreign capitals. The purpose of having a Commander-in-Chief and pursuing a national security strategy is to defend America’s interests, aggressively, effectively and unapologetically. If the American President doesn’t do this — who will?

We will, Liz. We, the people, will.

COMMENTS

  • avgamerican

    This is why I can’t help but think that Obama was a manchurian candidate planted to take America down from within. George Soros name might be at the top of the puppet string, but not necessarily the only one. Can anyone look at this man as being a mainstream American leader? No way. Was the financial crisis in 2008 timed as a diarist stated last two weeks ago? Was it spawned as a launch pad to insert a radical socialist to take over more than 50% of the economy with more to follow? This nuclear summit was nothing more than our president’s commitment to unilaterally disarm us. While Obama has been commiting to disarmament to show our sincerity in stoping Iran’s nuclear build up, Russian president Medevev was revealing his non-commitment to sanctions against Iran. Sound familiar? Every time Obama meets with world leaders he achieves nothing but pacifism in the face of threat.

    • sta46

      on the exquisitely timed financial meltdown.

  • http://www.ArchitecturalShots.com mdyou

    n/t

  • fate

    When you foam at the mouth at a comment that you edited in order to change the meaning? The ‘like it or not’ was clearly directed at the US getting dragged into conflicts *because* we are a super power. Nice editing, though.

    In other news, according to Lori Ziganto, “America isn

    • http://snarkandboobs.wordpress.com/ Lori Ziganto

      That isn’t what he said. The sentence I quoted was not edited. Those were the words he said.

      Anyway, you totally absolve yourself of any credibility by blatantly lying about what *I* said and putting false words in my mouth. But thanks for playing!

      • Doc Holliday

        he clearly said two things:

        1, whether we like it or not, we are a super power

        and

        2) because of this, we get drawn into conflicts

        • redneck_hippie

          Rush played this today. If this was a scripted (TOTUS) statement, then he deserves every bit of Lori’s derision, and more. As Rush said, there is no way Reagan would have let those words pass his lips in any way, shape or form.

          What I heard was, well, I have to accept superpower status, but I am doing everything in my power to change that (WHICH HE IS),

          And, Doc, as Tbone also says, the being drawn into conflict is a consequence of the situation we are in as a superpower. For once, Obama is telling the truth. He wants us to be equal to all other nations and no better off militarily or any other way. Spreading the wealth with our military capability is worse than a fool’s errand. The jerk is an apologist and appeaser.

          He is pursuing a pacifist agenda and aggressively as he dares. I am starting to believe he is campaigning for his next job, in world government.

          • sta46

            he really thinks he’s going to be appointed king of the globe… petulant, narcissistic, egomaniacal, infantile little marxist that he is.

        • http://snarkandboobs.wordpress.com/ Lori Ziganto

          nt

    • avgamerican

      Obama has consistently acted to the detriment of our military strength (ie cuts in missle defense, now pledging cuts in strategic nuclear capability). Fate you seem in blind denial to Obama’s anti-American ideology.

    • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

      Dude. This was so totally not worth burning your account over. Even if it did smack you right in the sense of self.

      • avgamerican

        All I said above is that actions speak louder than words. Obama is clearly a pacifist and I hope red state members are not denying that. Maybe the author above mistkenly mis-translated the president’s quotes, but I stand by my belief that Obama has achieved nothing but pacifism.

        • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

          Look at the threading. :)

    • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens
      • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens
  • mcg

    I have seen this several times today, and it pains me to bring it up because I agree with the substance of our disagreement with Obama. He spends far too much time apologizing for America’s greatness.

    But he did not say what you have put in quotes. Truncating a sentence is paraphrasing or worse, and should not be in quotes. The full sentence is this: “Whether we like it or not, we remain a dominant military superpower, and when conflicts break out, one way or another, we get pulled into it.”

    No matter how much we might disagree with his overall sentiment or approach, correcting the quote does, in fact, change its meaning in a substantive way. It can be interpreted as follows: “we may not like the fact that we get pulled into these conflicts around the world, but that is the price we pay for being the dominant military superpower.” If GWB said it, we’d accept that interpretation at face value.

    I don’t like Dowdification when it is done to us, so I don’t like seeing it practiced, especially when it is so easily avoided.

    • Tbone

      and your re-interpretation is nonsense.

      Concept one: “We” may or may not like being a military super power. Obama and the Left don’t, REAL Americans do.

      Concept two: When a conflict breaks out “WE” get pulled into it BECAUSE we are a military superpower.

      CONCLUSION: If we weren’t a military superpower, we wouldn’t be pulled into conflicts. (See “Luxembourg”.)

      • mcg

        you would agree that my interpretation is entirely reasonable. Of course I also maintain that if Obama had never said it we would still agree 100% on his disdain for our superpower status.

        I don’t find the “the video clip is there with quote in full” satisfactory. Certainly providing the video link is useful to provide the full context. But not everyone listens to the full context, not when a sentence appears so cut and dry as the editing makes it. I think reasonable people expect at a chosen quote to be precisely reproduced.

        But I’ve said my peace.

        • http://www.veronicaestrada.com/ Veronica Estrada

          and you’re not using Obama’s “history” of thought.

          If you want context, man, then apply the gamut of the full of year of Obama’s rhetoric.

          THATt’s context. Not some two-bit piece of vid that he “privileged” the press the take after he blocked them:

          Obama’s disregard for media reaches new heights at nuclear summit

          http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/13/AR2010041303067.html?hpid=opinionsbox1

        • Tbone

          Poor reading comprehension, well explained.

          • mcg

            You want to whip out curriculum vitae and have a little manhood measuring contest? Or do you want to address actual substance, which Lori has done, to her credit?

          • Tbone

            just enough to win. LOL

          • mcg

            Just kidding, I ‘m finished. A man’s gotta work. :)

        • Vegas_Rick

          because GWB would never have said it in the first place. He was proud of our military prowess.

    • http://snarkandboobs.wordpress.com/ Lori Ziganto

      Dowdification would be hiding or omitting the video clip. One is free to make their own interpretation of what he meant and what he believes. I stand by mine.

    • http://www.veronicaestrada.com/ Veronica Estrada

      “Whether we like it or not, we remain a dominant military superpower, and when conflicts break out, one way or another, we get pulled into it.

      • mcg

        And I certainly don’t need lectures from someone prone to invoke “OMG”. At least the president was speaking, and was therefore entitled to an expectation that his construction would be less than precise.

        Clumsy as it is, that the proper diagramming of this sentence is ambiguous without its punctuation. The opening clause could certainly serve to modify the compound independent statement that follows.

        • eastbaylarry

          nt

          • mcg

            hell if I know :) Thanks for the chuckle.

        • http://www.veronicaestrada.com/ Veronica Estrada

          Again, I pull what you didn’t respond to above:

          no, [your interpretation is] not reasonable, b/c you’re statement is indefensible.

          and you

    • Jack_Savage

      I listened to this several times also. Here is what he said, and what he meant, and the sentence structure makes it impossible to believe otherwise:

      “We are a dominant military superpower, whether we like it or not. As such, when conflicts break out, because of our status we, sadly, get pulled into it.”

      He could have easily, easily said “Whether we like it or not, when conflicts break out, one way or another, we get pulled into it.” But he did not – he apologized for our status, then used it as an excuse.

      And really, what a weasel way of putting things – we have no choice in anything anymore? Is this laying the groundwork for another blame Bush scenario? “Well, if we weren’t so darned strong militarily we wouldn’t have to deal with this conflict, but we do. Sorry, Kos Kids – that’s just the way it is.”

      • mcg

        When we consider the totality of Obama’s words and deeds I think we’re on the same page. I’d be willing to grant for the sake of argument that what he meant is exactly how you describe it. My issue here was simply that for the sake of honest debate we need to be quoting him properly.

  • cabanon

    However I’d agree that trying to hold up this paraphrase as proof is misleading.

    • mcg

      on both counts!

  • Tbone

    for his failure to protect America and the Constitution.

    • avgamerican

      Right now Ed Koch, former mayor of NYC is laying out the betrayal of Israel by Obama in order to gain cooperation by Sunni Arab nations. Honestly I don’t know what Obama’s motivation is for the stance he has taken, but I know it was predictable and voters were warned. I can only hope that people really are waking up to it and after next November President Obama’s policies will be stopped or at least slowed. Maybe if GOP gains back full control, there are going to be investigations of this president and his cabinent.

    • sta46

      what contributions I can mke in order to help bring that about. It could not possibly happen soon enough.

  • http://thesandsinstitute.org Vassar Bushmills

    ….OK, IF…there is a restoration of conservatism/constitutional wunder-lust…that Bill Clinton would be the poster child of what we hate. Seems this sombitch is working overtime to finally beat out the “other” Clinton, too.

  • renny

    The US has saved or liberated 2 billion since its inception.
    We freed ourselves, liberating 2,500,000 from imperial Britain, 1776.
    Lincoln freed 3,940,000 slaves, 1863, and kept the nation one instead of the US of N. America and Confederacy of Southern States. (Then, in emulation, the czar of Russia–a real czar–freed the serfs, c. 43,000,000).
    The US liberated 10-12,000,000 slaves in S. Am., when we won the Spn-Am War, 1898. All other slaves held in Spanish lands were also freed.
    Twice, Americans saved Europe: 368,000,000 in 1918 and 738,000,000 in 1945. Then we rebuilt Europe with the Marshall Plan.
    We gave 72,000,000 Japanese dem. capitalism instead of theocratic dictatorship in 1945.
    The US with the UN saved 3,000,000 S. Koreans from Northern communism (and today starvation by the N.) in 1952.
    Reagan brought down the Eastern European communist bloc and USSR communism in 1989, for the release of 300,000,000 and 287,000,000.
    And we owe the Muslim world very little–besides sending trillions for oil:
    In 1997, we saved c. 1.4 million Muslim Serbs from genocide.
    In the Middle East, America rescued 21,000,000 Kuwaitis in 1991, and 22,000,000 Afghanistans in 2003 and 24,000,000 Iraqis in 2003.
    We virtually support Egypt, and spend millions on the Palestinians.
    When the 2005 tsunami hit Indonesia (the world’s actual largest Muslim nation) and the Pacific Ocean, the ships and manpower that delivered aid and rescue were US military.
    When the earthquake hit Haiiti, we were the first on the ground.
    And save for the occupations within the first decade after WW II and a brief flirtation with colonialism after the Spn-Am. war, we have not colonialized the countries that we freed. We could be like the British Emp. on whom the sun never set but have not sought that power.
    little o should accomplish 1/10 as much.

  • inblack

    Sorry – Obama can’t help bad mouthing America. He was raised by anti-American his entire life and sought out anti-Americans his entire life.

    His disdain for our values and those that honor the county seeps out of his pores. He betrays our allies, coddles our enemies, demonizes people and groups at random to make himself look better.

    President Bush may not have been perfect, but he treated people with respect.

    Obama is an arrogant, self-hater who looks down on the American people and I feel it every time he opens his mouth.

    Don’t Tread On Me

  • RedBeard

    The feeble attempts to defend our indefensible and detestable “leader” fall flat in the face of everything the man has ever said, done, or believed. He clearly hates America’s superiority, military and otherwise, and wants to drag us down to”level the playing field” or some such international socialist pablum.

    Arguing over the placement of the commas in his remarks does nothing to salvage his reputation, but does serve to call even more attention to his utter failing at his sworn job.

  • paulrph1

    Anything to bring down America. Obama truly does not like America.

  • conritwng

    Good Grief…Obama would rather have another country overpower us? I like being a super power.!! Would he rather have Iran a SUPER POWER? or maybe North Korea, or How about China?

  • jbjones

    . . . fundamentals are

    1) Obama is Great
    2) American is BAD.

    How do you spell ‘LOSER”? O . . . .

  • voicefromthevoid

    All the conservative talk radio, TV people tell he’s doing “stupid” things or “misguided” things all the time, yet assuming his goals are in line with what’s supposed to be the goal of the President of USA.. Ask yourself, is it realyy possible that the guy who, one way or another, outsmarted a lot of people and become The President is so dumb or misguided? Really?

    There’s another explanation and that explanation is that he is an enemy of the People of USA, smart and cunning enough not to cross the line where his intentions become clear yet consistently doing everything possible to bring USA down, to destroy US economy, to squash US technological advantage, to bring US population into powerty and to ready US to become a third world country. Look at all he’s done so far and tell me I’m wrong!

    He’s not a loser, he’s an enemy and he’s winning so far.

    • izoneguy

      http://clerk.house.gov/member_info/memberfaq.html

      Do Members take an Oath of Office when they enter the House of Representatives?

      As required by Article 6 of the U.S. Constitution, Members of Congress shall be bound by oath or affirmation to support the Constitution. Representatives, delegates, and the resident commissioner all take the oath of office on the first day of the new Congress, immediately after the House has elected its Speaker. The Speaker of the House administers the oath of office as follows:

      “I, (name of Member), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”

      Representatives elected in special elections during the course of a Congress generally take the oath of office on the floor of the House Chamber when the Clerk of the House has received a formal notice of the new Member’s election or appointment from State government authorities. On rare occasions, because of illness or other circumstances, a Member-elect has been authorized to take the oath of office at a place other than the House. In those circumstances, the Clerk of the House sees to the proper administration of the oath.

      Senate Oath of Office

      http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/briefing/Oath_Office.htm

      I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.

      —————————————————————————————-

      I challenge all sitting members of Congress to do their duty as they swore to when they entered Congress. Obama is a domestic enemy of America and must be removed from office.

      • izoneguy